NATION

PASSWORD

ADL Statement on Ground Zero Mosque

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 35923
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:06 am

The Bleeding Roses wrote:Freedom of religion stops the moment that religion poses a threat to national security.

Right. Well, where are the mass deportations of Muslims? the concentration --er, sorry, relocation camps for Muslims? I don't think I've seen any of them forced to wear the crescent moon and star on their clothes yet.....

And really, was there a huge outcry against Christianity when Timothy McVeigh did the OK City Federal Building? No? I mean he WAS from a Catholic family....

User avatar
Sun Aut Ex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5402
Founded: Nov 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Aut Ex » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:06 am

Karsol wrote:He was saying that the attack was the result of years of idiotic foreign policy in the mid-east. :eyebrow:


Yep, that innocent family, including the four year old girl, had it coming.
Strykyh wrote:I wasn't trying to be intelligent.

Keronians wrote:
So you think it's ok to waste valuable police time and resources to pander to minority superstitions?

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about ten minutes, I have to go to ID a Muslim woman."


Yes.

Unless of course it's not OK for a woman to ask for a female to ask for a female officer to carry out body checks. In which case, the answer would be no.

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about then minutes, I have to go to carry out a body check on a woman."

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 35923
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:07 am

The Bleeding Roses wrote:
Wilgrove wrote:
The Bleeding Roses wrote:Freedom of religion stops the moment that religion poses a threat to national security.


Last time I check, 9/11 wasn't an attack by Islam, it was an attack by a radical group that used Islam as justification for their attacks and Anti-American Sentiments.

Also, I wasn't aware that the 1st amendment had a clause that we could suspend Freedom of Religion when we want to.

Sorry, but I'm no longer buying that you are a "law" student, because you seem pretty damn ignorant about the law.

Islam is a radical institution, take a look at the world around you.
That being said, the first amendment protections for religion do not allow for construction of buildings wherever the hell one wants. Surely you can recognize that.

No, but the building codes for NYC do, and guess what? They're within the restrictions the law set out.

User avatar
Sun Aut Ex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5402
Founded: Nov 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Aut Ex » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:07 am

Canadai wrote:Which came on after Europe attacked them? It went back and forth a lot.


Yeah... no. You just made that up. Muslims started it by invading Europe.
Strykyh wrote:I wasn't trying to be intelligent.

Keronians wrote:
So you think it's ok to waste valuable police time and resources to pander to minority superstitions?

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about ten minutes, I have to go to ID a Muslim woman."


Yes.

Unless of course it's not OK for a woman to ask for a female to ask for a female officer to carry out body checks. In which case, the answer would be no.

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about then minutes, I have to go to carry out a body check on a woman."

User avatar
Karsol
Senator
 
Posts: 4431
Founded: Jan 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Karsol » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:07 am

Sun Aut Ex wrote:
Galiria wrote:Christians are not running around screaming about how everyone who doesn't do what they say is going to hell? Seriously, where do you live? I want to go there.

Face it, Christians and Muslims are the same, they insist everyone followed their rules or else. If, as you seem to think, there are no moderate Muslims who keep to themselves, then clearly there are no moderate Christians who keep to themselves either. Judaism, Christianity and Islam are just three sides of the same coin (with the Jews being the edge naturally, since they're the smallest group :lol: .)


Christianity: You know, if you don't believe in Jesus, you'll end up in hell one day from the end of a noose...specially if you are Afro-Caribbean/American
Islam: You know, if you don't believe in Allah, you'll end up in hell. Now. Via an AK-47.
01010000 01100101 01101110 01101001 01110011 00100001 00100001 00100001
Ronald Reagan: "Well, what do you believe in? Do you want to abolish the rich?"
Olof Palme, the Prime Minister of Sweden: "No, I want to abolish the poor."

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -7.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.54

User avatar
Karsol
Senator
 
Posts: 4431
Founded: Jan 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Karsol » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:08 am

Sun Aut Ex wrote:
Canadai wrote:Which came on after Europe attacked them? It went back and forth a lot.


