Nope. Nor am I christian.
Advertisement

by Dyakovo » Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:31 pm

by The Rich Port » Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:32 pm
Xsyne wrote:Depends. Is your name Jorge Luis Borges?
. Why?Dyakovo wrote:Nope. Nor am I christian.

by Xsyne » Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:46 pm
Chernoslavia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.
Source?

by Geniasis » Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:47 pm
Reichskommissariat ost wrote:Women are as good as men , I dont know why they constantly whine about things.
Euronion wrote:because how dare me ever ever try to demand rights for myself, right men, we should just lie down and let the women trample over us, let them take awa our rights, our right to vote will be next just don't say I didn't warn ou

by The Rich Port » Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:48 pm

by Farnhamia » Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:53 pm
The Rich Port wrote:
Come to think of it, I think I AM him.Or maybe I'm his re-incarnation. Nah, maybe I'm just T.S. Eliot re-incarnated. And even then, HOLY SHIT I JUST WINRAR AGAIN.

by Strykla » Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:57 pm
Farnhamia wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
Come to think of it, I think I AM him.Or maybe I'm his re-incarnation. Nah, maybe I'm just T.S. Eliot re-incarnated. And even then, HOLY SHIT I JUST WINRAR AGAIN.
You're Tom Eliot? Of the St. Louis Eliots? So, did it really happen that you were seated at a dinner once and one of the people next to you anted to discuss the deficiencies of TS Eliot's poetry, and you held up your place-card to excuse yourself from the discussion?

by The Rich Port » Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:57 pm
Farnhamia wrote:You're Tom Eliot? Of the St. Louis Eliots? So, did it really happen that you were seated at a dinner once and one of the people next to you anted to discuss the deficiencies of TS Eliot's poetry, and you held up your place-card to excuse yourself from the discussion?

by Dyakovo » Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:59 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Farnhamia wrote:You're Tom Eliot? Of the St. Louis Eliots? So, did it really happen that you were seated at a dinner once and one of the people next to you anted to discuss the deficiencies of TS Eliot's poetry, and you held up your place-card to excuse yourself from the discussion?
If it involved a dark alley and an assault charge that I was acquited of due to lack of evidence, probably. Also, who the fuck are the St. Louis Eliots?

by Xsyne » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:00 pm
Chernoslavia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.
Source?

by Farnhamia » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:01 pm
Dyakovo wrote:The Rich Port wrote:Farnhamia wrote:You're Tom Eliot? Of the St. Louis Eliots? So, did it really happen that you were seated at a dinner once and one of the people next to you anted to discuss the deficiencies of TS Eliot's poetry, and you held up your place-card to excuse yourself from the discussion?
If it involved a dark alley and an assault charge that I was acquited of due to lack of evidence, probably. Also, who the fuck are the St. Louis Eliots?
The Eliot family from St. Louis presumably...

by Xsyne » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:09 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Farnhamia wrote:You're Tom Eliot? Of the St. Louis Eliots? So, did it really happen that you were seated at a dinner once and one of the people next to you anted to discuss the deficiencies of TS Eliot's poetry, and you held up your place-card to excuse yourself from the discussion?
If it involved a dark alley and an assault charge that I was acquited of due to lack of evidence, probably. Also, who the fuck are the St. Louis Eliots?
Chernoslavia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.
Source?

by Hyde2 » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:10 pm
Tekania wrote:Terrorists merely have the power to do minor and casual damage to some people, destroy some property, but have little power over our ideals...

by Hyde2 » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:11 pm
Tekania wrote:This is a bad comparison. An accurate comparison would be a situation where a group of Baghdad Christian Arabs wanted to build a Church near where Americans killed people.

by Farnhamia » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:12 pm
Xsyne wrote:The Rich Port wrote:Farnhamia wrote:You're Tom Eliot? Of the St. Louis Eliots? So, did it really happen that you were seated at a dinner once and one of the people next to you anted to discuss the deficiencies of TS Eliot's poetry, and you held up your place-card to excuse yourself from the discussion?
If it involved a dark alley and an assault charge that I was acquited of due to lack of evidence, probably. Also, who the fuck are the St. Louis Eliots?
A baseball team best known for having lost every game they've ever played, perhaps because they keep asking themselves if they dare to hit a pitch.


by The Norwegian Blue » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:13 pm
Xsyne wrote:The Rich Port wrote:Farnhamia wrote:You're Tom Eliot? Of the St. Louis Eliots? So, did it really happen that you were seated at a dinner once and one of the people next to you anted to discuss the deficiencies of TS Eliot's poetry, and you held up your place-card to excuse yourself from the discussion?
If it involved a dark alley and an assault charge that I was acquited of due to lack of evidence, probably. Also, who the fuck are the St. Louis Eliots?
A baseball team best known for having lost every game they've ever played, perhaps because they keep asking themselves if they dare to hit a pitch.

