Radictistan wrote:
They sure don't where I live. My local police department shoots people for no reason all the time and no one has ever gotten fired for it never mind going to prison.
Yeah unless you live in Myanmar I call bullshit.
Advertisement

by Panzerjaeger » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:56 pm
Radictistan wrote:
They sure don't where I live. My local police department shoots people for no reason all the time and no one has ever gotten fired for it never mind going to prison.
Caninope wrote:Toyota: Keep moving forward, even when you don't want to!
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:Timothy McVeigh casts... Pyrotechnics!
Greater Americania wrote:lol "No Comrade Ivan! Don't stick your head in there! That's the wood chi...!"
New Kereptica wrote:Fascism: because people are too smart nowadays.

by Andaluciae » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:57 pm
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...
by Radictistan » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:58 pm

by Panzerjaeger » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:59 pm
Radictistan wrote:
I live in Texas. I'll admit that "all the time" is somewhat of an exaggeration. It happens at least once a year though.
Caninope wrote:Toyota: Keep moving forward, even when you don't want to!
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:Timothy McVeigh casts... Pyrotechnics!
Greater Americania wrote:lol "No Comrade Ivan! Don't stick your head in there! That's the wood chi...!"
New Kereptica wrote:Fascism: because people are too smart nowadays.

by Monahtan » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:59 pm
Radictistan wrote:
I live in Texas. I'll admit that "all the time" is somewhat of an exaggeration. It happens at least once a year though.

by Ifreann » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:00 pm
Natapoc wrote:Radictistan wrote:To me this whole thing screams of him being protected because he's a cop. I bet he'll be acquitted at trial. No jury in this country would convict a police officer for something like that.
That is what I think too. Do you see an ordinary man having just $2500 bail after trying to lure a girl into his car 3 times with $100?
Clearly he has money to spare. All from the taxpayer too!
Natapoc wrote:Andaluciae wrote:Natapoc wrote:Bendira wrote:Come on guys, there is no such thing as an off duty cop!
http://www.wisegeek.com/does-an-off-dut ... hority.htm
"Different police departments have different policies concerning the authority of off-duty officers, but in many places an off-duty police officer does have the legal right to detain an offender until an on-duty officer arrives to finish the process".
Interesting. Yes I've seen this claimed in other threads but I was beginning to doubt.
What do you think of the bail amount?
I mean, the crimes the guy has been charged with, and the crimes that are likely capable of being proven in court, really wouldn't call for much more than that.
We can certainly infer that he was after a lot more, and more severe, activities, but he didn't commit them, and there isn't any direct evidence that he was planning to commit them.
According to "law enforcement"
by the time such people tend to be caught they have already gone after several victims. They should link missing children reports that match his area and investigate the possibility that he is involved in their vanishing.
I suggest DNA analysis of his car and a warrants to inspect ever corner of his house and dig up his back yard to see if any bones are back there.
Bendira wrote:Indeos wrote:Ifreann wrote:Bendira wrote:Come on guys, there is no such thing as an off duty cop!
http://www.wisegeek.com/does-an-off-dut ... hority.htm
"Different police departments have different policies concerning the authority of off-duty officers, but in many places an off-duty police officer does have the legal right to detain an offender until an on-duty officer arrives to finish the process".
He was also out of his jurisdiction. And I don't see why it matters whether he's off-duty or not. He wasn't trying to use his position as a police officer to get away with kidnapping, he was trying to use $100 and a truck.
/thread.
I make minimum wage at a grocery store, but I payed over $100 dollars in taxes this year. He used MY MONEY to try to kidnap this girl! That truck was bought by the taxpayers as well.
by Sibirsky » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:00 pm
Panzerjaeger wrote:Sibirsky wrote:Natapoc wrote:A New York City Police officer has been charged with attempting to lure a little girl into his car with promises of $100.
http://www.wten.com/global/Story.asp?s=12697236
The smart little girl ran to her grandparents house for help. I wonder how many other girls he has victimized in the past who decided to get into his car for the $100? Are they still alive to tell about it?
Bail for the would be kidnapper has been put at bail $2,500.
What do you think about this? Is the bail to low for someone who has been accused of predatory behavior of this type? When the police investigating the claims first interviewed the criminal he claimed to be self employed despite the fact that fingerprints later proved he was employed as a cop.
If a normal citizen lies about being a cop they can be charged. Should the opposite be true also? If a cop lies and claims that he is self employed and not, a member of the police department should there be a charge equivalent to "impersonating a civilian?"
Sick fuck. And $2500 is way too low. I'm not sure what the maximum penalty is for this offense, but that's what he should get.
Complain to the Judge they set the bail.

by Geilinor » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:00 pm

by Bendira » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:01 pm
Panzerjaeger wrote:Radictistan wrote:
I live in Texas. I'll admit that "all the time" is somewhat of an exaggeration. It happens at least once a year though.
Once a year? That is it? Why are you bitching about that?

by Andaluciae » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:01 pm
Natapoc wrote:Andaluciae wrote:Natapoc wrote:Bendira wrote:Come on guys, there is no such thing as an off duty cop!
http://www.wisegeek.com/does-an-off-dut ... hority.htm
"Different police departments have different policies concerning the authority of off-duty officers, but in many places an off-duty police officer does have the legal right to detain an offender until an on-duty officer arrives to finish the process".
Interesting. Yes I've seen this claimed in other threads but I was beginning to doubt.
What do you think of the bail amount?
I mean, the crimes the guy has been charged with, and the crimes that are likely capable of being proven in court, really wouldn't call for much more than that.
We can certainly infer that he was after a lot more, and more severe, activities, but he didn't commit them, and there isn't any direct evidence that he was planning to commit them.
According to "law enforcement" by the time such people tend to be caught they have already gone after several victims. They should link missing children reports that match his area and investigate the possibility that he is involved in their vanishing.
I suggest DNA analysis of his car and a warrants to inspect ever corner of his house and dig up his back yard to see if any bones are back there.
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...
by Sibirsky » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:01 pm
Monahtan wrote:Sibirsky wrote:Natapoc wrote:A New York City Police officer has been charged with attempting to lure a little girl into his car with promises of $100.
http://www.wten.com/global/Story.asp?s=12697236
The smart little girl ran to her grandparents house for help. I wonder how many other girls he has victimized in the past who decided to get into his car for the $100? Are they still alive to tell about it?
Bail for the would be kidnapper has been put at bail $2,500.
What do you think about this? Is the bail to low for someone who has been accused of predatory behavior of this type? When the police investigating the claims first interviewed the criminal he claimed to be self employed despite the fact that fingerprints later proved he was employed as a cop.
If a normal citizen lies about being a cop they can be charged. Should the opposite be true also? If a cop lies and claims that he is self employed and not, a member of the police department should there be a charge equivalent to "impersonating a civilian?"
Sick fuck. And $2500 is way too low. I'm not sure what the maximum penalty is for this offense, but that's what he should get.
I don't know what it is in new york, but attempting to lure or entice a child in Florida is a 1st degree misdemeanor.
by Radictistan » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:01 pm
Bendira wrote:Panzerjaeger wrote:Radictistan wrote:
I live in Texas. I'll admit that "all the time" is somewhat of an exaggeration. It happens at least once a year though.
Once a year? That is it? Why are you bitching about that?
Yeah only one person gets capped a year? Why do you even care meng?!?!

by Panzerjaeger » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:02 pm
Sibirsky wrote:Panzerjaeger wrote:Sibirsky wrote:Natapoc wrote:A New York City Police officer has been charged with attempting to lure a little girl into his car with promises of $100.
http://www.wten.com/global/Story.asp?s=12697236
The smart little girl ran to her grandparents house for help. I wonder how many other girls he has victimized in the past who decided to get into his car for the $100? Are they still alive to tell about it?
Bail for the would be kidnapper has been put at bail $2,500.
What do you think about this? Is the bail to low for someone who has been accused of predatory behavior of this type? When the police investigating the claims first interviewed the criminal he claimed to be self employed despite the fact that fingerprints later proved he was employed as a cop.
If a normal citizen lies about being a cop they can be charged. Should the opposite be true also? If a cop lies and claims that he is self employed and not, a member of the police department should there be a charge equivalent to "impersonating a civilian?"
Sick fuck. And $2500 is way too low. I'm not sure what the maximum penalty is for this offense, but that's what he should get.
Complain to the Judge they set the bail.
The magistrate. But what's the point? He had his day in court. Who the hell am I to question the court's decision?
Caninope wrote:Toyota: Keep moving forward, even when you don't want to!
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:Timothy McVeigh casts... Pyrotechnics!
Greater Americania wrote:lol "No Comrade Ivan! Don't stick your head in there! That's the wood chi...!"
New Kereptica wrote:Fascism: because people are too smart nowadays.

