NATION

PASSWORD

What are your most politically incorrect beleifs?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Panzerjaeger
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9856
Founded: Sep 15, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Panzerjaeger » Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:44 am

Geniasis wrote:
Kreanoltha wrote:
Geniasis wrote:
Kreanoltha wrote:Of course. It would be stupid not to. The situation I was refering to was if the father could provide an livable income for the entire family for until the children entered grade school. I happen to have had to the opposite play out for me. My mother had a higher paying job so my father stayed home with my sister and me. We did just fine, and had no money troubles.


OK, you're being reasonable. This isn't fun anymore.

*pouts*


GET BACK IN THAT KITCHEN AND MAKE ME A STAKE WOMAN! Is that better? :rofl:


Indeed. I'm afraid that I couldn't bring myself to marry a woman who wouldn't support my vampire-hunting hobbies.

Though how you knew that factoid is troubling. :eyebrow:

He is probably a vampire. We should kill him before he can escape and alert his Coven.
Friendly Neighborhood Fascist™
ФАШИЗМ БЕЗГРАНИЧНЫЙ И КРАСНЫЙ
Caninope wrote:Toyota: Keep moving forward, even when you don't want to!

Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:Timothy McVeigh casts... Pyrotechnics!

Greater Americania wrote:lol "No Comrade Ivan! Don't stick your head in there! That's the wood chi...!"

New Kereptica wrote:Fascism: because people are too smart nowadays.

User avatar
Kreanoltha
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8117
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Kreanoltha » Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:45 am

Geniasis wrote:
Kreanoltha wrote:
Geniasis wrote:
Kreanoltha wrote:Of course. It would be stupid not to. The situation I was refering to was if the father could provide an livable income for the entire family for until the children entered grade school. I happen to have had to the opposite play out for me. My mother had a higher paying job so my father stayed home with my sister and me. We did just fine, and had no money troubles.


OK, you're being reasonable. This isn't fun anymore.

*pouts*


GET BACK IN THAT KITCHEN AND MAKE ME A STAKE WOMAN! Is that better? :rofl:


Indeed. I'm afraid that I couldn't bring myself to marry a woman who wouldn't support my vampire-hunting hobbies.

Though how you knew that factoid is troubling. :eyebrow:


Crap! I misspelled steak. This is troubling. Now I'm going to get a round, splintery piece of wood instead of a thick juicy piece of beef...

GET BACK IN THAT KITCHEN AND BRING ME MY MEAT WOMAN!
I'M BACK!!!

"The size of ones internet spaceboats are inversely proportional to the size of ones penis."

FT only.
#NSLegion. For all your NS-FT RPing needs.

User avatar
New Amerik
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8801
Founded: Feb 08, 2010
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby New Amerik » Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:22 am

Kreanoltha wrote:
Geniasis wrote:
Kreanoltha wrote:
Geniasis wrote:
Kreanoltha wrote:Of course. It would be stupid not to. The situation I was refering to was if the father could provide an livable income for the entire family for until the children entered grade school. I happen to have had to the opposite play out for me. My mother had a higher paying job so my father stayed home with my sister and me. We did just fine, and had no money troubles.


OK, you're being reasonable. This isn't fun anymore.

*pouts*


GET BACK IN THAT KITCHEN AND MAKE ME A STAKE WOMAN! Is that better? :rofl:


Indeed. I'm afraid that I couldn't bring myself to marry a woman who wouldn't support my vampire-hunting hobbies.

Though how you knew that factoid is troubling. :eyebrow:


Crap! I misspelled steak. This is troubling. Now I'm going to get a round, splintery piece of wood instead of a thick juicy piece of beef...

GET BACK IN THAT KITCHEN AND BRING ME MY MEAT WOMAN!