by Enadail » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:17 pm
Hyde2 wrote:Tekania wrote:Terrorists merely have the power to do minor and casual damage to some people, destroy some property, but have little power over our ideals...
How the fuck could you even think this. You literally have to wish away the effect 9/11 had on geopolitics to think this (which is infinitely more devastating than people opposing a building), again, you actually have to be insane to think this. Well not insane, it's just partisan bullshit obviously, it helps make you look better, and your opposition worse.
Hyde2 wrote:Tekania wrote:This is a bad comparison. An accurate comparison would be a situation where a group of Baghdad Christian Arabs wanted to build a Church near where Americans killed people.
No, that's not an accurate comparison, because in order for that to be true, then Feisal Abdul Rauf would have to be a white non-immigrant American, which is completely false.

by Hyde2 » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:21 pm
Enadail wrote:So you're saying that terrorists do have control over our ideals? How so?
Hyde2 wrote:The fact that he's an immigrant is irrelevant, as we don't treat immigrated Americans different from non-immigrant Americans.

by Dyakovo » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:23 pm
Hyde2 wrote:Enadail wrote:The fact that he's an immigrant is irrelevant, as we don't treat immigrated Americans different from non-immigrant Americans.
No, it's not irrelevant because it makes his comparison bullshit, he deliberately made those Christians Arab natives, which subtly changes the context, if it didn't mean anything, why the fuck would he mention it, and why the fuck would he say my comparison is wrong?

by The Rich Port » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:23 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Dyakovo wrote:The Rich Port wrote:Farnhamia wrote:You're Tom Eliot? Of the St. Louis Eliots? So, did it really happen that you were seated at a dinner once and one of the people next to you anted to discuss the deficiencies of TS Eliot's poetry, and you held up your place-card to excuse yourself from the discussion?
If it involved a dark alley and an assault charge that I was acquited of due to lack of evidence, probably. Also, who the fuck are the St. Louis Eliots?
The Eliot family from St. Louis presumably...
"Eliot was born into the Eliot family, originally from New England, who had moved to St. Louis, Missouri. His father, Henry Ware Eliot (1843–1919), was a successful businessman, president and treasurer of the Hydraulic-Press Brick Company in St. Louis. His mother, Charlotte Champe Stearns (1843–1929), wrote poems and was a social worker. Eliot was the last of six surviving children; his parents were both 44 years old when he was born. His four sisters were between 11 and 19 years older; his brother was eight years older. Known to family and friends as Tom, he was the namesake of his maternal grandfather Thomas Stearns."
Farnhamia wrote:Xsyne wrote:The Rich Port wrote:Farnhamia wrote:You're Tom Eliot? Of the St. Louis Eliots? So, did it really happen that you were seated at a dinner once and one of the people next to you anted to discuss the deficiencies of TS Eliot's poetry, and you held up your place-card to excuse yourself from the discussion?
If it involved a dark alley and an assault charge that I was acquited of due to lack of evidence, probably. Also, who the fuck are the St. Louis Eliots?
A baseball team best known for having lost every game they've ever played, perhaps because they keep asking themselves if they dare to hit a pitch.
Besides, post-modernists pwned all of literature. They're awesome. At least, more awesome than those pansy Romantics.
by Hyde2 » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:24 pm
Dyakovo wrote:Hyde2 wrote:Enadail wrote:The fact that he's an immigrant is irrelevant, as we don't treat immigrated Americans different from non-immigrant Americans.
No, it's not irrelevant because it makes his comparison bullshit, he deliberately made those Christians Arab natives, which subtly changes the context, if it didn't mean anything, why the fuck would he mention it, and why the fuck would he say my comparison is wrong?
Where exactly did he specify that they were natives?

by Dyakovo » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:26 pm
Hyde2 wrote:Dyakovo wrote:Hyde2 wrote:Enadail wrote:The fact that he's an immigrant is irrelevant, as we don't treat immigrated Americans different from non-immigrant Americans.
No, it's not irrelevant because it makes his comparison bullshit, he deliberately made those Christians Arab natives, which subtly changes the context, if it didn't mean anything, why the fuck would he mention it, and why the fuck would he say my comparison is wrong?
Where exactly did he specify that they were natives?
He specified they were Arabs, the only way that could change anything is if there was an implication of them being native, otherwise, it doesn't make the slightest bit of difference, and does nothing to undermine my comparison.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Custadia, Neoncomplexultra, Page, Seylau
Advertisement