by Andaluciae » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:03 pm
Radictistan wrote:Bendira wrote:Panzerjaeger wrote:Radictistan wrote:
I live in Texas. I'll admit that "all the time" is somewhat of an exaggeration. It happens at least once a year though.
Once a year? That is it? Why are you bitching about that?
Yeah only one person gets capped a year? Why do you even care meng?!?!
You do realize I'm referring to unjustified police shootings, not total police shootings, right?
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

by Monahtan » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:03 pm
Sibirsky wrote:Monahtan wrote:Sibirsky wrote:Natapoc wrote:A New York City Police officer has been charged with attempting to lure a little girl into his car with promises of $100.
http://www.wten.com/global/Story.asp?s=12697236
The smart little girl ran to her grandparents house for help. I wonder how many other girls he has victimized in the past who decided to get into his car for the $100? Are they still alive to tell about it?
Bail for the would be kidnapper has been put at bail $2,500.
What do you think about this? Is the bail to low for someone who has been accused of predatory behavior of this type? When the police investigating the claims first interviewed the criminal he claimed to be self employed despite the fact that fingerprints later proved he was employed as a cop.
If a normal citizen lies about being a cop they can be charged. Should the opposite be true also? If a cop lies and claims that he is self employed and not, a member of the police department should there be a charge equivalent to "impersonating a civilian?"
Sick fuck. And $2500 is way too low. I'm not sure what the maximum penalty is for this offense, but that's what he should get.
I don't know what it is in new york, but attempting to lure or entice a child in Florida is a 1st degree misdemeanor.
Florida goes easy. That's a felony charge in my mind.
by Sibirsky » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:03 pm

by Panzerjaeger » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:04 pm
Andaluciae wrote:Radictistan wrote:Bendira wrote:Panzerjaeger wrote:Radictistan wrote:
I live in Texas. I'll admit that "all the time" is somewhat of an exaggeration. It happens at least once a year though.
Once a year? That is it? Why are you bitching about that?
Yeah only one person gets capped a year? Why do you even care meng?!?!
You do realize I'm referring to unjustified police shootings, not total police shootings, right?
Where the frick do you live?
Caninope wrote:Toyota: Keep moving forward, even when you don't want to!
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:Timothy McVeigh casts... Pyrotechnics!
Greater Americania wrote:lol "No Comrade Ivan! Don't stick your head in there! That's the wood chi...!"
New Kereptica wrote:Fascism: because people are too smart nowadays.

by Ifreann » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:04 pm
Radictistan wrote:Bendira wrote:Panzerjaeger wrote:Radictistan wrote:
I live in Texas. I'll admit that "all the time" is somewhat of an exaggeration. It happens at least once a year though.
Once a year? That is it? Why are you bitching about that?
Yeah only one person gets capped a year? Why do you even care meng?!?!
You do realize I'm referring to unjustified police shootings, not total police shootings, right?
by Radictistan » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:04 pm
Andaluciae wrote:Radictistan wrote:Bendira wrote:Panzerjaeger wrote:Radictistan wrote:
I live in Texas. I'll admit that "all the time" is somewhat of an exaggeration. It happens at least once a year though.
Once a year? That is it? Why are you bitching about that?
Yeah only one person gets capped a year? Why do you even care meng?!?!
You do realize I'm referring to unjustified police shootings, not total police shootings, right?
Where the frick do you live?