Yeah... no. You just made that up. Muslims started it by invading Europe.


In Spain... half the world away...
01010000 01100101 01101110 01101001 01110011 00100001 00100001 00100001
Ronald Reagan: "Well, what do you believe in? Do you want to abolish the rich?"
Olof Palme, the Prime Minister of Sweden: "No, I want to abolish the poor."

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -7.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.54

User avatar
The Bleeding Roses
Minister
 
Posts: 2593
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Bleeding Roses » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:08 am

Katganistan wrote:
The Bleeding Roses wrote:Freedom of religion stops the moment that religion poses a threat to national security.

Right. Well, where are the mass deportations of Muslims? the concentration --er, sorry, relocation camps for Muslims? I don't think I've seen any of them forced to wear the crescent moon and star on their clothes yet.....

And really, was there a huge outcry against Christianity when Timothy McVeigh did the OK City Federal Building? No? I mean he WAS from a Catholic family....

It doesn't take much to be able to pinpoint a practicing Muslim in a crowd...

That being said, there are far too many liberal apologists in office for us to take the steps we need to in order to deal with the problem.
The Parthenese Confederation
Parthenon
Intergallactic Hell
The Bleeding Roses
West Parthenon
Former GDODAD/Metus Member

User avatar
Sun Aut Ex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5402
Founded: Nov 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Aut Ex » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:09 am

Canadai wrote:Considering how many your "God" fearing Americans killed with their helicopters during the initial invasion, you've got a fuckload to answer for.


This has nothing, NOTHING to do with the American invasion. How can "America started it" ever justify a terrorist attacking an innocent family?

Because that's what you're doing.
Last edited by Sun Aut Ex on Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Strykyh wrote:I wasn't trying to be intelligent.

Keronians wrote:
So you think it's ok to waste valuable police time and resources to pander to minority superstitions?

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about ten minutes, I have to go to ID a Muslim woman."


Yes.

Unless of course it's not OK for a woman to ask for a female to ask for a female officer to carry out body checks. In which case, the answer would be no.

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about then minutes, I have to go to carry out a body check on a woman."

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 35923
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:09 am

The Bleeding Roses wrote:
Karsol wrote:Two words, Property Rights.

Two more words. Building Codes.

Progress again. The building codes allow their planned construction. Hence barring it would be on the basis of what, exactly?

User avatar
Wilgrove
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38647
Founded: May 08, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Wilgrove » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:09 am

Sun Aut Ex wrote:
Canadai wrote:Which came on after Europe attacked them? It went back and forth a lot.


Yeah... no. You just made that up. Muslims started it by invading Europe.


Actually Christianity started by invading Europe. Charlemagne slaughtered thousands of Germanic people in the name of Christ.

User avatar
Sun Aut Ex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5402
Founded: Nov 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Aut Ex » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:09 am

Karsol wrote:In Spain... half the world away...


And?
Strykyh wrote:I wasn't trying to be intelligent.

Keronians wrote:
So you think it's ok to waste valuable police time and resources to pander to minority superstitions?

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about ten minutes, I have to go to ID a Muslim woman."


Yes.

Unless of course it's not OK for a woman to ask for a female to ask for a female officer to carry out body checks. In which case, the answer would be no.

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about then minutes, I have to go to carry out a body check on a woman."

User avatar
The Bleeding Roses
Minister
 
Posts: 2593
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Bleeding Roses » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:10 am

Katganistan wrote:
The Bleeding Roses wrote:
Wilgrove wrote:
The Bleeding Roses wrote:Freedom of religion stops the moment that religion poses a threat to national security.


Last time I check, 9/11 wasn't an attack by Islam, it was an attack by a radical group that used Islam as justification for their attacks and Anti-American Sentiments.

Also, I wasn't aware that the 1st amendment had a clause that we could suspend Freedom of Religion when we want to.

