Nuclear Weapons

[Person012345]

We helped you in WWII and that's why you won. That's my entire point, that you don't win without our help (except a few times in the very early years).

You're still spouting that crap? Without American industrial muscle, the British would have never been able to capitalize on their early victories in WW2. They wouldn't have been able to supply their armies across the globe without American ship building. Monty wouldn't have been able to push back Romel if we hadn't given the 8th Army the Sherman tanks designated for Operation Torch. With literally no threat of a British only Cross channel invasion, they could have brought dozens of divisions and hundreds of thousands of men from Western Europe to the East, where they could have made a difference other than giving the French Resistance its overhyped reputation.

Maybe this is too hard for you to understand, but I'll give it another go. We were on the same team in WWII, correct? That is why our team won. The reason Americas team won the war is because it had britain on it. It's why we're gonna win iraq and afghanistan. It's why you lost vietnam but won korea.

Understand now?

[Brogavia]

We helped you in WWII and that's why you won. That's my entire point, that you don't win without our help (except a few times in the very early years).

You're still spouting that crap? Without American industrial muscle, the British would have never been able to capitalize on their early victories in WW2. They wouldn't have been able to supply their armies across the globe without American ship building. Monty wouldn't have been able to push back Romel if we hadn't given the 8th Army the Sherman tanks designated for Operation Torch. With literally no threat of a British only Cross channel invasion, they could have brought dozens of divisions and hundreds of thousands of men from Western Europe to the East, where they could have made a difference other than giving the French Resistance its overhyped reputation.

Maybe this is too hard for you to understand, but I'll give it another go. We were on the same team in WWII, correct? That is why our team won. The reason Americas team won the war is because it had britain on it. It's why we're gonna win iraq and afghanistan. It's why you lost vietnam but won korea.

Understand now?

That's why the first 5 coalitions against Napoleon were victorious.

[Brandenburg-Altmark]

We helped you in WWII and that's why you won. That's my entire point, that you don't win without our help (except a few times in the very early years).

You're still spouting that crap? Without American industrial muscle, the British would have never been able to capitalize on their early victories in WW2. They wouldn't have been able to supply their armies across the globe without American ship building. Monty wouldn't have been able to push back Romel if we hadn't given the 8th Army the Sherman tanks designated for Operation Torch. With literally no threat of a British only Cross channel invasion, they could have brought dozens of divisions and hundreds of thousands of men from Western Europe to the East, where they could have made a difference other than giving the French Resistance its overhyped reputation.

Maybe this is too hard for you to understand, but I'll give it another go. We were on the same team in WWII, correct? That is why our team won. The reason Americas team won the war is because it had britain on it. It's why we're gonna win iraq and afghanistan. It's why you lost vietnam but won korea.

Understand now?

The reason the USA lost Vietnam was because the politicians were dead set on a "limited war" that they could sell to the voters.

[Baltenstein]

I want to note that Montezuma just broke a cease-fire by nuking the living shit out of my cities which led to Mongolian paratroopers capturing my capital.

Therefore, nuclear weapons SUCK!

[Person012345]

We helped you in WWII and that's why you won. That's my entire point, that you don't win without our help (except a few times in the very early years).

You're still spouting that crap? Without American industrial muscle, the British would have never been able to capitalize on their early victories in WW2. They wouldn't have been able to supply their armies across the globe without American ship building. Monty wouldn't have been able to push back Romel if we hadn't given the 8th Army the Sherman tanks designated for Operation Torch. With literally no threat of a British only Cross channel invasion, they could have brought dozens of divisions and hundreds of thousands of men from Western Europe to the East, where they could have made a difference other than giving the French Resistance its overhyped reputation.

Maybe this is too hard for you to understand, but I'll give it another go. We were on the same team in WWII, correct? That is why our team won. The reason Americas team won the war is because it had britain on it. It's why we're gonna win iraq and afghanistan. It's why you lost vietnam but won korea.

Understand now?

That's why the first 5 coalitions against Napoleon were victorious.

we did beat napoleon. The british team was victorious.

And also, britain doesn't win all of it's wars, I've said that. I never said it did. Just that the U.S. fails without britains help.

[Brogavia]

I want to note that Montezuma just broke a cease-fire by nuking the living shit out of my cities which led to Mongolian paratroopers capturing my capital.

Therefore, nuclear weapons SUCK!

learn2fightawarproperly

[Dyakovo]

Though I still can't understand why the English insist on spelling "-er" as "-re".
Centre, metre, etc...

Maybe because that's how they're spelt in England.

Fixed.

Like I said.

Which only makes it "the way it is spelt" for those countries which use that spelling. Like it or not there are different dialects of English.

[Dyakovo]

We helped you in WWII and that's why you won. That's my entire point, that you don't win without our help (except a few times in the very early years).

