I am not saying that he is not a Christian, he converted as an adult.
Advertisement

by Militsia » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:11 pm

by Tellend » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:11 pm
Altamirus wrote:Tellend wrote:Wa no Kuni wrote:
1. Wikipedia is not a source.
2. The 1,000 membership was from 2001, has definitly grown since then.
3. What about the hundreds of other islamic terrorist groups? Al-Qaeda is not the only one.![]()
Your numbers are way off.
1. I disagree about wikipedia, but several thousand is definitely the high end (http://www.harpers.org/archive/2006/07/sb-al-qaeda-new-members-badly-needed-1151963690 This is the source for Wikipedia. I'm using that.) I'll stick to wikipedia for the rest.
2. Alright, 100,000 members (No way is it, and those other groups combined that big). that leaves 0.00006%. no wait, 1 million. 0.0006% Still way less than the Nazi percentage (0.8%). I'm pretty sure you couldn't fill Philly with Al-Qaeda.
My numbers are all way off, but they are off in favor of the people who think Muslim=Al-Qaeda, but still come out the other way by a large margin. The exact numbers aren't so much the point as the general idea that Al-Qaeda is smaller compared to muslims than Nazis to Christians in the 1940's. If I really cared enough, I would find the absolute exact numbers, and they would still support my point. My math is probably off too, you should check it.
Yeah but I bet there were allot more Christians killing Nazi's in WWII than there is Muslims killing Al Qaeda terrorists. Also Heil Hitler and the calling him de fuhrer(Lord) goes against a basic tenet of Christianity.

by Juristonia » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:13 pm
Liriena wrote:Say what you will about fascists: they are remarkably consistent even after several decades of failing spectacularly elsewhere.
Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.
Cannot think of a name wrote:Anyway, I'm from gold country, we grow up knowing that when people jump up and down shouting "GOLD GOLD GOLD" the gold is gone and the only money to be made is in selling shovels.
And it seems to me that cryptocurrency and NFTs and such suddenly have a whooooole lot of shovel salespeople.

by Pandarchy » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:13 pm
Altamirus wrote:Ifreann wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-10973459Obama defends right to build mosque near 9/11 site
US President Barack Obama has staunchly defended controversial plans to build a mosque near Ground Zero in New York.
Opponents have protested against the construction of an Islamic cultural centre and mosque several hundred feet away from the site of the Twin Towers.
Mr Obama acknowledged "sensitivities" surround the 9/11 site, but said Muslims have the same right to practise their religion "as anyone else".
"Our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakeable," Mr Obama said.Since a New York developer announced plans to build a 13-storey Islamic community centre and mosque about two blocks from the former World Trade Center site, prominent Republican politicians and a host of conservative pundits have attacked the project.
Some relatives of people killed in the terror attacks on the World Trade Center in 2001 are also opposed to the plan.
'Stab in the heart'
In a speech at a White House dinner celebrating Ramadan, the Muslim holy month, Mr Obama waded into the row, saying:
"We must all recognise and respect the sensitivities surrounding the development of lower Manhattan, Ground Zero is, indeed, hallowed ground. But let me be clear, as a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practise their religion as anyone else in this country.
The proposed mosque site in New York The site of the proposed mosque is about two blocks from the former World Trade Center
"That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community centre on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances. This is America, and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakeable. The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country, and will not be treated differently by their government, is essential to who we are."
He told the group of US Congressmen, government officials and foreign dignitaries that America's tradition of religious tolerance distinguishes it from "our enemies".
"Al-Qaeda's cause is not Islam," he said, "it is a gross distortion of Islam".
Until now Mr Obama had not commented on the mosque row, with the White House saying that the matter was a local issue.
In voicing his support for the right to build the centre, Mr Obama joins New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who had been the only prominent politician to endorse it.
Opponents of the building project have called for investigations into its backers and financing. In New York, opponents sought unsuccessfully to have the building currently at the mosque site granted landmark protection status, in an effort to hinder development.
Former US House of Representatives speaker Newt Gingrich dubbed the plan an "assertion of Islamist triumphalism" and has denounced it in speeches.
Former Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin wrote that "to build a mosque at Ground Zero is a stab in the heart of the families of the innocent victims of those horrific attacks".
Proving at last that he is a Kenyan Muslim, Obama publicly disagreed with Republicans and right wing talking-heads while at dinner with his comrade Muslims.
But seriously, was it wise for Obama to weigh in on this? Personally I think that if the White House had kept its mouth shut for too much longer it would start to get questionable. Clearly this story has worked up national attention. Whether this will help or hurt Obama is obviously hard to say. So naturally NSG already knows.
I read somewhere that the people wanting to build the Mosque don't own the property they want to build it on.

by Amigard » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:15 pm

by Militsia » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:18 pm

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:20 pm
Militsia wrote:
You should read Obamas book, where he disclosed everything that could be used against him in the campain.
http://www.amazon.com/Dreams-My-Father- ... 1400082773
The paper back is just 10$ or find it at the library.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Ashmoria » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:23 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Militsia wrote:
You should read Obamas book, where he disclosed everything that could be used against him in the campain.
http://www.amazon.com/Dreams-My-Father- ... 1400082773
The paper back is just 10$ or find it at the library.
I have read it, for one, and you'd have to be new to the English language to think that he says he was raised Muslim.
For some time he went to a Muslim school in Indonesia (where secularism probably isn't in their dictionary). Only that and nothing more.
Even so, who cares?

by Amigard » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:23 pm

by Militsia » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:32 pm
Amigard wrote:Even if President Obama was a Muslim I didn't realize there was a section in the Constitution that holds the nations highest office of the US in reserve for Christians only.

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:32 pm
Ashmoria wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:Militsia wrote:
You should read Obamas book, where he disclosed everything that could be used against him in the campain.
http://www.amazon.com/Dreams-My-Father- ... 1400082773
The paper back is just 10$ or find it at the library.
I have read it, for one, and you'd have to be new to the English language to think that he says he was raised Muslim.
For some time he went to a Muslim school in Indonesia (where secularism probably isn't in their dictionary). Only that and nothing more.
Even so, who cares?
i didnt read the book .... his step father wasnt muslim?
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Juristonia » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:32 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Militsia wrote:
You should read Obamas book, where he disclosed everything that could be used against him in the campain.
http://www.amazon.com/Dreams-My-Father- ... 1400082773
The paper back is just 10$ or find it at the library.
I have read it, for one, and you'd have to be new to the English language to think that he says he was raised Muslim.
For some time he went to a Muslim school in Indonesia (where secularism probably isn't in their dictionary). Only that and nothing more.
Even so, who cares?
Liriena wrote:Say what you will about fascists: they are remarkably consistent even after several decades of failing spectacularly elsewhere.
Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.
Cannot think of a name wrote:Anyway, I'm from gold country, we grow up knowing that when people jump up and down shouting "GOLD GOLD GOLD" the gold is gone and the only money to be made is in selling shovels.
And it seems to me that cryptocurrency and NFTs and such suddenly have a whooooole lot of shovel salespeople.

by Enadail » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:34 pm
Amigard wrote:Even if President Obama was a Muslim I didn't realize there was a section in the Constitution that holds the nations highest office of the US in reserve for Christians only.

by Militsia » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:38 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ashmoria wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:Militsia wrote:
You should read Obamas book, where he disclosed everything that could be used against him in the campain.
http://www.amazon.com/Dreams-My-Father- ... 1400082773
The paper back is just 10$ or find it at the library.
I have read it, for one, and you'd have to be new to the English language to think that he says he was raised Muslim.
For some time he went to a Muslim school in Indonesia (where secularism probably isn't in their dictionary). Only that and nothing more.
Even so, who cares?
i didnt read the book .... his step father wasnt muslim?
He was. I don't see the importance of this, though.

by Juristonia » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:40 pm
Militsia wrote:It is not important, but it would have been weird if he had gone out against the City of New York and his childhood faith. I seriously do not understand why the president would need to have a stated opinion on a basic city planning issue.
Liriena wrote:Say what you will about fascists: they are remarkably consistent even after several decades of failing spectacularly elsewhere.
Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.
Cannot think of a name wrote:Anyway, I'm from gold country, we grow up knowing that when people jump up and down shouting "GOLD GOLD GOLD" the gold is gone and the only money to be made is in selling shovels.
And it seems to me that cryptocurrency and NFTs and such suddenly have a whooooole lot of shovel salespeople.

by Amigard » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:41 pm
Militsia wrote:Amigard wrote:Even if President Obama was a Muslim I didn't realize there was a section in the Constitution that holds the nations highest office of the US in reserve for Christians only.
There isn't, but I doubt a devote muslim would get though the primaries and atleast not the general election.

by Sondstead » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:42 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:
For some time he went to a Muslim school in Indonesia (where secularism probably isn't in their dictionary).
Fartsniffage wrote:Poor analogy. A better one would be a high school american football team approaching a couple of kids quietly reading/writing during lunch hour, telling them to play with them and then stamping on their books/notepads if they refuse.
All with the teacher watching on from the sidelines nodding in approval.

by Tekania » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:43 pm
Militsia wrote:It is not important, but it would have been weird if he had gone out against the City of New York and his childhood faith. I seriously do not understand why the president would need to have a stated opinion on a basic city planning issue.

by Faith Hope Charity » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:44 pm

by Militsia » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:46 pm
Juristonia wrote:Militsia wrote:It is not important, but it would have been weird if he had gone out against the City of New York and his childhood faith. I seriously do not understand why the president would need to have a stated opinion on a basic city planning issue.
Yet again assuming that was his childhood faith.
What would've been weird was if he had gone against the constitution and US law.

by Ashmoria » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:51 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Ashmoria wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:Militsia wrote:
You should read Obamas book, where he disclosed everything that could be used against him in the campain.
http://www.amazon.com/Dreams-My-Father- ... 1400082773
The paper back is just 10$ or find it at the library.
I have read it, for one, and you'd have to be new to the English language to think that he says he was raised Muslim.
For some time he went to a Muslim school in Indonesia (where secularism probably isn't in their dictionary). Only that and nothing more.
Even so, who cares?
i didnt read the book .... his step father wasnt muslim?
He was. I don't see the importance of this, though.

by Wamitoria » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:51 pm
Canadai wrote:Militsia wrote:Juristonia wrote:Militsia wrote:It is not important, but it would have been weird if he had gone out against the City of New York and his childhood faith. I seriously do not understand why the president would need to have a stated opinion on a basic city planning issue.
Yet again assuming that was his childhood faith.
What would've been weird was if he had gone against the constitution and US law.
It is my opinion that the federal government should not interfere when the city of New York decides where to build Mosques. It equvalent of having the president give his opinion on a Walmart construction project.
I agree. Obama should veto all Walmarts.

by Tekania » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:54 pm
Faith Hope Charity wrote:1st amendment DOES guarantee freedom of religion, yes, but it DOESNT guarantee WHERE you can build your place of worship.. if it did, you wouldnt have zoning laws saying where churches, etc can and cant be built...
Faith Hope Charity wrote: the ground zero mosque
Faith Hope Charity wrote: is nothing more then a taunt to us
Faith Hope Charity wrote: and a triumph of radical islam over NYC...
Faith Hope Charity wrote: i thought it would take longer then it did, but often reality is stranger than fiction.

by Enadail » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:54 pm
Faith Hope Charity wrote:1st amendment DOES guarantee freedom of religion, yes, but it DOESNT guarantee WHERE you can build your place of worship.. if it did, you wouldnt have zoning laws saying where churches, etc can and cant be built... the ground zero mosque is nothing more then a taunt to us and a triumph of radical islam over NYC... i thought it would take longer then it did, but often reality is stranger than fiction.
Militsia wrote:Juristonia wrote:Militsia wrote:It is not important, but it would have been weird if he had gone out against the City of New York and his childhood faith. I seriously do not understand why the president would need to have a stated opinion on a basic city planning issue.
Yet again assuming that was his childhood faith.
What would've been weird was if he had gone against the constitution and US law.
It is my opinion that the federal government should not interfere when the city of New York decides where to build Mosques. It equvalent of having the president give his opinion on a Walmart construction project.

by Faith Hope Charity » Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:00 pm
Tekania wrote:Faith Hope Charity wrote:1st amendment DOES guarantee freedom of religion, yes, but it DOESNT guarantee WHERE you can build your place of worship.. if it did, you wouldnt have zoning laws saying where churches, etc can and cant be built...
We're past that stage. They've met all the zoning and landmark concerns, and have had approval from the applicable city offices.Faith Hope Charity wrote: the ground zero mosque
It's not "the ground zero moque", it's Park51, a community center and Muslim prayer center over on Park Ave 2 blocks away from "Ground Zero" and in fact not even visible from it.Faith Hope Charity wrote: is nothing more then a taunt to us
Who is the "us"? It certainly isn't Americans, Christians, New Yorkers, 9/11 Survivors nor Victims Family members.... as all of those applicable groups have supporters of this center in them. Not really sure who this "us" could be.Faith Hope Charity wrote: and a triumph of radical islam over NYC...
Those buidling it aren't "Radicals"... And many of them involved are and have been New Yorkers.Faith Hope Charity wrote: i thought it would take longer then it did, but often reality is stranger than fiction.
That is only because reality is this is a country built towards freedom and liberty and that is what it strives towards.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fartsniffage, Galactic Powers, Galloism, Grinning Dragon, Ifreann, Lativs, Ostroeuropa, Raskana, The Archregimancy, The Snazzylands, Tinhampton
Advertisement