Advertisement
by Blouman Empire » Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:36 am
by Katganistan » Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:40 am
You-Gi-Owe wrote:Unhealthy2 wrote:You-Gi-Owe wrote:Maybe she wants to counsel other Christians?
Seems to me that would be her likely clientele.
Or do you not want her to be a counselor at all?
That's still risky. What if she counsels closet homosexual Christians? None of her advise to them could possibly be psychologically healthy.
Of course it'd be healthy. If they follow her advice then they're much less likely to get AIDS.
by Blouman Empire » Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:42 am
Katganistan wrote:You-Gi-Owe wrote:Unhealthy2 wrote:You-Gi-Owe wrote:Maybe she wants to counsel other Christians?
Seems to me that would be her likely clientele.
Or do you not want her to be a counselor at all?
That's still risky. What if she counsels closet homosexual Christians? None of her advise to them could possibly be psychologically healthy.
Of course it'd be healthy. If they follow her advice then they're much less likely to get AIDS.
Except that the poor, not homosexuals, are much more likely to be infected with HIV. But you knew that, right? And women are more likely to get it than men.
by Katganistan » Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:45 am
Quelesh wrote:This is from World Net Daily, a "publication" to which I give no credence whatsoever. I don't believe a single thing they say.
by Katganistan » Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:50 am
Marcurix wrote:the right to freedom of speech and religion as defined by the US constiution will end this rather quickly.
by Zephie » Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:53 am
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.
by Katganistan » Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:54 am
Caninope wrote:Barringtonia wrote:Jimanistan wrote:Referring to the story linked by the OP specifically, I don't think school administrators have any right to expel students for being ignorant.
They didn't, they're not allowing her to complete a course in counseling where she does not accept homosexuality as anything but a sinful choice nor will she provide unbiased advice on abortions.
Essentially, those disqualify her from being a counsellor, and rightly so.
You come to counselors for advice- if you know she feels that way, then don't go to them. It she thinks it's a choice, then she can think that.
A rather extreme example of something similar would be asking a racist friend for advice. If you didn't want racist advice, don't go to the racist friend. With all this said, I don't really see what she did that was so bad.
by Katganistan » Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:58 am
by Katganistan » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:15 am
Ryadn wrote:Bramborska wrote:Tmutarakhan wrote:
The phrase "reduction by 4 orders of magnitude" means "less than one chance in 10,000". If you want to pretend that that justifies what the Church has told people, go ahead. I say the Church has massive amounts of blood on its hands.
Let's be honest, 10,000 fucks isn't a lot of sex. I mean, if Ford had a car that blew up 1 out of 10,000; they'd be screwed pretty badly.
It's three times a day, every day, for 10 years.
by Galloism » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:17 am
Katganistan wrote:
So some of our more prolific posters must be capable of X-treme Multi-Tasking!!!!!
by Sebally-Orwitskia » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:18 am
by Katganistan » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:19 am
Bramborska wrote:I mean, in almost any other profession I think I'd understand, but c'mon... As I said before, we're talking about a counselor. The sort of people who make hard decisions for teenagers like what acne cream to avoid. We're not exactly talking hard science here or hard rules. I know this could be construed to be a tad unfair, but when the profession is like a step away from being a Zen Balancer or some other "practitioner," I'm always a little amused because people put on airs and talk about integrity for quasi-useless professions like it was a matter of life'n'death.
by Sebally-Orwitskia » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:20 am
by Vervaria » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:26 am
Robustian wrote:If you disagree with me, you are wrong. Period.
Ashmoria wrote:it worries me more when people who hate the government and dont think it can do a good job at anything get into power and start running things.
Wanderjar wrote:hiding behind this "I WANT SOURCES" wall is very quaint
Self--Esteem wrote:No. I love smearing those people who evidently like their country blown by a nuke and who are too foolish to realise that middle-eastern terrorism is nothing to be fond of.
Novistranaya wrote:After the Civil War, the majority of Southerners were more than happy to accept defeat and acknowledge the fact that (though not immediately) blacks were going to have the same rights as them.
by Katganistan » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:27 am
Gordonopia wrote:Again, I am sorry to point out the blatant flaw in your statement, but I must. Proposition 8 was a large step in the right direction. While it is fashionable to mock Christians and the deeply held beliefs about morality that they hold sacred, I and others who hold those beliefs are derided and ostracized. Who's the bigot now? While I find the practice of homosexuality evil and deeply disturbing, I nevertheless defend the right of those who hold positions contrary to mine to express them freely. My issue is that Christians are not allowed the same courtesy.
by Katganistan » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:30 am
Zephie wrote:Soheran wrote:
Wait, for real?