You're still spouting that crap? Without American industrial muscle, the British would have never been able to capitalize on their early victories in WW2. They wouldn't have been able to supply their armies across the globe without American ship building. Monty wouldn't have been able to push back Romel if we hadn't given the 8th Army the Sherman tanks designated for Operation Torch. With literally no threat of a British only Cross channel invasion, they could have brought dozens of divisions and hundreds of thousands of men from Western Europe to the East, where they could have made a difference other than giving the French Resistance its overhyped reputation.

Maybe this is too hard for you to understand, but I'll give it another go. We were on the same team in WWII, correct? That is why our team won. The reason Americas team won the war is because it had britain on it. It's why we're gonna win iraq and afghanistan. It's why you lost vietnam but won korea.

Understand now?

Right. Because England has never lost a war...

[Brogavia]

we did beat napoleon. The british team was victorious.

And also, britain doesn't win all of it's wars, I've said that. I never said it did. Just that the U.S. fails without britains help.

It only took 7 tries. And after most of the French army got left frozen in Russia.

And that's just plain stupid.

[Dyakovo]

We helped you in WWII and that's why you won. That's my entire point, that you don't win without our help (except a few times in the very early years).

You're still spouting that crap? Without American industrial muscle, the British would have never been able to capitalize on their early victories in WW2. They wouldn't have been able to supply their armies across the globe without American ship building. Monty wouldn't have been able to push back Romel if we hadn't given the 8th Army the Sherman tanks designated for Operation Torch. With literally no threat of a British only Cross channel invasion, they could have brought dozens of divisions and hundreds of thousands of men from Western Europe to the East, where they could have made a difference other than giving the French Resistance its overhyped reputation.

Maybe this is too hard for you to understand, but I'll give it another go. We were on the same team in WWII, correct? That is why our team won. The reason Americas team won the war is because it had britain on it. It's why we're gonna win iraq and afghanistan. It's why you lost vietnam but won korea.

Understand now?

That's why the first 5 coalitions against Napoleon were victorious.

we did beat napoleon. The british team was victorious.

And also, britain doesn't win all of it's wars, I've said that. I never said it did. Just that the U.S. fails without britains help.

Except of course, the war for independence, the war of 1812, the civil war, and the Spanish-American war...

[Puff-Puff-Pass Land]

We helped you in WWII and that's why you won. That's my entire point, that you don't win without our help (except a few times in the very early years).

You're still spouting that crap? Without American industrial muscle, the British would have never been able to capitalize on their early victories in WW2. They wouldn't have been able to supply their armies across the globe without American ship building. Monty wouldn't have been able to push back Romel if we hadn't given the 8th Army the Sherman tanks designated for Operation Torch. With literally no threat of a British only Cross channel invasion, they could have brought dozens of divisions and hundreds of thousands of men from Western Europe to the East, where they could have made a difference other than giving the French Resistance its overhyped reputation.

Maybe this is too hard for you to understand, but I'll give it another go. We were on the same team in WWII, correct? That is why our team won. The reason Americas team won the war is because it had britain on it. It's why we're gonna win iraq and afghanistan. It's why you lost vietnam but won korea.

Understand now?

That's why the first 5 coalitions against Napoleon were victorious.

we did beat napoleon. The british team was victorious.

And also, britain doesn't win all of it's wars, I've said that. I never said it did. Just that the U.S. fails without britains help.

Except of course, the war for independence, the war of 1812, the civil war, and the Spanish-American war...

Dyakovo, I normally agree. But the Civil War? Bad example. America would win no matter what. It's like playing chess versus yourself- and saying you won.

[New Somersetshire]

Except of course, the war for independence, the war of 1812, the civil war, and the Spanish-American war...

Dyakovo, I normally agree. But the Civil War? Bad example. America would win no matter what. It's like playing chess versus yourself- and saying you won.

If the South won, that would be America losing.

[Person012345]

Though I still can't understand why the English insist on spelling "-er" as "-re".
Centre, metre, etc...

Maybe because that's how they're spelt in England.

Fixed.

Like I said.

Which only makes it "the way it is spelt" for those countries which use that spelling. Like it or not there are different dialects of English.

I don't like it therefore it's not true.

So there.

[Person012345]

Except of course, the war for independence, the war of 1812, the civil war, and the Spanish-American war...

1. You lost 1812. It's not hard. You invaded and got kicked out. That's a loss. Just like how you won korea.
2. Good god man, go and read what I've already said.

[Brogavia]

Except of course, the war for independence, the war of 1812, the civil war, and the Spanish-American war...

And the Mexican War, the Indian Wars, Vietnam (we won. The fact that the RVN couldn't stand after we left is meaningless) the Philippine War, the dozen or so Latin American campaigns between the WWs, the Pacific War, Grenada, Panama, and the many others I can't remember.

[Dyakovo]

We helped you in WWII and that's why you won. That's my entire point, that you don't win without our help (except a few times in the very early years).

You're still spouting that crap? Without American industrial muscle, the British would have never been able to capitalize on their early victories in WW2. They wouldn't have been able to supply their armies across the globe without American ship building. Monty wouldn't have been able to push back Romel if we hadn't given the 8th Army the Sherman tanks designated for Operation Torch. With literally no threat of a British only Cross channel invasion, they could have brought dozens of divisions and hundreds of thousands of men from Western Europe to the East, where they could have made a difference other than giving the French Resistance its overhyped reputation.

Maybe this is too hard for you to understand, but I'll give it another go. We were on the same team in WWII, correct? That is why our team won. The reason Americas team won the war is because it had britain on it. It's why we're gonna win iraq and afghanistan. It's why you lost vietnam but won korea.

Understand now?

That's why the first 5 coalitions against Napoleon were victorious.

we did beat napoleon. The british team was victorious.

And also, britain doesn't win all of it's wars, I've said that. I never said it did. Just that the U.S. fails without britains help.

Except of course, the war for independence, the war of 1812, the civil war, and the Spanish-American war...

Dyakovo, I normally agree. But the Civil War? Bad example. America would win no matter what. It's like playing chess versus yourself- and saying you won.

No, actually it isn't. America (i.e. The United States of America) was fighting the Confederate States of America.

[Brogavia]

Except of course, the war for independence, the war of 1812, the civil war, and the Spanish-American war...

1. You lost 1812. It's not hard. You invaded and got kicked out. That's a loss. Just like how you won korea.
2. Good god man, go and read what I've already said.

It was a draw. No one gained a damn thing.

[Dyakovo]

Except of course, the war for independence, the war of 1812, the civil war, and the Spanish-American war...

1. You lost 1812. It's not hard. You invaded and got kicked out. That's a loss. Just like how you won korea.
2. Good god man, go and read what I've already said.

1: No, actually we didn't. Neither side won.
2: The rest of what you have said is nonsense.

[Dyakovo]

Though I still can't understand why the English insist on spelling "-er" as "-re".
Centre, metre, etc...

Maybe because that's how they're spelt in England.

Fixed.

Like I said.

Which only makes it "the way it is spelt" for those countries which use that spelling. Like it or not there are different dialects of English.

I don't like it therefore it's not true.

So there.

In other words you have nothing.

[Brogavia]

Except of course, the war for independence, the war of 1812, the civil war, and the Spanish-American war...

1. You lost 1812. It's not hard. You invaded and got kicked out. That's a loss. Just like how you won korea.
2. Good god man, go and read what I've already said.

1: No, actually we didn't. Neither side won.
2: The rest of what you have said is nonsense.

He's a crackhead pederass. You can take what he says with a grain of salt.

[Dyakovo]

Vietnam (we won. The fact that the RVN couldn't stand after we left is meaningless).

No, we definitely lost Vietnam. The only goal of that war was to prevent the communist takeover of Vietnam, something which we failed to prevent.

[Person012345]

Except of course, the war for independence, the war of 1812, the civil war, and the Spanish-American war...

And the Mexican War, the Indian Wars, Vietnam (we won. The fact that the RVN couldn't stand after we left is meaningless) the Philippine War, the dozen or so Latin American campaigns between the WWs, the Pacific War, Grenada, Panama, and the many others I can't remember.

Read what I said Read what I said Vietnam was a loss, get over it read what I said meh Pacific war you had british help with OMG GRENADA/PANAMA HOW DID YOU DO THAT??? THEY'RE LIKE, THE MOST POWERFUL COUNTRIES EVER.

[Brogavia]

Vietnam (we won. The fact that the RVN couldn't stand after we left is meaningless).

No, we definitely lost Vietnam. The only goal of that war was to prevent the communist takeover of Vietnam, something which we failed to prevent.

We did. And we left, then it went to shit because Nixon resigned and Ford didn't know Dick promised the South that if the North broke the cease fire, it would mean LineBacker III.

[Person012345]

Except of course, the war for independence, the war of 1812, the civil war, and the Spanish-American war...

1. You lost 1812. It's not hard. You invaded and got kicked out. That's a loss. Just like how you won korea.
2. Good god man, go and read what I've already said.

1: No, actually we didn't. Neither side won.
2: The rest of what you have said is nonsense.

You can take what he says with a grain of salt.

^this bit is true. My statement was not intended to be wholley serious from the start.

Though an invasion in which you are repelled is a loss.

[Dyakovo]

Except of course, the war for independence, the war of 1812, the civil war, and the Spanish-American war...

And the Mexican War, the Indian Wars, Vietnam (we won. The fact that the RVN couldn't stand after we left is meaningless) the Philippine War, the dozen or so Latin American campaigns between the WWs, the Pacific War, Grenada, Panama, and the many others I can't remember.

Read what I said Read what I said Vietnam was a loss, get over it read what I said meh Pacific war you had british help with OMG GRENADA/PANAMA HOW DID YOU DO THAT??? THEY'RE LIKE, THE MOST POWERFUL COUNTRIES EVER.

What wars has the UK won without international assistance since the foundation of the US? Oh, that's right... The Falklands... Ranks right up there with Grenada/Panama in theoretical difficulty...