SaintB wrote:Humor, cultivate some.
The OP would do well to take this advice to heart as well.
Advertisement

by Saint Clair Island » Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:46 pm
SaintB wrote:Humor, cultivate some.

by Gun Manufacturers » Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:55 pm
Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:I was fighting against illegal poaching. However, this thread is not about that. I received very disturbing news upon my arrival back in the states. I had always suspected this, but now we know it's true.
A good friend of mine lent me the documentary "True Blood". Now, thus far, I've only seen the first season, and I'll spoiler the rest for those that haven't seen that.Now, we follow the story of Bill the vampire and his blonde girlfriend. I'm sure it's no news to all of you, but it documents how True Blood was invented by the Japanese, and subsequently, vampires came out in the open.
Now, Bill is a very likable guy. He drinks the manufactured product (most of the time), rather than drink human blood. However, he does drink human blood once (with consent), and once when he's really desperate (without consent).
It got me to thinking about the plight of vampires and carnivorous creatures in general. I'm not sure the best solution. Should we cull these carnivorous creatures, retrain them, or make them above the law and moral guidelines when they need sustenance?
I have lots of sympathy for Bill the vampire, but I also cannot forget that he is a bloodthirsty carnivore.
Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...
Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo
Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.
Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.

by Olthar » Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:26 pm
Hydesland wrote:The worst is when people say AID's, as if someone named AID coined the disease.

by Techno-Kat » Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:29 pm
So, I Just Returned From Africa

by Athiests4AnimalRights » Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:38 pm
Charvah wrote:
No, calling a certain race of people (I.E Asian, European, Black etc.) is a tad racist.

by Athiests4AnimalRights » Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:41 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:I was fighting against illegal poaching. However, this thread is not about that. I received very disturbing news upon my arrival back in the states. I had always suspected this, but now we know it's true.
A good friend of mine lent me the documentary "True Blood". Now, thus far, I've only seen the first season, and I'll spoiler the rest for those that haven't seen that.Now, we follow the story of Bill the vampire and his blonde girlfriend. I'm sure it's no news to all of you, but it documents how True Blood was invented by the Japanese, and subsequently, vampires came out in the open.
Now, Bill is a very likable guy. He drinks the manufactured product (most of the time), rather than drink human blood. However, he does drink human blood once (with consent), and once when he's really desperate (without consent).
It got me to thinking about the plight of vampires and carnivorous creatures in general. I'm not sure the best solution. Should we cull these carnivorous creatures, retrain them, or make them above the law and moral guidelines when they need sustenance?
I have lots of sympathy for Bill the vampire, but I also cannot forget that he is a bloodthirsty carnivore.
Please look up "evolution" and "obligate carnivore." Oh, and vampires don't really exist, y'know, though I'd bite Anna Paquin, too.

by Farnhamia » Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:45 pm
Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:I was fighting against illegal poaching. However, this thread is not about that. I received very disturbing news upon my arrival back in the states. I had always suspected this, but now we know it's true.
A good friend of mine lent me the documentary "True Blood". Now, thus far, I've only seen the first season, and I'll spoiler the rest for those that haven't seen that.Now, we follow the story of Bill the vampire and his blonde girlfriend. I'm sure it's no news to all of you, but it documents how True Blood was invented by the Japanese, and subsequently, vampires came out in the open.
Now, Bill is a very likable guy. He drinks the manufactured product (most of the time), rather than drink human blood. However, he does drink human blood once (with consent), and once when he's really desperate (without consent).
It got me to thinking about the plight of vampires and carnivorous creatures in general. I'm not sure the best solution. Should we cull these carnivorous creatures, retrain them, or make them above the law and moral guidelines when they need sustenance?
I have lots of sympathy for Bill the vampire, but I also cannot forget that he is a bloodthirsty carnivore.
Please look up "evolution" and "obligate carnivore." Oh, and vampires don't really exist, y'know, though I'd bite Anna Paquin, too.
Absurd. I saw the fangs on Bill.
I also saw his celerity and him sucking blood. You can't fake that shit. Now, what are we going to do about the vampire issue?

by Athiests4AnimalRights » Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:47 pm
Gun Manufacturers wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:I was fighting against illegal poaching. However, this thread is not about that. I received very disturbing news upon my arrival back in the states. I had always suspected this, but now we know it's true.
A good friend of mine lent me the documentary "True Blood". Now, thus far, I've only seen the first season, and I'll spoiler the rest for those that haven't seen that.Now, we follow the story of Bill the vampire and his blonde girlfriend. I'm sure it's no news to all of you, but it documents how True Blood was invented by the Japanese, and subsequently, vampires came out in the open.
Now, Bill is a very likable guy. He drinks the manufactured product (most of the time), rather than drink human blood. However, he does drink human blood once (with consent), and once when he's really desperate (without consent).
It got me to thinking about the plight of vampires and carnivorous creatures in general. I'm not sure the best solution. Should we cull these carnivorous creatures, retrain them, or make them above the law and moral guidelines when they need sustenance?
I have lots of sympathy for Bill the vampire, but I also cannot forget that he is a bloodthirsty carnivore.
![]()
You're awesome, I really enjoy your posts.


