United Russian State wrote:The west can't be compromised with.
I don't think that was one of the chioces was it?
Advertisement
by Kormanthor » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:27 am
United Russian State wrote:The west can't be compromised with.
by Galloism » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:28 am
Twenty Years wrote:Well if you want to compromise of pro choice and pro life lets all just buy machine guns and shoot random people on the streets!!!! Killing adults and killing babies are the same thing people!!!
Peoples reason for having pro-choice (& why there dumb reasons):
1st- "My friend was raped and now shes prego!" So just becuase something bad happened to the mom means that the baby has to pay for it??? ya that make sense...
2nd- "I can support the child" thats like sayin im too poor so i'm goin to kill it... AND PEOPLE THERE THINGS LIKE ADOPTION there are alot of couples that can't have children while idiots kill babies like its goin out of style.
3rd- "im only 16 and my parents will kick me out if i have to support a baby" here we go again PEOPLE, MILLIONS OF COUPLES CANNOT GET PREGO AND YOU THINK THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ADOPTION!!!!!!!!!!! and why should 16 year old being having sex in the first place??????????????
Pro-Choice is a killing dumb stupid thing that should never be compromised!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Getbrett » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:28 am
Twenty Years wrote:Well if you want to compromise of pro choice and pro life lets all just buy machine guns and shoot random people on the streets!!!! Killing adults and killing babies are the same thing people!!!
Peoples reason for having pro-choice (& why there dumb reasons):
1st- "My friend was raped and now shes prego!" So just becuase something bad happened to the mom means that the baby has to pay for it??? ya that make sense...
2nd- "I can support the child" thats like sayin im too poor so i'm goin to kill it... AND PEOPLE THERE THINGS LIKE ADOPTION there are alot of couples that can't have children while idiots kill babies like its goin out of style.
3rd- "im only 16 and my parents will kick me out if i have to support a baby" here we go again PEOPLE, MILLIONS OF COUPLES CANNOT GET PREGO AND YOU THINK THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ADOPTION!!!!!!!!!!! and why should 16 year old being having sex in the first place??????????????
Pro-Choice is a killing dumb stupid thing that should never be compromised!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Galloism » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:30 am
Getbrett wrote:Twenty Years wrote:Well if you want to compromise of pro choice and pro life lets all just buy machine guns and shoot random people on the streets!!!! Killing adults and killing babies are the same thing people!!!
Peoples reason for having pro-choice (& why there dumb reasons):
1st- "My friend was raped and now shes prego!" So just becuase something bad happened to the mom means that the baby has to pay for it??? ya that make sense...
2nd- "I can support the child" thats like sayin im too poor so i'm goin to kill it... AND PEOPLE THERE THINGS LIKE ADOPTION there are alot of couples that can't have children while idiots kill babies like its goin out of style.
3rd- "im only 16 and my parents will kick me out if i have to support a baby" here we go again PEOPLE, MILLIONS OF COUPLES CANNOT GET PREGO AND YOU THINK THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ADOPTION!!!!!!!!!!! and why should 16 year old being having sex in the first place??????????????
Pro-Choice is a killing dumb stupid thing that should never be compromised!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I can't take you seriously because "prego" is an intrinsically funny word. Prego. Hahaha.
by Ashmoria » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:31 am
South East Europe wrote:Ashmoria wrote:South East Europe wrote:Votes for women could have reached a compromise, Some women can vote but not all. Just like special treatment for blacks could have reached a compromise, Only Blacks who contribute to society can get preferential treatment.
those are pretty sucky compromises.
and like the old doctrine of "seperate but equal" too dependent on the imperfect (racist/sexist) local official to decide who makes the grade and who doesnt.
I am vehemantly against "seperate but equal", I am just saying that such a compromise could be worked out not that I would agree with such a compromise.
by Hamilay » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:31 am
by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:31 am
Getbrett wrote:South East Europe wrote:
I have the right word. Blacks can call me "Faggot", "Freak", "Shemale", etc... in my school and when it's reported, they don't even get a slap on the wrist. But, if I were to call a black person a "Nigger", then I would be expelled. That's prefential treatment if I ever saw it.
Oh man, your world view really does revolve around your persecution complex, doesn't it? It's pathetic.
by Farnhamia » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:32 am
Galloism wrote:Getbrett wrote:Twenty Years wrote:Well if you want to compromise of pro choice and pro life lets all just buy machine guns and shoot random people on the streets!!!! Killing adults and killing babies are the same thing people!!!