Generally, in a relationship it's the man who's supposed to have the meat, not the woman... :eyebrow:
The Basics of New Amerik
Factbook | Portfolio | Resurrection Offered (Storefront) | Embassy
Founder of the ROUS
*NALOW 5 = Open Peace
NALOW 4 =
NALOW 3 = Defensive Actions
NALOW 2 = Open War
NALOW 1 = Total War
NALOW 0 = Blackout

User avatar
Dark Side Messiahs
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1105
Founded: May 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Dark Side Messiahs » Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:20 pm

Geniasis wrote:
Panzerjaeger wrote:
Geniasis wrote:
Kreanoltha wrote:
Jimanistan wrote:
Geniasis wrote:What about the father?


The "proper place of a woman" argument tends to bother me, a bit. Surely a father has as much an obligation to raise children as a mother, right?


If the father can make more money than the mother he should be earning his family's income.


And what about the situation of the father working 2-3 minimum wage jobs that can't quite pay the bills? Is the woman allowed the leave the kitchen once we've hit that kind of DEFCON 1?

Women outside the kitchen? HERESY!


She made awful sammiches. It's for the best.


Thanks Kreanoltha, the support is welcome.

What about the father? He needs to get off his lazy ass and find something better than 2-3 minimum wage jobs that can't quite pay the bills. Education, while costly in some cases, is key to being able to support your family and they have financial aid for that very thing.

This isn't a sexist argument where I am saying that women belong solely in the kitchen, I'm saying that women need to think about what's really important; their kids or their corner office. Someone needs to be there for those kids and as their primary caregiver, which is how they are viewed under law and by society, mothers have an obligation to their children. Does this mean they shouldn't be allowed to work, not in the slightest but they do need to choose which is more important to them. Once the kids hit grade school level there are options to work from home but until the children reach that age they need someone to look out for them and be home when they get home from school.

Parents seem to have fallen into a place where family isn't as important as work; is this view forced on them by their employer, probably but that is no excuse... family comes first. In today's society, its hard to find a stay at home mom or stay at home dad regularly. They hand their kids over to strangers to take care of instead of taking on the responsibility of being a parent themselves.
Yep, I'm a Geek. I'm also a left-wing, anti-illegal, pro-life, gun loving, white, college educated, politically informed, socially abrasive, conservatively liberal male with a big mouth...deal with it.
!!!WARNING!!!
I give it a 1 in 4 chance you will not like my view on certain things,
you might find my opinion off kilter or even offensive.
I don't give a flying fuck how my position makes you feel,
it's my opinion and you won't change my mind.
So save yourself a lot of wasted time trying to argue with me,
don't compile a list of of my posts so you can try to point out the flaws in my beliefs,
you will not win.

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21292
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:45 pm

Dark Side Messiahs wrote:This is going to piss a few people off but I don't care...

I believe women should have to choose between family life or having a career; if you're a woman who works and wants to be a mother than you must decide what is more important to you. No more having kids and then putting your job before them; as a mother, your children are your job.


I had a very good stay at home dad, so my mom really didn't have to choose. If a woman marries a guy who does not like to hang around the house with the kids then she might want to avoid working long hours.

People need to think about this before they get married.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21292
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:48 pm

Kreanoltha wrote:
Jimanistan wrote:
Geniasis wrote:What about the father?


The "proper place of a woman" argument tends to bother me, a bit. Surely a father has as much an obligation to raise children as a mother, right?


If the father can make more money than the mother he should be earning his family's income.


And if the woman can make more money? Most of the guys I've dated made less than I do.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
Coccygia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7521
Founded: Nov 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Coccygia » Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:16 pm

A traditional two-parent (man and woman, married) family is the best option for a child. (I know I'm gonna get it for this one. Almost a bad as defending notorious mass murderer Rachel Carson...)
"Nobody deserves anything. You get what you get." - House
"Hope is for sissies." - House
“Qokedy qokedy dal qokedy qokedy." - The Voynich Manuscript
"We're not ordinary people - we're morons!" - Jerome Horwitz
"A book, any book, is a sacred object." - Jorge Luis Borges
"I am a survivor. I am like a cockroach, you just can't get rid of me." - Madonna

User avatar
Tungookska
Minister
 
Posts: 2310
Founded: Jan 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Tungookska » Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:18 pm

Coccygia wrote:A traditional two-parent (man and woman, married) family is the best option for a child. (I know I'm gonna get it for this one. Almost a bad as defending notorious mass murderer Rachel Carson...)

one man more than one woman is more 'traditional' than monogamy
Last edited by Tungookska on Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Coccygia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7521
Founded: Nov 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Coccygia » Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:20 pm

Tungookska wrote:
Coccygia wrote:A traditional two-parent (man and woman, married) family is the best option for a child. (I know I'm gonna get it for this one. Almost a bad as defending notorious mass murderer Rachel Carson...)

one man more than one woman is more 'traditional' than monogamy

In some places, maybe, but you know perfectly well what I meant. >:(
"Nobody deserves anything. You get what you get." - House
"Hope is for sissies." - House
“Qokedy qokedy dal qokedy qokedy." - The Voynich Manuscript
"We're not ordinary people - we're morons!" - Jerome Horwitz
"A book, any book, is a sacred object." - Jorge Luis Borges
"I am a survivor. I am like a cockroach, you just can't get rid of me." - Madonna

User avatar
Tungookska
Minister
 
Posts: 2310
Founded: Jan 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Tungookska » Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:21 pm

Coccygia wrote:
Tungookska wrote:
Coccygia wrote:A traditional two-parent (man and woman, married) family is the best option for a child. (I know I'm gonna get it for this one. Almost a bad as defending notorious mass murderer Rachel Carson...)

one man more than one woman is more 'traditional' than monogamy

In some places, maybe, but you know perfectly well what I meant. >:(

so does that make polygamists better or worse than rasing kids then the gays?

User avatar
Coccygia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7521
Founded: Nov 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Coccygia » Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:32 pm

Tungookska wrote:
Coccygia wrote:
Tungookska wrote:
Coccygia wrote:A traditional two-parent (man and woman, married) family is the best option for a child. (I know I'm gonna get it for this one. Almost a bad as defending notorious mass murderer Rachel Carson...)

one man more than one woman is more 'traditional' than monogamy

In some places, maybe, but you know perfectly well what I meant. >:(

so does that make polygamists better or worse than raising kids then the gays?

:blink: Oh, now you got me confused...

Anyway, I don't say that gay couples or single parents shouldn't have kids, just that the heterodual1 family unit is preferable.


[sup]1[/sup} You like? I just made it up.
"Nobody deserves anything. You get what you get." - House
"Hope is for sissies." - House
“Qokedy qokedy dal qokedy qokedy." - The Voynich Manuscript
"We're not ordinary people - we're morons!" - Jerome Horwitz
"A book, any book, is a sacred object." - Jorge Luis Borges
"I am a survivor. I am like a cockroach, you just can't get rid of me." - Madonna

User avatar
Tungookska
Minister
 
Posts: 2310
Founded: Jan 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Tungookska » Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:33 pm

Coccygia wrote:
Tungookska wrote:
Coccygia wrote:
Tungookska wrote:
Coccygia wrote:A traditional two-parent (man and woman, married) family is the best option for a child. (I know I'm gonna get it for this one. Almost a bad as defending notorious mass murderer Rachel Carson...)

one man more than one woman is more 'traditional' than monogamy

In some places, maybe, but you know perfectly well what I meant. >:(

so does that make polygamists better or worse than raising kids then the gays?

:blink: Oh, now you got me confused...

Anyway, I don't say that gay couples or single parents shouldn't have kids, just that the heterodual1 family unit is preferable.


[sup]1[/sup} You like? I just made it up.

but why would it be preferable

User avatar
EvilDarkMagicians
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13456
Founded: Jul 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

What are your most politically incorrect beleifs?

Postby EvilDarkMagicians » Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:36 pm

Coccygia wrote:A traditional two-parent (man and woman, married) family is the best option for a child. (I know I'm gonna get it for this one. Almost a bad as defending notorious mass murderer Rachel Carson...)


Got any sources or an insight to why you think this?

User avatar
Waterlow
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1068
Founded: May 23, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Waterlow » Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:40 pm

I actually want to kill Jack Straw. Disembowel him and eat every last scrap of his flesh before vomiting it back on his children's heads.
To live in England for the pleasures of social intercourse - that would be like searching for flowers in a sandy desert. ~ Nikolai Karamzin

The English think very highly of their own humanity; I am willing to admit they are not inhuman... ~ Louis Simond

The people of England choose to be, in a great measure, without Law and without Police; they have reached a very distinguished point in industry and civilisation without them. ~ Morning Chronicle


On, on!

User avatar
Coccygia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7521
Founded: Nov 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Coccygia » Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:40 pm

EvilDarkMagicians wrote:
Coccygia wrote:A traditional two-parent (man and woman, married) family is the best option for a child. (I know I'm gonna get it for this one. Almost a bad as defending notorious mass murderer Rachel Carson...)


Got any sources or an insight to why you think this?

It's what humans were designed for (by evolution, not Jehovah or Ben Stein).
"Nobody deserves anything. You get what you get." - House
"Hope is for sissies." - House
“Qokedy qokedy dal qokedy qokedy." - The Voynich Manuscript
"We're not ordinary people - we're morons!" - Jerome Horwitz
"A book, any book, is a sacred object." - Jorge Luis Borges
"I am a survivor. I am like a cockroach, you just can't get rid of me." - Madonna

User avatar
Tokos
Senator
 
Posts: 4870
Founded: Oct 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tokos » Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:41 pm

Tungookska wrote:
Coccygia wrote:A traditional two-parent (man and woman, married) family is the best option for a child. (I know I'm gonna get it for this one. Almost a bad as defending notorious mass murderer Rachel Carson...)

one man more than one woman is more 'traditional' than monogamy


Depends on where you're from. Might as well say peyote is more traditional than beer.

The idea of women staying at home and not working is one borne of luxury. Traditionally women would work; it is just that the man would usually be the primary breadwinner. Not the sole breadwinner.
The Confederal Fasces of Tokos

Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.05

User avatar
Tungookska
Minister
 
Posts: 2310
Founded: Jan 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Tungookska » Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:41 pm

Coccygia wrote:
EvilDarkMagicians wrote:
Coccygia wrote:A traditional two-parent (man and woman, married) family is the best option for a child. (I know I'm gonna get it for this one. Almost a bad as defending notorious mass murderer Rachel Carson...)


Got any sources or an insight to why you think this?

It's what humans were designed for (by evolution, not Jehovah or Ben Stein).

polygamy isnt?

User avatar
Coccygia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7521
Founded: Nov 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Coccygia » Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:43 pm

Tungookska wrote:
Coccygia wrote:
EvilDarkMagicians wrote:
Coccygia wrote:A traditional two-parent (man and woman, married) family is the best option for a child. (I know I'm gonna get it for this one. Almost a bad as defending notorious mass murderer Rachel Carson...)


Got any sources or an insight to why you think this?

It's what humans were designed for (by evolution, not Jehovah or Ben Stein).

polygamy isnt?

Nope. Anyway, it's illegal in most countries except the Islamic world.
"Nobody deserves anything. You get what you get." - House
"Hope is for sissies." - House
“Qokedy qokedy dal qokedy qokedy." - The Voynich Manuscript
"We're not ordinary people - we're morons!" - Jerome Horwitz
"A book, any book, is a sacred object." - Jorge Luis Borges
"I am a survivor. I am like a cockroach, you just can't get rid of me." - Madonna

User avatar
Tungookska
Minister
 
Posts: 2310
Founded: Jan 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Tungookska » Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:44 pm

Coccygia wrote:
Tungookska wrote:
Coccygia wrote:
EvilDarkMagicians wrote:
Coccygia wrote:A traditional two-parent (man and woman, married) family is the best option for a child. (I know I'm gonna get it for this one. Almost a bad as defending notorious mass murderer Rachel Carson...)


Got any sources or an insight to why you think this?

It's what humans were designed for (by evolution, not Jehovah or Ben Stein).

polygamy isnt?

Nope. Anyway, it's illegal in most countries except the Islamic world.

yes, and non islamic countries claim to be bastions of freedom

User avatar
South Kirkcaldy
Diplomat
 
Posts: 605
Founded: May 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby South Kirkcaldy » Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:02 pm

Waterlow wrote:I actually want to kill Jack Straw. Disembowel him and eat every last scrap of his flesh before vomiting it back on his children's heads.


He's not my favorite politician, but why do you want to...well, do everything you mentioned above?
Home of Dame Simone Monat CGG (as knighted by the Duke of Wessex)

Our News Network. viewtopic.php?f=4&t=59198

Tungookska wrote: Hire Teenagers While They Still Know Everything!


Unilisia wrote:
The Silver Pawn wrote:I am 14 and my name is Samantha. I have brown hair, green eyes, am about 4'11", and LOVE cats. Would you date me? I am the kind of girl who doesn't care about looks, just sweetness.


You sound like a nice friend, but since I am 19, it wouldn't really work out well legally.

Plus, I doubt your bisexual, thus making it nigh impossible for us to date.

V + V = Sqishy squish.

User avatar
Kreanoltha
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8117
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Kreanoltha » Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:13 pm

Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Kreanoltha wrote:
Jimanistan wrote:
Geniasis wrote:What about the father?


The "proper place of a woman" argument tends to bother me, a bit. Surely a father has as much an obligation to raise children as a mother, right?


If the father can make more money than the mother he should be earning his family's income.


And if the woman can make more money? Most of the guys I've dated made less than I do.


Did you purposely stop reading my posts after you read this one? Here's what I wrote latter:

Kreanoltha wrote:Of course. It would be stupid not to. The situation I was referring to was if the father could provide an livable income for the entire family for until the children entered grade school. I happen to have had to the opposite play out for me. My mother had a higher paying job so my father stayed home with my sister and me. We did just fine, and had no money troubles.
I'M BACK!!!

"The size of ones internet spaceboats are inversely proportional to the size of ones penis."

FT only.
#NSLegion. For all your NS-FT RPing needs.

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21292
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:15 pm

Kreanoltha wrote:Did you purposely stop reading my posts after you read this one? Here's what I wrote latter:

Kreanoltha wrote:Of course. It would be stupid not to. The situation I was referring to was if the father could provide an livable income for the entire family for until the children entered grade school. I happen to have had to the opposite play out for me. My mother had a higher paying job so my father stayed home with my sister and me. We did just fine, and had no money troubles.


I wasn't paying attention. My bad.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
Bajireyn
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6691
Founded: Jun 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Bajireyn » Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:18 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Bajireyn wrote:Political Correctness is a load of BS

Why do you say that? Someone yell at you for calling someone a retard?

no...
Right behind you...: UDL

User avatar
Twisted twister
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 470
Founded: Jul 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Twisted twister » Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:21 pm

Assasinate Kim Jong
Assasinate Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

User avatar
Tokos
Senator
 
Posts: 4870
Founded: Oct 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tokos » Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:26 pm

Tungookska wrote:polygamy isnt?


Not unless you want huge social upheaval with vast numbers of very pissed-off men.

Polygamy only works if it's the really Big Men who are allowed.
The Confederal Fasces of Tokos

Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.05

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Best Mexico, Duvniask, Spirit of Hope

Advertisement

Remove ads