by Athiests4AnimalRights » Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:52 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:I was fighting against illegal poaching. However, this thread is not about that. I received very disturbing news upon my arrival back in the states. I had always suspected this, but now we know it's true.
A good friend of mine lent me the documentary "True Blood". Now, thus far, I've only seen the first season, and I'll spoiler the rest for those that haven't seen that.Now, we follow the story of Bill the vampire and his blonde girlfriend. I'm sure it's no news to all of you, but it documents how True Blood was invented by the Japanese, and subsequently, vampires came out in the open.
Now, Bill is a very likable guy. He drinks the manufactured product (most of the time), rather than drink human blood. However, he does drink human blood once (with consent), and once when he's really desperate (without consent).
It got me to thinking about the plight of vampires and carnivorous creatures in general. I'm not sure the best solution. Should we cull these carnivorous creatures, retrain them, or make them above the law and moral guidelines when they need sustenance?
I have lots of sympathy for Bill the vampire, but I also cannot forget that he is a bloodthirsty carnivore.
Please look up "evolution" and "obligate carnivore." Oh, and vampires don't really exist, y'know, though I'd bite Anna Paquin, too.
Absurd. I saw the fangs on Bill.
I also saw his celerity and him sucking blood. You can't fake that shit. Now, what are we going to do about the vampire issue?
For me, I'm going to put you down as "yet another failed humorist" or "yet another humorless failure." You can decide which.

by The Horror Channel » Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:53 pm
Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:Gun Manufacturers wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:I was fighting against illegal poaching. However, this thread is not about that. I received very disturbing news upon my arrival back in the states. I had always suspected this, but now we know it's true.
A good friend of mine lent me the documentary "True Blood". Now, thus far, I've only seen the first season, and I'll spoiler the rest for those that haven't seen that.Now, we follow the story of Bill the vampire and his blonde girlfriend. I'm sure it's no news to all of you, but it documents how True Blood was invented by the Japanese, and subsequently, vampires came out in the open.
Now, Bill is a very likable guy. He drinks the manufactured product (most of the time), rather than drink human blood. However, he does drink human blood once (with consent), and once when he's really desperate (without consent).
It got me to thinking about the plight of vampires and carnivorous creatures in general. I'm not sure the best solution. Should we cull these carnivorous creatures, retrain them, or make them above the law and moral guidelines when they need sustenance?
I have lots of sympathy for Bill the vampire, but I also cannot forget that he is a bloodthirsty carnivore.
![]()
You're awesome, I really enjoy your posts.
Everyone needs at least one fan.

by Gun Manufacturers » Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:55 pm
Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:Gun Manufacturers wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:I was fighting against illegal poaching. However, this thread is not about that. I received very disturbing news upon my arrival back in the states. I had always suspected this, but now we know it's true.
A good friend of mine lent me the documentary "True Blood". Now, thus far, I've only seen the first season, and I'll spoiler the rest for those that haven't seen that.Now, we follow the story of Bill the vampire and his blonde girlfriend. I'm sure it's no news to all of you, but it documents how True Blood was invented by the Japanese, and subsequently, vampires came out in the open.
Now, Bill is a very likable guy. He drinks the manufactured product (most of the time), rather than drink human blood. However, he does drink human blood once (with consent), and once when he's really desperate (without consent).
It got me to thinking about the plight of vampires and carnivorous creatures in general. I'm not sure the best solution. Should we cull these carnivorous creatures, retrain them, or make them above the law and moral guidelines when they need sustenance?
I have lots of sympathy for Bill the vampire, but I also cannot forget that he is a bloodthirsty carnivore.
![]()
You're awesome, I really enjoy your posts.
Everyone needs at least one fan.
Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...
Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo
Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.
Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.

by Bydlostan (Ancient) » Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:59 pm

by Cobhanglica » Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:03 pm
Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:It got me to thinking about the plight of vampires and carnivorous creatures in general. I'm not sure the best solution. Should we cull these carnivorous creatures, retrain them, or make them above the law and moral guidelines when they need sustenance?

by Athiests4AnimalRights » Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:10 pm
Cobhanglica wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:It got me to thinking about the plight of vampires and carnivorous creatures in general. I'm not sure the best solution. Should we cull these carnivorous creatures, retrain them, or make them above the law and moral guidelines when they need sustenance?
Animals exist outside our laws. They can eat each other all they like as long as they don't kill humans or animals owned by humans.

by Aryan Republics of Ame » Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:15 pm
Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:It got me to thinking about the plight of vampires and carnivorous creatures in general. I'm not sure the best solution. Should we cull these carnivorous creatures, retrain them, or make them above the law and moral guidelines when they need sustenance?
Animals exist outside our laws. They can eat each other all they like as long as they don't kill humans or animals owned by humans.
"Owned by humans", despicable. You can't own a living thing. That was one of the things that irritated me about the vampires in the documentary: they claimed ownership of certain individual humans.
How can you "own" an independent being?

by Athiests4AnimalRights » Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:22 pm
Aryan Republics of Ame wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:It got me to thinking about the plight of vampires and carnivorous creatures in general. I'm not sure the best solution. Should we cull these carnivorous creatures, retrain them, or make them above the law and moral guidelines when they need sustenance?
Animals exist outside our laws. They can eat each other all they like as long as they don't kill humans or animals owned by humans.
"Owned by humans", despicable. You can't own a living thing. That was one of the things that irritated me about the vampires in the documentary: they claimed ownership of certain individual humans.
How can you "own" an independent being?
By purchasing them or breeding them from your existing stock, duh.

by Aryan Republics of Ame » Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:26 pm
Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:Aryan Republics of Ame wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:It got me to thinking about the plight of vampires and carnivorous creatures in general. I'm not sure the best solution. Should we cull these carnivorous creatures, retrain them, or make them above the law and moral guidelines when they need sustenance?
Animals exist outside our laws. They can eat each other all they like as long as they don't kill humans or animals owned by humans.
"Owned by humans", despicable. You can't own a living thing. That was one of the things that irritated me about the vampires in the documentary: they claimed ownership of certain individual humans.
How can you "own" an independent being?
By purchasing them or breeding them from your existing stock, duh.
But how did you come to "own" that existing stock or the seller come to "own" that animal? Face it. Somewhere along the line, the animal was kidnapped and enslaved.
You slave trader.

by Athiests4AnimalRights » Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:30 pm
Aryan Republics of Ame wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:Aryan Republics of Ame wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:It got me to thinking about the plight of vampires and carnivorous creatures in general. I'm not sure the best solution. Should we cull these carnivorous creatures, retrain them, or make them above the law and moral guidelines when they need sustenance?
Animals exist outside our laws. They can eat each other all they like as long as they don't kill humans or animals owned by humans.
"Owned by humans", despicable. You can't own a living thing. That was one of the things that irritated me about the vampires in the documentary: they claimed ownership of certain individual humans.
How can you "own" an independent being?
By purchasing them or breeding them from your existing stock, duh.
But how did you come to "own" that existing stock or the seller come to "own" that animal? Face it. Somewhere along the line, the animal was kidnapped and enslaved.
You slave trader.
Oh nos!!! Enslavment of my food source! How will I ever live with myself. I have a question though? What do you animal rights types think of owning a pet, such as a dog?

by Aryan Republics of Ame » Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:03 pm
Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:Aryan Republics of Ame wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:Aryan Republics of Ame wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:It got me to thinking about the plight of vampires and carnivorous creatures in general. I'm not sure the best solution. Should we cull these carnivorous creatures, retrain them, or make them above the law and moral guidelines when they need sustenance?
Animals exist outside our laws. They can eat each other all they like as long as they don't kill humans or animals owned by humans.
"Owned by humans", despicable. You can't own a living thing. That was one of the things that irritated me about the vampires in the documentary: they claimed ownership of certain individual humans.
How can you "own" an independent being?
By purchasing them or breeding them from your existing stock, duh.
But how did you come to "own" that existing stock or the seller come to "own" that animal? Face it. Somewhere along the line, the animal was kidnapped and enslaved.
You slave trader.
Oh nos!!! Enslavment of my food source! How will I ever live with myself. I have a question though? What do you animal rights types think of owning a pet, such as a dog?
One does not "own" a "pet".
One has a companion animal which consents to stay with him.

by Scarsaw » Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:24 pm
Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:One does not "own" a "pet".
One has a companion animal which consents to stay with him.

by Olthar » Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:24 pm
Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:Aryan Republics of Ame wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:It got me to thinking about the plight of vampires and carnivorous creatures in general. I'm not sure the best solution. Should we cull these carnivorous creatures, retrain them, or make them above the law and moral guidelines when they need sustenance?
Animals exist outside our laws. They can eat each other all they like as long as they don't kill humans or animals owned by humans.
"Owned by humans", despicable. You can't own a living thing. That was one of the things that irritated me about the vampires in the documentary: they claimed ownership of certain individual humans.
How can you "own" an independent being?
By purchasing them or breeding them from your existing stock, duh.
But how did you come to "own" that existing stock or the seller come to "own" that animal? Face it. Somewhere along the line, the animal was kidnapped and enslaved.
You slave trader.

by Hasurei » Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:28 pm
Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:Goddamn it. That was not a pejorative term towards our guide, Mr. Yo Jimbo (at least, that was as close as I could get). I was referring to Sue, the monkey we had along for the trip.
I asked her what her name was, and she said "ooh ooh ooh", and after a quick check downstairs, discovered she was a girl. I therefore surmised she meant "Sue" and just couldn't pronounce it, so I went with that.

by South Lorenya » Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:28 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Oh, and vampires don't really exist, y'know, though I'd bite Anna Paquin, too.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dumb Ideologies, Google [Bot], Grinning Dragon, Myrensis, Nlarhyalo, Point Blob, Soviet Haaregrad, The Archregimancy, Valyxias
Advertisement