Miklesia wrote:Fine? Those are hideous rectangular slabs of concrete!
This above quote is the perfect description of New York City.
Advertisement

by Farnhamia » Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:30 pm

by North Calaveras » Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:38 pm

by Farnhamia » Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:48 pm
Inertina wrote:
Very much so, but then I live in the city and am unfortunately familiar with it's love of cement.

by Enadail » Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:00 pm
North Calaveras wrote:Legally they should be allowed to do this but at the same time theyHAVESHOULD to consider people's feelings towards this,
North Calaveras wrote: we also have not heard where the money is coming from.
North Calaveras wrote:Mosque and community center don't mix either, i really want to see how that works out for them.


by Sdaeriji » Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:02 pm
Helertia wrote:Tekania wrote:It's design is a glass and steel block like most of the rest of Manhattan. About the same hight as the building covering the opposite side of the block, and smaller and shorter than the buildings covering the next two blocks approaching "Ground Zero"., it would end up being the fourth largest building in those three blocks after the aforementioned three. There is already a Muslim religious service being held on the present property inside the old Burlington Coat Factory building. So what is really going on here, is Cordoba is going to tear down the existing property, build the new building, who will house both the existing group of muslims who have been meeting at that location, and provide much additional space for community outreach services and programs.
It's also hideous, you forgot to mention that.

by Liuzzo » Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:04 pm
Caninope wrote:Maurepas wrote:Hyde2 wrote:Free Soviets wrote:actual opposition grounded in anything other than universal anti-clericalism is bullshit
What if you oppose it because you think there are much better buildings could be built in that area, despite not being anticlerical?
What if you oppose it because you think that it actually *shock horror* does offend people and does harm relations between the west and Islam, whether you like the fact that people are offended or not (as if 90% of the time when people are offended by anything, it's not grounded in non-rational emotional or symbolic things)?
I have a feeling that if this was about Americans insisting on building a Church in the middle of Baghdad, near a site where a huge amount of Muslims were killed by Americans, despite large opposition in the area, everyone would think the Americans are total wankers - whilst at the same time acknowledging that the opposition from Muslims is not necessarily logical or rational (i.e. these particular American Christians had nothing to do with the deaths, they have a right to property there). It's possible to hold both positions at the same time you know.
I actually think you are probably right about that, if it was being built in Baghdad of course. The fact is though, the United States prides itself on being above that sort of thing.
If you moved this situation to Iraq it's a whole new kettle of fish, cause you're dealing with a different group of people.
Maybe so, but I am *GASP* gonna agree with Obama here.
They have the right to build it there, but it isn't necessarily the best or most wise location.

by Tekania » Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:10 pm
Sdaeriji wrote:Helertia wrote:Tekania wrote:It's design is a glass and steel block like most of the rest of Manhattan. About the same hight as the building covering the opposite side of the block, and smaller and shorter than the buildings covering the next two blocks approaching "Ground Zero"., it would end up being the fourth largest building in those three blocks after the aforementioned three. There is already a Muslim religious service being held on the present property inside the old Burlington Coat Factory building. So what is really going on here, is Cordoba is going to tear down the existing property, build the new building, who will house both the existing group of muslims who have been meeting at that location, and provide much additional space for community outreach services and programs.
It's also hideous, you forgot to mention that.
See I feel this is a much more legitimate argument against the building than the whole Muslim angle. It really will be an eyesore, totally out of place with the buildings around it. It really is arrogant of the architects to not even try to integrate the building into the neighborhood.

by North Calaveras » Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:19 pm
Enadail wrote:North Calaveras wrote:Legally they should be allowed to do this but at the same time theyHAVESHOULD to consider people's feelings towards this,
Fixed that as they don't HAVE to do anything, but polite decorum asks that they considers others' feelings.North Calaveras wrote: we also have not heard where the money is coming from.
Where the money comes from is irrelevant, unless there's some evidence suggesting its coming from a nefarious source. It matters no more then it matters where money for any religious building, nay, any building at all comes from. Innocent until proven guilty and all that.North Calaveras wrote:Mosque and community center don't mix either, i really want to see how that works out for them.
Why is that? Are religious centers not congrative in nature, where community gathers to discuss both religious and personal topics? And if anyone can enter and partake in the services provided without needing to pray (like the YMCA or JCC), how would this not be a community center? Why can a mosque and community center not mix?

by Tekania » Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:36 pm
North Calaveras wrote:Yes it is important where the money comes from you don't just walk up with the dough and expect it to be done its not that simple and we should know where the money is coming from in case it is in fact from a nefarious source.

