NATION

PASSWORD

Your stance on Police Brutality?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Louis Van Boxel Woolf
Diplomat
 
Posts: 634
Founded: May 13, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Louis Van Boxel Woolf » Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:38 pm

I suspect the trial or investigation should judge each individual incidence.

THERE IS NO TRIAL OR INVESTIGATION! THAT IS WHAT I HATE!!!!!!!!!
Founder of the SLU (Socialist Liberal Union)
Member of CAG
Colonies: Rororea, Right Wing Politics, Good Nazis, Bigzanzi, Central Demvev
KEY:2
KEY: 1 Peacetime, 2 International Tention, 3 Small War, 4 Major War, 5 Turmoil and/or Nuclear War.

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=22852 Check out the link for easy banking!
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9952&hilit=+Crown+Cars Check out the link for luxury cars!

You can't spell Conservative without CON
- Sarzonia
98% of all internet users would cry if facebook would break down, if you are part of that 2% who simply would sit back and laugh then copy and paste this into your sig.

User avatar
The Phoenix Milita
Diplomat
 
Posts: 661
Founded: Antiquity
Compulsory Consumerist State

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby The Phoenix Milita » Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:39 pm

If the police had some guns or at least tasers then this would all be solved. Tasers don't do any permanent damage - and they work. As for a gun... point a club at someone and tell them to back up and then point a gun at someone and see the difference.
Last edited by The Phoenix Milita on Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Othyl
Diplomat
 
Posts: 766
Founded: Jul 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Othyl » Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:26 am

Louis Van Boxel Woolf wrote:
I suspect the trial or investigation should judge each individual incidence.

THERE IS NO TRIAL OR INVESTIGATION! THAT IS WHAT I HATE!!!!!!!!!


Who would head such an investigation? Police? That seems ineffective.

User avatar
Techno-Soviet
Senator
 
Posts: 3785
Founded: Jan 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Techno-Soviet » Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:28 am

The Phoenix Milita wrote:If the police had some guns or at least tasers then this would all be solved. Tasers don't do any permanent damage - and they work. As for a gun... point a club at someone and tell them to back up and then point a gun at someone and see the difference.


What about that fellow who was tasered to death by police because he didn't speak English well enough?
[align=center]Economic Tyranny/Libertarian: 6.38
Social Libertarian/Tyranny: -3.33

User avatar
The Phoenix Milita
Diplomat
 
Posts: 661
Founded: Antiquity
Compulsory Consumerist State

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby The Phoenix Milita » Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:05 am

Let me ask you this: Would you rather be bludgeoned to death and die slowly of internal injuries or take the small risk of dying suddenly from being tasered?

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Grays Harbor » Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:09 am

Booya1 wrote:here in america most policemen are whiny fat babies who weren't even fit enough to pass the miniscule requirements to get in the U.S army. is britain pretty much the same?

That is certainly one of the more ill informed opinions on American Police Officers I believe I have seen. I really would like to see a source on that, because I have serious doubts there is one beyond personal opinion.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Gift-of-god
Minister
 
Posts: 3138
Founded: Jul 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Gift-of-god » Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:25 am

Grays Harbor wrote:Yes, that is a regretful accident. However, perhaps he should have thought to himself, "lets see....big protest........police and protesters clashing........yes, I should not walk right down the middle of it because I am obviously innocent." before he took that route? Or does common sense not count anymore?


I see. So, if the conditions were as you described them (which they were not, but no matter), and he did what you described, I would agree that it would show a lack of common sense.

Do you think a lack of common sense is reason enough to be beaten to death?

Sibirsky wrote:Scum. Those cops are scum. They will rot in hell for all eternity. Everyday, government assholes like themselves push me closer and closer to anarcho-capitalism.

If we had a private police force, their employees would be subject to laws just like anybody else. They would not be able to hide behind their government issued badge. The incentive would be to use as little power as possible. In these cases, these scumbags would go to jail for assault and murder. The employees would not be power hungry, authoritarian nut cases that tend to join the government police forces in today's society. It would be too expensive to hire assholes like that.


And how would they be held accountable? Who would arrest them? And do you have any evidence that it would be less expensive, or do you just have some untested economic hypothesis?

Currently, police forces can be helf accountable a myriad of ways, because they are public officials. I have yet to hear of a private system that does better. If you know of one, please enlighten me.

Othyl wrote:
Louis Van Boxel Woolf wrote:
I suspect the trial or investigation should judge each individual incidence.