Sorry, but I'm no longer buying that you are a "law" student, because you seem pretty damn ignorant about the law.

Islam is a radical institution, take a look at the world around you.
That being said, the first amendment protections for religion do not allow for construction of buildings wherever the hell one wants. Surely you can recognize that.

No, but the building codes for NYC do, and guess what? They're within the restrictions the law set out.

I take it you are 3 pages behind in the discussion. I have already mentioned that building codes in NYC can, and have, been modified to prohibit certain building types.
The Parthenese Confederation
Parthenon
Intergallactic Hell
The Bleeding Roses
West Parthenon
Former GDODAD/Metus Member

User avatar
Karsol
Senator
 
Posts: 4431
Founded: Jan 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Karsol » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:10 am

Sun Aut Ex wrote:
Karsol wrote:In Spain... half the world away...


And?

Wouldn't it of made sense to..you know... unify against the Berbers,and not the Arabs?
01010000 01100101 01101110 01101001 01110011 00100001 00100001 00100001
Ronald Reagan: "Well, what do you believe in? Do you want to abolish the rich?"
Olof Palme, the Prime Minister of Sweden: "No, I want to abolish the poor."

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -7.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.54

User avatar
Sun Aut Ex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5402
Founded: Nov 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Aut Ex » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:11 am

Wilgrove wrote:Actually Christianity started by invading Europe. Charlemagne slaughtered thousands of Germanic people in the name of Christ.


And this is relevant to the current discussion how?

Canadai wrote:Islam: If you keep invading my homeland where you have no business being, I will defend myself without caring about collateral damage.


Got it on record. "Spain: Islamic homeland. Give it back."
Strykyh wrote:I wasn't trying to be intelligent.

Keronians wrote:
So you think it's ok to waste valuable police time and resources to pander to minority superstitions?

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about ten minutes, I have to go to ID a Muslim woman."


Yes.

Unless of course it's not OK for a woman to ask for a female to ask for a female officer to carry out body checks. In which case, the answer would be no.

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about then minutes, I have to go to carry out a body check on a woman."

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 35923
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:11 am

The Bleeding Roses wrote:There isn't one in the books that would prevent such construction yet but there certainty can be one.

Also, I have ALWAYS been a supporter of building codes. Keeping low class shit out of good neighborhoods and ugly buildings out of nice areas is a way to keep property values high and to maintain good demographics in an area.


That has nothing to do with building codes and all to do with the fair housing laws, created just to bar the kind of "we don't want your kind in our neighborhood" bullshit you're talking about.

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 35923
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:12 am

The Bleeding Roses wrote:
Wilgrove wrote:
The Bleeding Roses wrote:There isn't one in the books that would prevent such construction yet but there certainty can be one.

Also, I have ALWAYS been a supporter of building codes. Keeping low class shit out of good neighborhoods and ugly buildings out of nice areas is a way to keep property values high and to maintain good demographics in an area.


Translation, I support deregulation and Property Rights, as long as the darkies and brownies know their place and stay there.

Who the Hel is going to hire you as a lawyer, the Ku Klux Klan?

Good demographics is referring to class, not race. A trailer park is just as damaging to a community as a Newports and 40s shop.

Good thing they're building neither there.

User avatar
Sun Aut Ex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5402
Founded: Nov 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Aut Ex » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:12 am

Canadai wrote:The same way THE MUSLIMS STARTED IT justified the crusades.


The Crusades were directly caused by the Muslim invasion of Europe. Some guy blowing up an innocent family in Iraq was not directly cause by the US invasion. See the difference?
Strykyh wrote:I wasn't trying to be intelligent.

Keronians wrote:
So you think it's ok to waste valuable police time and resources to pander to minority superstitions?

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about ten minutes, I have to go to ID a Muslim woman."


Yes.

Unless of course it's not OK for a woman to ask for a female to ask for a female officer to carry out body checks. In which case, the answer would be no.

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about then minutes, I have to go to carry out a body check on a woman."

User avatar
Wilgrove
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38647
Founded: May 08, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Wilgrove » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:12 am

Sun Aut Ex wrote:
Wilgrove wrote:Actually Christianity started by invading Europe. Charlemagne slaughtered thousands of Germanic people in the name of Christ.


And this is relevant to the current discussion how?


Eh the same way that the discussion on who started the Crusades is relevant.

User avatar
Krytenia
Senator
 
Posts: 4425
Founded: Apr 22, 2004
Capitalizt

Postby Krytenia » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:13 am

Greater Americania wrote:
Auremena wrote:What is wrong with this? I see nothing wrong? They should be able to build a mosque wherever they damn please.


Muslims blew those buildings down and killed 3,000 people there. Muslims shouldn't be allowed to make such a pro-terroristic statement as building a mosque on the spot.

Fundamentalist, foaming-at-the-mouth Muslims blew those buildings down and killed 3,000 people there.

Muslim =/= terrorist.

Now put. The cookie. Down.
"I revel in the nonsense; it's why I'm in Anaia."
Capital: Emberton ⍟ RP Population: ~180,000,000 ⍟ Trigram: KRY ⍟ iTLD: .kt ⍟ Demonym: Krytenian, Krytie (inf.)
Languages: English (de jure), Spanish, French, Welsh (regional)

Hosts: Cup of Harmony 7, AOCAF 1, Cup of Harmony 15, World Cup 24, AOCAF 13, World Cup 29, AOCAF 17, AOCAF 23, World Cup 40, Cup of Harmony 32, Baptism of Fire 32, AOCAF 27, Baptism of Fire 36, World Cup 50, Baptism of Fire 40, Cup of Harmony 64, AOCAF 48, World Cup 75, AOCAF 40, Cup of Harmony 80, CAFA 2
Champions: AOCAF 52, Cup of Harmony 78, CAFA 6
Runner-Up: AOCAF 7, World Cup 58, Cup of Harmony 80, CAFA 1
Creator, AOCAF & Cygnus Cup - Host, VI Winter Olympics (Ashton) & VII Summer Olympics (Emberton)

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 35923
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:13 am

The Bleeding Roses wrote:
Wilgrove wrote:
The Bleeding Roses wrote:
Wilgrove wrote:
The Bleeding Roses wrote:There isn't one in the books that would prevent such construction yet but there certainty can be one.

Also, I have ALWAYS been a supporter of building codes. Keeping low class shit out of good neighborhoods and ugly buildings out of nice areas is a way to keep property values high and to maintain good demographics in an area.


Translation, I support deregulation and Property Rights, as long as the darkies and brownies know their place and stay there.

Who the Hel is going to hire you as a lawyer, the Ku Klux Klan?

Good demographics is referring to class, not race. A trailer park is just as damaging to a community as a Newports and 40s shop.


Yea, you're still coming off as a racist Islamophobe, sorry. The simple fact is, that as long as the Mosque complies with all the building codes in NYC (and I don't see why they wouldn't, despite the secret wet dreams of some posters on here), they have the right to build on that property. IE, Property Rights.

New York has passed similar legislation before. Times Square used to be a redlight district till Guilianni rezoned it and prohibited pornographic theaters from operating within 500 feet of a home.

Because porn theaters, drug users and hookers = mosques and Muslim American families.

User avatar
Sun Aut Ex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5402
Founded: Nov 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Aut Ex » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:13 am

Canadai wrote:I was talking about Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and whoever else the Americans are raping, but nice try.


None of which the US was in when 9/11 occurred.

Nice try.
Strykyh wrote:I wasn't trying to be intelligent.

Keronians wrote:
So you think it's ok to waste valuable police time and resources to pander to minority superstitions?

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about ten minutes, I have to go to ID a Muslim woman."


Yes.

Unless of course it's not OK for a woman to ask for a female to ask for a female officer to carry out body checks. In which case, the answer would be no.

