by Epicnopolis » Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:39 pm
by Conserative Morality » Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:39 pm
by Epicnopolis » Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:41 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Deliberate?
by Heinleinites » Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:44 pm
Epicnopolis wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:Deliberate?
....Doesn't that mean explain?
by Parthenon » Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:44 pm
Epicnopolis wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:Deliberate?
....Doesn't that mean explain?
by Epicnopolis » Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:44 pm
by Cameroi » Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:45 pm
by Conserative Morality » Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:45 pm
Epicnopolis wrote:....Doesn't that mean explain?
2. To consult with another or others in a process of reaching a decision.
by Epicnopolis » Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:47 pm
Cameroi wrote:mars yes. the most interesting place we can yet get to that no earth human, as far as it is possible to know with any degree of certainty, has ever been to yet.
nothing, not even any war, ever did as much to stimulate the evolution of technology then the race to the moon. it is highly unlikely we would have these computers and this internet without its having taken place.
it is our world's great misfortune there is no longer a russia capable of competing in a race to get there.
perhaps china and/or india will oblige.
by Curilia » Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:50 pm
by Cameroi » Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:54 pm
Epicnopolis wrote:Cameroi wrote:mars yes. the most interesting place we can yet get to that no earth human, as far as it is possible to know with any degree of certainty, has ever been to yet.
nothing, not even any war, ever did as much to stimulate the evolution of technology then the race to the moon. it is highly unlikely we would have these computers and this internet without its having taken place.
it is our world's great misfortune there is no longer a russia capable of competing in a race to get there.
perhaps china and/or india will oblige.
When do you think we could get their?
by The Tofu Islands » Fri Jul 17, 2009 12:05 am
by Cameroi » Fri Jul 17, 2009 12:15 am
The Tofu Islands wrote:You really managed to murder grammar in the title... apostrophes don't mark plurals, and even if they did, Mars isn't a plural.
As for space missions to Mars*, I'm not sure what the point is at the moment. Beyond "we got there first", I don't see what there is to gain beyond what we already know or could find out with unmanned missions.
*I'm assuming you're referring to manned missions -- we've already sent unmanned missions there.
by UNIverseVERSE » Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:00 am
Cameroi wrote:we got this friggin internet as a very tangible byproduct of going to the moon. obviously we didn't find it ON the moon. that's really just about totally not the point. although it does seem mars is likely to have a lot more diversity and oddity then the moon's monotonous gray dust and lumps of higher density gray rocks beneath its surface.
by Yootopia » Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:03 am
Conserative Morality wrote:Deliberate?
by Non Aligned States » Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:06 am
UNIverseVERSE wrote:I would comfortably lay £5 that, if a manned mission to Mars were undertaken, it would make no significant discoveries over those of Spirit, Sojourner and Opportunity, and would cost several orders of magnitude more.
by Conserative Morality » Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:06 am
Yootopia wrote:Wait a tick... wtf you doing in NSG about a week after you "left". JEEEEEEEEEEEEEESUS man
by Ryadn » Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:09 am
Epicnopolis wrote:But still can anyone explain it too me
Epicnopolis wrote:When do you think we could get their?
by UNIverseVERSE » Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:11 am
Non Aligned States wrote:Taken.
One significant discovery would be that of longer lasting life support systems under hostile conditions to make the mission possible.
You never said anything about discoveries on Mars.
by Saige Dragon » Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:32 am
by Ryadn » Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:34 am
Saige Dragon wrote:What gets me in all these concepts and prototypes we have going for a manned mission to Mars is everything is white. The spacesuits, landers, ships, rovers, all of it white. And we're sending it to a big red desert known for it's gigantic dust storms?
by Meridiani Planum » Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:36 am
Conserative Morality wrote:Deliberate?
by Saige Dragon » Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:37 am
Ryadn wrote:Saige Dragon wrote:What gets me in all these concepts and prototypes we have going for a manned mission to Mars is everything is white. The spacesuits, landers, ships, rovers, all of it white. And we're sending it to a big red desert known for it's gigantic dust storms?
...I assumed the white was to reflect. And what color could we make it so it WOULDN'T be lost in a dust storm?
by Pure Metal » Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:50 am
Epicnopolis wrote:This is a spin-off of this...sort of...http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?t=7721&f=20&view=unread#unread. But really?! MARS?!.......................Anyone care to explain?
Saige Dragon wrote:I was more concerned about the lack of a Bubbles Car Wash on the red planet... white is so hard to keep clean.
by No Names Left Damn It » Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:28 am
Advertisement
Advertisement