The Romulan Republic wrote:Curious Inquiry wrote:Anything that gets teens (and preteens, too) interested in reading is good. Eventually they'll move on to other interests, but the reading will stick for (un)life
No, I have to say that with all due respect, I really hate this line.
Not anything that gets children interested in reading is good. The point is not just to help them develop reading skills, but to get them reading something that isn't inane drivel. At least that's what I thought.
Note that people's tastes in literature may be developed at an early age, and that it is inexcusable for teenagers to be reading garbage when they could be reading great fantasy like The Lord of the Rings, or great books from some other genre all together. Or, if LotR is too difficult for them, they could at least stick to Harry Potter levels of quality.
Note, I may be completely wrong about Twilight. I have never read it, and I never plan to. However, your argument is flawed, regardless of what book it applies to.
'Tis your opinion, and you're entitled to it -- but if that were the case, if you didn't find the book that got kids interested, all the Great Expectations and Lord of the Rings in the world won't get them started.
And there are those (not me at all) who think Harry Potter is overrated tripe, too.







And I'm about as "square" as they come...