THERE IS NO TRIAL OR INVESTIGATION! THAT IS WHAT I HATE!!!!!!!!!


Who would head such an investigation? Police? That seems ineffective.


The most effective method, so far, has been independent public boards of inquiry staffed by non-police officers.
I am the very model of the modern kaiju Gamera
I've a shell that's indestructible and endless turtle stamina.
I defend the little kids and I level downtown Tokyo
in a giant free-for-all mega-kaiju rodeo.

User avatar
Colonic Immigration
Minister
 
Posts: 3337
Founded: Mar 29, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Colonic Immigration » Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:28 am

I like watching riots - sticks and stones vs. batons, rubber bullets and riot shields.


Not really a contest.
RoI
Economic Left/Right: -5.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.97
Western Mercenary Unio - Yeah, you kinda make idiocy an art

Haikus are easy,
They don't always make much sense,
Refrigerator

User avatar
Booya1
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Jul 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Booya1 » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:24 am

Grays Harbor wrote:
Booya1 wrote:here in america most policemen are whiny fat babies who weren't even fit enough to pass the miniscule requirements to get in the U.S army. is britain pretty much the same?

That is certainly one of the more ill informed opinions on American Police Officers I believe I have seen. I really would like to see a source on that, because I have serious doubts there is one beyond personal opinion.

source on them being whiny babies or source on them all failing to meet the requirements for the army? 'cause the army thing was just hyperbole.

User avatar
Yootopia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8410
Founded: Dec 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Yootopia » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:24 am

Sibirsky wrote:If we had a private police force, their employees would be subject to laws just like anybody else. They would not be able to hide behind their government issued badge. The incentive would be to use as little power as possible.

Err wtf are you talking about -_-

If the people given the power of arrest were employees of a private company, then what's to stop them arbitrarily locking people up for purely economic reasons, with shitty prisons and all that? "You buy Pepsi, a night in the cells young miss" etc.

"Oh but we could sue them". Yeah but they're still the police, and if a private company is in charge, they could just make residents sign a waiver agreeing not to sue the police. And anyone who didn't sign the waiver wouldn't be covered, and hired thieves would just break into their house until they DID sign. That's what I'd do if I was running a private police company for maximum profit.
End the Modigarchy now.

User avatar
Yootopia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8410
Founded: Dec 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Yootopia » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am

Tiesabre wrote:Cops will always get away with it unless God himself points his finger at the cop.

You could have a video of a cop about to arrest a guy, guy could trip over and the cop would shoot him 35 times claiming that as the suspect fell over he reach out for my hand and it was obvious he was trying to kill me. I shot him 12 times, reloaded, shot another 12 times then his leg twitched which is an obvious sign of him resisting arrest and shot him another 12 times.

Then the judge will say well even though the offcer shot the suspect 24 times, the suspects leg twitched while on the edge of death so the officer's life was still in danger.

Honestly if a cop unjustifiably shot me several times and doesn't kill me, after I recover I will kill him. Count on it.

Wow, you're so manly etc. *swoon*
End the Modigarchy now.

User avatar
Mad hatters in jeans
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19119
Founded: Nov 14, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Mad hatters in jeans » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:47 am

I'm sure it wasn't just a one sided police brawl for fun, i'm pretty sure there were the usual hotheads and idiots who go to these riots to join in.
And it costs alot of money to train the police just so the rioters can have their fun at protesting, i mean alot of money.
So i have no sympathy for those in the protests in London, why should i have to fork out money just to let them get an opportunity to slag off police officers?

User avatar
Gift-of-god
Minister
 
Posts: 3138
Founded: Jul 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Gift-of-god » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:51 am

Mad hatters in jeans wrote:I'm sure it wasn't just a one sided police brawl for fun, i'm pretty sure there were the usual hotheads and idiots who go to these riots to join in.


Then I'm sure you have evidence for such a claim.

And it costs alot of money to train the police just so the rioters can have their fun at protesting, i mean alot of money.
So i have no sympathy for those in the protests in London, why should i have to fork out money just to let them get an opportunity to slag off police officers?


Because the cops are not getting paid to hang out with rioters. They are paid to maintain peace and order. If they are unable to do that while others are exercising their democratic right to protest, then they are incapable of doing their jobs.
I am the very model of the modern kaiju Gamera
I've a shell that's indestructible and endless turtle stamina.
I defend the little kids and I level downtown Tokyo
in a giant free-for-all mega-kaiju rodeo.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54741
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Risottia » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:51 am

Louis Van Boxel Woolf wrote:They all demonstrate how the Police widely abuse their power in Britain and how political freedoms are slowly being curtailed! I think this is disgusting!


