Thank you.
Advertisement

by Greed and Death » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:46 pm

by Ifreann » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:46 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ifreann wrote:
Hardly. There are myriad reasons for the hate-filled to target Muslims, without any interference from Republican talking heads.
I'll rephrase my previous question. If this mosque controversy weren't going on at the moment, do you think Mr. Enright have slashed this man's throat? I don't think so. I'm not 100% or even 90% sure. But I can connect the dots and make a reasonable assumption, such as the one I laid out.

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:46 pm

You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:49 pm
Ifreann wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ifreann wrote:
Hardly. There are myriad reasons for the hate-filled to target Muslims, without any interference from Republican talking heads.
I'll rephrase my previous question. If this mosque controversy weren't going on at the moment, do you think Mr. Enright have slashed this man's throat? I don't think so. I'm not 100% or even 90% sure. But I can connect the dots and make a reasonable assumption, such as the one I laid out.
Mosque controversy =/= Beck, Limbaugh etc. As I recall it was some 9/11 families group that started this nonsense.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Lowetania » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:50 pm

by Ashas Favor » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:51 pm
Ifreann wrote:
Hardly. There are myriad reasons for the hate-filled to target Muslims, without any interference from Republican talking heads.

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:52 pm
Ashas Favor wrote:Ifreann wrote:
Hardly. There are myriad reasons for the hate-filled to target Muslims, without any interference from Republican talking heads.
Wow, I actually agree with Ifreann...
This is a horrible assumption with no backing whatsoever.
People are responsible for their own actions. Period.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Ifreann » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:53 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ifreann wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ifreann wrote:
Hardly. There are myriad reasons for the hate-filled to target Muslims, without any interference from Republican talking heads.
I'll rephrase my previous question. If this mosque controversy weren't going on at the moment, do you think Mr. Enright have slashed this man's throat? I don't think so. I'm not 100% or even 90% sure. But I can connect the dots and make a reasonable assumption, such as the one I laid out.
Mosque controversy =/= Beck, Limbaugh etc. As I recall it was some 9/11 families group that started this nonsense.
But those people latched on to the mosque controversy to further their bigger cause, which is to spread fear and hate of Islam. Their target audience is those who don't know any better, like Mr. Enright.

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:55 pm
Ifreann wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ifreann wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ifreann wrote:
Hardly. There are myriad reasons for the hate-filled to target Muslims, without any interference from Republican talking heads.
I'll rephrase my previous question. If this mosque controversy weren't going on at the moment, do you think Mr. Enright have slashed this man's throat? I don't think so. I'm not 100% or even 90% sure. But I can connect the dots and make a reasonable assumption, such as the one I laid out.
Mosque controversy =/= Beck, Limbaugh etc. As I recall it was some 9/11 families group that started this nonsense.
But those people latched on to the mosque controversy to further their bigger cause, which is to spread fear and hate of Islam. Their target audience is those who don't know any better, like Mr. Enright.
Which assumes he only acted because of the actions of the republican talking heads. There's no evidence of that. He could have come to whatever insane conclusions he came to about Muslims of his own accord.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Lackadaisical2 » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:55 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ashas Favor wrote:Ifreann wrote:
Hardly. There are myriad reasons for the hate-filled to target Muslims, without any interference from Republican talking heads.
Wow, I actually agree with Ifreann...
This is a horrible assumption with no backing whatsoever.
People are responsible for their own actions. Period.
Someone with mental defects is not responsible for his own actions.
But moreover, people are not only influenced by their own ideas. To argue that is stupid. The media has always had a huge influence on the masses.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by Ashas Favor » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:55 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ashas Favor wrote:Ifreann wrote:
Hardly. There are myriad reasons for the hate-filled to target Muslims, without any interference from Republican talking heads.
Wow, I actually agree with Ifreann...
This is a horrible assumption with no backing whatsoever.
People are responsible for their own actions. Period.
Someone with mental defects is not responsible for his own actions.
But moreover, people are not only influenced by their own ideas. To argue that is stupid. The media has always had a huge influence on the masses.

