Advertisement

by Ceannairceach » Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:46 pm
Chumblywumbly wrote:
It makes sense in the same way that the US, India, etc., are no longer part of the British Empire.
The people of a territory - not the claimant(s) of a territory - get together, by various means, and determine for themselves whether they wish to be an independent territory.
Kalibarr wrote:If a majority want to secede then they can secede. A Majority wanted to secede.
/thread


by Scarsaw » Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:47 pm
Kalibarr wrote:If a majority want to secede then they can secede. A Majority wanted to secede.
/thread

by Scarsaw » Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:48 pm

by Chumblywumbly » Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:54 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:Chumblywumbly wrote:It makes sense in the same way that the US, India, etc., are no longer part of the British Empire.
The people of a territory - not the claimant(s) of a territory - get together, by various means, and determine for themselves whether they wish to be an independent territory.
So by this argument if millions of Mexicans(for example only, I do not hate Mexicans) in the south wanted to secede, that would be fine?

by Novistranaya » Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:04 pm
Yenke-Bin wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Mirkana wrote:I support Kosovo as an independent nation, due to right of self-determination.
I don't get this argument. Its Serbian land, with Serbian people occupying it. But, when ethnic Albanians want it, they can have it? Really, that doesn't make sense. To me, that looks like Albania attempting to decrease the power of Serbia and increase their influence in the Balkans and elsewhere.
What I imagine is that Albania will step in once Kosovo fails as an independent state, and over time they will annex it into Albania.

by Yenke-Bin » Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:07 pm
Novistranaya wrote:Yenke-Bin wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Mirkana wrote:I support Kosovo as an independent nation, due to right of self-determination.
I don't get this argument. Its Serbian land, with Serbian people occupying it. But, when ethnic Albanians want it, they can have it? Really, that doesn't make sense. To me, that looks like Albania attempting to decrease the power of Serbia and increase their influence in the Balkans and elsewhere.
What I imagine is that Albania will step in once Kosovo fails as an independent state, and over time they will annex it into Albania.
Not going to happen. The Albanian government promised that they wouldn't, and we can always trust the word of politicians no matter their nationality :nods:!

by Daistallia 2104 » Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:22 pm
Krsta wrote:This will be a major thread on Kosovo from now.
Krsta wrote:Don't open any new threads if not necessary (example: escalation of armed conflict between Serbia and Kosovo).
Krsta wrote:(Making fun of the thread, spamming, trolling and flooding will result in me requesting a temporary ban of the user from the forums from a moderator)

by Hornopolis » Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:57 pm
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Krsta wrote:This will be a major thread on Kosovo from now.
That isn't your decision to make. And this is not a likely topic to make it to megathread status.Krsta wrote:Don't open any new threads if not necessary (example: escalation of armed conflict between Serbia and Kosovo).
Other threads on the topic can and will be opened, as long as they fall under the rules. In fact, not opening a new thread at the appropriate time rather than reviving this after it dies the quick death it will most likely meet will would constitute a rules violation.Krsta wrote:(Making fun of the thread, spamming, trolling and flooding will result in me requesting a temporary ban of the user from the forums from a moderator)
You've been around long enough to know better than that, as well as the above BS you're trying to pull.

by Katganistan » Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:57 pm
Krsta wrote:This will be a major thread on Kosovo from now. Don't open any new threads if not necessary (example: escalation of armed conflict between Serbia and Kosovo).
Krsta wrote:(Making fun of the thread, spamming, trolling and flooding will result in me requesting a temporary ban of the user from the forums from a moderator)

by New Manvir » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:02 am

by Ceannairceach » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:04 am
New Manvir wrote:I say we reanimate Tito and let him whip the whole area back into shape.

by Dododecapod » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:06 am

by Ceannairceach » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:09 am
Dododecapod wrote:The Kosovars won effective independence in the one and only way that historically matters: They and their allies (many of whom were only "enemies of my enemy", but ultimately their allies still) fought for it and won. All else is commentary.

by Dododecapod » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:12 am
Ceannairceach wrote:Dododecapod wrote:The Kosovars won effective independence in the one and only way that historically matters: They and their allies (many of whom were only "enemies of my enemy", but ultimately their allies still) fought for it and won. All else is commentary.
Please explain how they "fought for it and won." I've seen the Serbian military, and their no pushovers in my opinion, and their smart at that!*
*Smart enough to confuse America, that is...

by Ceannairceach » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:22 am
Dododecapod wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Dododecapod wrote:The Kosovars won effective independence in the one and only way that historically matters: They and their allies (many of whom were only "enemies of my enemy", but ultimately their allies still) fought for it and won. All else is commentary.
Please explain how they "fought for it and won." I've seen the Serbian military, and their no pushovers in my opinion, and their smart at that!*
*Smart enough to confuse America, that is...
I'm not sure what you mean by confused, but it was primarily the US bombing Serbia that did it.
In other cicumstances, I suspect the US would not have been so quick to act. But given Serbia's aggresson towards SLovenia, Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina, assuming Serbia was the aggressor yet again was quite reasonable.

by Dododecapod » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:28 am
Ceannairceach wrote:Dododecapod wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Dododecapod wrote:The Kosovars won effective independence in the one and only way that historically matters: They and their allies (many of whom were only "enemies of my enemy", but ultimately their allies still) fought for it and won. All else is commentary.
Please explain how they "fought for it and won." I've seen the Serbian military, and their no pushovers in my opinion, and their smart at that!*
*Smart enough to confuse America, that is...
I'm not sure what you mean by confused, but it was primarily the US bombing Serbia that did it.
In other cicumstances, I suspect the US would not have been so quick to act. But given Serbia's aggresson towards SLovenia, Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina, assuming Serbia was the aggressor yet again was quite reasonable.
Ah, well thats a good example. If it was justified.
I'm looking up sources as I type. You see, America did bomb Serbia. Though, they didn't bomb anything important. The Serbs used fake tanks, bases, roads, artillery, etc. to allow the US to bomb things for weeks on end and not destroy a single thing.

by Ceannairceach » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:30 am
Dododecapod wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Dododecapod wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Dododecapod wrote:The Kosovars won effective independence in the one and only way that historically matters: They and their allies (many of whom were only "enemies of my enemy", but ultimately their allies still) fought for it and won. All else is commentary.
Please explain how they "fought for it and won." I've seen the Serbian military, and their no pushovers in my opinion, and their smart at that!*
*Smart enough to confuse America, that is...
I'm not sure what you mean by confused, but it was primarily the US bombing Serbia that did it.
In other cicumstances, I suspect the US would not have been so quick to act. But given Serbia's aggresson towards SLovenia, Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina, assuming Serbia was the aggressor yet again was quite reasonable.
Ah, well thats a good example. If it was justified.
I'm looking up sources as I type. You see, America did bomb Serbia. Though, they didn't bomb anything important. The Serbs used fake tanks, bases, roads, artillery, etc. to allow the US to bomb things for weeks on end and not destroy a single thing.
Yet, Serbia withdrew from Kosovo. I really don't care if the military hit a damned thing; the ultimate goal of the exercise was accomplished. Actually, better this way - we get to use our toys, nobody much gets killed. Win/win.

by Tergnitz » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:31 am

by Ceannairceach » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:32 am
Tergnitz wrote:Kosovo is Serbia; the sheer idea of an independent Kosovo is insulting.

by Tergnitz » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:33 am
Kalibarr wrote:If a majority want to secede then they can secede. A Majority wanted to secede.

by Dododecapod » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:38 am
Ceannairceach wrote:Dododecapod wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Dododecapod wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Dododecapod wrote:The Kosovars won effective independence in the one and only way that historically matters: They and their allies (many of whom were only "enemies of my enemy", but ultimately their allies still) fought for it and won. All else is commentary.
Please explain how they "fought for it and won." I've seen the Serbian military, and their no pushovers in my opinion, and their smart at that!*
*Smart enough to confuse America, that is...
I'm not sure what you mean by confused, but it was primarily the US bombing Serbia that did it.
In other cicumstances, I suspect the US would not have been so quick to act. But given Serbia's aggresson towards SLovenia, Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina, assuming Serbia was the aggressor yet again was quite reasonable.
Ah, well thats a good example. If it was justified.
I'm looking up sources as I type. You see, America did bomb Serbia. Though, they didn't bomb anything important. The Serbs used fake tanks, bases, roads, artillery, etc. to allow the US to bomb things for weeks on end and not destroy a single thing.
Yet, Serbia withdrew from Kosovo. I really don't care if the military hit a damned thing; the ultimate goal of the exercise was accomplished. Actually, better this way - we get to use our toys, nobody much gets killed. Win/win.
True, they did technically "win", but the way you made it sound was as if Kosovo and America had completely destroyed Serbia in the war. When not only was Serbia right in the conflict (inho), but they could have sustained the war for far longer without many casualties.
Also, I found a source.

by Dododecapod » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:41 am
Tergnitz wrote:Kalibarr wrote:If a majority want to secede then they can secede. A Majority wanted to secede.
Just like you let the Southern States secede?
Good man. If Kosovo can become independent, then Arizona or Texas can become independent in the next 20-30 years when the Mexican population is high enough. The only way to prevent this type of divisive thinking is to ensure that the historical territory of a country is never splintered without the consensus of that entire nation.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bigpipstan, Celestial Fortune, Comfed, Eahland, Ethel mermania, Fahran, Heavenly Assault, Mechanocracy, Nilokeras, Orcuo, Scytharum, Shrillland, Tinhampton, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement