Buffett and Colbert wrote:I was thinking in terms of organisms with more than one cell.
Some species of insect also reproduce by mitosis if no sexual partners are around / they have a headache.
Advertisement

by Yootopia » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:12 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:I was thinking in terms of organisms with more than one cell.

by Niur » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:12 pm
Sarkhaan wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:The fact that the author of this bullshit thinks that a male or female had to evolve first in a species for evolution to work is sad... Niur, a biologist could explain this to you much better than I can, but sex chromosomes are what make evolution possible. Without birth and rebirth in a species, nothing would change (obviously). One sex couldn't have evolved without the other. Period. That is why we don't see "monosex" (I feel there is a word for that, but I can't remember what it is) species (unless they have some mechanism to fertilise their own eggs). The author also assumes that different parts of the body had to evolve one at a time, which is dumb.
Nope. Check how single cell life still reproduces to this day. It's via mitosis rather than meiosis and sexual reproduction.

by Daistallia 2104 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:13 pm
Which evolved first, male or female?
How many millions of years elapsed between the first male and first female?
Why hasn't any extinct creature re-evolved after millions of years?
Which came first:
...the eye,
...the eyelid,
...the eyebrow,
...the eye sockets,
...the eye muscles,
...the eye lashes,
...the tear ducts,
...the brain's interpretation of light?
If we all evolved from a common ancestor, why can't all the different species mate with one another and produce fertile offspring?
Explain why something as complex as human life could happen by chance, but something as simple as a coin must have a creator. (Show your math solution.)
Why aren't any fossils or coal or oil being formed today?
Why hasn't anyone collected the millions of dollars in rewards for proof of evolution?
If life began hundreds of millions of years ago, why is the earth still under populated?
Why hasn't evolution duplicated all species on all continents?

by Sarkhaan » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:13 pm
The Adrian Empire wrote:I quite like question five, anyone care to answer it, because the secular side of my brain is frankly stumped

by Niur » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:13 pm

by Buffett and Colbert » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:16 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by DaWoad » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:16 pm
1. Which evolved first, male or female?
2. How many millions of years elapsed between the first male and first female?
3. List at least 9 of the false assumptions made with radioactive dating methods.
4. Why hasn't any extinct creature re-evolved after millions of years?
5. Which came first:
...the eye,
...the eyelid,
...the eyebrow,
...the eye sockets,
...the eye muscles,
...the eye lashes,
...the tear ducts,
...the brain's interpretation of light?
6. How many millions of years between each in question 5?
7. If we all evolved from a common ancestor, why can't all the different species mate with one another and produce fertile offspring?
8. List any of the millions of creatures in just five stages of its evolution showing the progression of a new organ of any kind. When you have done this, you can collect the millions of dollars in rewards offered for proof of evolution!
9. Why is it that the very things that would prove Evolution (transitional forms) are still missing?
10. Explain why something as complex as human life could happen by chance, but something as simple as a coin must have a creator. (Show your math solution.)
11. Why aren't any fossils or coal or oil being formed today?
12. List 50 vestigial or useless organs or appendages in the human body.
13. Why hasn't anyone collected the millions of dollars in rewards for proof of evolution?
14. If life began hundreds of millions of years ago, why is the earth still under populated?
15. Why hasn't evolution duplicated all species on all continents?

by Farnhamia » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:16 pm

by Sarkhaan » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:17 pm
Broof wrote:Darwin sucks dick. You know what? You all fucking suck dick. Fuck nationstates, fuck all you liberal dipshits, and fuck all you dumbfucks that voted for Obama.
Niur wrote:Sarkhaan wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:The fact that the author of this bullshit thinks that a male or female had to evolve first in a species for evolution to work is sad... Niur, a biologist could explain this to you much better than I can, but sex chromosomes are what make evolution possible. Without birth and rebirth in a species, nothing would change (obviously). One sex couldn't have evolved without the other. Period. That is why we don't see "monosex" (I feel there is a word for that, but I can't remember what it is) species (unless they have some mechanism to fertilise their own eggs). The author also assumes that different parts of the body had to evolve one at a time, which is dumb.
Nope. Check how single cell life still reproduces to this day. It's via mitosis rather than meiosis and sexual reproduction.
Your making a broad assumption. Some single celled organisms do reproduce sexually, albeit in a much different manner than humans.

by Borinata » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:18 pm

by The Adrian Empire » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:18 pm
Aggicificicerous wrote:
The most likely explanation is that organisms developed light-sensitive patches called "eyespots" (not real eyes) capable of detecting light, not as a pain sensation but more to know which direction to swim in. Even today, there are single-celled organisms like the euglena with these eyespots. As the euglena is photosynthetic, you can see how light-sensitivity is a great asset. However, single-celled organisms do not have brains; those would have come much later.

Faith Hope Charity wrote:I would just like to take this time to say... The Adrian Empire is awesome.

by Kryozerkia » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:18 pm
Broof wrote:Darwin sucks dick. You know what? You all fucking suck dick. Fuck nationstates, fuck all you liberal dipshits, and fuck all you dumbfucks that voted for Obama.

by Buffett and Colbert » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:19 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Carls-land » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:23 pm


by Farnhamia » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:24 pm


by Niur » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:26 pm

by Yootopia » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:27 pm
Niur wrote:To answer 12.

by DaWoad » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:28 pm
The Adrian Empire wrote:Aggicificicerous wrote:
The most likely explanation is that organisms developed light-sensitive patches called "eyespots" (not real eyes) capable of detecting light, not as a pain sensation but more to know which direction to swim in. Even today, there are single-celled organisms like the euglena with these eyespots. As the euglena is photosynthetic, you can see how light-sensitivity is a great asset. However, single-celled organisms do not have brains; those would have come much later.
Ah, thanks, you see the majority of my evolutionary knowledge comes from Spore

by Farnhamia » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:28 pm

by Borinata » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:29 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Borinata wrote:Teachers, give this test to your students if you really want them to know the truth about evolution!
1. Which evolved first, male or female? As we all know, isogamy was the rule before the sexes split, but my money's on male, as anisogamy was likely a way for some species to not put as much energy into gamete production.
2. How many millions of years elapsed between the first male and first female? Completely irrelevant: if it was 10 million it's okay, but if it's 11 million evolution is disproved?
3. List at least 9 of the false assumptions made with radioactive dating methods.While I can completely understand qualms about assuming radioactive decay is A: a completely constant process and B. constant under all conditions, I've thus far gotten two only 2 questionable assumptions...
4. Why hasn't any extinct creature re-evolved after millions of years? Considering the odds of it evolving in the first place were extremely, expecting it to come around again is likely expecting two flips of a coin to land sideways
5. Which came first:
...the eye,
...the eyelid,
...the eyebrow,
...the eye sockets,
...the eye muscles,
...the eye lashes,
...the tear ducts,
...the brain's interpretation of light? Scientists theorize that the first step was light sensitive tissue which likely tapped into already present heat/pressure neurons. Then some sort of interpretation of light waves specifically as the tissue began to form an inverted cup (think an eye socket with no eyeball. After that, it's a tossup as to which came first depending on which species eye you mean, however I'm sure the eyebrows and eye lashes came last as they have nothing to do with sight.
6. How many millions of years between each in question 5? See question 2
7. If we all evolved from a common ancestor, why can't all the different species mate with one another and produce fertile offspring? Because they do not share identical genes arranged identically on a matching number of chromosomes, resulting in the in-expression of a large number of genes that are necessary for the healthy development of an organism and the maintenance of life.
8. List any of the millions of creatures in just five stages of its evolution showing the progression of a new organ of any kind. When you have done this, you can collect the millions of dollars in rewards offered for proof of evolution! Let's see, bacterium, animal-like protist, sponge, cnidarian, annelid, fish, amphibian, reptile, mammal, Pentecostal preacher, Neanderthal, Homo sapiens. I'll take my money now.
9. Why is it that the very things that would prove Evolution (transitional forms) are still missing? Obviously they don't prove evolution, since we don't have them. On a related note, no one has proven evolution, they have however provided a framework for understanding how life may have evolved through natural processes and eliminated false hypotheses.
10. Explain why something as complex as human life could happen by chance, but something as simple as a coin must have a creator. (Show your math solution.) Because life randomly mutates and natural selection preserves only beneficial mutations, unlike the US mint which purposefully makes shitty currency that dominates and everyone is forced to use (seriously, why is my $5 bill purple?)
11. Why aren't any fossils or coal or oil being formed today? But they are, it just takes a while. That's like asking how come the cake I just placed in the oven isn't done already.
12. List 50 vestigial or useless organs or appendages in the human body. I can't, apparently evolution doesn't let anything go to waste.
13. Why hasn't anyone collected the millions of dollars in rewards for proof of evolution? Because I'm awaiting your payment via money order or certified check
14. If life began hundreds of millions of years ago, why is the earth still under populated? Have you been to China? It's pretty crowded. However, the important thing to remember isn't the length of time in question but the reproductive rates, most ecological niches have been filled, generally by evolutionary processes creating new and distinct organisms.
15. Why hasn't evolution duplicated all species on all continents?See question 4
Source
Jesus that hurt.
OK, I'll be the first to admit I have doubts about life's ability to create enough beneficial mutations to evolve everything in a few billion years as well as serious metaphysical doubts about the spontaneous creation of matter and time, however if you're gonna call something false, do it because you know some truth.

by Daistallia 2104 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:30 pm
Carls-land wrote:Which came first: as far as i know, either the eye sockets, or the brain's interpretation
Carls-land wrote:How many millions of years between each in question 5? i dont really know
Why hasn't anyone collected the millions of dollars in rewards for proof of evolution? because there is no reward, as far as i know.

by Denecaep » Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:31 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, American Legionaries, Armeattla, Dimetrodon Empire, Eragon Island, Greater Miami Shores 3, Haganham, Immoren, Modelia, New Temecula, Phobos Drilling and Manufacturing, Primitive Communism, Stalvervild, Tarsonis, Thermodolia, Umeria, Valyxias, Washington-Columbia
Advertisement