Peoples reason for having pro-choice (& why there dumb reasons):
1st- "My friend was raped and now shes prego!" So just becuase something bad happened to the mom means that the baby has to pay for it??? ya that make sense...
2nd- "I can support the child" thats like sayin im too poor so i'm goin to kill it... AND PEOPLE THERE THINGS LIKE ADOPTION there are alot of couples that can't have children while idiots kill babies like its goin out of style.
3rd- "im only 16 and my parents will kick me out if i have to support a baby" here we go again PEOPLE, MILLIONS OF COUPLES CANNOT GET PREGO AND YOU THINK THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ADOPTION!!!!!!!!!!! and why should 16 year old being having sex in the first place??????????????
Pro-Choice is a killing dumb stupid thing that should never be compromised!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I can't take you seriously because "prego" is an intrinsically funny word. Prego. Hahaha.
Prego makes pretty good sauce, though.
by Northwest Slobovia » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:33 am
South East Europe wrote:Northwest Slobovia wrote:South East Europe wrote:So since there is a compromise for nearly everything that people make a serious issue, I ask you this, why can't we all just compromise?
Well, you could start by compromising on your extremist believe that there is nearly always a compromise.
It's an extremist belief? Why? Because I don't entirely agree with you but am willing to compromise?
by Galloism » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:33 am
Farnhamia wrote:Galloism wrote:Getbrett wrote:I can't take you seriously because "prego" is an intrinsically funny word. Prego. Hahaha.
Prego makes pretty good sauce, though.
It does. And I wish people like that would just come right out and say what they mean, don't you?
by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:34 am
Ashmoria wrote:South East Europe wrote:Ashmoria wrote:those are pretty sucky compromises.
and like the old doctrine of "seperate but equal" too dependent on the imperfect (racist/sexist) local official to decide who makes the grade and who doesnt.
I am vehemantly against "seperate but equal", I am just saying that such a compromise could be worked out not that I would agree with such a compromise.
oh
well then
a sucky compromise doesnt defend your position well. it would be better to propose a compromise that you think of as the best possible choice.
by United Russian State » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:34 am
Kormanthor wrote:United Russian State wrote:The west can't be compromised with.
I don't think that was one of the chioces was it?
by Kormanthor » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:35 am
Getbrett wrote:Kormanthor wrote:South East Europe wrote:Here is my dilemma!
Pro-"Life" or Pro-"Choice"? There is a compromise is there not?
Lets take one of these subjects for Instance; I am Definately ProLife, where is the compromise there? Please explain your reasoning here.
Hypothetically, abort the anti-choicer, not the fetus.
by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:37 am
Northwest Slobovia wrote:South East Europe wrote:Northwest Slobovia wrote:Well, you could start by compromising on your extremist believe that there is nearly always a compromise.
It's an extremist belief? Why? Because I don't entirely agree with you but am willing to compromise?
It's intended as self-referential humor. That is, could you "moderate" your belief by saying that people can compromise only half the time/on half the issues they believe in. That's a compromise between "compromise is (nearly) always possible" and "we must always try to get our own way", right?
Oh, you want a serious answer. Ok... people who feel strongly about something -- anything, really -- might say that saying "we can (nearly) always compromise" is an indication of relativist beliefs -- there is no right and wrong -- which is often taken as an extreme position. Others would point out that things that seem like compromises actually embrace extreme principles held by one side or the other in a dispute.
For example, during the run-up to the US Civil War, there were people who advocated a compromise: gradually eliminating slavery, perhaps by buying slaves from their owners. Many abolitionists thought this was abominable, because it accepted the notion that people could be property. So, in that sense, the apparent compromise of gradual elimination of slavery by purchase rather than the extremes of yes slavery or no slavery is actually an extreme position by accepting the "extremist" view that people can property.
Does that help?
by Getbrett » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:37 am
South East Europe wrote:Getbrett wrote:South East Europe wrote:
I have the right word. Blacks can call me "Faggot", "Freak", "Shemale", etc... in my school and when it's reported, they don't even get a slap on the wrist. But, if I were to call a black person a "Nigger", then I would be expelled. That's prefential treatment if I ever saw it.
Oh man, your world view really does revolve around your persecution complex, doesn't it? It's pathetic.
Excuse me, I'm talking about personal experiences not things in my mind. So, my world view is from how I have been treated. Your right, it is pathetic to judge all people from one group because of how the majority of people I have met from that group have treated me. I don't believe I am being persecuted, I know I am being persecuted. And you don't even know one thing about persecution, gays have it way better off than I do. Everyone bends over backwards for gay marriage but stands hard against equal employment protection of transsexuals. Straights, Gays, and Bisexuals are for the most part Transphobic, this too is based on personal experience.
by Anti-Mod Duck » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:38 am
by Angleter » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:38 am
by Kormanthor » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:39 am
United Russian State wrote:[Let me put it in this way than.
Most people from western nations (NATO) have the thinking "I am right, you are worng. Fuck off." They cannot compromise with their own (look at Amercia) or others from differnt cultures.
by Hamilay » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:39 am
United Russian State wrote:Kormanthor wrote:United Russian State wrote:The west can't be compromised with.
I don't think that was one of the chioces was it?
Let me put it in this way than.
Most peoplefrom western nations (NATO)have the thinking "I am right, you are worng. Fuck off." They cannot compromise with their own (look at Amercia) or others from differnt cultures.
by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:39 am
United Russian State wrote:Kormanthor wrote:United Russian State wrote:The west can't be compromised with.
I don't think that was one of the chioces was it?
Let me put it in this way than.
Most people from western nations (NATO) have the thinking "I am right, you are worng. Fuck off." They cannot compromise with their own (look at Amercia) or others from differnt cultures.
by Anti-Mod Duck » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:40 am
Twenty Years wrote:Well if you want to compromise of pro choice and pro life lets all just buy machine guns and shoot random people on the streets!!!! Killing adults and killing babies are the same thing people!!!
Peoples reason for having pro-choice (& why there dumb reasons):
1st- "My friend was raped and now shes prego!" So just becuase something bad happened to the mom means that the baby has to pay for it??? ya that make sense...
2nd- "I can support the child" thats like sayin im too poor so i'm goin to kill it... AND PEOPLE THERE THINGS LIKE ADOPTION there are alot of couples that can't have children while idiots kill babies like its goin out of style.
3rd- "im only 16 and my parents will kick me out if i have to support a baby" here we go again PEOPLE, MILLIONS OF COUPLES CANNOT GET PREGO AND YOU THINK THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ADOPTION!!!!!!!!!!! and why should 16 year old being having sex in the first place??????????????
Pro-Choice is a killing dumb stupid thing that should never be compromised!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Galloism » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:41 am
Kormanthor wrote:United Russian State wrote:[Let me put it in this way than.
Most people from western nations (NATO) have the thinking "I am right, you are worng. Fuck off." They cannot compromise with their own (look at Amercia) or others from differnt cultures.
Lets turn this into an America bashing party OK?
by Conserative Morality » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:42 am
by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:43 am
Getbrett wrote:South East Europe wrote:Getbrett wrote:Oh man, your world view really does revolve around your persecution complex, doesn't it? It's pathetic.
Excuse me, I'm talking about personal experiences not things in my mind. So, my world view is from how I have been treated. Your right, it is pathetic to judge all people from one group because of how the majority of people I have met from that group have treated me. I don't believe I am being persecuted, I know I am being persecuted. And you don't even know one thing about persecution, gays have it way better off than I do. Everyone bends over backwards for gay marriage but stands hard against equal employment protection of transsexuals. Straights, Gays, and Bisexuals are for the most part Transphobic, this too is based on personal experience.
All of this may well be true. However, it has nothing to do with what you're proposing in the opening post. Nothing. The fact that you brought it back to this topic, even when it's largely unrelated, reeks of a persecution complex. Make your argument without appealing to irrelevant emotion and perhaps I'll listen.
by Brogavia » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:43 am
United Russian State wrote:Kormanthor wrote:United Russian State wrote:The west can't be compromised with.
I don't think that was one of the chioces was it?
Let me put it in this way than.
Most people from western nations (NATO) have the thinking "I am right, you are worng. Fuck off." They cannot compromise with their own (look at Amercia) or others from differnt cultures.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Amara Coast, Google [Bot], Kreigsreich of Iron, La Xinga, Rusozak, Sakar Island
Advertisement