by Enadail » Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:38 pm
North Calaveras wrote:Enadail wrote:North Calaveras wrote:Legally they should be allowed to do this but at the same time theyHAVESHOULD to consider people's feelings towards this,
Fixed that as they don't HAVE to do anything, but polite decorum asks that they considers others' feelings.North Calaveras wrote: we also have not heard where the money is coming from.
Where the money comes from is irrelevant, unless there's some evidence suggesting its coming from a nefarious source. It matters no more then it matters where money for any religious building, nay, any building at all comes from. Innocent until proven guilty and all that.North Calaveras wrote:Mosque and community center don't mix either, i really want to see how that works out for them.
Why is that? Are religious centers not congrative in nature, where community gathers to discuss both religious and personal topics? And if anyone can enter and partake in the services provided without needing to pray (like the YMCA or JCC), how would this not be a community center? Why can a mosque and community center not mix?
Yes it is important where the money comes from you don't just walk up with the dough and expect it to be done its not that simple and we should know where the money is coming from in case it is in fact from a nefarious source.
by Whole Conviction » Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:42 pm
North Calaveras wrote:Yes it is important where the money comes from you don't just walk up with the dough and expect it to be done its not that simple and we should know where the money is coming from in case it is in fact from a nefarious source.

by Caninope » Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:56 pm
Liuzzo wrote:Tis why you and I almost always get along.

Agritum wrote:Arg, Caninope is Captain America under disguise. Everyone knows it.
Frisivisia wrote:Me wrote:Just don't. It'll get you a whole lot further in life if you come to realize you're not the smartest guy in the room, even if you probably are.
Because Caninope may be in that room with you.
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Thankfully, we have you and EM to guide us to wisdom and truth, holy one. :p
Norstal wrote:What I am saying of course is that we should clone Caninope.

by Katganistan » Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:40 pm
Helertia wrote:Tekania wrote:Helertia wrote:Tekania wrote:It's design is a glass and steel block like most of the rest of Manhattan. About the same hight as the building covering the opposite side of the block, and smaller and shorter than the buildings covering the next two blocks approaching "Ground Zero"., it would end up being the fourth largest building in those three blocks after the aforementioned three. There is already a Muslim religious service being held on the present property inside the old Burlington Coat Factory building. So what is really going on here, is Cordoba is going to tear down the existing property, build the new building, who will house both the existing group of muslims who have been meeting at that location, and provide much additional space for community outreach services and programs.
It's also hideous, you forgot to mention that.
Yes, it'll fit in with modern Manhattan architecture well.
It would, if it were built among it. Seeing as it's built in a bunch of masonary buildings...
Architects are such idiots sometimes - This is a perfect example of a building with no urban manners. Gaudi was weird and unusual, but his buildings fit in with the rest of Barcelona. This building is ugly glass and steel, built among fine masonary.

by Dyakovo » Tue Aug 17, 2010 10:14 pm
Hyde2 wrote:But apparently I'm a bigot who thinks all Arabs are Iraqis and that all Muslims are terrorists, and I seek destroy the foundations of America and am actually worse than the 9/11 terrorists.

by Geniasis » Tue Aug 17, 2010 10:54 pm
Katganistan wrote:You mean likeSagrada Familia Cathedral fits into Barcelona?
Reichskommissariat ost wrote:Women are as good as men , I dont know why they constantly whine about things.
Euronion wrote:because how dare me ever ever try to demand rights for myself, right men, we should just lie down and let the women trample over us, let them take awa our rights, our right to vote will be next just don't say I didn't warn ou

by The Rich Port » Tue Aug 17, 2010 11:03 pm
Geniasis wrote:Katganistan wrote:You mean likeSagrada Familia Cathedral fits into Barcelona?
Totally different. That's Jesus.

by Dyakovo » Tue Aug 17, 2010 11:07 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Geniasis wrote:Katganistan wrote:You mean likeSagrada Familia Cathedral fits into Barcelona?
Totally different. That's Jesus.
You have to admit: it's pretty fuckingbadassostentatious.

by North Suran » Tue Aug 17, 2010 11:10 pm
Katganistan wrote:Helertia wrote:Architects are such idiots sometimes - This is a perfect example of a building with no urban manners. Gaudi was weird and unusual, but his buildings fit in with the rest of Barcelona. This building is ugly glass and steel, built among fine masonary.
You mean like Sagrada Familia Cathedral fits into Barcelona?
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.
Geniasis wrote:The War on Christmas

by Katganistan » Tue Aug 17, 2010 11:16 pm
Dyakovo wrote:The Rich Port wrote:Geniasis wrote:Katganistan wrote:You mean likeSagrada Familia Cathedral fits into Barcelona?
Totally different. That's Jesus.
You have to admit: it's pretty fuckingbadassostentatious.
fixed

by North Suran » Tue Aug 17, 2010 11:17 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Geniasis wrote:Katganistan wrote:You mean likeSagrada Familia Cathedral fits into Barcelona?
Totally different. That's Jesus.
You have to admit: it's pretty fucking badass.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.
Geniasis wrote:The War on Christmas
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fartsniffage, Galactic Powers, Galloism, Grinning Dragon, Ifreann, Lativs, Ostroeuropa, The Archregimancy, The Snazzylands, Tinhampton
Advertisement