The south should rise again. and I think Texas should secede. I've been waiting for a independ Texas all my life.
Advertisement

by Ceannairceach » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:42 am
Dododecapod wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Dododecapod wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Dododecapod wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Dododecapod wrote:The Kosovars won effective independence in the one and only way that historically matters: They and their allies (many of whom were only "enemies of my enemy", but ultimately their allies still) fought for it and won. All else is commentary.
Please explain how they "fought for it and won." I've seen the Serbian military, and their no pushovers in my opinion, and their smart at that!*
*Smart enough to confuse America, that is...
I'm not sure what you mean by confused, but it was primarily the US bombing Serbia that did it.
In other cicumstances, I suspect the US would not have been so quick to act. But given Serbia's aggresson towards SLovenia, Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina, assuming Serbia was the aggressor yet again was quite reasonable.
Ah, well thats a good example. If it was justified.
I'm looking up sources as I type. You see, America did bomb Serbia. Though, they didn't bomb anything important. The Serbs used fake tanks, bases, roads, artillery, etc. to allow the US to bomb things for weeks on end and not destroy a single thing.
Yet, Serbia withdrew from Kosovo. I really don't care if the military hit a damned thing; the ultimate goal of the exercise was accomplished. Actually, better this way - we get to use our toys, nobody much gets killed. Win/win.
True, they did technically "win", but the way you made it sound was as if Kosovo and America had completely destroyed Serbia in the war. When not only was Serbia right in the conflict (inho), but they could have sustained the war for far longer without many casualties.
Also, I found a source.
Nice source. I actually knew most of it.
Unfortunately, the writer's a moron. "All of which casts serious doubt on Nato's wartime propaganda." Well of COURSE the propaganda wasn't accurate! It's PROPAGANDA, not a history report!
I have to agree, the Serb forces played it good and smart; their maskirovka were meticulous and well executed. I think it was ultimately a political decision to withdraw; that, and the fact that however clever their military was, they didn't really have the capacity to strike back at the US forces. It's very difficult to win a war on the defensive.

by Tergnitz » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:46 am
Good man. If Kosovo can become independent, then Arizona or Texas can become independent in the next 20-30 years when the Mexican population is high enough. The only way to prevent this type of divisive thinking is to ensure that the historical territory of a country is never splintered without the consensus of that entire nation.
If Texas or Arizona fight a war and win, or get enough allies to come and "white knight" for them, then they deserve to be independent. It IS the gold standard for becoming an independent state.

by Dododecapod » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:59 am
Tergnitz wrote:
Good man. If Kosovo can become independent, then Arizona or Texas can become independent in the next 20-30 years when the Mexican population is high enough. The only way to prevent this type of divisive thinking is to ensure that the historical territory of a country is never splintered without the consensus of that entire nation.
If Texas or Arizona fight a war and win, or get enough allies to come and "white knight" for them, then they deserve to be independent. It IS the gold standard for becoming an independent state.
So you would be perfectly fine with your country being split apart, piece by piece? If Kosovo fought a war on its own and won against Serbia, then their claim to independence would hold at least some validity, but they didn't. The US, playing the role of the globe-striding imperialist (so frequently criticized by the left) intervened and forced Serbia to back down.

by Ceannairceach » Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:03 am
Dododecapod wrote:Tergnitz wrote:
Good man. If Kosovo can become independent, then Arizona or Texas can become independent in the next 20-30 years when the Mexican population is high enough. The only way to prevent this type of divisive thinking is to ensure that the historical territory of a country is never splintered without the consensus of that entire nation.
If Texas or Arizona fight a war and win, or get enough allies to come and "white knight" for them, then they deserve to be independent. It IS the gold standard for becoming an independent state.
So you would be perfectly fine with your country being split apart, piece by piece? If Kosovo fought a war on its own and won against Serbia, then their claim to independence would hold at least some validity, but they didn't. The US, playing the role of the globe-striding imperialist (so frequently criticized by the left) intervened and forced Serbia to back down.
Yup. Just like the Kingdom of France intervened when the 13 colonies rebelled against Great Britain back in 1776.
If a people, group, or geographical area have the will, the wherewithal and the guts to fight for their freedom as an independent state, and either the military force or the political and diplomatic acumen to pull it off, then they've earned the right to be independent. And I am not a hypocrite - if some part of the US ever manages the same trick, then let it stand.

