Ahhh...Shahada and Genesis combo! Neat!
Advertisement
by Risottia » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:23 am
Moriskov wrote:Ах, дайте мне насладиться моментом .........идиотs всегда развлекает меня
by RepentNowOrPayLater » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:25 am
by Maynarden » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:25 am
by RepentNowOrPayLater » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:26 am
Vonners wrote:Ahhh...Shahada and Genesis combo! Neat!
by Risottia » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:27 am
Maynarden wrote:As this link shows, Arkansas had the second highest divorce rate of any state in 2005. Oklahoma had the fourth highest divorce rate. Also notice that every state with more than 5 divorces per 1,000 people in 2005 voted for Bush in 2004. Five out of the six also voted for McCain in 2008. Apparently the more religious are getting divorced at higher rates, despite the fact that the fear of divine retribution strengthens their relationships (I find the notion that we should behave because God will punish us for not doing so objectionable as well, but that is a subjective matter).
by Moriskov » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:28 am
by Sungai Pusat » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:28 am
Virabia wrote:You sir, are an idiot.
by RepentNowOrPayLater » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:28 am
Maynarden wrote:As this link shows, Arkansas had the second highest divorce rate of any state in 2005. Oklahoma had the fourth highest divorce rate. Also notice that every state with more than 5 divorces per 1,000 people in 2005 voted for Bush in 2004. Five out of the six also voted for McCain in 2008. Apparently the more religious are getting divorced at higher rates, despite the fact that the fear of divine retribution strengthens their relationships (I find the notion that we should behave because God will punish us for not doing so objectionable as well, but that is a subjective matter).
by RepentNowOrPayLater » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:30 am
by Sungai Pusat » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:30 am
by Maynarden » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:33 am
RepentNowOrPayLater wrote:Maynarden wrote:As this link shows, Arkansas had the second highest divorce rate of any state in 2005. Oklahoma had the fourth highest divorce rate. Also notice that every state with more than 5 divorces per 1,000 people in 2005 voted for Bush in 2004. Five out of the six also voted for McCain in 2008. Apparently the more religious are getting divorced at higher rates, despite the fact that the fear of divine retribution strengthens their relationships (I find the notion that we should behave because God will punish us for not doing so objectionable as well, but that is a subjective matter).
Your post is proof that cursory quantitative analysis is not substitute for careful examination of what you think you're responding too.
Consider that a few extra seconds examining what you're rebutting can save you minutes of looking up internet links.
by Risottia » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:34 am
Turan devleti wrote:because they do not have value system
by Moriskov » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:35 am
by Lackadaisical2 » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:37 am
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.
by Sungai Pusat » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:38 am
by RepentNowOrPayLater » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:40 am
by Ramsetia » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:40 am
by RepentNowOrPayLater » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:42 am
Maynarden wrote:RepentNowOrPayLater wrote:Maynarden wrote:As this link shows, Arkansas had the second highest divorce rate of any state in 2005. Oklahoma had the fourth highest divorce rate. Also notice that every state with more than 5 divorces per 1,000 people in 2005 voted for Bush in 2004. Five out of the six also voted for McCain in 2008. Apparently the more religious are getting divorced at higher rates, despite the fact that the fear of divine retribution strengthens their relationships (I find the notion that we should behave because God will punish us for not doing so objectionable as well, but that is a subjective matter).
Your post is proof that cursory quantitative analysis is not substitute for careful examination of what you think you're responding too.
Consider that a few extra seconds examining what you're rebutting can save you minutes of looking up internet links.
I know, but I thought it would be interesting to point out anyway. Guess I almost put the thread back on track, eh?
by Risottia » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:42 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Barinive, Dazchan, Diarcesia, Eahland, Eragon Island, Ineva, Kostane, SimTropican, Zetaopalatopia
Advertisement