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:59 pm
Ashas Favor wrote:Eh...does not make his shortcomings the fault of two talking heads who make fools of themselves on TV each and every week.
Ashas Favor wrote:Stop blaming the media.
Ashas Favor wrote:Thats like saying violent video games cause violent crimes...its just not true.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Ifreann » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:01 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ifreann wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:But those people latched on to the mosque controversy to further their bigger cause, which is to spread fear and hate of Islam. Their target audience is those who don't know any better, like Mr. Enright.
Which assumes he only acted because of the actions of the republican talking heads. There's no evidence of that. He could have come to whatever insane conclusions he came to about Muslims of his own accord.
When did I say the boldfaced?

by Ashas Favor » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:03 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ashas Favor wrote:Eh...does not make his shortcomings the fault of two talking heads who make fools of themselves on TV each and every week.
If you actually read my posts, you'll notice I don't blame his actions on just two talking heads.Ashas Favor wrote:Stop blaming the media.
No thanks.Ashas Favor wrote:Thats like saying violent video games cause violent crimes...its just not true.
While I agree that violent video games don't lead to violent crime, I do believe they lead to a drop in the value of human life in the more impressionable players. Kind of like in this case...

by Ifreann » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:05 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ashas Favor wrote:Eh...does not make his shortcomings the fault of two talking heads who make fools of themselves on TV each and every week.
If you actually read my posts, you'll notice I don't blame his actions on just two talking heads.Ashas Favor wrote:Stop blaming the media.
No thanks.Ashas Favor wrote:Thats like saying violent video games cause violent crimes...its just not true.
While I agree that violent video games don't lead to violent crime, I do believe they lead to a drop in the value of human life in the more impressionable players. Kind of like in this case...

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:05 pm
Lackadaisical2 wrote:Where does it say this guy was a lemming, or insane, or retarded?
Lackadaisical2 wrote:Thats not in dispute, but until they actually start telling people to go attack Muslims I see ntohing wrong with their speech.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:05 pm
Ifreann wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ashas Favor wrote:Eh...does not make his shortcomings the fault of two talking heads who make fools of themselves on TV each and every week.
If you actually read my posts, you'll notice I don't blame his actions on just two talking heads.Ashas Favor wrote:Stop blaming the media.
No thanks.Ashas Favor wrote:Thats like saying violent video games cause violent crimes...its just not true.
While I agree that violent video games don't lead to violent crime, I do believe they lead to a drop in the value of human life in the more impressionable players. Kind of like in this case...
Ergo, murders can be linked to video games if we assume the perpetrator played violent video games. Just as we can assume that acts of violence can be linked to certain spheres of the media if we assume the perpetrator was in their audience.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:06 pm
Ashas Favor wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ashas Favor wrote:Eh...does not make his shortcomings the fault of two talking heads who make fools of themselves on TV each and every week.
If you actually read my posts, you'll notice I don't blame his actions on just two talking heads.Ashas Favor wrote:Stop blaming the media.
No thanks.Ashas Favor wrote:Thats like saying violent video games cause violent crimes...its just not true.
While I agree that violent video games don't lead to violent crime, I do believe they lead to a drop in the value of human life in the more impressionable players. Kind of like in this case...
Like another poster said...until I hear "the media" start telling people to start shooting or stabbing Muslims...long story short, I will continue to let you live in your world while I live in the real world. Your stance is ludicrous.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Ashas Favor » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:17 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ashas Favor wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ashas Favor wrote:Eh...does not make his shortcomings the fault of two talking heads who make fools of themselves on TV each and every week.
If you actually read my posts, you'll notice I don't blame his actions on just two talking heads.Ashas Favor wrote:Stop blaming the media.
No thanks.Ashas Favor wrote:Thats like saying violent video games cause violent crimes...its just not true.
While I agree that violent video games don't lead to violent crime, I do believe they lead to a drop in the value of human life in the more impressionable players. Kind of like in this case...
Like another poster said...until I hear "the media" start telling people to start shooting or stabbing Muslims...long story short, I will continue to let you live in your world while I live in the real world. Your stance is ludicrous.
Watch the clip I posted.