by Dododecapod » Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:09 am
Ceannairceach wrote:Dododecapod wrote:Tergnitz wrote:
Good man. If Kosovo can become independent, then Arizona or Texas can become independent in the next 20-30 years when the Mexican population is high enough. The only way to prevent this type of divisive thinking is to ensure that the historical territory of a country is never splintered without the consensus of that entire nation.
If Texas or Arizona fight a war and win, or get enough allies to come and "white knight" for them, then they deserve to be independent. It IS the gold standard for becoming an independent state.
So you would be perfectly fine with your country being split apart, piece by piece? If Kosovo fought a war on its own and won against Serbia, then their claim to independence would hold at least some validity, but they didn't. The US, playing the role of the globe-striding imperialist (so frequently criticized by the left) intervened and forced Serbia to back down.
Yup. Just like the Kingdom of France intervened when the 13 colonies rebelled against Great Britain back in 1776.
If a people, group, or geographical area have the will, the wherewithal and the guts to fight for their freedom as an independent state, and either the military force or the political and diplomatic acumen to pull it off, then they've earned the right to be independent. And I am not a hypocrite - if some part of the US ever manages the same trick, then let it stand.
You make a good argument, but its thoughts like that which make me want to destroy the UN, EU, NATO, etc.
really, all Kosovo is is a state that owes NATO and primarily the USA their lives and freedom. A puppet in the Balkans, so to speak.

by Ceannairceach » Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:13 am
Dododecapod wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Dododecapod wrote:Tergnitz wrote:
Good man. If Kosovo can become independent, then Arizona or Texas can become independent in the next 20-30 years when the Mexican population is high enough. The only way to prevent this type of divisive thinking is to ensure that the historical territory of a country is never splintered without the consensus of that entire nation.
If Texas or Arizona fight a war and win, or get enough allies to come and "white knight" for them, then they deserve to be independent. It IS the gold standard for becoming an independent state.
So you would be perfectly fine with your country being split apart, piece by piece? If Kosovo fought a war on its own and won against Serbia, then their claim to independence would hold at least some validity, but they didn't. The US, playing the role of the globe-striding imperialist (so frequently criticized by the left) intervened and forced Serbia to back down.
Yup. Just like the Kingdom of France intervened when the 13 colonies rebelled against Great Britain back in 1776.
If a people, group, or geographical area have the will, the wherewithal and the guts to fight for their freedom as an independent state, and either the military force or the political and diplomatic acumen to pull it off, then they've earned the right to be independent. And I am not a hypocrite - if some part of the US ever manages the same trick, then let it stand.
You make a good argument, but its thoughts like that which make me want to destroy the UN, EU, NATO, etc.
really, all Kosovo is is a state that owes NATO and primarily the USA their lives and freedom. A puppet in the Balkans, so to speak.
For now. Change is the only constant in politics, though, and Kosovo wil have to live with the fact that Serbia is it's biggest and most important neighbour, while the US is across the Atlantic and has bigger fish to fry. Just as the US had to come to an accomodation with Great Britain in the end, Kosovo and Serbia will have to come to some form of arrangement - likely being Kosovo as an economic satellite of Serbia.

