Advertisement

by Nobel Hobos » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:35 pm

by Farnhamia » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:37 pm
O5vx wrote:Hay, guys I would be contesting next year for election in nigeria. This you chance to test me on my policy toward the west, especially America.

by Nobel Hobos » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:39 pm

by Aubelland » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:39 pm
East Lithuania wrote:While driving, you could smell marijuana from inside the car if you've used it inside. And we already have those practices now. (In New Jersey, you HAVE to submit to a breathalyzer and police can hold you until drug dogs are called or you go with them to get tested).
Yeah but that is a lot of work and puts doctors at risk of losing their practice. FFS, why not just set heavy fines for weed used outside the house or a hooka-barish business and leave people be?

by Greed and Death » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:40 pm

by NERVUN » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:40 pm

by UnitedStatesOfAmerica- » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:40 pm
O5vx wrote:UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:Fate of the California Props:
Prop 19: Legalization of the recreational use of marijuana. Would have banned employers, including the military, from firing or disciplining employees who used marijuana. Defeated.
Prop 20: Congressional districts drawn by a non partisan commission: approved
Prop 21: free entry into all state parks if you pay a new $18 vehicle fee each year. approved. (This is a good deal. For $18 a year you get access to all of the state's parks for the entire year instead of paying $50 each day you go.)
Prop 22: Ban the state from taking from schools and cities to pay for the legislature's rubber checks. approved.
Prop 23: Suspend California's Climate Change law until the economy improves. Defeated
Prop 24: Repeal tax breaks for small business owners who employ minorities: Defeated
Prop 25: Require only 51% to pass a state budget: approved
Prop 26: requires 2/3 voter approval for all local taxes and fees: approved
Prop 27: eliminate the non partisan redistricting commission: defeated
According to these votes, you can see how liberal and communistic the people of California are and just what type of government it is that Californians want to force on the rest of America.
No one is trying to force anything on america, but america spending more than it can ever afford to pay.

by Aubelland » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:41 pm

by Farnhamia » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:41 pm

by Sourion » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:41 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:Fate of the California Props:
Prop 19: Legalization of the recreational use of marijuana. Would have banned employers, including the military, from firing or disciplining employees who used marijuana. Defeated.
Prop 20: Congressional districts drawn by a non partisan commission: approved
Prop 21: free entry into all state parks if you pay a new $18 vehicle fee each year. approved. (This is a good deal. For $18 a year you get access to all of the state's parks for the entire year instead of paying $50 each day you go.)
Prop 22: Ban the state from taking from schools and cities to pay for the legislature's rubber checks. approved.
Prop 23: Suspend California's Climate Change law until the economy improves. Defeated
Prop 24: Repeal tax breaks for small business owners who employ minorities: Defeated
Prop 25: Require only 51% to pass a state budget: approved
Prop 26: requires 2/3 voter approval for all local taxes and fees: approved
Prop 27: eliminate the non partisan redistricting commission: defeated
According to these votes, you can see how liberal and communistic the people of California are and just what type of government it is that Californians want to force on the rest of America.
Are you trying to win the WTF moment award?

by NERVUN » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:42 pm
UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:O5vx wrote:No one is trying to force anything on america, but america spending more than it can ever afford to pay.
the majority of that spending is by the state of California and the spending is reckless at that. The teacher salaries are way too high so because the state can pay the salaries themselve, they are demanding the rest of the nation pay the unjustifiably high salaries of incompetents. Further, they continue to have flaunt US laws while demanding and recieving federal tax money from people in Michigan, Main, Nevada, Florida, etc.
Think about it. The other 50 states are, metaphorically speaking, required to pay annual and monthly tribute to the Imperial Empire of California to support the criminal habits of its residents.
Having said that. Where is the tribute that the rest of you Americans owe to California? Almost everything in California is paid for Americans who don't live in California and most of whome will never set foot in California. There is no justice in this system.