Hello Britain, welcome to the rest of the world, where policemen aren't that nice after all.

As for the British record, I think that the pursuit and cold-blooded homicide of a Brazilian immigrant by plainclothes agents (who didn't even bother to identify themselves) still rules.

As for Italy, I might point out that just a couple of weeks ago four policemen were sentenced for manslaughter (as consequence of assault, battery and severe injuries) for the death of a young man they were arresting. Also, this week another policemen is expected to be sentenced to 14 years (prosecutor's request) for homicide - he shot and killed an unarmed guy who was walking away from a minor brawl.

Yup. There are many idiots around; and when the idiots are in the police, the problem is worse, because they are armed.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Warner Channel
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 110
Founded: Jul 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Warner Channel » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:52 am

I hate these bloody Bobbies.

Odio estos sangrientos Bobbies.
ESTADOS DE LA INCORPORADAS WARNER CHANNEL
"Cancun piedras"

CEO Axel Lopez

Tú sabes que me amas.

Ayudar a los Combatientes por la Libertad en la guerra civil Sorgan
Fundador de Cancun
Miembros del CAG
Embajada en el Master M

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Sibirsky » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:52 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Your stance on Police Brutality?

I'm all for it as long as its not directed at me or my family and friends... :D


I hope more of it IS directed at YOU for saying stupid shit like that.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54741
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Risottia » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:52 am

Othyl wrote:
Louis Van Boxel Woolf wrote:
I suspect the trial or investigation should judge each individual incidence.

THERE IS NO TRIAL OR INVESTIGATION! THAT IS WHAT I HATE!!!!!!!!!


Who would head such an investigation? Police? That seems ineffective.


I thought that usually investigations were headed by a prosecutor (which is not part of the police).
Last edited by Risottia on Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:53 am, edited 2 times in total.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Sibirsky » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:55 am

Yootopia wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:If we had a private police force, their employees would be subject to laws just like anybody else. They would not be able to hide behind their government issued badge. The incentive would be to use as little power as possible.

Err wtf are you talking about -_-

If the people given the power of arrest were employees of a private company, then what's to stop them arbitrarily locking people up for purely economic reasons, with shitty prisons and all that? "You buy Pepsi, a night in the cells young miss" etc.

"Oh but we could sue them". Yeah but they're still the police, and if a private company is in charge, they could just make residents sign a waiver agreeing not to sue the police. And anyone who didn't sign the waiver wouldn't be covered, and hired thieves would just break into their house until they DID sign. That's what I'd do if I was running a private police company for maximum profit.


And I would hire a COMPETING agency to protect myself. So your protection agency would go out of business shortly thereafter as more and more people left you. As far as the waivers, there could be a law against such a thing. Problem solved. They are not exempt from lawsuits.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Louis Van Boxel Woolf
Diplomat
 
Posts: 634
Founded: May 13, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Louis Van Boxel Woolf » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:57 am

No in Britain, it is headed by the IPCC (Indpendent Police Complaints Commision) which is chaired by non police officers, they can say where the police went wrong and give their verdict on whether the Police were in the wrong or the right, but they do not have the power to sentence police officers!
Also Police hiding their ID numbers, disgraceful...
Founder of the SLU (Socialist Liberal Union)
Member of CAG
Colonies: Rororea, Right Wing Politics, Good Nazis, Bigzanzi, Central Demvev
KEY:2
KEY: 1 Peacetime, 2 International Tention, 3 Small War, 4 Major War, 5 Turmoil and/or Nuclear War.

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=22852 Check out the link for easy banking!
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9952&hilit=+Crown+Cars Check out the link for luxury cars!

You can't spell Conservative without CON
- Sarzonia
98% of all internet users would cry if facebook would break down, if you are part of that 2% who simply would sit back and laugh then copy and paste this into your sig.

User avatar
Baycosa
Diplomat
 
Posts: 811
Founded: May 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Baycosa » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:58 am

Cops should not be your everyday run of the mill neighbourhood friendly police, let the police be the police, if you get beat up you obviously done something to deserve it.