by Monahtan » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:05 pm
Radictistan wrote:Andaluciae wrote:Radictistan wrote:Bendira wrote:Panzerjaeger wrote:Radictistan wrote:
I live in Texas. I'll admit that "all the time" is somewhat of an exaggeration. It happens at least once a year though.
Once a year? That is it? Why are you bitching about that?
Yeah only one person gets capped a year? Why do you even care meng?!?!
You do realize I'm referring to unjustified police shootings, not total police shootings, right?
Where the frick do you live?
Austin.
by Sibirsky » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:06 pm
Panzerjaeger wrote:Sibirsky wrote:Panzerjaeger wrote:Sibirsky wrote:Natapoc wrote:A New York City Police officer has been charged with attempting to lure a little girl into his car with promises of $100.
http://www.wten.com/global/Story.asp?s=12697236
The smart little girl ran to her grandparents house for help. I wonder how many other girls he has victimized in the past who decided to get into his car for the $100? Are they still alive to tell about it?
Bail for the would be kidnapper has been put at bail $2,500.
What do you think about this? Is the bail to low for someone who has been accused of predatory behavior of this type? When the police investigating the claims first interviewed the criminal he claimed to be self employed despite the fact that fingerprints later proved he was employed as a cop.
If a normal citizen lies about being a cop they can be charged. Should the opposite be true also? If a cop lies and claims that he is self employed and not, a member of the police department should there be a charge equivalent to "impersonating a civilian?"
Sick fuck. And $2500 is way too low. I'm not sure what the maximum penalty is for this offense, but that's what he should get.
Complain to the Judge they set the bail.
The magistrate. But what's the point? He had his day in court. Who the hell am I to question the court's decision?
Bail is usually set based on finances and flight risk and the nature of the crime. Since this is at worst only just a Misdemeanor the bail seems fine to me. Not to say this shouldn't lead to a very thorough investigation of the officer in question.

by Panzerjaeger » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:07 pm
Sibirsky wrote:Panzerjaeger wrote:Sibirsky wrote:Panzerjaeger wrote:Sibirsky wrote:Natapoc wrote:A New York City Police officer has been charged with attempting to lure a little girl into his car with promises of $100.
http://www.wten.com/global/Story.asp?s=12697236
The smart little girl ran to her grandparents house for help. I wonder how many other girls he has victimized in the past who decided to get into his car for the $100? Are they still alive to tell about it?
Bail for the would be kidnapper has been put at bail $2,500.
What do you think about this? Is the bail to low for someone who has been accused of predatory behavior of this type? When the police investigating the claims first interviewed the criminal he claimed to be self employed despite the fact that fingerprints later proved he was employed as a cop.
If a normal citizen lies about being a cop they can be charged. Should the opposite be true also? If a cop lies and claims that he is self employed and not, a member of the police department should there be a charge equivalent to "impersonating a civilian?"
Sick fuck. And $2500 is way too low. I'm not sure what the maximum penalty is for this offense, but that's what he should get.
Complain to the Judge they set the bail.
The magistrate. But what's the point? He had his day in court. Who the hell am I to question the court's decision?
Bail is usually set based on finances and flight risk and the nature of the crime. Since this is at worst only just a Misdemeanor the bail seems fine to me. Not to say this shouldn't lead to a very thorough investigation of the officer in question.
I guess. The crime should be a felony in my mind. And bail accordingly higher.
Caninope wrote:Toyota: Keep moving forward, even when you don't want to!
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:Timothy McVeigh casts... Pyrotechnics!
Greater Americania wrote:lol "No Comrade Ivan! Don't stick your head in there! That's the wood chi...!"
New Kereptica wrote:Fascism: because people are too smart nowadays.

by Andaluciae » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:07 pm
Radictistan wrote:Andaluciae wrote:Radictistan wrote:Bendira wrote:Panzerjaeger wrote:Radictistan wrote:
I live in Texas. I'll admit that "all the time" is somewhat of an exaggeration. It happens at least once a year though.
Once a year? That is it? Why are you bitching about that?
Yeah only one person gets capped a year? Why do you even care meng?!?!
You do realize I'm referring to unjustified police shootings, not total police shootings, right?
Where the frick do you live?
Austin.
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Bear Stearns, Duvniask, Ethel mermania, EuroStralia, Google [Bot], Isomedia, Little Bit of Trolling, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Nantoraka, Port Caverton, Shrillland, Techocracy101010, Urkennalaid
Advertisement