by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:14 am
by No Names Left Damn It » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:15 am
by Angleter » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:16 am
by Belschaft » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:17 am
by Ashmoria » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:17 am
South East Europe wrote:Here is my dilemma!
Pro-"Life" or Pro-"Choice"? There is a compromise is there not?
Anti-Homosexual "Marriage" or Pro-Homosexual "Marriage"? There is a compromise is there not?
Socialism or Capitalism? Fascism or Communism? There is a compromise is there not?
Unisex Restrooms or Binary Restrooms? There is a compromise is there not?
Fiscal Responsibility or Liberal Spending? There is a compromise.
Environment Conservation or Environmental Preservation or Environmental Destruction? There is a compromise.
Dangerous Substances or No Dangerous Substances? There is a compromise.
Healthcare Reform or Anti-Healthcare Reform? There is a compromise.
So since there is a compromise for nearly everything that people make a serious issue, I ask you this, why can't we all just compromise?
by Northwest Slobovia » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:18 am
South East Europe wrote:So since there is a compromise for nearly everything that people make a serious issue, I ask you this, why can't we all just compromise?
by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:19 am
by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:20 am
Northwest Slobovia wrote:South East Europe wrote:So since there is a compromise for nearly everything that people make a serious issue, I ask you this, why can't we all just compromise?
Well, you could start by compromising on your extremist believe that there is nearly always a compromise.
by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:21 am
Ashmoria wrote:i think you need to propose the compromise in all these things....
for example what is the compromise between unisex and sex segregated bathrooms?
by Belschaft » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:21 am
South East Europe wrote:Northwest Slobovia wrote:South East Europe wrote:So since there is a compromise for nearly everything that people make a serious issue, I ask you this, why can't we all just compromise?
Well, you could start by compromising on your extremist believe that there is nearly always a compromise.
It's an extremist belief? Why? Because I don't entirely agree with you but am willing to compromise?
by No Names Left Damn It » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:22 am
South East Europe wrote:Votes for women could have reached a compromise
by Ashmoria » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:22 am
South East Europe wrote:Votes for women could have reached a compromise, Some women can vote but not all. Just like special treatment for blacks could have reached a compromise, Only Blacks who contribute to society can get preferential treatment.
by Getbrett » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:22 am
South East Europe wrote:Votes for women could have reached a compromise, Some women can vote but not all. Just like special treatment for blacks could have reached a compromise, Only Blacks who contribute to society can get preferential treatment.
by Kormanthor » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:22 am
South East Europe wrote:Here is my dilemma!
Pro-"Life" or Pro-"Choice"? There is a compromise is there not?
by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:22 am
Belschaft wrote:Debates would be pretty boring if we all typed 'while I disagree with you, I respect your right o hold that opinion, as you do my own'
by Chumblywumbly » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:23 am
South East Europe wrote:Votes for women could have reached a compromise, Some women can vote but not all. Just like special treatment for blacks could have reached a compromise, Only Blacks who contribute to society can get preferential treatment.
by Ashmoria » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:23 am
South East Europe wrote:Ashmoria wrote:i think you need to propose the compromise in all these things....
for example what is the compromise between unisex and sex segregated bathrooms?
Well, the compromise between unisex and sex segregated bathrooms is to have unisex and sex segregated bathrooms.
by Getbrett » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:24 am
Kormanthor wrote:South East Europe wrote:Here is my dilemma!
Pro-"Life" or Pro-"Choice"? There is a compromise is there not?
Lets take one of these subjects for Instance; I am Definately ProLife, where is the compromise there? Please explain your reasoning here.
by United Russian State » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:25 am
by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:25 am
Getbrett wrote:South East Europe wrote:Votes for women could have reached a compromise, Some women can vote but not all. Just like special treatment for blacks could have reached a compromise, Only Blacks who contribute to society can get preferential treatment.
Preferential treatment? No, the word you're looking for is "equal treatment".
by Kormanthor » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:25 am
Chumblywumbly wrote:South East Europe wrote:Votes for women could have reached a compromise, Some women can vote but not all. Just like special treatment for blacks could have reached a compromise, Only Blacks who contribute to society can get preferential treatment.
And how in any stretch of the imagination would this be a good thing?
by No Names Left Damn It » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:26 am
South East Europe wrote:I have the right word. Blacks can call me "Faggot", "Freak", "Shemale", etc... in my school and when it's reported, they don't even get a slap on the wrist. But, if I were to call a black person a "Nigger", then I would be expelled. That's prefential treatment if I ever saw it.
by Getbrett » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:26 am
South East Europe wrote:Getbrett wrote:South East Europe wrote:Votes for women could have reached a compromise, Some women can vote but not all. Just like special treatment for blacks could have reached a compromise, Only Blacks who contribute to society can get preferential treatment.
Preferential treatment? No, the word you're looking for is "equal treatment".
I have the right word. Blacks can call me "Faggot", "Freak", "Shemale", etc... in my school and when it's reported, they don't even get a slap on the wrist. But, if I were to call a black person a "Nigger", then I would be expelled. That's prefential treatment if I ever saw it.
by South East Europe » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:27 am
Ashmoria wrote:South East Europe wrote:Votes for women could have reached a compromise, Some women can vote but not all. Just like special treatment for blacks could have reached a compromise, Only Blacks who contribute to society can get preferential treatment.
those are pretty sucky compromises.
and like the old doctrine of "seperate but equal" too dependent on the imperfect (racist/sexist) local official to decide who makes the grade and who doesnt.
by Twenty Years » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:27 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ineva, Pathonia, Plan Neonie, Riviere Renard, Statesburg, Uiiop
Advertisement