Advertisement

by Galloism » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:31 pm

by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:31 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:South East Europe wrote:This is the only case where that has been proven to be true. This exact thread, which I did for a joke towards people like you. I give views on most subjects and provide sources when I can find them. I have said worthwhile things in most of my posts, so don't accuse me of bullshit.
Why would you provide reasonable argument and sources for only some of your posts? I would try my best do do so for all of them.

by Buffett and Colbert » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:31 pm
South East Europe wrote:The counter argument I am presenting is the truth instead of lies. There is no better counter argument then to present truth over lies.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Conserative Morality » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:31 pm
South East Europe wrote:The counter argument I am presenting is the truth instead of lies. There is no better counter argument then to present truth over lies.

by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:32 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:South East Europe wrote:This is the only case where that has been proven to be true. This exact thread, which I did for a joke towards people like you. I give views on most subjects and provide sources when I can find them. I have said worthwhile things in most of my posts, so don't accuse me of bullshit.
I want to see these posts.

by Buffett and Colbert » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:32 pm
South East Europe wrote:Yes, and since it was in most of my posts, that is trying my best for all of them.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Conserative Morality » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:33 pm
South East Europe wrote:Refer back to 'when I can find them', its hard to go about finding 400 or so posts.

by Galloism » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:33 pm
South East Europe wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:South East Europe wrote:This is the only case where that has been proven to be true. This exact thread, which I did for a joke towards people like you. I give views on most subjects and provide sources when I can find them. I have said worthwhile things in most of my posts, so don't accuse me of bullshit.
I want to see these posts.
Refer back to 'when I can find them', its hard to go about finding 400 or so posts.

by Buffett and Colbert » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:34 pm
South East Europe wrote:Refer back to 'when I can find them', its hard to go about finding 400 or so posts.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:35 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:South East Europe wrote:The counter argument I am presenting is the truth instead of lies. There is no better counter argument then to present truth over lies.
Would mind actually telling us what you think is the truth? You have yet to make an actual point. All I can tell is that you're making fun of the fundies. I don't see the point yet. Maybe if you cared to elaborate, I would.

by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:36 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:South East Europe wrote:The counter argument I am presenting is the truth instead of lies. There is no better counter argument then to present truth over lies.
But you must prove that your posts are the truth, not the alleged lies. You have failed to do so.

by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:36 pm
South East Europe wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:South East Europe wrote:The counter argument I am presenting is the truth instead of lies. There is no better counter argument then to present truth over lies.
But you must prove that your posts are the truth, not the alleged lies. You have failed to do so.
Why would I have a hidden message in any of my posts? I never claimed that black people were evil like you insinuate. I don't have hidden messages, I have straightforward messages.

by Buffett and Colbert » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:37 pm
South East Europe wrote:People writing that I wrote things that I didn't write, that is lying. Writing what I actually wrote, that is the truth. My point is to make fun of the fundies. Again, there is nothing relevant about this thread.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Brogavia » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:38 pm
South East Europe wrote:to be an Islamic Fundamentalist, do you?
to be a Liberal Zionist, do you?
to be a Conservative Christian, do you?
to be a Libertarian Athiest, do you?
to base most of your politics on religion, do you?

by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:38 pm
Galloism wrote:
Let's start with 1 or 2 then.
Hopefully something that will somehow be relevant to this thread. I'm still confused as to what this thread's about.

by Conserative Morality » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:39 pm
South East Europe wrote:Why would I have a hidden message in any of my posts? I never claimed that black people were evil like you insinuate. I don't have hidden messages, I have straigtforward messages.

by Neo Art » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:39 pm

by Conserative Morality » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:40 pm
South East Europe wrote:Did I say the thread was about anything? No. Did I say it was an attempt at a joke? (even though its a sucky one) Yes. Nothing is relevant to this thread because this thread is not relevant.

by Conserative Morality » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:41 pm
Neo Art wrote:I'm eternally amazed at people who will spend all the effort stamp their feet like children yelling about how they "have a point", and not actually tell us what the fucking point is.


by Buffett and Colbert » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:41 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Ifreann » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:41 pm
Neo Art wrote:I'm eternally amazed at people who will spend all the effort stamp their feet like children yelling about how they "have a point", and not actually tell us what the fucking point is.

by SoWiBi » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:42 pm
South East Europe wrote:This is the only case where that has been proven to be true. This exact thread, which I did for a joke towards people like you. I give views on most subjects and provide sources when I can find them. I have said worthwhile things in most of my posts, so don't accuse me of bullshit.
| ..SoWiBi.. | ..Oeck.. | ..ElkElks.. | ..NietzscheHeretics.. | ..Isjan.. | ..I am a False Statement.. |

by EvilDarkMagicians » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:42 pm
Galloism wrote:I used to be a conservative Christian, so yeah on that count.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Barfleur, Calption, Celritannia, Chernobyl and Pripyat, Duncaq, Ethel mermania, Fartsniffage, Google [Bot], Greater Miami Shores 3, Necroghastia, Ostroeuropa, Saiwana, San Lumen, Skiearpia, The Embassy 3, The Emerald Legion, Urkennalaid, Violetist Britannia, Xmara
Advertisement