I suspect the trial or investigation should judge each individual incidence.
THERE IS NO TRIAL OR INVESTIGATION! THAT IS WHAT I HATE!!!!!!!!!
Advertisement

by Louis Van Boxel Woolf » Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:38 pm
I suspect the trial or investigation should judge each individual incidence.

by The Phoenix Milita » Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:39 pm

by Othyl » Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:26 am
Louis Van Boxel Woolf wrote:I suspect the trial or investigation should judge each individual incidence.
THERE IS NO TRIAL OR INVESTIGATION! THAT IS WHAT I HATE!!!!!!!!!
Phenia wrote:Real men don't use lube when raping physics.

by Techno-Soviet » Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:28 am
The Phoenix Milita wrote:If the police had some guns or at least tasers then this would all be solved. Tasers don't do any permanent damage - and they work. As for a gun... point a club at someone and tell them to back up and then point a gun at someone and see the difference.

by The Phoenix Milita » Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:05 am

by Grays Harbor » Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:09 am
Booya1 wrote:here in america most policemen are whiny fat babies who weren't even fit enough to pass the miniscule requirements to get in the U.S army. is britain pretty much the same?

by Gift-of-god » Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:25 am
Grays Harbor wrote:Yes, that is a regretful accident. However, perhaps he should have thought to himself, "lets see....big protest........police and protesters clashing........yes, I should not walk right down the middle of it because I am obviously innocent." before he took that route? Or does common sense not count anymore?
Sibirsky wrote:Scum. Those cops are scum. They will rot in hell for all eternity. Everyday, government assholes like themselves push me closer and closer to anarcho-capitalism.
If we had a private police force, their employees would be subject to laws just like anybody else. They would not be able to hide behind their government issued badge. The incentive would be to use as little power as possible. In these cases, these scumbags would go to jail for assault and murder. The employees would not be power hungry, authoritarian nut cases that tend to join the government police forces in today's society. It would be too expensive to hire assholes like that.
Othyl wrote:Louis Van Boxel Woolf wrote:I suspect the trial or investigation should judge each individual incidence.
THERE IS NO TRIAL OR INVESTIGATION! THAT IS WHAT I HATE!!!!!!!!!
Who would head such an investigation? Police? That seems ineffective.

by Colonic Immigration » Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:28 am

by Booya1 » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:24 am
Grays Harbor wrote:Booya1 wrote:here in america most policemen are whiny fat babies who weren't even fit enough to pass the miniscule requirements to get in the U.S army. is britain pretty much the same?
That is certainly one of the more ill informed opinions on American Police Officers I believe I have seen. I really would like to see a source on that, because I have serious doubts there is one beyond personal opinion.

by Yootopia » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:24 am
Sibirsky wrote:If we had a private police force, their employees would be subject to laws just like anybody else. They would not be able to hide behind their government issued badge. The incentive would be to use as little power as possible.

by Yootopia » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
Tiesabre wrote:Cops will always get away with it unless God himself points his finger at the cop.
You could have a video of a cop about to arrest a guy, guy could trip over and the cop would shoot him 35 times claiming that as the suspect fell over he reach out for my hand and it was obvious he was trying to kill me. I shot him 12 times, reloaded, shot another 12 times then his leg twitched which is an obvious sign of him resisting arrest and shot him another 12 times.
Then the judge will say well even though the offcer shot the suspect 24 times, the suspects leg twitched while on the edge of death so the officer's life was still in danger.
Honestly if a cop unjustifiably shot me several times and doesn't kill me, after I recover I will kill him. Count on it.

by Mad hatters in jeans » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:47 am

by Gift-of-god » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:51 am
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:I'm sure it wasn't just a one sided police brawl for fun, i'm pretty sure there were the usual hotheads and idiots who go to these riots to join in.
And it costs alot of money to train the police just so the rioters can have their fun at protesting, i mean alot of money.
So i have no sympathy for those in the protests in London, why should i have to fork out money just to let them get an opportunity to slag off police officers?

by Risottia » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:51 am
Louis Van Boxel Woolf wrote:They all demonstrate how the Police widely abuse their power in Britain and how political freedoms are slowly being curtailed! I think this is disgusting!

by Warner Channel » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:52 am
by Sibirsky » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:52 am
Dyakovo wrote:Your stance on Police Brutality?
I'm all for it as long as its not directed at me or my family and friends...

by Risottia » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:52 am
Othyl wrote:Louis Van Boxel Woolf wrote:I suspect the trial or investigation should judge each individual incidence.
THERE IS NO TRIAL OR INVESTIGATION! THAT IS WHAT I HATE!!!!!!!!!
Who would head such an investigation? Police? That seems ineffective.
by Sibirsky » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:55 am
Yootopia wrote:Sibirsky wrote:If we had a private police force, their employees would be subject to laws just like anybody else. They would not be able to hide behind their government issued badge. The incentive would be to use as little power as possible.
Err wtf are you talking about -_-
If the people given the power of arrest were employees of a private company, then what's to stop them arbitrarily locking people up for purely economic reasons, with shitty prisons and all that? "You buy Pepsi, a night in the cells young miss" etc.
"Oh but we could sue them". Yeah but they're still the police, and if a private company is in charge, they could just make residents sign a waiver agreeing not to sue the police. And anyone who didn't sign the waiver wouldn't be covered, and hired thieves would just break into their house until they DID sign. That's what I'd do if I was running a private police company for maximum profit.

by Louis Van Boxel Woolf » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:57 am

by Baycosa » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:58 am

by Gift-of-god » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:58 am
Sibirsky wrote:And I would hire a COMPETING agency to protect myself. So your protection agency would go out of business shortly thereafter as more and more people left you. As far as the waivers, there could be a law against such a thing. Problem solved. They are not exempt from lawsuits.
by Sibirsky » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:59 am
by Sibirsky » Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:01 am
Baycosa wrote:Cops should not be your everyday run of the mill neighbourhood friendly police, let the police be the police, if you get beat up you obviously done something to deserve it.
Police are meant to beat, lock up and shoot (prehaps not in that order) troublemakers and lawbreakers.

by Gift-of-god » Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:01 am
Sibirsky wrote:Who wants to bet me, that those English cops do not serve more than 15 years if convicted? I am not sure about the sentencing guidelines in the UK, but had they been employees of a private agency, they would inevitably serve more time. And both the employee and employer would end up in civil court as well. The victims family would win tens of millions of pounds in damages. Exactly why such a thing would never happen with a private police force.

by Louis Van Boxel Woolf » Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:05 am
Baycosa wrote:Cops should not be your everyday run of the mill neighbourhood friendly police, let the police be the police, if you get beat up you obviously done something to deserve it.
Police are meant to beat, lock up and shoot (prehaps not in that order) troublemakers and lawbreakers.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Northern Socialist Council Republics, Page, Saiwana
Advertisement