

by Bavungria » Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:50 am


by Lackadaisical2 » Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:52 am
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by Bavungria » Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:52 am

by Olthar » Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:53 am
Lackadaisical2 wrote:I believe your title is very misleading.

by Bavungria » Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:56 am

by East Fancainia » Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:00 am

by Bydlostan (Ancient) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:04 am

by Bavungria » Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:07 am

by Lackadaisical2 » Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:08 am
Bavungria wrote:ok thanks Bydlostan. Do you know any conservatives and liberals on this forum ?
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by Call to power » Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:14 am
Bavungria wrote:How would you define a liberal? How would you define a conservative? whats the different policies and economic beliefs do they have ? Why are liberal associated as the left ? Also has anyone read liberal Fascism ?
Lackadaisical2 wrote:For example, I'm from the hatred party, we hate everyone and every concept.


by Abdju » Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:17 am

by Lackadaisical2 » Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:18 am
Call to power wrote:Lackadaisical2 wrote:For example, I'm from the hatred party, we hate everyone and every concept.
why do you hate freedom
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by Bydlostan (Ancient) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:23 am
Call to power wrote:-liberals want more freedom (anyone who says economic regulation is getting hit with the stick)

by Bavungria » Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:26 am
Bydlostan wrote:Call to power wrote:-liberals want more freedom (anyone who says economic regulation is getting hit with the stick)
thats an archaic definition from back when people were ruled by unenlightened monarchs. That'd be considered a libertarian.
A "liberal" is better described as a "progressive" that wants to go forward without the influence of tradition in their decision making. Modern liberals have no qualms about restricting personal or economic freedom, look at Sweden.

by Call to power » Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:53 am
Lackadaisical2 wrote:E: they have marmite in Britain too, don't they...
Bydlostan wrote:thats an archaic definition from back when people were ruled by unenlightened monarchs. That'd be considered a libertarian.
Bydlostan wrote:Modern liberals have no qualms about restricting personal or economic freedom, look at Sweden.

by Bavungria » Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:41 am

by Jervak » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:00 am

by Bavungria » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:04 am

by Jervak » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:06 am
Bavungria wrote:how so ?

by Desperate Measures » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:07 am

by Bavungria » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:09 am
Jervak wrote:Bavungria wrote:how so ?
Liberals refuse to acknowledge class and only wish to make capitalism nicer, they still want a free market, just with weak safety nets.
America is currently under a liberal regime, and it's pretty awful nation to live in, in comparison to social democratic countries.

by Bavungria » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:10 am
Desperate Measures wrote:Liberals are awesome! Yaaaay! Conservatives are evil! Booo!

by Reodika » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:21 am

by Desperate Measures » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:43 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Arikea, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bradfordville, Cannot think of a name, Celritannia, Ethel mermania, Galloism, Narland, Perchan, Port Caverton, Raskana, Riviere Renard, Ryemarch, Saiwana, The Archregimancy, The Jamesian Republic, The Selkie, The Snazzylands, The Two Jerseys
Advertisement