NationStates

Norstal wrote:

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
Why do you think I hand out so many tacos?

LF is trying to poison us WITH OBESITY!

Though seriously, I found teenage girls attractive. I think every men do. What is NOT right is having sex with them. Look, but don't touch.

Except gay men of course...

South Sharfghotten wrote:I am under the impression that certain members of this board support pedophilia- that is, the act of an adult engaging in sexual contact with a minor. How can you justify this? It is a selfish and sickening practice that not only ruins the lives of children directly affected, but also affects the quality of life of all other children when reactionary parents impose restrictions upon their children.

In my opinion anyone who supports this practice is a revisionist collaborator and requires removal from society lest they harm an innocent child.

I question the current age of consent, which is different from sex with prepubescent children.

Innsmothe wrote:

Norstal wrote:
LF is trying to poison us WITH OBESITY!

Though seriously, I found teenage girls attractive. I think every men do. What is NOT right is having sex with them. Look, but don't touch.

Except gay men of course...

Except homosexuals. Gay means happy.

New Nicksyllvania wrote:People can feel however they want as long as they keep it to themselves. An important aspect of civilised society is to know how to suppress feelings that will end up with a noose around your neck.

Not acting on a feeling and suppressing it are not the same thing.

New Nicksyllvania wrote:

New Kereptica wrote:
I distinctly remember telling you, nigh-on a year ago, to stop using "whom" if you don't know how to do it correctly :<

With regard to the rest of the post: people can feel however they damn well please, and you are in no place to tell them otherwise.

Can't be bothered in the interwebz

People can feel however they want as long as they keep it to themselves. An important aspect of civilised society is to know how to suppress feelings that will end up with a noose around your neck.

In a civilised society you don't go about stringing people up or otherwise executing them, it is a barbaric practice reserved for Yanks and third world countries.

New Nicksyllvania wrote:Can't be bothered in the interwebz

People can feel however they want as long as they keep it to themselves. An important aspect of civilised society is to know how to suppress feelings that will end up with a noose around your neck.

Such as expressing support for the wrong party?

Norstal wrote:Except homosexuals. Gay means happy.

In modern speech, not so.

Norstal wrote:

Innsmothe wrote:Except gay men of course...

Except homosexuals. Gay means happy.

Gay men are generally happy...>.>

Except when the immoral Children of Abraham spread their evil and foriegn faiths.

Innsmothe wrote:In a civilised society you don't go about stringing people up or otherwise executing them, it is a barbaric practice reserved for Yanks and third world countries.

Such statements reveal your ignorance (possible willing) of the workings of US society.

Innsmothe wrote:Except when the immoral Children of Abraham spread their evil and foriegn faiths.

For England... What religion is not foreign?

New Nicksyllvania wrote:I don't see what gives some uppity punk teenage aspiring muscician the right to do so while excluding a middle aged executive with a stable job.

The latter at the very least can be held fiscally responsible for any pregnancies he causes.

The teenage bit. Romeo and Juliet laws.

Conserative Morality wrote:

Innsmothe wrote:Except when the immoral Children of Abraham spread their evil and foriegn faiths.

For England... What religion is not foreign?

Druidism?

Innsmothe wrote:Druidism?

Gallic. Try again. The English, for that matter, are foreign to England.

Conserative Morality wrote:

New Nicksyllvania wrote:I don't see what gives some uppity punk teenage aspiring muscician the right to do so while excluding a middle aged executive with a stable job.

The latter at the very least can be held fiscally responsible for any pregnancies he causes.

The teenage bit. Romeo and Juliet laws.

Pretty much this.

Conserative Morality wrote:

Innsmothe wrote:Druidism?

Gallic. Try again. The English, for that matter, are foreign to England.

Damn you and you're word play!

Albion will be reborn!

Innsmothe wrote:Damn you and you're word play!

Albion will be reborn!

I am word play? Dear God, it all makes sense! I am the English language incarnate!

Do I get my own comic book series?

I believe that the majority of pedophiles (people who are attracted to pre-pubescent children) are good people who manage to repress their urges. They should receive the support of society. The minority who abuse children should be punished by law.

South Sharfghotten wrote:. . . a revisionist collaborator . . .

Satirius wrote:. . .statist stooges. . .

Conserative Morality wrote:Do I get my own comic book series?

900-Man! Issue #1, Dr. Eggcorn.

I'm inclined to agree with LG. It's possible that there are very young children mature and strong-willed enough that they don't need the law's protection, but we can't really treat that on a case-by-case basis so we don't.

New Nicksyllvania wrote:They should not. If they are having trouble suppressing their problems, they will become a problem.

Persecuting them and driving them into hiding isn't going to fix that problem

Innsmothe wrote:In a civilised society you don't go about stringing people up or otherwise executing them, it is a barbaric practice reserved for Yanks and third world countries.

Like the Imperial system

Satirius wrote:

New Kereptica wrote: people can feel however they damn well please, and you are in no place to tell them otherwise.

I feel that every Generalite should be gassed

You cannot tell me otherwise

Nope.

Feel that as you please.

I feel that a belief based around personal liberty and freedom cannot coexist with religion in any way, shape, nor form.

L3 Communications wrote:I feel that a belief based around personal liberty and freedom cannot coexist with religion in any way, shape, nor form.

1. How is that relevant to the thread?

2. How so? Personal liberty and freedom are not necessarily restricted by religion?

This is an interesting conversation
Edit for spelling multiple times lol

I don't "support" it any more than I support homosexuality or heterosexuality. I am accepting and tolerant of those who are of that persuasion since they can't help it.

Having sex with those who will not or can not give consent is rape; children are under the age of consent, so an adult engaging in sexual activity with one must be without consent, and therefore rape, which I am utterly against. Perhaps the age of consent should be altered, but as far as prepubescent kids go, I don't think they are capable of giving consent due to their under-developed psyche and the ability of adults to use their position of power to influence them.

Conserative Morality wrote:

L3 Communications wrote:I feel that a belief based around personal liberty and freedom cannot coexist with religion in any way, shape, nor form.

1. How is that relevant to the thread?

2. How so? Personal liberty and freedom are not necessarily restricted by religion?

1. NSG never goes off on tangents in threads?

2. Sharia Law disagrees.