by The Black Forrest » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:42 pm
Aubelland wrote:greed and death wrote:While waiting for the blood test, ask to see the license phlebotomist, then demand a doctor observe the procedure and request a copy of his credentials as well. Normally gets you another hour to sober up.
Exactly. So we'd have a system incapable of tracking marijuana abuse. Ergo, increased level of DUIs, ergo, I wouldn't feel all that safe on the roads anymore.

by Gauntleted Fist » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:43 pm

by NERVUN » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:44 pm

by O5vx » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:46 pm

by East Lithuania » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:46 pm
Aubelland wrote:That may be true in New Jersey, but in California we don't have such practices. Therefore, we would need a separate law to be passed, just for that.
Also, "smelling marijuana" is far too vague and unofficial of a detection method. A cop can't pull you over simply for "smelling that a guy had marijuana", I've known a cop that tried to do that with an underage kid who had alcohol in his car. Or rather, I knew the kid. The case got overturned because the cop did not have a reason for pulling him over other then he "suspected" he had beer in his car.
Well, I wouldn't really have a problem with that. Personally I don't care if folks smoke weed, it doesn't matter to me. What worries me is when they are on the job and they're high, or in their cars and they're high, and they manage to injure someone while under the influence because there was no way to measure of whether they were "high" or not "officially". After all, I could dismiss the "red eyes" thing with an excuse of just being "tired", right?
I also don't really recall alot of doctors losing their practice over prescribing medical marijuana as it is today, however, if it were passed, then the Federal Government and the DEA would no doubt crack down on marijuana, seeing as how that is still illegal to Federal Law. So I could see way more doctors losing their jobs as a result of Prop. 19 passing then it not passing.

by Greed and Death » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:48 pm

by East Lithuania » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:49 pm

by UnitedStatesOfAmerica- » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:50 pm
NERVUN wrote:UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:
the majority of that spending is by the state of California and the spending is reckless at that. The teacher salaries are way too high so because the state can pay the salaries themselve, they are demanding the rest of the nation pay the unjustifiably high salaries of incompetents. Further, they continue to have flaunt US laws while demanding and recieving federal tax money from people in Michigan, Main, Nevada, Florida, etc.
Think about it. The other 50 states are, metaphorically speaking, required to pay annual and monthly tribute to the Imperial Empire of California to support the criminal habits of its residents.
Having said that. Where is the tribute that the rest of you Americans owe to California? Almost everything in California is paid for Americans who don't live in California and most of whome will never set foot in California. There is no justice in this system.
Annoying as California is, it sends far more tax dollars to the Federal government than it receives in help.

by The Black Forrest » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:52 pm
UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:NERVUN wrote:Annoying as California is, it sends far more tax dollars to the Federal government than it receives in help.
A state that flagrantly refuses to comply with all federal laws should recieve no funding. The job of government is not act as a welfare state. Californians are wanting federal money to pay people who $100,000 a year jobs while people in Georgia, Ohio, and Oklahoma can't even get jobs or social assistance because all the money was given to California.
We would be a lot better off if at least 75% of the California public employee workforce were fired and all of the state's free welfare giveaways were eliminated. Then California would not be a drain and it would not be in danger of economic collapse which will be the result of several of the ballot initiatives. We might as well federalize the entire state and get it over with.
This state, that I've lived in my whole life, is no longer viable economically. If the feds don't step in California will cease to exist as a US state.

by Farnhamia » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:53 pm
greed and death wrote:Well 3 seats left. not official.
Looks like the Dems have Washington, and the GOP gets Colorado and Alaska.
So it will be 52/48 split.

by O5vx » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:54 pm

by NERVUN » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:54 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aerlanica, Anastasica, Dangerous Raiders, Dimetrodon Empire, Eahland, El Lazaro, La Xinga, Majestic-12 [Bot], New Oasken, Nova Paradisius, Pizza Friday Forever91, Tarsonis, The Holy Therns, Tinhampton, USS Monitor, Victorian Anarchy
Advertisement