NATION

PASSWORD

Is soccer un-American?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Effimination
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Is soccer un-American?

Postby Effimination » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:06 pm

In The Week, soccer has been accused of being un-American. I think it is not un-American; it's as important as NASCAR (America) as it is to bowling (rest of world. I swear). It came along a bit too late -- what with football which doesn't even make sense why it's called that because only 1/10 of the time, maximum at a football game is spent kicking a football.
What do you think?
Effimination:
"Graceful, dancing duodenums, pulsating in the moonlight..." or something like that - Sosa

User avatar
Sun Aut Ex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5402
Founded: Nov 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Aut Ex » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:07 pm

How can a sport be un-any nationality?

Besides, I'd argue that soccer is the MOST American sport. Most other codes enforce equality through various measures (salary cap, drafts, player movement restrictions). In soccer, the biggest, richest and most famous clubs usually win.
Strykyh wrote:I wasn't trying to be intelligent.

Keronians wrote:
So you think it's ok to waste valuable police time and resources to pander to minority superstitions?

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about ten minutes, I have to go to ID a Muslim woman."


Yes.

Unless of course it's not OK for a woman to ask for a female to ask for a female officer to carry out body checks. In which case, the answer would be no.

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about then minutes, I have to go to carry out a body check on a woman."

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 35926
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:07 pm

Of course it's not unAmerican. It's 1) played in the Americas and 2) soccer moms are about as American as you can get.

User avatar
Rolling Dead
Diplomat
 
Posts: 515
Founded: Feb 22, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Rolling Dead » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:10 pm

Yes.


Soccer was created by European Women, to keep themselves busy while the men are working in the Kitchen.


Strictly against American Values.

User avatar
Buffett and Colbert
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32382
Founded: Oct 05, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Buffett and Colbert » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:10 pm

Katganistan wrote:Of course it's not unAmerican. It's 1) played in the Americas and 2) soccer moms are about as American as you can get.

I always knew Palin was unAmerican.
If the knowledge isn't useful, you haven't found the lesson yet. ~Iniika
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Clever, but your Jedi mind tricks don't work on me.

His Jedi mind tricks are insignificant compared to the power of Buffy's sex appeal.
Keronians wrote:
Buffett and Colbert wrote:My law class took my virginity. And it was 100% consensual.

I accuse your precious law class of statutory rape.

User avatar
SaintB
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21792
Founded: Apr 18, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby SaintB » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:11 pm

its as Un-American as pizza pie.
Hi my name is SaintB and I am prone to sarcasm and hyperbole. Because of this I make no warranties, express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the above statement, of its constituent parts, or of any supporting data. These terms are subject to change without notice from myself.

Every day NationStates tells me I have one issue. I am pretty sure I've got more than that.

User avatar
Lackadaisical2
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 50831
Founded: Mar 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Lackadaisical2 » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:13 pm

Rolling Dead wrote:Yes.


Soccer was created by European Women, to keep themselves busy while the men are working in the Kitchen.


Strictly against American Values.

^this. It encourages infidelity and homosexuality.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:14 pm

...the US has a team that made it to the world cup, doesn't it?

How is the sport un-American if they have a team that actually makes it to the World Cup?

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:15 pm

Dakini wrote:...the US has a team that made it to the world cup, doesn't it?

How is the sport un-American if they have a team that actually makes it to the World Cup?

Gets people to consider purchasing a copy of The Week?
Last edited by Maurepas on Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:16 pm

I guess. Technically, it's English, right? So that's un-American. A better way to put it would be non-American, though.
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
Abury
Envoy
 
Posts: 237
Founded: Apr 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Abury » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:16 pm

Soccer's 0-0, 1-1 or 1-0 outcomes don't sit well with Americans, who like to think that work accomplishes something...

soccer is a European sport because it is all about death and despair. Americans would never invent a sport where the better you get the less you score....

Even the strong chance that any given game will end in a tie makes it attractive for parents reluctant to impart life's difficult lessons to young kids....

Soccer is truly Seinfeldesque, a game about nothing...


In short, a powerful component of character building is missing from youth soccer, an important component of character is missing from pro soccer, and a sense of purposefulness is missing from the entire sport.
Economic Left/Right: 10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.10

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:17 pm

Sdaeriji wrote:I guess. Technically, it's English, right? So that's un-American. A better way to put it would be non-American, though.

I think England let the game slip through their hands actually, nowadays I think America has just as much of it as they do.

User avatar
Kirby J
Envoy
 
Posts: 299
Founded: May 09, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Kirby J » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:18 pm

Dakini wrote:...the US has a team that made it to the world cup, doesn't it?

How is the sport un-American if they have a team that actually makes it to the World Cup?

It's not a genuine world championship unless only Good Honest Freedom-Loving American teams play. I mean really, how can you have teams from other countries in a world championship? It just doesn't make sense. Thus soccer is un-American.

User avatar
Novograd IV
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8330
Founded: Nov 13, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Novograd IV » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:19 pm

Effimination wrote:In The Week, soccer has been accused of being un-American. I think it is not un-American; it's as important as NASCAR (America) as it is to bowling (rest of world. I swear). It came along a bit too late -- what with football which doesn't even make sense why it's called that because only 1/10 of the time, maximum at a football game is spent kicking a football.
What do you think?


soccer = football
football sport created in England

America =/= founder of 'soccer'
Soccer = un-American.
Novan Wiki (under [re]construction)

Economic Left/Right: -9.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.24

http://www.politicaltest.net/test/result/196124/

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:19 pm

Kirby J wrote:
Dakini wrote:...the US has a team that made it to the world cup, doesn't it?

How is the sport un-American if they have a team that actually makes it to the World Cup?

It's not a genuine world championship unless only Good Honest Freedom-Loving American teams play. I mean really, how can you have teams from other countries in a world championship? It just doesn't make sense. Thus soccer is un-American.

My fellow Earthicans...

User avatar
Abury
Envoy
 
Posts: 237
Founded: Apr 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Abury » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:21 pm

Kirby J wrote:It's not a genuine world championship unless only Good Honest Freedom-Loving American teams play. I mean really, how can you have teams from other countries in a world championship? It just doesn't make sense. Thus soccer is un-American.


Well in World cup not all countries play but only the 32 selected by unknown criteria

I don't understand why crap country like Honduras plays and not country like China or India who are better at soccer
Last edited by Abury on Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:25 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Economic Left/Right: 10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.10

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:22 pm

Abury wrote:
Kirby J wrote:It's not a genuine world championship unless only Good Honest Freedom-Loving American teams play. I mean really, how can you have teams from other countries in a world championship? It just doesn't make sense. Thus soccer is un-American.


Well in World cup not all countries play but only the 32 selected by unknowm criteria


Just because you choose to remain ignorant of the qualification process does not make it unknown. Stop projecting your own ignorance.
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
Shabarik
Envoy
 
Posts: 301
Founded: May 28, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Shabarik » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:22 pm

Katganistan wrote:Of course it's not unAmerican. It's 1) played in the Americas and 2) soccer moms are about as American as you can get.

^This
I'm going to be out for a while, don't fret if I don't reply to your posts.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:23 pm

Abury wrote:
Kirby J wrote:It's not a genuine world championship unless only Good Honest Freedom-Loving American teams play. I mean really, how can you have teams from other countries in a world championship? It just doesn't make sense. Thus soccer is un-American.


Well in World cup not all countries play but only the 32 selected by unknown criteria criteria

I don't understand why crap country like Honduras plays and not country like China or India who are better at soccer

Um...How could they be better if Honduras made it to the Cup, and they didn't? :blink:

It's like asking why a "crap" team like New Orleans made it into the playoffs, when a big city like New York didn't.
Last edited by Maurepas on Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
San Pellegrino Romana
Minister
 
Posts: 2796
Founded: Jul 14, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby San Pellegrino Romana » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:24 pm

Glenn Beck says its unAmerican so it must be.

That is not my view, I am just stating a little sarcasm. I think its the most American sport after baseball and football.
Please refer to my nation IC as the Kingdom of Rome or Roman Kingdom.
~2QTBSTR8~
Diplomacy: Factbook | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Energizia Inc. | Van De Kaap Diamonds
Organizations: Roman Catholic Church | The Stonewall Alliance

User avatar
North Suran
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9974
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby North Suran » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:25 pm

Maurepas wrote:
Abury wrote:I don't understand why crap country like Honduras plays and not country like China or India who are better at soccer

Um...How could they be better if Honduras made it to the Cup, and they didn't? :blink:

Abury apparently believes that teams are chosen for the World Cup based on the value of their home country, rather than their skill.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.


User avatar
Bergnovinaia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7314
Founded: Jul 26, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Bergnovinaia » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:26 pm

Katganistan wrote:Of course it's not unAmerican. It's 1) played in the Americas and 2) soccer moms are about as American as you can get.


Nah... American is hockey moms from Alaska and Joe Six-packs ;)
I am pursuing my undergraduate degree from Texas A&M University in Psychology and Spanish. My goal in life is to be a marriage and family counselor. If you have questions about me or my life, just ask!

My girlfriend and I blog about Christian & general marriage, relationship, and dating advice!

NS member since 2009. WA Resolution Author (mostly all repealed), NS sports fanatic.

User avatar
Kirby J
Envoy
 
Posts: 299
Founded: May 09, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Kirby J » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:26 pm

Abury wrote:Well in World cup not all countries play but only the 32 selected by unknown criteria criteria

I don't understand why crap country like Honduras plays and not country like China or India who are better at soccer

Right.... India didn't even get close to qualifying, they're really not very good at all. Although they did qualify once, I think it might have been 1950, but Fifa wouldn't let them play with bare feet so they didn't play.

User avatar
Abury
Envoy
 
Posts: 237
Founded: Apr 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Abury » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:27 pm

Kirby J wrote:Although they did qualify once, I think it might have been 1950, but Fifa wouldn't let them play with bare feet so they didn't play.


This joke is not funny
Economic Left/Right: 10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.10

User avatar
Kirby J
Envoy
 
Posts: 299
Founded: May 09, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Kirby J » Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:29 pm

Abury wrote:
Kirby J wrote:Although they did qualify once, I think it might have been 1950, but Fifa wouldn't let them play with bare feet so they didn't play.


This joke is not funny

Except it's not a joke. From wikipedia: "Two other teams, Turkey and India, also withdrew after qualifying, with India refusing to go "because of the expense of travelling such a long way to play"[2] (or, according to some reports, because FIFA would not allow the team to play barefoot[3])." Also, why did you think this was a joke, but not what I said upthread, which you quoted and responded to seriously?
Last edited by Kirby J on Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Duvniask, Emotional Support Crocodile, Ma-li, Satanic Atheists

Advertisement

Remove ads