How many open atheists are there in the US Congress? How many open Christians are there? Do you realize that atheists are among the least popular groups in the country, according to poll data?
I never said atheists were never attacked. But from my experience, I see atheists provoking it. We have freedom of religion in the U.S I don't see why everyone can't just respect that.
by Vervaria » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:31 am
Katganistan wrote:Zephie wrote:Soheran wrote:
Wait, for real?
How many open atheists are there in the US Congress? How many open Christians are there? Do you realize that atheists are among the least popular groups in the country, according to poll data?
I never said atheists were never attacked. But from my experience, I see atheists provoking it. We have freedom of religion in the U.S I don't see why everyone can't just respect that.
Do rape victims provoke it too?
Just curious.
Robustian wrote:If you disagree with me, you are wrong. Period.
Ashmoria wrote:it worries me more when people who hate the government and dont think it can do a good job at anything get into power and start running things.
Wanderjar wrote:hiding behind this "I WANT SOURCES" wall is very quaint
Self--Esteem wrote:No. I love smearing those people who evidently like their country blown by a nuke and who are too foolish to realise that middle-eastern terrorism is nothing to be fond of.
Novistranaya wrote:After the Civil War, the majority of Southerners were more than happy to accept defeat and acknowledge the fact that (though not immediately) blacks were going to have the same rights as them.
by Unchecked Expansion » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:31 am
by Katganistan » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:34 am
Zephie wrote:Soheran wrote:Zephie wrote:But from my experience, I see atheists provoking it.
Atheists, after millenia of literally being told that we will justly suffer eternal torment for our beliefs, have finally, in a few cases, stopped being perfectly respectful of people's religious beliefs--and thus we are "provoking it"?
You are collectivizing it throughout history; I am talking about the present. The past is irrelevant.
by Katganistan » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:37 am
Jusela wrote:What the heck is wrong with you people and your double standards?
Cant believe nine people favored voting yes to expel her based on her beliefs. Just the heck is wrong with you?
by Dakini » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:38 am
by Vandengaarde » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:38 am
Soheran wrote:Zephie wrote:But from my experience, I see atheists provoking it.
Atheists, after millenia of literally being told that we will justly suffer eternal torment for our beliefs, have finally, in a few cases, stopped being perfectly respectful of people's religious beliefs--and thus we are "provoking it"?
by Unchecked Expansion » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:38 am
Katganistan wrote:Jusela wrote:What the heck is wrong with you people and your double standards?
Cant believe nine people favored voting yes to expel her based on her beliefs. Just the heck is wrong with you?
She has refused to abide by the ethical code required by the school and the licensing authority. What the heck is wrong with being refused the degree under those circumstances?
by Sebally-Orwitskia » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:38 am
Vervaria wrote:
by Vervaria » Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:39 am
Vandengaarde wrote:Soheran wrote:Zephie wrote:But from my experience, I see atheists provoking it.
Atheists, after millenia of literally being told that we will justly suffer eternal torment for our beliefs, have finally, in a few cases, stopped being perfectly respectful of people's religious beliefs--and thus we are "provoking it"?
I'm not even religious and I agree with Zephie. (this one time, never again!) I usually see atheists being the people who say "God is some floating invisible guy, why would you believe in him?" and baiting Christians/Muslims/whoever. The mods always ignore it because they're biased, but it doesn't change the facts.
Robustian wrote:If you disagree with me, you are wrong. Period.
Ashmoria wrote:it worries me more when people who hate the government and dont think it can do a good job at anything get into power and start running things.
Wanderjar wrote:hiding behind this "I WANT SOURCES" wall is very quaint
Self--Esteem wrote:No. I love smearing those people who evidently like their country blown by a nuke and who are too foolish to realise that middle-eastern terrorism is nothing to be fond of.
Novistranaya wrote:After the Civil War, the majority of Southerners were more than happy to accept defeat and acknowledge the fact that (though not immediately) blacks were going to have the same rights as them.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Bovad, Dumb Ideologies, Ineva, Keltionialang, Likhinia, Maximum Imperium Rex, Plan Neonie, Post War America, Repreteop, Shrillland, Simonia, Singaporen Empire
Advertisement