NATION

PASSWORD

"Ground Zero" mosque approved, Obama supports

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Coccygia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7521
Founded: Nov 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Coccygia » Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:42 pm

There are a number of Muslims who think that putting a mosque there is wrong, including a Sufi. Just as the Vatican doesn't "get it" about pedophile priests, unfortunately, a lot of Muslims don't "get it" about 9/11. Apparently neither do quite a few non-Muslims, such as Obama - who typically is waffling all over the place on the issue and trying to have it both ways. (At least stick to your guns, willya?) The people behind the mosque, I'm sure, have good intentions, or believe that they do - as did the Catholic Church when it built a convent at Auschwitz where the nuns would pray for the conversion of the Jews, or the Mormons when they started retroactively baptizing Jewish Holocaust victims as part of their "Baptism of the Dead" program. It's not Muslims or Islam I object to. It's religious triumphalism. And this particular example is going to piss a LOT of people off. Starting with me (even though I'm already pretty bored with the issue).
"Nobody deserves anything. You get what you get." - House
"Hope is for sissies." - House
“Qokedy qokedy dal qokedy qokedy." - The Voynich Manuscript
"We're not ordinary people - we're morons!" - Jerome Horwitz
"A book, any book, is a sacred object." - Jorge Luis Borges
"I am a survivor. I am like a cockroach, you just can't get rid of me." - Madonna

User avatar
North Suran
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9974
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby North Suran » Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:47 pm

Coccygia wrote:There are a number of Muslims who think that putting a mosque there is wrong, including a Sufi.

And I could cart out quite a number of Russians who'd claim that life was better under Stalin. What's your point?

Coccygia wrote:Just as the Vatican doesn't "get it" about pedophile priests, unfortunately, a lot of Muslims don't "get it" about 9/11.

The difference being that the "paedophile priest" scandal was institutionalised corruption that reflected on the executive branch of the Roman Catholic Church as a whole, whereas 9/11 was committed by a handful of random extremists. Oh, and that the Muslims involved had nothing to do with 9/11.

Coccygia wrote:-snip unrelated-

So yeah.

Coccygia wrote:It's not Muslims or Islam I object to. It's religious triumphalism. And this particular example is going to piss a LOT of people off.

How is this "religious triumphalism"? Should they hold their community centre in a cardboard box?
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.


User avatar
Unchecked Expansion
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5599
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unchecked Expansion » Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:49 pm

Coccygia wrote:There are a number of Muslims who think that putting a mosque there is wrong, including a Sufi. Just as the Vatican doesn't "get it" about pedophile priests, unfortunately, a lot of Muslims don't "get it" about 9/11. Apparently neither do quite a few non-Muslims, such as Obama - who typically is waffling all over the place on the issue and trying to have it both ways. (At least stick to your guns, willya?) The people behind the mosque, I'm sure, have good intentions, or believe that they do - as did the Catholic Church when it built a convent at Auschwitz where the nuns would pray for the conversion of the Jews, or the Mormons when they started retroactively baptizing Jewish Holocaust victims as part of their "Baptism of the Dead" program. It's not Muslims or Islam I object to. It's religious triumphalism. And this particular example is going to piss a LOT of people off. Starting with me (even though I'm already pretty bored with the issue).


These are Muslims who have already been praying there, live or work in the area and were quite probably familiar with people who worked in the Trade Centre. This isn't some outsiders planting a flag like it's Iwo Jima, it's local New Yorkers building a community centre for people of their faith and of the local community

User avatar
Helertia
Minister
 
Posts: 3270
Founded: Nov 28, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Helertia » Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:50 pm

Coccygia wrote:There are a number of Muslims who think that putting a mosque there is wrong, including a Sufi. Just as the Vatican doesn't "get it" about pedophile priests, unfortunately, a lot of Muslims don't "get it" about 9/11. Apparently neither do quite a few non-Muslims, such as Obama - who typically is waffling all over the place on the issue and trying to have it both ways. (At least stick to your guns, willya?) The people behind the mosque, I'm sure, have good intentions, or believe that they do - as did the Catholic Church when it built a convent at Auschwitz where the nuns would pray for the conversion of the Jews, or the Mormons when they started retroactively baptizing Jewish Holocaust victims as part of their "Baptism of the Dead" program. It's not Muslims or Islam I object to. It's religious triumphalism. And this particular example is going to piss a LOT of people off. Starting with me (even though I'm already pretty bored with the issue).


Not really sure how this is religious triumphalism, seeing as A: It isn't a Mosque and B: It was planned before 9/11
Do hypocrites hate hypocrisy?

User avatar
Ovelebertane
Attaché
 
Posts: 85
Founded: Aug 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovelebertane » Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:53 pm

Sailsia wrote:So, is there anyone on right now who OPPOSES it? I'm looking for a debate, but it seems that most everybody agrees this is a victory for the religious freedom.


I for one see it as a victory. A victory for muslim radicals.
Reigning King: Richard Krushian(Richard I)
Queen(partial reign): Isabella Krushian (of the House of Hobspeil)
Heir Apparent/High Prince: Richard Krushian Jr.(Richard II) Prince of Dashia
2nd Prince: Robert Krushian, Prince of Geilsi
Youngest Child/Low Princess: Isabella Krushian, Princess of Yoktion
The House of Krushian has ruled since the Kingdom's creation in A.D. 1006.

Capital City: Oveleis
Government Type: Absolute Monarchy with Constitution
Noble Houses:
High
Minister of the Majority :Charles Spielbug, Duke of Wassen
Minister of Minority: Roger Clems, Duke of Pais
Low
Minister of the Majority: Mary Hobspeil, Countess of Gelotta Village
Minister of the Minority: Henry Botts, Baron of Rockwell Estate
Year: 1463

User avatar
Helertia
Minister
 
Posts: 3270
Founded: Nov 28, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Helertia » Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:55 pm

Ovelebertane wrote:
Sailsia wrote:So, is there anyone on right now who OPPOSES it? I'm looking for a debate, but it seems that most everybody agrees this is a victory for the religious freedom.


I for one see it as a victory. A victory for muslim radicals.


Which it isn't being built by. NEXT.
Do hypocrites hate hypocrisy?

User avatar
Unchecked Expansion
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5599
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unchecked Expansion » Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:56 pm

Ovelebertane wrote:
Sailsia wrote:So, is there anyone on right now who OPPOSES it? I'm looking for a debate, but it seems that most everybody agrees this is a victory for the religious freedom.


I for one see it as a victory. A victory for muslim radicals.


Just like the death of George Tiller was a victory for moderate Christians

User avatar
UnitedStatesOfAmerica-
Minister
 
Posts: 3138
Founded: Nov 25, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby UnitedStatesOfAmerica- » Wed Aug 18, 2010 4:01 pm

As much as we might find this distasteful, the US Constitution gives them every right to build the mosque there.
Land of Free Beer and the Home of the Kentucky Fried Chicken

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21669
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Wed Aug 18, 2010 4:03 pm

Coccygia wrote:There are a number of Muslims who think that putting a mosque there is wrong, including a Sufi. Just as the Vatican doesn't "get it" about pedophile priests, unfortunately, a lot of Muslims don't "get it" about 9/11. Apparently neither do quite a few non-Muslims, such as Obama - who typically is waffling all over the place on the issue and trying to have it both ways. (At least stick to your guns, willya?) The people behind the mosque, I'm sure, have good intentions, or believe that they do - as did the Catholic Church when it built a convent at Auschwitz where the nuns would pray for the conversion of the Jews, or the Mormons when they started retroactively baptizing Jewish Holocaust victims as part of their "Baptism of the Dead" program. It's not Muslims or Islam I object to. It's religious triumphalism. And this particular example is going to piss a LOT of people off. Starting with me (even though I'm already pretty bored with the issue).


It's not a "Mosque" it's a Community Center, to put an even worse hitch in it for you, the present building is already being used for Muslim prayer services. And there are ACTUAL Mosques in NYC close to Ground Zero , ones which predate the 9/11 attacks. Masjid Manhattan for example is a mere 4 blocks north, and has been there since 1970. (The horror... we need to run them out!).

A General Community Center which additionally houses a Muslim prayer facility is not the same thing as building a nunnery next door to Auschwitz so nuns can pray for Jewish conversion... no matter how much acid you drop.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
UnitedStatesOfAmerica-
Minister
 
Posts: 3138
Founded: Nov 25, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby UnitedStatesOfAmerica- » Wed Aug 18, 2010 4:09 pm

Interesting. Mosque or community center. The name does not matter. It is how it used that matters. If it is intended as a holy site, the government cannot ban it.
I find it interesting that the same people who are whining about the building of a Muslim prayer building have no problems strip clubs right next to ground zero and teen girls going there to prostitute themselves. Nor do they seem to have any problems with people being mugged there.
Land of Free Beer and the Home of the Kentucky Fried Chicken

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:30 pm

Gift-of-god wrote:
Augarundus wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Didn't I already ask you for a load of sources on this kind of thing? I don't remember you getting back to me on that....


Imam is a radical.

He's friends with this guy.