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about then minutes, I have to go to carry out a body check on a woman."

User avatar
Galiria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 683
Founded: Jun 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Galiria » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:13 am

Sun Aut Ex wrote:
Galiria wrote:Christians are not running around screaming about how everyone who doesn't do what they say is going to hell? Seriously, where do you live? I want to go there.

Face it, Christians and Muslims are the same, they insist everyone followed their rules or else. If, as you seem to think, there are no moderate Muslims who keep to themselves, then clearly there are no moderate Christians who keep to themselves either. Judaism, Christianity and Islam are just three sides of the same coin (with the Jews being the edge naturally, since they're the smallest group :lol: .)


Christianity: You know, if you don't believe in Jesus, you'll end up in hell one day.
Islam: You know, if you don't believe in Allah, you'll end up in hell. Now. Via an AK-47.

No, seriously, where do you live? Not only does the Quran not mention AK-47s, but most Muslims won't even threaten you with a blade of grass, let alone a gun.
Political Compass
Economic: Left/Right: -6.62
Social: Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.69

User avatar
Karsol
Senator
 
Posts: 4431
Founded: Jan 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Karsol » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:13 am

Sun Aut Ex wrote:
Wilgrove wrote:Actually Christianity started by invading Europe. Charlemagne slaughtered thousands of Germanic people in the name of Christ.


And this is relevant to the current discussion how?
Makes you look a Hypocrite?
Canadai wrote:Islam: If you keep invading my homeland where you have no business being, I will defend myself without caring about collateral damage.


Got it on record. "Spain: Islamic homeland. Give it back."
01010000 01100101 01101110 01101001 01110011 00100001 00100001 00100001
Ronald Reagan: "Well, what do you believe in? Do you want to abolish the rich?"
Olof Palme, the Prime Minister of Sweden: "No, I want to abolish the poor."

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -7.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.54

User avatar
Vervaria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1803
Founded: Oct 31, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Vervaria » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:14 am

Sun Aut Ex wrote:
Canadai wrote:I was talking about Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and whoever else the Americans are raping, but nice try.


None of which the US was in when 9/11 occurred.

Nice try.

Because Iraq totally had anything to do with 9/11, right?
Lulz: viewtopic.php?p=2707685#p2707685
Fact book
Robustian wrote:If you disagree with me, you are wrong. Period.

Ashmoria wrote:it worries me more when people who hate the government and dont think it can do a good job at anything get into power and start running things.

Wanderjar wrote:hiding behind this "I WANT SOURCES" wall is very quaint

Self--Esteem wrote:No. I love smearing those people who evidently like their country blown by a nuke and who are too foolish to realise that middle-eastern terrorism is nothing to be fond of.

Novistranaya wrote:After the Civil War, the majority of Southerners were more than happy to accept defeat and acknowledge the fact that (though not immediately) blacks were going to have the same rights as them.

User avatar
Sun Aut Ex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5402
Founded: Nov 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Aut Ex » Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:14 am

Wilgrove wrote:Eh the same way that the discussion on who started the Crusades is relevant.


It's relevant because the Muslims triggered the Crusades by invading Europe, and their attitude hasn't changed since.

Actually, it's gotten worse.

Katganistan wrote:Because porn theaters, drug users and hookers = mosques and Muslim American families.


If you can use the law to keep one thing out, you can use it on another thing.
Strykyh wrote:I wasn't trying to be intelligent.

Keronians wrote:
So you think it's ok to waste valuable police time and resources to pander to minority superstitions?

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about ten minutes, I have to go to ID a Muslim woman."


Yes.

Unless of course it's not OK for a woman to ask for a female to ask for a female officer to carry out body checks. In which case, the answer would be no.

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about then minutes, I have to go to carry out a body check on a woman."

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Aggicificicerous, Czechostan, Dakran, Eurocom, Fartsniffage, Herador, Kubra, Lativs, Libertia-Columbia, Rary, Spirit of Hope, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads