Advertisement

by Lunatic Goofballs » Sat Jul 04, 2009 5:20 am

by Pepe Dominguez » Sat Jul 04, 2009 5:23 am
Daistallia 2104 wrote:North Korea and France wrote:MILF4PRES
Doesn't the "ILF" part imply that Palin's actually attractive???


by Pepe Dominguez » Sat Jul 04, 2009 5:29 am
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Community college has prepared her well to run a state, but if she is going to be President, maybe she ought to take some of those adult education courses. Ballroom dancing and floral arrangements will supplement her existing skillset nicely. *nod*


by Lunatic Goofballs » Sat Jul 04, 2009 5:34 am
Pepe Dominguez wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Community college has prepared her well to run a state, but if she is going to be President, maybe she ought to take some of those adult education courses. Ballroom dancing and floral arrangements will supplement her existing skillset nicely. *nod*
Careful, now: insulting community college students is getting dangerous as more and more universities are cutting enrollment and/or only accepting transfer students. My alma mater (Cal Poly, a 4-year) did this recently, along with eliminating summer classes completely. Here on the West coast, community college attendance doesn't actually bespeak low intelligence or lack of academic success - it's actually a wise decision, financially. Just a tip, even though Wiki says Palin did graduate from a proper four-year university (after transferring).

by Rathaeria » Sat Jul 04, 2009 5:36 am
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Pepe Dominguez wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Community college has prepared her well to run a state, but if she is going to be President, maybe she ought to take some of those adult education courses. Ballroom dancing and floral arrangements will supplement her existing skillset nicely. *nod*
Careful, now: insulting community college students is getting dangerous as more and more universities are cutting enrollment and/or only accepting transfer students. My alma mater (Cal Poly, a 4-year) did this recently, along with eliminating summer classes completely. Here on the West coast, community college attendance doesn't actually bespeak low intelligence or lack of academic success - it's actually a wise decision, financially. Just a tip, even though Wiki says Palin did graduate from a proper four-year university (after transferring).
True enough, She went to 4 schools total. The middle 2 were community colleges. This is not a detriment. Not everybody handles the stresses and rigors of college life well. This doesn't make you less intelligent.
But we aren't talking about the manager of a bowling alley or a corporate executive. We're talking about the President of the United States. My standards are a bit higher. I don't want a President that did ok at life. I want a President that excelled at everything he put his energy into. Are my standards too high?

by Pepe Dominguez » Sat Jul 04, 2009 5:50 am
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:But we aren't talking about the manager of a bowling alley or a corporate executive. We're talking about the President of the United States. My standards are a bit higher. I don't want a President that did ok at life. I want a President that excelled at everything he or she put his or her energy into. Are my standards too high?

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Jul 04, 2009 6:40 am
Hanibar wrote:Is Palin running for 2012? I've heard that she wasn't going to run for Governor anymore and if she is running for president,who do you think would win Obama or Palin?

You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by The Romulan Republic » Sat Jul 04, 2009 6:46 am
Buffett and Colbert wrote:If she runs, I will lose the sliver of respect for that woman. I just can't believe that she could be arrogant enough to believe that she has a fraction of the intelligence to become president. There's no way she could think that. The scary part is, she would get a fair number of votes in the primaries. Shows how many Americans really are <snip to save myself from modly wrath.> But I kinda do hope she runs because that would secure the democrats a win!

by South Lorenya » Sat Jul 04, 2009 6:48 am

by The Romulan Republic » Sat Jul 04, 2009 6:53 am
South Lorenya wrote:Will Palin run for president? Most likely.
Will she do even worse than Kucinich and Ron Paul? Most likely.

by South Lorenya » Sat Jul 04, 2009 7:01 am
The Romulan Republic wrote:South Lorenya wrote:Will Palin run for president? Most likely.
Will she do even worse than Kucinich and Ron Paul? Most likely.
First, Kucinich and Paul weren't in the same league. Paul almost won some states in the GOP primaries. I think Kucinich hovered in the single digits the whole time.
Second, Palin has a fair amount of support from the racists and socialism fearing nuts who went to her rallies last time around. There's a certain fraction of the population who are bigoted religious nuts (some of them likely potential right-wing terrorists), and who praise Bible Belt nut Palin like the Second Coming.
Remember, 60% of Americans don't believe in evolution, and near 30% still approved of Bush. That's a rich source of narrow-minded fanatics for her to exploit. She's to stupid to win a general election against any competent competition, but she could at least score in the double digits in a GOP primary I think.

by Rathaeria » Sat Jul 04, 2009 7:59 am
The Romulan Republic wrote:South Lorenya wrote:Will Palin run for president? Most likely.
Will she do even worse than Kucinich and Ron Paul? Most likely.
First, Kucinich and Paul weren't in the same league. Paul almost won some states in the GOP primaries. I think Kucinich hovered in the single digits the whole time.
Second, Palin has a fair amount of support from the racists and socialism fearing nuts who went to her rallies last time around. There's a certain fraction of the population who are bigoted religious nuts (some of them likely potential right-wing terrorists), and who praise Bible Belt nut Palin like the Second Coming.
Remember, 60% of Americans don't believe in evolution, and near 30% still approved of Bush. That's a rich source of narrow-minded fanatics for her to exploit. She's to stupid to win a general election against any competent competition, but she could at least score in the double digits in a GOP primary I think.


by New Mitanni » Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:48 pm


by Milks Empire » Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:18 pm
New Mitanni wrote:The fact that liberals in general and the Dishonest Liberal Media in particular view her as a threat to their entire world-view, are terrified by her, hate her and thus will stop at nothing to trash her is reason enough for me and millions of others to back her in 2012.

by Farnhamia » Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:23 pm
New Mitanni wrote:The fact that liberals in general and the Dishonest Liberal Media in particular view her as a threat to their entire world-view, are terrified by her, hate her and thus will stop at nothing to trash her is reason enough for me and millions of others to back her in 2012.

by The Black Forrest » Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:44 pm

by Ranzar » Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:45 pm
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:But we aren't talking about the manager of a bowling alley or a corporate executive. We're talking about the President of the United States. My standards are a bit higher. I don't want a President that did ok at life. I want a President that excelled at everything he or she put his or her energy into. Are my standards too high?

by The Black Forrest » Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:47 pm
Farnhamia wrote:New Mitanni wrote:The fact that liberals in general and the Dishonest Liberal Media in particular view her as a threat to their entire world-view, are terrified by her, hate her and thus will stop at nothing to trash her is reason enough for me and millions of others to back her in 2012.
Terrified? Hate? Stop at nothing? Please. If the "Dishonest Liberal Media" didn't cover her, you'd be crying in your beer about that, too.
It still amazes me that someone as politically savvy as John McCain let himself be talked into picking her last year. The Republican Party ought to investigate the people who made that decision if they want to find out why they lost so badly.

by Steam Steam East » Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:47 pm

by The Black Forrest » Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:49 pm
Ranzar wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:But we aren't talking about the manager of a bowling alley or a corporate executive. We're talking about the President of the United States. My standards are a bit higher. I don't want a President that did ok at life. I want a President that excelled at everything he or she put his or her energy into. Are my standards too high?
Republicans are skilled in turning mediocrity into a virtue. You remember how Palin went on about soccer moms and Joe Six-packs in the last election? It failed then, but I think there are still a lot of people who can be convinced that a person may be too smart to get elected.


by Grave_n_idle » Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:57 pm
New Mitanni wrote:The fact that liberals in general and the Dishonest Liberal Media in particular view her as a threat to their entire world-view, are terrified by her, hate her and thus will stop at nothing to trash her is reason enough for me and millions of others to back her in 2012.

by Luchsandria » Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:01 pm

by Farnhamia » Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:38 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Farnhamia wrote:New Mitanni wrote:The fact that liberals in general and the Dishonest Liberal Media in particular view her as a threat to their entire world-view, are terrified by her, hate her and thus will stop at nothing to trash her is reason enough for me and millions of others to back her in 2012.
Terrified? Hate? Stop at nothing? Please. If the "Dishonest Liberal Media" didn't cover her, you'd be crying in your beer about that, too.
It still amazes me that someone as politically savvy as John McCain let himself be talked into picking her last year. The Republican Party ought to investigate the people who made that decision if they want to find out why they lost so badly.
Politically savvy? Not really. John McCain is nothing more then the fuck up son and grandson of famous admirals.
Read the Rolling Stone article about him and he you will loose your admiration of him.
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/ ... rick/print

by Farnhamia » Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:46 pm
Luchsandria wrote:I am a Democrat who would, in fact, love Sarah Palin to run, because she'd get squashed since she can't even verbally defend her poor stances. If the GOP actually wanted to challenge the Democrats, and possibly even a chance to let America decide on the issues, they'd go for Bobby Jindal. But they want the hot chick, because they know that they'd be in shambles if America decided on the issues.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Elejamie, Ostroeuropa, Pizza Friday Forever91, Practice Nation State, Saiwana, Torisakia, Urkennalaid, Violetist Britannia
Advertisement