by Marcurix » Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:14 am

by Dododecapod » Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:17 am
Ceannairceach wrote:Dododecapod wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Dododecapod wrote:Tergnitz wrote:
Good man. If Kosovo can become independent, then Arizona or Texas can become independent in the next 20-30 years when the Mexican population is high enough. The only way to prevent this type of divisive thinking is to ensure that the historical territory of a country is never splintered without the consensus of that entire nation.
If Texas or Arizona fight a war and win, or get enough allies to come and "white knight" for them, then they deserve to be independent. It IS the gold standard for becoming an independent state.
So you would be perfectly fine with your country being split apart, piece by piece? If Kosovo fought a war on its own and won against Serbia, then their claim to independence would hold at least some validity, but they didn't. The US, playing the role of the globe-striding imperialist (so frequently criticized by the left) intervened and forced Serbia to back down.
Yup. Just like the Kingdom of France intervened when the 13 colonies rebelled against Great Britain back in 1776.
If a people, group, or geographical area have the will, the wherewithal and the guts to fight for their freedom as an independent state, and either the military force or the political and diplomatic acumen to pull it off, then they've earned the right to be independent. And I am not a hypocrite - if some part of the US ever manages the same trick, then let it stand.
You make a good argument, but its thoughts like that which make me want to destroy the UN, EU, NATO, etc.
really, all Kosovo is is a state that owes NATO and primarily the USA their lives and freedom. A puppet in the Balkans, so to speak.
For now. Change is the only constant in politics, though, and Kosovo wil have to live with the fact that Serbia is it's biggest and most important neighbour, while the US is across the Atlantic and has bigger fish to fry. Just as the US had to come to an accomodation with Great Britain in the end, Kosovo and Serbia will have to come to some form of arrangement - likely being Kosovo as an economic satellite of Serbia.
What I foresee is Kosovo getting a Canada treatment, with Serbia becoming the UK. Seems like a good guess. A thing I have a problem with is all the churches that will probably get destroyed by the Kosovoans if they get sanction as an independent nation. Thousands of years of beauty could be destroyed, and have been destroyed.

by Wisentia » Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:20 am

by Ceannairceach » Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:27 am
Wisentia wrote:
In fact, something like that did happen in the South. The year was 1845. The province in play was called Texas. And the Mexicans living there wanted to secede from Mexico. Are you saying that the United States had no business recognising the secession? Are you saying Texas had no sovereignty to join the USA? Because I'd love to present THAT thesis to Governor Perry.

by Lietvos » Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:44 am

by Ceannairceach » Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:48 am
Lietvos wrote:I really wish people wouldn't keep citing BS mantras like 'If a people want to secede, they have a right to it'. Idiocy. The entire idea of Sovereignty goes down the drain if this is a case. Also the comparison someone made to the British EMpire and India is again sheer crap if you gave it the slightest thought - there is no resemblance between British imperialism and the affair in Kosovo, which has been Serbian Land for a thousand years until large numbers of Muslim Albanians began squatting there under the ottomans. This comparison is then similar to these two cases 1) I come to your house, beat the crap out of you and your family and claim your house as my own - In this case you have a perfectly good reason to be annoyed 2) I have a house with plenty of space in which you being homeless rent a room - we get along merrily until one day you burst in the kitchen with some big tough friends from the US and Nato saying that that room is officially your property as you've been living there so long - see a problem?
P.S The second example is the Kosovo mockery by the way.
P.P.S Anyone else think it's amusing that the Albanians are probably the only US-backed muslims in history?

by Chumblywumbly » Wed Aug 25, 2010 2:01 am
Lietvos wrote:I really wish people wouldn't keep citing BS mantras like 'If a people want to secede, they have a right to it'. Idiocy. The entire idea of Sovereignty goes down the drain if this is a case.
Also the comparison someone made to the British EMpire and India is again sheer crap if you gave it the slightest thought...

by Lietvos » Wed Aug 25, 2010 2:24 am
Chumblywumbly wrote:And this is bad because...?
Ceannairceach wrote:I love you!
In the brotherly way, of course. And as to your PPS, isn't Turkey backed by the USA? Then theirs Kuwait, I believe...

by Militsia » Wed Aug 25, 2010 2:30 am

by Chumblywumbly » Wed Aug 25, 2010 2:44 am

by Angleter » Wed Aug 25, 2010 3:04 am

by Angleter » Wed Aug 25, 2010 3:08 am
P.P.S Anyone else think it's amusing that the Albanians are probably the only US-backed muslims in history?

by Cybach » Wed Aug 25, 2010 5:09 am
Click and Stand wrote:If the people living in the region want to secede, they should be able to do so. Blah blah blah, Self Determination, etc.

by Lackadaisical2 » Wed Aug 25, 2010 5:13 am
Cybach wrote:If Kosovo gets it's independence. Why exactly should the Republic Sprska also not be allowed to secede from Bosnia?
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by Forster Keys » Wed Aug 25, 2010 5:23 am

by Cybach » Wed Aug 25, 2010 5:33 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bigpipstan, Celestial Fortune, Comfed, Eahland, Ethel mermania, Fahran, Google [Bot], Heavenly Assault, Mechanocracy, Nilokeras, Orcuo, Scytharum, Shrillland, Tinhampton, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement