NATION

PASSWORD

Ceramic Bullets

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Tungookska
Minister
 
Posts: 2310
Founded: Jan 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Tungookska » Sat Jul 03, 2010 8:53 pm

Caninope wrote:
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Instead of an ice bullet, what about a spice bullet?

That way you can kill someone and season him at the same time. :)


Works great on babies. ;)

do want

User avatar
Caninope
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24620
Founded: Nov 26, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Caninope » Sat Jul 03, 2010 9:30 pm

Tungookska wrote:
Caninope wrote:
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Instead of an ice bullet, what about a spice bullet?

That way you can kill someone and season him at the same time. :)


Works great on babies. ;)

do want


You missed the joke didn't you?
I'm the Pope
Secretly CIA interns stomping out negative views of the US
Türkçe öğreniyorum ama zorluk var.
Winner, Silver Medal for Debating
Co-Winner, Bronze Medal for Posting
Co-Winner, Zooke Goodwill Award

Agritum wrote:Arg, Caninope is Captain America under disguise. Everyone knows it.
Frisivisia wrote:
Me wrote:Just don't. It'll get you a whole lot further in life if you come to realize you're not the smartest guy in the room, even if you probably are.

Because Caninope may be in that room with you.
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Thankfully, we have you and EM to guide us to wisdom and truth, holy one. :p
Norstal wrote:What I am saying of course is that we should clone Caninope.

User avatar
Wamitoria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18852
Founded: Jun 28, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wamitoria » Sat Jul 03, 2010 9:33 pm

Caninope wrote:
Wamitoria wrote:
Conservative Alliances wrote:
Wamitoria wrote:Would ceramic bullets be capable of penetrating body armor?

Depends on the ceramic, I suppose. With the right mixture and the right kiln, I would assume so. Maybe ceramics are not malleable enough to make armor piercing bullets, though. Also not that body armor made from ceramics can easily repel bullets.

Well, if ceramic bullets are capable of penetrating body armor, then they are a great idea. No more toxic lead.

I think the use other metals sometimes...correct me if I'm wrong.

They do sometimes, but most bullets still use that grand old carcinogen.
Wonder where all the good posters went? Look no further!

Hurry, before the Summer Nazis show up again!

User avatar
Lhazastan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 756
Founded: Sep 17, 2009
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Lhazastan » Sat Jul 03, 2010 9:44 pm

Sailsia wrote:
Peddieville wrote:
Lhazastan wrote:
Kalysk wrote:
Lhazastan wrote:why can't we just use normal guns on planes?

and before you say "explosive decompression," no.

Because a bullet could punch through a person and end up hitting somebody behind them.


this is an argument against conventional bullets altogether

In an airplane, you've got lots of people lined up, making collateral damage likely.

and wouldn't a bullet go right through the airplanes' metal?


this is not a problem, if it even could. collateral damage is the only legit argument I see in favor of this. personally, I wouldn't want bullets that shatter inside of people, though, and I doubt it'd be very effective against people with even a small amount of protection
The Lhazarane State (FT)
The Matriarchy of Lhazastan (MT)

Factbook

User avatar
Mikedor
Minister
 
Posts: 2375
Founded: Apr 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mikedor » Sun Jul 04, 2010 3:21 am

Lhazastan wrote:
Sailsia wrote:
Peddieville wrote:
Lhazastan wrote:
Kalysk wrote:
Lhazastan wrote:why can't we just use normal guns on planes?

and before you say "explosive decompression," no.

Because a bullet could punch through a person and end up hitting somebody behind them.


this is an argument against conventional bullets altogether

In an airplane, you've got lots of people lined up, making collateral damage likely.

and wouldn't a bullet go right through the airplanes' metal?


this is not a problem, if it even could. collateral damage is the only legit argument I see in favor of this. personally, I wouldn't want bullets that shatter inside of people, though, and I doubt it'd be very effective against people with even a small amount of protection

Not that different to dum dum's.
Welcome to 1938.

I thought ten thousand swords must have leaped from their scabbards to avenge even a look that threatened her with insult. But the age of chivalry is gone. That of sophisters, economists, and calculators has succeeded; and the glory of Europe is extinguished for ever.

User avatar
Dododecapod
Minister
 
Posts: 2965
Founded: Nov 02, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Dododecapod » Sun Jul 04, 2010 4:50 am

Lhazastan wrote:
Sailsia wrote:
Peddieville wrote:
Lhazastan wrote:
Kalysk wrote:
Lhazastan wrote:why can't we just use normal guns on planes?

and before you say "explosive decompression," no.

Because a bullet could punch through a person and end up hitting somebody behind them.


this is an argument against conventional bullets altogether

In an airplane, you've got lots of people lined up, making collateral damage likely.

and wouldn't a bullet go right through the airplanes' metal?


this is not a problem, if it even could. collateral damage is the only legit argument I see in favor of this. personally, I wouldn't want bullets that shatter inside of people, though, and I doubt it'd be very effective against people with even a small amount of protection


We've already got those - frangible bullets, expanders, prefrags...

On the Op, the military wouldn't be interested. They aren't allowed to use anything except Fully Jacketed rounds by the Geneva Conventions - it's one of the few aspects of the GC most miltaries actually follow (the other being treatment of POW's).
GENERATION 28: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55272
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sun Jul 04, 2010 5:54 am

Mossat wrote:
Canadai wrote:You mean ice bullet.


Mythbusters tried that too.

Their tests discovered that a bullet made of ice is perfectly useless.

I've tried ice cubes as slingstones though. They work fine.
.

User avatar
Mikedor
Minister
 
Posts: 2375
Founded: Apr 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mikedor » Sun Jul 04, 2010 6:07 am

Risottia wrote:
Mossat wrote:
Canadai wrote:You mean ice bullet.


Mythbusters tried that too.

Their tests discovered that a bullet made of ice is perfectly useless.

I've tried ice cubes as slingstones though. They work fine.

Slingstones don't have to deal with the heat caused by an exploding charge or hot gases.
Welcome to 1938.

I thought ten thousand swords must have leaped from their scabbards to avenge even a look that threatened her with insult. But the age of chivalry is gone. That of sophisters, economists, and calculators has succeeded; and the glory of Europe is extinguished for ever.

User avatar
Lhazastan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 756
Founded: Sep 17, 2009
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Lhazastan » Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:57 pm

Dododecapod wrote:We've already got those - frangible bullets, expanders, prefrags...

On the Op, the military wouldn't be interested. They aren't allowed to use anything except Fully Jacketed rounds by the Geneva Conventions - it's one of the few aspects of the GC most miltaries actually follow (the other being treatment of POW's).


I didn't say we didn't already have. I said I wouldn't want them. as, I wouldn't want people being shot with them

and as for the ice bullets, the ice didn't have much in the way of penetrative characteristics, if I remember correctly. it wasn't just heat. sling shot doesn't have to penetrate, it just has to hit you. and they can be bigger
The Lhazarane State (FT)
The Matriarchy of Lhazastan (MT)

Factbook

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cerespasia, Cerula, Cyptopir, Elejamie

Advertisement

Remove ads