Advertisement

by Javoul » Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:06 pm

by Non Aligned States » Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:15 pm
The Alma Mater wrote:As for the main question - hello interstellar starship.

by Grave_n_idle » Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:36 pm
Maurepas wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:Vetalia wrote:I think that's sort of the policy North Korea uses in regard to emigrants. I guess it works...
North Korea encourages people that don't like the regime to resettle?
I think they "resettle" them into Prisons, as well as the more traditional, bringing them out back to put a bullet in their head,

by Derscon » Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:13 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Maurepas wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:North Korea encourages people that don't like the regime to resettle?
I think they "resettle" them into Prisons, as well as the more traditional, bringing them out back to put a bullet in their head,
That's pretty much what I was thinking.
I thought it nonsensical for someone to suggest that - under PRIVATE ownership of an entire nation - a 'love it or leave it' approach was somehow comparable to death-squads and political prisons.

by Maurepas » Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:14 pm
Derscon wrote:
While I disagree with your particular choice of policy implementation...
Under the assumption that you did, in fact, legitimately purchase the entirety of the United States - and I don't mean just from the State, but bought up all the land under US jurisdiction from its private owners, as well - then the tracts of land are your personal property, and you have the right to not associate with whomever you choose.


by Grave_n_idle » Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:18 pm
Maurepas wrote:Derscon wrote:
While I disagree with your particular choice of policy implementation...
Under the assumption that you did, in fact, legitimately purchase the entirety of the United States - and I don't mean just from the State, but bought up all the land under US jurisdiction from its private owners, as well - then the tracts of land are your personal property, and you have the right to not associate with whomever you choose.
But, not all US land is for sale, and, the parts that are can be claimed under Eminent Domain,

by Maurepas » Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Maurepas wrote:Derscon wrote:
While I disagree with your particular choice of policy implementation...
Under the assumption that you did, in fact, legitimately purchase the entirety of the United States - and I don't mean just from the State, but bought up all the land under US jurisdiction from its private owners, as well - then the tracts of land are your personal property, and you have the right to not associate with whomever you choose.
But, not all US land is for sale, and, the parts that are can be claimed under Eminent Domain,
We're talking about a nonsensical figure of money, that allows you to create nonsensical conjectures. For the sake of assumption, let's go with me 'buying out' the government and everyone willing to sell, and then compulsary purchasing the remainder. Or something.


by Grave_n_idle » Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:25 pm
Maurepas wrote:Communist!

by Derscon » Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:54 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Maurepas wrote:Derscon wrote:
While I disagree with your particular choice of policy implementation...
Under the assumption that you did, in fact, legitimately purchase the entirety of the United States - and I don't mean just from the State, but bought up all the land under US jurisdiction from its private owners, as well - then the tracts of land are your personal property, and you have the right to not associate with whomever you choose.
But, not all US land is for sale, and, the parts that are can be claimed under Eminent Domain,
We're talking about a nonsensical figure of money, that allows you to create nonsensical conjectures. For the sake of assumption, let's go with me 'buying out' the government and everyone willing to sell, and then compulsary purchasing the remainder. Or something.


by Grave_n_idle » Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:55 pm
Derscon wrote:I was assuming you acquired it all legitimately (I view emminent domain as illegitimate, but that's neither here nor there) for the purposes of this hypothetical situation.

by Dinaverg » Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:55 pm

by Maurepas » Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:57 pm
Dinaverg wrote:That's probably enough money to change your view on eminent domain.

by Non Aligned States » Fri Jul 17, 2009 6:13 pm
Maurepas wrote:Communist!

by Maurepas » Fri Jul 17, 2009 6:16 pm
Non Aligned States wrote:Maurepas wrote:Communist!
He's bought out the government. So it's called eminent domain.

by Big Jim P » Fri Jul 17, 2009 6:28 pm

by Satellite Indoslavokia » Fri Jul 17, 2009 6:35 pm

by Cameroi » Fri Jul 17, 2009 11:45 pm

by The Alma Mater » Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:17 am
Non Aligned States wrote:The Alma Mater wrote:As for the main question - hello interstellar starship.
You've all got interesting goals, but no real plan of action on how to achieve it.


by Heinleinites » Sat Jul 18, 2009 1:00 am
Grave_n_idle wrote:I'd buy the US and institute a new test for citizenship. Only one question "Are you in favour of universal healthcare"? The correct answer is yes. 'No' answers get you deported.

by Triniteras2 » Sat Jul 18, 2009 1:17 am

by Grave_n_idle » Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:39 am
Heinleinites wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:I'd buy the US and institute a new test for citizenship. Only one question "Are you in favour of universal healthcare"? The correct answer is yes. 'No' answers get you deported.
Now see, I'd do almost the same thing. Except on my test, people would be placed in a giant catapult right before they were asked the question, and a 'Yes' answer would trip the lever. Or maybe I'd just settle for some kind of Clockwork Orange-style "re-education" machine, whichever is more entertaining to watch.
Some of the money would go to a secret hollowed-out James Bond villian type volcano lair. Or maybe an asteroid base, I'm not sure.

by Grave_n_idle » Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:41 am
Triniteras2 wrote:Grand_n_idle, why do you deport the people who don't vote for universal healthcare? Why not put them in comfortable labour camps? Is only deporting them necessary for the comfort of the population, or what?

by Tantranesi » Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:47 am
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:58 am
Tantranesi wrote:I'd pay off the national cumulative national debts of North America. And buy a car.....and maybe a hooker....

by Grave_n_idle » Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:00 am
Tantranesi wrote:I'd pay off the national cumulative national debts of North America. And buy a car.....and maybe a hooker....
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Diopolis, El Lazaro, Google [Bot], North Korea Choson, Old Tyrannia, The Jamesian Republic, Valyxias
Advertisement