Police are meant to beat, lock up and shoot (prehaps not in that order) troublemakers and lawbreakers.
The Commonwealth of Baycosa
Current goverment: Military Junta Former goverment: Executed
President of Baycosa, Field Marshal of the Commonwealth: Farhad M. Polh
Currently in a state of War aginst the Socialist Republic of Osea - The Osea War
Details:
- Operation Sunrise "The confrontation at Podgrad"
- 70 Soldiers "Baycosan Recon Forces", 3 Cobra gunships, 3 Transport choppers - Unkown numbers of local communist Milita and Regulars

Est. casualties inflicted:
51 confirmed kills / 70+ Est.
1 Mi-26
Civilian casualties and damage to civilian structure.

Confirmed Losses:
19 Baycosan recon soldiers KIA/MIA
2 Baycosan pilots MIA
1 Cobra guship


User avatar
Gift-of-god
Minister
 
Posts: 3138
Founded: Jul 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Gift-of-god » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:58 am

Sibirsky wrote:And I would hire a COMPETING agency to protect myself. So your protection agency would go out of business shortly thereafter as more and more people left you. As far as the waivers, there could be a law against such a thing. Problem solved. They are not exempt from lawsuits.


How do you ensure that the competing police force does not do the same thing?
How do you enforce such a law against waivers or lawsuits, or any law for that restricts the police forces that are covered by these laws?
I am the very model of the modern kaiju Gamera
I've a shell that's indestructible and endless turtle stamina.
I defend the little kids and I level downtown Tokyo
in a giant free-for-all mega-kaiju rodeo.

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Sibirsky » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:59 am

Who wants to bet me, that those English cops do not serve more than 15 years if convicted? I am not sure about the sentencing guidelines in the UK, but had they been employees of a private agency, they would inevitably serve more time. And both the employee and employer would end up in civil court as well. The victims family would win tens of millions of pounds in damages. Exactly why such a thing would never happen with a private police force.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Sibirsky » Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:01 am

Baycosa wrote:Cops should not be your everyday run of the mill neighbourhood friendly police, let the police be the police, if you get beat up you obviously done something to deserve it.

Police are meant to beat, lock up and shoot (prehaps not in that order) troublemakers and lawbreakers.


The guy in the first video was walking away with his back turned to them. Those officers should get the death penalty as far as I'm concerned. There is no excuse for their behavior.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Gift-of-god
Minister
 
Posts: 3138
Founded: Jul 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Gift-of-god » Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:01 am

Sibirsky wrote:Who wants to bet me, that those English cops do not serve more than 15 years if convicted? I am not sure about the sentencing guidelines in the UK, but had they been employees of a private agency, they would inevitably serve more time. And both the employee and employer would end up in civil court as well. The victims family would win tens of millions of pounds in damages. Exactly why such a thing would never happen with a private police force.


I read a comic book where the world worked like this. It had talking monkeys. Reality does not work this way.

Perhaps you have some evidence that shows that private police forces are more accountable than public ones, but I doubt it.
I am the very model of the modern kaiju Gamera
I've a shell that's indestructible and endless turtle stamina.
I defend the little kids and I level downtown Tokyo
in a giant free-for-all mega-kaiju rodeo.

User avatar
Louis Van Boxel Woolf
Diplomat
 
Posts: 634
Founded: May 13, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Your stance on Police Brutality?

Postby Louis Van Boxel Woolf » Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:05 am

Baycosa wrote:Cops should not be your everyday run of the mill neighbourhood friendly police, let the police be the police, if you get beat up you obviously done something to deserve it.

Police are meant to beat, lock up and shoot (prehaps not in that order) troublemakers and lawbreakers.


WHAT? Did you see Mr Tomlinson, he was walking away! In the 3rd vid the guy who now has brain damage, what was he doing?
Founder of the SLU (Socialist Liberal Union)
Member of CAG
Colonies: Rororea, Right Wing Politics, Good Nazis, Bigzanzi, Central Demvev
KEY:2
KEY: 1 Peacetime, 2 International Tention, 3 Small War, 4 Major War, 5 Turmoil and/or Nuclear War.

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=22852 Check out the link for easy banking!
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9952&hilit=+Crown+Cars Check out the link for luxury cars!

You can't spell Conservative without CON
- Sarzonia
98% of all internet users would cry if facebook would break down, if you are part of that 2% who simply would sit back and laugh then copy and paste this into your sig.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Northern Socialist Council Republics, Page, Saiwana

Advertisement

Remove ads