Advertisement
by Peisandros » Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:25 am
by Colonic Immigration » Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:25 am
by Extreme Ironing » Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:31 am
Colonic Immigration wrote:Really? They think that it's vs UK?
by Colonic Immigration » Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:33 am
Extreme Ironing wrote:Colonic Immigration wrote:Really? They think that it's vs UK?
No, no, Scotland, Wales or N.Ireland have never had good cricket teams. England on the other hand have an exce....oh.
by Blouman Empire » Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:40 am
Colonic Immigration wrote:Do they think that about football and rugby too?
by Barringtonia » Sun Jul 12, 2009 9:11 am
by Peisandros » Sun Jul 12, 2009 9:34 am
by Colonic Immigration » Sun Jul 12, 2009 9:37 am
by Peisandros » Sun Jul 12, 2009 9:41 am
Colonic Immigration wrote:'Sover?
by Fartsniffage » Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:46 am
Barringtonia wrote:40 odd runs to move ahead of Australia, 20 odd overs to go, 3 more wickets to fall,
It's actually reasonably tense, as far as cricket can be, I just feel England will be all out a shade under 10 overs to go, I just don't think Swann is a holding batsman, every effort needs to be made to ensure Collingwood is facing,
by Colonic Immigration » Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:48 am
by Extreme Ironing » Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:53 am
by Colonic Immigration » Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:55 am
by Eofaerwic » Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:55 am
Fartsniffage wrote:Barringtonia wrote:40 odd runs to move ahead of Australia, 20 odd overs to go, 3 more wickets to fall,
It's actually reasonably tense, as far as cricket can be, I just feel England will be all out a shade under 10 overs to go, I just don't think Swann is a holding batsman, every effort needs to be made to ensure Collingwood is facing,
Oh ye of little faith.
Got the draw.
by Fartsniffage » Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:55 am
Extreme Ironing wrote:It's funny how you can celebrate a draw, though I suppose it's like being bottom of the league at Christmas and not getting relegated at the end. Well played Collingwood.
by Extreme Ironing » Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:55 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Extreme Ironing wrote:It's funny how you can celebrate a draw, though I suppose it's like being bottom of the league at Christmas and not getting relegated at the end. Well played Collingwood.
From the position we were in at close of play yesterday this feels more like a win than a draw.
by Colonic Immigration » Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:04 pm
by Peisandros » Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:26 pm
Colonic Immigration wrote:Harmison better play next time.
by Colonic Immigration » Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:33 pm
Peisandros wrote:Colonic Immigration wrote:Harmison better play next time.
Yeah, probably in for Monty depending on the pitch.
by Peisandros » Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:36 pm
Colonic Immigration wrote:Peisandros wrote:Colonic Immigration wrote:Harmison better play next time.
Yeah, probably in for Monty depending on the pitch.
We could have done with him, imo.
Why were we playing in Wales?
by Blouman Empire » Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:44 pm
by Barringtonia » Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:00 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Barringtonia wrote:40 odd runs to move ahead of Australia, 20 odd overs to go, 3 more wickets to fall,
It's actually reasonably tense, as far as cricket can be, I just feel England will be all out a shade under 10 overs to go, I just don't think Swann is a holding batsman, every effort needs to be made to ensure Collingwood is facing,
Oh ye of little faith.
Got the draw.
Blouman Empire wrote:So a draw in the end with the next test match to be played at Lords.
What do people think of Pontings claims of the Poms timewasting?
Does he have a point?
by Zombie PotatoHeads » Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:14 pm
SaintB wrote:For a second i thought this was about a nuclear war or something.
by Barringtonia » Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:40 pm
Zombie PotatoHeads wrote:As expected, after England manage to climb out of their hole and stagger towards a well-undeserved draw they immediately start up about how great they are for having done so. It's kinda sweet to see their hopeless (and hapless) optimism. Almost as much as their inevitable complaints about the ref when they lose.
No idea why Ponting let Johnson bowl so much on the last day when he was obviously making no headway. That decision cost Oz the match imo.
by Neu Leonstein » Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:43 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:What do people think of Pontings claims of the Poms timewasting?
Does he have a point?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Cyptopir, General TN, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Kreushia, Magical Hypnosis Border Collie of Doom, Maximum Imperium Rex, Mergold-Aurlia, Plan Neonie, Republics of the Solar Union, The Apollonian Systems, Tryust, Tungstan, United Desri
Advertisement