No Names Left Damn It wrote:The BNP are not Nazis.
Some high up members come pretty damn close.
Advertisement

by Hydesland » Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:47 am
No Names Left Damn It wrote:The BNP are not Nazis.

by NERV arms conglomerate » Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:48 am

by Hydesland » Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:49 am
NERV arms conglomerate wrote:it says so on their website

by No Names Left Damn It » Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:49 am
Hydesland wrote:Some high up members come pretty damn close.

by Belschaft » Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:50 am
NERV arms conglomerate wrote:true, but i lack good jokes, the bnp is a political part who are not racist in any way, it says so on their website
the bnp are not really evil its just bnp's britain

by Treznor » Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:51 am
Belschaft wrote:Treznor wrote:Why are you feeding the trolls? You know it just encourages him.
He angers me deeply. It's less intentional feeding and more rage at someone who if he got his way would send me to a gas chamber.

by Belschaft » Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:52 am
No Names Left Damn It wrote:Hydesland wrote:Some high up members come pretty damn close.
John Tyndall, was anti-Semitic, but the new lot are just anti-Islam and immigration.

by Brum Brum » Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:53 am

by Gaia Tree » Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:58 am
Belschaft wrote:No Names Left Damn It wrote:Hydesland wrote:Some high up members come pretty damn close.
John Tyndall, was anti-Semitic, but the new lot are just anti-Islam and immigration.
And you think if Hitler was alive today he wouldn't have a problem with Islam? He campaigned for racial; purity inside Germany's borders just like the BNP.

by No Names Left Damn It » Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:58 am
Belschaft wrote:And you think if Hitler was alive today he wouldn't have a problem with Islam?
Belschaft wrote:He campaigned for racial; purity inside Germany's borders just like the BNP.

by Grays Harbor » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:02 am
Aloha Mars 2 wrote:No Names Left Damn It wrote:I don't "want out" with those "racist bigots". They should be allowed to have a party, and people should choose whether to vote for them or not. Whilst I disagree with quite a few of their policies, that is no reason to ban them, eject them from the country or whatever.
So you do support them then?

by Belschaft » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:06 am
No Names Left Damn It wrote:Belschaft wrote:And you think if Hitler was alive today he wouldn't have a problem with Islam?
Hitler actually allied himself with Muslim leaders in the Middle East.Belschaft wrote:He campaigned for racial; purity inside Germany's borders just like the BNP.
Right, but the BNP aren't proposing to kill anyone based on race.

by No Names Left Damn It » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:11 am
Belschaft wrote:He referenced the Jewish problem in the same way Nick Griffin references the Muslim problem, and only showed his true colours once elected and made dictator for life. Everything about Nick Griffin tells us that his polices would be just as extreme as Hitler's.

by Belschaft » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:13 am
No Names Left Damn It wrote:Belschaft wrote:He referenced the Jewish problem in the same way Nick Griffin references the Muslim problem, and only showed his true colours once elected and made dictator for life. Everything about Nick Griffin tells us that his polices would be just as extreme as Hitler's.
Wrong. As early as the 1910s Hitler was blabbing on about the master race, how the Jews were all murderous bastards and othersuch bullshit.

by No Names Left Damn It » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:15 am
Belschaft wrote:And Nick Griffin is blabbing on about the Muslims and the immigrants and them stealing our jobs and corrupting our youth and how the British are the Master race. He hasn't used the exact words yet but it's only a matter of time.

by Aloha Mars 2 » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:18 am
No Names Left Damn It wrote:Belschaft wrote:And Nick Griffin is blabbing on about the Muslims and the immigrants and them stealing our jobs and corrupting our youth and how the British are the Master race. He hasn't used the exact words yet but it's only a matter of time.
So what you're saying is he hasn't actually said this, and from that I can conclude you are talking out of your arse.

by Aloha Mars 2 » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:18 am
Grays Harbor wrote:Aloha Mars 2 wrote:No Names Left Damn It wrote:I don't "want out" with those "racist bigots". They should be allowed to have a party, and people should choose whether to vote for them or not. Whilst I disagree with quite a few of their policies, that is no reason to ban them, eject them from the country or whatever.
So you do support them then?
I do not see how not being in favor of censorship translates into "support them".
do you support censorship, then?

by Khossistam » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:20 am

by Grays Harbor » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:21 am
Aloha Mars 2 wrote:Grays Harbor wrote: do you support censorship, then?
When it comes to the BNP, yes.

by Belschaft » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:23 am
No Names Left Damn It wrote:Belschaft wrote:And Nick Griffin is blabbing on about the Muslims and the immigrants and them stealing our jobs and corrupting our youth and how the British are the Master race. He hasn't used the exact words yet but it's only a matter of time.
So what you're saying is he hasn't actually said this, and from that I can conclude you are talking out of your arse.

by The Tofu Islands » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:24 am
Aloha Mars 2 wrote:So you support the BNP?

by Aloha Mars 2 » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:29 am
Grays Harbor wrote:Aloha Mars 2 wrote:Grays Harbor wrote: do you support censorship, then?
When it comes to the BNP, yes.
that is pretty selective, and seems not a bit self-indulgent. you support censorship for what you dislike, but not for anything else. convenient.

by Treznor » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:31 am
Aloha Mars 2 wrote:Grays Harbor wrote:Aloha Mars 2 wrote:When it comes to the BNP, yes.
that is pretty selective, and seems not a bit self-indulgent. you support censorship for what you dislike, but not for anything else. convenient.
So you like the BNP? Sorry but promoting hate speech is wrong.

by Neo Art » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:34 am
Treznor wrote:What you fail to understand is that supporting freedom of speech is not the same as supporting what is said. Freedom of speech means freedom for everyone, not just the speech you like. If you can justify censoring him, then someone else can find justification to censor you. The only way to protect your freedom of speech is to protect everyone's.

by Treznor » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:34 am
Neo Art wrote:Treznor wrote:What you fail to understand is that supporting freedom of speech is not the same as supporting what is said. Freedom of speech means freedom for everyone, not just the speech you like. If you can justify censoring him, then someone else can find justification to censor you. The only way to protect your freedom of speech is to protect everyone's.
You nazi.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bombadil, Eternal Algerstonia, Floofybit, Hispida, Lysset, Neu California, Posthumanism, The Jamesian Republic, Trump Almighty, Vinteronia
Advertisement