Lies, deceit, and pro-north korean slander!
Yes, nine out of ten archaeologist agree that "Ties are great" is ancient sumerian for "Kim Jong-Il is the messiah" despite the apparent anachronisms.
Advertisement

by South Lorenya » Fri Sep 24, 2010 10:19 pm

by Lakhon » Fri Sep 24, 2010 10:49 pm
Saint Jade IV wrote:A shop owner in Sydney has made public his opinion regarding the burqa in a most provocative way by painting a mural on the outside wall of his shop.
FACEPALMReblle wrote:I love war and every one has a opinion against me and that I am a Nazi. State your opinion here and I will read them but don't use anger.
North Wiedna wrote:Life is either priceless or useless.

by Wa no Kuni » Fri Sep 24, 2010 11:38 pm

by Dryk Reborn » Sat Sep 25, 2010 2:35 am

by Call to power » Sat Sep 25, 2010 2:52 am
Jingoist Hippostan wrote:"Identifiable in public" is different from "forced to identify yourself."
Jingoist Hippostan wrote:I'd say you would be, actually. There's a good chance, depending on the area, that wearing a ski mask on a normal day would yield to extreme nervousness on the part of those around you, suspicious person reports, and possible police harassment/requests to remove the mask.
Jingoist Hippostan wrote:http://www.anapsid.org/cnd/mcs/maskcodes.html#IOWA
Wa no Kuni wrote:All I have to say is that this man is a hero to stand up to islam and muslims who want to take over the world.
Lakhon wrote:it's his property, and he can paint whatever he wants there.

by Nobel Hobos » Sat Sep 25, 2010 3:31 am

by Blouman Empire » Sat Sep 25, 2010 3:40 am
Nobel Hobos wrote:Blouman Empire wrote:
It's when it's not on an athletic behind but one that is not there is the problem
I've never understood that. Women or men who are flabby or asymettrical or just plain odd-shaped, wearing revealing clothes or being naked has never struck me as anything more than embarassing. I feel a little sorry for them sometimes ... that they want to strut their stuff like most people do at one time or another, but their stuff is ...er, like that. But you wouldn't ever catch me sneering or laughing at them.
But what I have never understood is the "problem" you talk about. Letting you see something you don't want to see, or dressing a body you regard as ugly in the trappings of a "sexy" body. I think it might be fetishism, frankly, as though naked is supposed to mean sexy, or there is some offence being committed (lying perhaps?) to dress a body you don't find sexy in the clothing you have come to expect should only be seen on sexy bodies.
If it's a problem ... it's your problem.

by Wildeson » Sat Sep 25, 2010 3:54 am
Vortiaganica wrote:Wildeson wrote:
The politicians who want to ban the Burqa find that the Burqa is very degrading for women to wear because it is a symbol of sexism since they're forced by theirhusbandsreligionhusbands who think their religion requires their wives to wear it.
That's not my opinion; i'm just sharing info.
Corrected. It is a very big difference.

by Baltenstein » Sat Sep 25, 2010 4:00 am

by The Parkus Empire » Sat Sep 25, 2010 4:12 am

by Call to power » Sat Sep 25, 2010 4:56 am
Blouman Empire wrote:(Though I don't like anyone in skinny jeans)
Wildeson wrote:This one is more true. There are different views of Islam and some Muslims I know don't believe their religion requires them to wear a burqa.

by Hamilay » Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:04 am
Baltenstein wrote:Actually, a lot of Muslims believe that Burqas/Niqabs are not necessary - up to and including the governments of Egypt, Syria and Saudia-Arabia, who recently banned them in public places.

by Dryk Reborn » Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:11 am


by The Parkus Empire » Sat Sep 25, 2010 7:01 am

by The Parkus Empire » Sat Sep 25, 2010 7:22 am
Ifreann wrote:Because otherwise Muslims might be allowed do stuff!

by Coccygia » Sat Sep 25, 2010 1:38 pm


by Sailsia » Sat Sep 25, 2010 1:43 pm

by The Floridian Coast » Sat Sep 25, 2010 1:44 pm

by Tmutarakhan » Sat Sep 25, 2010 1:50 pm

by The Alma Mater » Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:01 am
Wamitoria wrote:What is the point of banning the Burqa? I honestly don't see one.


by North Suran » Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:20 am
Juristonia wrote:The Quaran says nothing about women having to wear a Burqa.
It's cultural attire, not religious.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.
Geniasis wrote:The War on Christmas
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, EuroStralia, Greater Miami Shores 3, Groonland, Luminerra, Mestovakia, Terminus Station, United Sigma Armada, Upper Ireland, Upper Magica, Velstrania, Z-Zone 3
Advertisement