by Pandas and Heineken » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:16 am
by Ifreann » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:17 am
by Pandas and Heineken » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:19 am
Ifreann wrote:I didn't think hating rich people implied communism. Nor do I think Jesus hated anyone.
by Pandas and Heineken » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:21 am
Natapoc wrote:yes. He gave everything away for free and insisted the rich give all they had if they wanted to follow him.
by Living Freedom Land » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:22 am
The Holy Bible wrote:It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. And they were astonished out of measure, saying among themselves, Who then can be saved? And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible.
by Lunatic Goofballs » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:23 am
by Dododecapod » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:28 am
by Barringtonia » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:29 am
by Glorious Homeland » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:31 am
Living Freedom Land wrote:The Holy Bible wrote:It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. And they were astonished out of measure, saying among themselves, Who then can be saved? And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible.
The Bible clearly says, with God, all things are possible. The real problem is not wealth, but that men let wealth get between them and God.
by Aelosia » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:31 am
Dododecapod wrote:No. The Jesus of the Bible was an ascetic - one who seeks to live simply, without the distractions of goods and ownership, that he may perfect himself spiritually. When asked how to be a good folower of him, he says to do likewise, to give away your worldly goods and follow the ascetic path.
A good communist wants everyone to have equal access to everything. Jesus wanted to have nothing.
by Wamitoria » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:31 am
Dododecapod wrote:No. The Jesus of the Bible was an ascetic - one who seeks to live simply, without the distractions of goods and ownership, that he may perfect himself spiritually. When asked how to be a good folower of him, he says to do likewise, to give away your worldly goods and follow the ascetic path.
A good communist wants everyone to have equal access to everything. Jesus wanted to have nothing.
by Lackadaisical2 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:33 am
Barringtonia wrote:Apparently there's some get-out clause through 'render unto Caesar' that people are able to exploit by which they can becomes as rich as they like.. as well as choose tax-free offshore Caesar Islands in the Caribbean to render unto..
..fantastic stuff,
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.
by Living Freedom Land » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:33 am
Glorious Homeland wrote:Living Freedom Land wrote:The Holy Bible wrote:It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. And they were astonished out of measure, saying among themselves, Who then can be saved? And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible.
The Bible clearly says, with God, all things are possible. The real problem is not wealth, but that men let wealth get between them and God.
Funny how the rich Americans always say that. But then America is a country that was founded by heretics. Socialism in the UK took a large amount of support from the likes of the Methodist church, which supported socialism on theological grounds.
by Wamitoria » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:35 am
Living Freedom Land wrote:Glorious Homeland wrote:Living Freedom Land wrote:The Holy Bible wrote:It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. And they were astonished out of measure, saying among themselves, Who then can be saved? And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible.
The Bible clearly says, with God, all things are possible. The real problem is not wealth, but that men let wealth get between them and God.
Funny how the rich Americans always say that. But then America is a country that was founded by heretics. Socialism in the UK took a large amount of support from the likes of the Methodist church, which supported socialism on theological grounds.
America was founded not founded by heretics. Rather, Americans were fleeing heretical oppression.
by Barringtonia » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:35 am
Lackadaisical2 wrote:Barringtonia wrote:Apparently there's some get-out clause through 'render unto Caesar' that people are able to exploit by which they can becomes as rich as they like.. as well as choose tax-free offshore Caesar Islands in the Caribbean to render unto..
..fantastic stuff,
That doesn't get you out of the possibility of private charity.
by Living Freedom Land » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:38 am
Wamitoria wrote:Living Freedom Land wrote:Glorious Homeland wrote:Living Freedom Land wrote:The Holy Bible wrote:It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. And they were astonished out of measure, saying among themselves, Who then can be saved? And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible.
The Bible clearly says, with God, all things are possible. The real problem is not wealth, but that men let wealth get between them and God.
Funny how the rich Americans always say that. But then America is a country that was founded by heretics. Socialism in the UK took a large amount of support from the likes of the Methodist church, which supported socialism on theological grounds.
America was founded not founded by heretics. Rather, Americans were fleeing heretical oppression.
And they proceeded to persecute everyone who didn't agree with their personal beliefs, your point?
by Pythria » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:40 am
by Tungookska » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:40 am
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:I'm not convinced that an individual can be a communist. Oh, an individual might tout the benefits of communism both real and imagined, but to actually practice communism, he really needs some people to practice communism with.
by Ifreann » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:42 am
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:I'm not convinced that an individual can be a communist. Oh, an individual might tout the benefits of communism both real and imagined, but to actually practice communism, he really needs some people to practice communism with.
by Wamitoria » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:43 am
Living Freedom Land wrote:Wamitoria wrote:Living Freedom Land wrote:Glorious Homeland wrote:Living Freedom Land wrote:The Holy Bible wrote:It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. And they were astonished out of measure, saying among themselves, Who then can be saved? And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible.
The Bible clearly says, with God, all things are possible. The real problem is not wealth, but that men let wealth get between them and God.
Funny how the rich Americans always say that. But then America is a country that was founded by heretics. Socialism in the UK took a large amount of support from the likes of the Methodist church, which supported socialism on theological grounds.
America was founded not founded by heretics. Rather, Americans were fleeing heretical oppression.
And they proceeded to persecute everyone who didn't agree with their personal beliefs, your point?
I fail to see how the nation that pioneered freedom of religion is a nation rife with persecution. Sure, some people like the Puritans in Massachusetts originally restricted other religions, but the Pennsylvanians were pacifist Quakers that wanted to harm nobody. By the time a real American identity was established, freedom of religion was an idea gaining ground and was adopted in the First Amendment of the Constitution.
by Bamabam » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:44 am
by Communist Phanafia » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:47 am
by Living Freedom Land » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:47 am
Wamitoria wrote:I phrased that wrong, our founders persecuted anyone who didn't look like them.
Black slaves, Native Americans to name a few. Sure, the slaves were eventually freed, but the Native Americans were all but exterminated. But, I'm getting off-topic...
by Chrobalta » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:49 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Adamede, Askio, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Fame And Even More Fame, Hutsuls, Jabberwocky, Kohr, Malorossi, Novos Zazprogidamos, Osmauri, Pale Dawn, Peaca, Pelmennayaa, Port Myreal, Post War America, Rajyam, Stellar Colonies, SusScorfa, The Notorious Mad Jack, The Selkie, Uiiop
Advertisement