I know right, how dare they have self-esteem and confidence and pride in their own identities?
I rather think you can keep your 'shame.'
Advertisement
by Sith Korriban » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:00 am
by Kovasckitz » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:01 am
Skirtingboard wrote:I will destroy the invaders. Through interperative dance.
by Great Nepal » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:03 am
Haiz wrote:
What does it matter? Maybe if groups werent so shameful and disorganized, we wouldnt be in this mess. Its not flaunching to uphold what you believe in. Its democracy.
by Rolling squid » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:04 am
Hammurab wrote:An athiest doesn't attend mass, go to confession, or know a lot about catholicism. So basically, an athiest is the same as a catholic.
Post-Unity Terra wrote:Golly gosh, one group of out-of-touch rich white guys is apparently more in touch with the average man than the other group of out-of-touch rich white guys.
by Skaladora » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:05 am
Great Nepal wrote:There is huge difference between free speech and advertising against a company just cos they support someone against you, in a private property. For example say I dont like your ideology (what ever it is), does free speech give me right to go to your workplace and shout to fire you from your workplace?
by Greed and Death » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:08 am
Skaladora wrote:Great Nepal wrote:There is huge difference between free speech and advertising against a company just cos they support someone against you, in a private property. For example say I dont like your ideology (what ever it is), does free speech give me right to go to your workplace and shout to fire you from your workplace?
Actually, it's not illegal to do that, just rude. You have to leave when they show you the door, though.
As I said before, I think the way they went around doing this wasn't very well planned, or very tasteful, but it wasn't illegal, since they left when the manager told them to get out.
by Rolling squid » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:10 am
greed and death wrote:Skaladora wrote:Great Nepal wrote:There is huge difference between free speech and advertising against a company just cos they support someone against you, in a private property. For example say I dont like your ideology (what ever it is), does free speech give me right to go to your workplace and shout to fire you from your workplace?
Actually, it's not illegal to do that, just rude. You have to leave when they show you the door, though.
As I said before, I think the way they went around doing this wasn't very well planned, or very tasteful, but it wasn't illegal, since they left when the manager told them to get out.
maybe some local profanity laws.
Hammurab wrote:An athiest doesn't attend mass, go to confession, or know a lot about catholicism. So basically, an athiest is the same as a catholic.
Post-Unity Terra wrote:Golly gosh, one group of out-of-touch rich white guys is apparently more in touch with the average man than the other group of out-of-touch rich white guys.
by Great Nepal » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:10 am
Skaladora wrote:Great Nepal wrote:There is huge difference between free speech and advertising against a company just cos they support someone against you, in a private property. For example say I dont like your ideology (what ever it is), does free speech give me right to go to your workplace and shout to fire you from your workplace?
Actually, it's not illegal to do that, just rude. You have to leave when they show you the door, though.
As I said before, I think the way they went around doing this wasn't very well planned, or very tasteful, but it wasn't illegal, since they left when the manager told them to get out.
by Unhealthy2 » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:12 am
by Wamitoria » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:13 am
by Greed and Death » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:16 am
by Skaladora » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:18 am
Great Nepal wrote:Not every law needs to be written in national law, there are some rules which are social constructs and are unwritten.
For example, there is no rule in NS, saying you cant have 100,000,000 quad trillion man army when your population is 100 million. But you cant have it.
by Wamitoria » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:19 am
greed and death wrote:
at 39 seconds the word shit is used.
Again at 57 seconds.
Local law calls for a 10,000 dollar per usage fine that can be donated to the political campaign of the plaintiffs choosing (when on private property).
by Sith Korriban » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:19 am
Great Nepal wrote:Skaladora wrote:Great Nepal wrote:There is huge difference between free speech and advertising against a company just cos they support someone against you, in a private property. For example say I dont like your ideology (what ever it is), does free speech give me right to go to your workplace and shout to fire you from your workplace?
Actually, it's not illegal to do that, just rude. You have to leave when they show you the door, though.
As I said before, I think the way they went around doing this wasn't very well planned, or very tasteful, but it wasn't illegal, since they left when the manager told them to get out.
Not every law needs to be written in national law, there are some rules which are social constructs and are unwritten.
For example, there is no rule in NS, saying you cant have 100,000,000 quad trillion man army when your population is 100 million. But you cant have it.
by Skaladora » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:19 am
greed and death wrote:
at 39 seconds the word shit is used.
Again at 57 seconds.
Local law calls for a 10,000 dollar per usage fine that can be donated to the political campaign of the plaintiffs choosing (when on private property).
by Vandengaarde » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:20 am
by Gun Manufacturers » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:21 am
Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...
Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo
Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.
Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.
by Greed and Death » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:21 am
by Political Pilgrims » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:22 am
by Greed and Death » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:24 am
Skaladora wrote:greed and death wrote:
at 39 seconds the word shit is used.
Again at 57 seconds.
Local law calls for a 10,000 dollar per usage fine that can be donated to the political campaign of the plaintiffs choosing (when on private property).
Shit is profanity now? And worthy of ten grand fines?
Jeebus. Don't ever come visit Québec.
by Wamitoria » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:25 am
Political Pilgrims wrote:"Target suports hate and discrimination"
...
"Target is full of shit"
I think that all these homosexuals should stop spreading their message of hate against us heterosexuals1. I mean, all we want to do is go on living our lives in peace without the oppressive LGBT hounding our every step!2
Anyway, sure, Target, a private company, has funded an anti-homosexual candidate. So if you're gay or lesbian, stop shopping there3. Why did they feel obligated to attack Target in this manner? I think I would personally find it less pigheaded if they had protested outside of the Target. Inside a private building, and with violent cutting remarks that do not logically support that didn't help support their position, is inappropriate4. The manager of that store would have been completely justified in removing them from the store5.
by Vandengaarde » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:25 am
Skaladora wrote:greed and death wrote:
at 39 seconds the word shit is used.
Again at 57 seconds.
Local law calls for a 10,000 dollar per usage fine that can be donated to the political campaign of the plaintiffs choosing (when on private property).
Shit is profanity now? And worthy of ten grand fines?
Jeebus. Don't ever come visit Québec.
by Unhealthy2 » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:26 am
Vandengaarde wrote:I realize it isn't profanity in a lot of places outside the U.S., but American English is quite odd in that way, where different words are on different levels of being rude than in other languages.
by Soheran » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:27 am
Vandengaarde wrote:I've seen some people here saying that the republican candidate for governor of Minnesota would stop Minnesotan gays from marrying, but there aren't many gays here and a lot of the population in the capital and Minneapolis is homophobic. There are annual nazi rallies there and not really any gay pride things. We've had a Republican governor for 8 years now, which just shows people here are ambivalent towards gay rights.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Bienenhalde, Eahland, Ethel mermania, Europa Undivided, Greater Cesnica, Minoa, Nu Elysium, Outer Bratorke, Terra Magnifica Gloria, Tesseris, The Matthew Islands, USHALLNOTPASS
Advertisement