And the Audacity of Hope sets sail in September.


Your "evidence" that he is a radical seems to rest on the fact that he had an office next to an organisation that the FBI believes is associated with Hamas.

The person sitting beside me is Cree. Is that evidence that I am a Canadian aboriginal?

Yes
It's just really, really crappy evidence...
;)
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:34 pm

Hegstoria wrote:
Inertina wrote:
Miklesia wrote:Fine? Those are hideous rectangular slabs of concrete!


This above quote is the perfect description of New York City.

The above post is from someone who has never actually been to New York city.

amidoinitrite?

I've been to NYC numerous times. It's full of hideous rectangular slabs of concrete.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:39 pm

Katganistan wrote:The Marist Poll showing what the residents of Manhattan, who really are the only ones involved, think of the mosque:

Manhattan: favors Park51: 53%, Opposes: 31% Undecided: 16% MoE +/-4%

Well, let's see...
The Margin of Error is 4%, so that makes the support %age: 49%, and obviously that 4% instead belongs with the oppose, so that makes the opposed %age 35%. Also, everyone knows the undecideds are actually opposed and just didn't want to say so...

Manhattan: favors Park51: 49%, Opposes: 51% Undecided: 0% MoE +/-0%[/quote]
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Unchecked Expansion
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5599
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unchecked Expansion » Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:40 pm

Dyakovo wrote:
Hegstoria wrote:
Inertina wrote:
Miklesia wrote:Fine? Those are hideous rectangular slabs of concrete!


This above quote is the perfect description of New York City.

The above post is from someone who has never actually been to New York city.

amidoinitrite?

I've been to NYC numerous times. It's full of hideous rectangular slabs of concrete.

I've yet to see a modern city that isn't to some degree

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:41 pm

Unchecked Expansion wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:
Hegstoria wrote:
Inertina wrote:
Miklesia wrote:Fine? Those are hideous rectangular slabs of concrete!


This above quote is the perfect description of New York City.

The above post is from someone who has never actually been to New York city.

amidoinitrite?

I've been to NYC numerous times. It's full of hideous rectangular slabs of concrete.

I've yet to see a modern city that isn't to some degree

True.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Whole Conviction
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1935
Founded: Aug 10, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Whole Conviction » Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:43 pm

A fact check article from AP: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100818/ap_ ... fact_check


No one has established a link between the cleric and radicals. New York Police Department spokesman Paul Browne said: "We've identified no law enforcement issues related to the proposed mosque."

Ros-Lehtinen and King were referring to the State Department's plan, predating the mosque debate, to send Rauf on another religious outreach trip to the Middle East as part of his "long-term relationship" with U.S. officials in the Bush and Obama administrations. The State Department said Wednesday it will pay him $3,000 for a trip costing the government $16,000.

Rauf counts former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright from the Clinton administration as a friend and appeared at events overseas or meetings in Washington with former President George W. Bush's secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, and Bush adviser Karen Hughes.

He has denounced the terrorist attacks and suicide bombing as anti-Islamic and has criticized Muslim nationalism. But he's made provocative statements about America, too, calling it an "accessory" to the 9/11 attacks and attributing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children to the U.S.-led sanctions in the years before the invasion.

Those 'provocative' statements, and everything else he's ever said, have been echoed from inside the US by people on the left and the right (including Glenn Beck and, I believe, Ron Paul). They just stick to him more because he's a Muslim, I guess. Well, part of his job is to help create interfaith understanding. You don't do that by being a loyal agent of one side. You have to see both sides, and that necessarily involves seeing flaws and benefits of both.
I got told to get a blog. So I did.

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:41 pm

UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:Interesting. Mosque or community center. The name does not matter. It is how it used that matters. If it is intended as a holy site, the government cannot ban it.
I find it interesting that the same people who are whining about the building of a Muslim prayer building have no problems strip clubs right next to ground zero and teen girls going there to prostitute themselves. Nor do they seem to have any problems with people being mugged there.


Strippers and prostitutes aren't known for holy wars and blowing themselves up.
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Exilia and Colonies
Diplomat
 
Posts: 626
Founded: Dec 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Exilia and Colonies » Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:52 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:Interesting. Mosque or community center. The name does not matter. It is how it used that matters. If it is intended as a holy site, the government cannot ban it.
I find it interesting that the same people who are whining about the building of a Muslim prayer building have no problems strip clubs right next to ground zero and teen girls going there to prostitute themselves. Nor do they seem to have any problems with people being mugged there.


Strippers and prostitutes aren't known for holy wars and blowing themselves up.


Yet... *looks shifty*
VEGAN IS SYMBOLIC OPPRESSION! STOP THE MURDER OF PLANTS! GO SUNLIGHT DIET!

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:56 pm

Exilia and Colonies wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:Interesting. Mosque or community center. The name does not matter. It is how it used that matters. If it is intended as a holy site, the government cannot ban it.
I find it interesting that the same people who are whining about the building of a Muslim prayer building have no problems strip clubs right next to ground zero and teen girls going there to prostitute themselves. Nor do they seem to have any problems with people being mugged there.


Strippers and prostitutes aren't known for holy wars and blowing themselves up.


Yet... *looks shifty*


>.>
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21669
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Wed Aug 18, 2010 7:01 pm

Whole Conviction wrote:Those 'provocative' statements, and everything else he's ever said, have been echoed from inside the US by people on the left and the right (including Glenn Beck and, I believe, Ron Paul). They just stick to him more because he's a Muslim, I guess. Well, part of his job is to help create interfaith understanding. You don't do that by being a loyal agent of one side. You have to see both sides, and that necessarily involves seeing flaws and benefits of both.


I'm a US Veteran and I've been making "provocative" statements about out US foreign policy even as far back as 1995 during my active duty time. And share with both Rauf and Beck (at least Beck from April) that our own policies have made us an accessory to the 9/11 attacks. Some on the right may not like to hear it; but it's just speaking truly about it. We spent alot of money and time empowering the people who attacked us, especially under the guise of opposing communism in the 60's, 70's and 80's.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
Exilia and Colonies
Diplomat
 
Posts: 626
Founded: Dec 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Exilia and Colonies » Wed Aug 18, 2010 7:01 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
Exilia and Colonies wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:Interesting. Mosque or community center. The name does not matter. It is how it used that matters. If it is intended as a holy site, the government cannot ban it.
I find it interesting that the same people who are whining about the building of a Muslim prayer building have no problems strip clubs right next to ground zero and teen girls going there to prostitute themselves. Nor do they seem to have any problems with people being mugged there.


Strippers and prostitutes aren't known for holy wars and blowing themselves up.


Yet... *looks shifty*


>.>


I'll have you know there is nothing shifty or suspicious about the Church of Explosive Boobology.
VEGAN IS SYMBOLIC OPPRESSION! STOP THE MURDER OF PLANTS! GO SUNLIGHT DIET!

User avatar
Bluth Corporation
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6849
Founded: Apr 15, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bluth Corporation » Wed Aug 18, 2010 7:03 pm

Question: How many of the people who supported the efforts to legally block this Muslim group from exercising its property rights by using its private property for peaceful purposes, also (quite rightly) criticized the recent Kelo v. New London decision precisely because it violated individual's private property rights?
The Huge Mistake of Bluth Corporation
Capital: Newport Beach, Shostakovich | Starting Quarterback: Peyton Manning #18 | Company President: Michael Bluth

Champions of: World Bowl X


You should really be using Slackware

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21669
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Wed Aug 18, 2010 7:03 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:Interesting. Mosque or community center. The name does not matter. It is how it used that matters. If it is intended as a holy site, the government cannot ban it.
I find it interesting that the same people who are whining about the building of a Muslim prayer building have no problems strip clubs right next to ground zero and teen girls going there to prostitute themselves. Nor do they seem to have any problems with people being mugged there.


Strippers and prostitutes aren't known for holy wars and blowing themselves up.


Neither, generally, are Manhattan native Muslims, nor the members of and advisers for the Cordoba Initiative.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Wed Aug 18, 2010 7:05 pm

Tekania wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:Interesting. Mosque or community center. The name does not matter. It is how it used that matters. If it is intended as a holy site, the government cannot ban it.
I find it interesting that the same people who are whining about the building of a Muslim prayer building have no problems strip clubs right next to ground zero and teen girls going there to prostitute themselves. Nor do they seem to have any problems with people being mugged there.


Strippers and prostitutes aren't known for holy wars and blowing themselves up.


Neither, generally, are Manhattan native Muslims, nor the members of and advisers for the Cordoba Initiative.



All im saying is that Islam has the nasty habit of killing lots of people and causing problems over "misinterpretations"
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Tungookska
Minister
 
Posts: 2310
Founded: Jan 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Tungookska » Wed Aug 18, 2010 7:07 pm

North Calaveras wrote:All im saying is that Islam has the nasty habit of killing lots of people and causing problems over "misinterpretations"

just like christians and jews?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bracadun, Edush, Ifreann, Point Blob, Senkaku, The Holy Therns, Violetist Britannia

Advertisement

Remove ads