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:19 pm
Ashas Favor wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ashas Favor wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ashas Favor wrote:Eh...does not make his shortcomings the fault of two talking heads who make fools of themselves on TV each and every week.
If you actually read my posts, you'll notice I don't blame his actions on just two talking heads.Ashas Favor wrote:Stop blaming the media.
No thanks.Ashas Favor wrote:Thats like saying violent video games cause violent crimes...its just not true.
While I agree that violent video games don't lead to violent crime, I do believe they lead to a drop in the value of human life in the more impressionable players. Kind of like in this case...
Like another poster said...until I hear "the media" start telling people to start shooting or stabbing Muslims...long story short, I will continue to let you live in your world while I live in the real world. Your stance is ludicrous.
Watch the clip I posted.
I love watching Steven Colbert as much as most people do. I also understand that his show is satire. There are actually people who do not know Colbert is satire. I am not saying you are one of those people. Just be careful when you use someone known for satire to prove a point you believe is valid.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Vandengaarde » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:27 pm

by Gravlen » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:43 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:greed and death wrote:This is a horrendus crime however I am unwilling to lay this at Limbaugh and Beck's feet.
Michael Enright the suspect was a liberal arts student who had did volunteer work in Afghanistan.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crim ... _ward.html
He may in fact jsut be crazy, god knows New York has plenty of those.
And who encouraged him? Beck. Limbaugh. Those bigoted assholes. I think I'm right to blame them for this attack.

by Holy Paradise » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:47 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ifreann wrote:
Hardly. There are myriad reasons for the hate-filled to target Muslims, without any interference from Republican talking heads.
I'll rephrase my previous question. If this mosque controversy weren't going on at the moment, do you think Mr. Enright have slashed this man's throat? I don't think so. I'm not 100% or even 90% sure. But I can connect the dots and make a reasonable assumption, such as the one I laid out.

by Ashas Favor » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:47 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ashas Favor wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ashas Favor wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ashas Favor wrote:Eh...does not make his shortcomings the fault of two talking heads who make fools of themselves on TV each and every week.
If you actually read my posts, you'll notice I don't blame his actions on just two talking heads.Ashas Favor wrote:Stop blaming the media.
No thanks.Ashas Favor wrote:Thats like saying violent video games cause violent crimes...its just not true.
While I agree that violent video games don't lead to violent crime, I do believe they lead to a drop in the value of human life in the more impressionable players. Kind of like in this case...
Like another poster said...until I hear "the media" start telling people to start shooting or stabbing Muslims...long story short, I will continue to let you live in your world while I live in the real world. Your stance is ludicrous.
Watch the clip I posted.
I love watching Steven Colbert as much as most people do. I also understand that his show is satire. There are actually people who do not know Colbert is satire. I am not saying you are one of those people. Just be careful when you use someone known for satire to prove a point you believe is valid.
Since when was satire a less valid source of valid points?

by Ashas Favor » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:51 pm
Holy Paradise wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ifreann wrote:
Hardly. There are myriad reasons for the hate-filled to target Muslims, without any interference from Republican talking heads.
I'll rephrase my previous question. If this mosque controversy weren't going on at the moment, do you think Mr. Enright have slashed this man's throat? I don't think so. I'm not 100% or even 90% sure. But I can connect the dots and make a reasonable assumption, such as the one I laid out.
Indeed, that could a contributing factor, but we cannot play the what-if game here and say that he wouldn't do it if the mosque controversy did not exist.
And, as much as Beck and Limbaugh may say outrageous things, I have yet to hear them call for the stabbing of random Muslim Americans. To place the burden of guilt upon Beck and Limbaugh requires proof, and, from the article you have presented, all I can tell is that the suspect is a nutjob.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Forsher, Habsburg Mexico, Ifreann, Komarovo, Phage, Port Caverton, Rary, The Jamesian Republic, Umeria
Advertisement