NATION

PASSWORD

What If Germany Won World War 2?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
New Bern99
Diplomat
 
Posts: 803
Founded: Jul 05, 2008
Ex-Nation

What If Germany Won World War 2?

Postby New Bern99 » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:20 am

Thread is ten months old folks...let it rest in peace.
Last edited by New Bern99 on Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nations Do Not Survive By Setting Examples For Others.
Nations Survive By Making Examples Of Others.

User avatar
Rolamec
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6860
Founded: Dec 15, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Rolamec » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:35 am

New Bern99 wrote:I recently watched a movie that had an alternate history of Germany winning World War 2.

The Allied invasion of Normandy was rebuffed. The United States never got a foothold in Fortress Europe and was unable to aide in the liberation of the countries occupied by Germany and instead concentrated their efforts against the Japanese Empire with a similar outcome as happened in real life. The movie takes place some twenty years later where the SS has evolved into a peace time police force and the death camps and Hitler's "Final Solution" were not known to the world. Hitler has mellowed with age and is attempting to put a friendlier face on the Nazi Empire.

The Nazi Empire is still fighting the Soviets in the East and now seeks an alliance with the United States against them.

My question is: Is this turn of events possible? What would Germany had to have done to actually win the War in Europe?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvR15G8yEhg First five minutes or so of the movie which is undoubtedly the most interesting part and the only reason I watched the movie.


Isn't there a book about this?

I don't know. Germans would be deep in Russia. England has a puppet, crony king edward whatever of the Nazis. No Israel. I dunno.
Rolamec of New Earth
A Proud and Progressive Republican.
"Life is hard; it's harder if you're stupid." -John Wayne

Economic Left/Right: 4.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.05

User avatar
New Manvir
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6821
Founded: Jan 06, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Manvir » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:39 am

Rolamec wrote:
New Bern99 wrote:I recently watched a movie that had an alternate history of Germany winning World War 2.

The Allied invasion of Normandy was rebuffed. The United States never got a foothold in Fortress Europe and was unable to aide in the liberation of the countries occupied by Germany and instead concentrated their efforts against the Japanese Empire with a similar outcome as happened in real life. The movie takes place some twenty years later where the SS has evolved into a peace time police force and the death camps and Hitler's "Final Solution" were not known to the world. Hitler has mellowed with age and is attempting to put a friendlier face on the Nazi Empire.

The Nazi Empire is still fighting the Soviets in the East and now seeks an alliance with the United States against them.

My question is: Is this turn of events possible? What would Germany had to have done to actually win the War in Europe?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvR15G8yEhg First five minutes or so of the movie which is undoubtedly the most interesting part and the only reason I watched the movie.


Isn't there a book about this?

I don't know. Germans would be deep in Russia. England has a puppet, crony king edward whatever of the Nazis. No Israel. I dunno.


Yes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatherland_%28novel%29
I am from Canada | I'm some kind of Socialist | And also Batman
"Never be deceived that the rich will permit you to vote away their wealth." - Lucy Parsons
Socialism is an economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy. "Social ownership" may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, state ownership, citizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these. There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them. They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets or planning, how management is to be organised within productive institutions, and the role of the state in constructing socialism.

User avatar
Ziway
Attaché
 
Posts: 71
Founded: Apr 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ziway » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:39 am

They would have had to have the nuclear bomb first... and if they did win Palestine would be a flourishing nation in the middle of a very peaceful Middle East.

User avatar
Carls-land
Minister
 
Posts: 2087
Founded: Apr 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Carls-land » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:40 am

hitler would be assasinated, and we would get a united european republic, or a non rascist military dictatorship.

User avatar
Rolamec
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6860
Founded: Dec 15, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Rolamec » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:41 am

Carls-land wrote:hitler would be assasinated, and we would get a united european republic, or a non rascist military dictatorship.


Wow, where the hell did you get that from?
Rolamec of New Earth
A Proud and Progressive Republican.
"Life is hard; it's harder if you're stupid." -John Wayne

Economic Left/Right: 4.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.05

User avatar
Carls-land
Minister
 
Posts: 2087
Founded: Apr 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Carls-land » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:42 am

Rolamec wrote:
Carls-land wrote:hitler would be assasinated, and we would get a united european republic, or a non rascist military dictatorship.


Wow, where the hell did you get that from?

there were so many assasination atempts on hitler, it would only be some time before he got assasinated

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21669
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:43 am

Rolamec wrote:
New Bern99 wrote:I recently watched a movie that had an alternate history of Germany winning World War 2.

The Allied invasion of Normandy was rebuffed. The United States never got a foothold in Fortress Europe and was unable to aide in the liberation of the countries occupied by Germany and instead concentrated their efforts against the Japanese Empire with a similar outcome as happened in real life. The movie takes place some twenty years later where the SS has evolved into a peace time police force and the death camps and Hitler's "Final Solution" were not known to the world. Hitler has mellowed with age and is attempting to put a friendlier face on the Nazi Empire.

The Nazi Empire is still fighting the Soviets in the East and now seeks an alliance with the United States against them.

My question is: Is this turn of events possible? What would Germany had to have done to actually win the War in Europe?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvR15G8yEhg First five minutes or so of the movie which is undoubtedly the most interesting part and the only reason I watched the movie.


Isn't there a book about this?

I don't know. Germans would be deep in Russia. England has a puppet, crony king edward whatever of the Nazis. No Israel. I dunno.


sounds like something Harry Turtledove would do
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
Western cuba
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6472
Founded: Jul 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Western cuba » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:45 am

Well the Jews wouldn't be alive right now and the USA would not be a superpower so would the USSR. By the way in this movie did Fascist Italy survive or no?
Now known as the Technological State of Adros, the successor state of Western Cuba

User avatar
Ermarian
Minister
 
Posts: 2783
Founded: Jan 11, 2004
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Ermarian » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:47 am

I know alternate history is, well, alternate, but it's still supposed to follow realism. I can't see anything Germany could have done to realistically withstand the Soviet army for more than another few years, regardless of Normandy. Even with nuclear weapons. If Germany could have beaten the odds and actually designed and tested one in spite of their research and resource shortage, they still wouldn't have been able to drop it in Russia.
The Endless Empire of Ermarian | Jolt Archives | Encyclopedia Ermariana | ( -6.38 | -8.56 ) | Luna is best pony.
"Without deeper reflection one knows from daily life that one exists for other people - first of all for those upon whose smiles and well-being our own happiness is wholly dependent, and then for the many, unknown to us, to whose destinies we are bound by the ties of sympathy." -Einstein
"Is there a topic for discussion here, or did you just want to be wrong in public?" -Ifreann

User avatar
New Manvir
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6821
Founded: Jan 06, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Manvir » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:47 am

I doubt it would have turned out that way. The USSR still would have won, albeit probably in 1946 or 47. Even if Operation Overlord didn't succeed, Operation Bagration probably did and that crushed the German armies in the East.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Fr ... ummer_1944
The Germans had transferred some units to France to counter the invasion of Normandy two weeks before. The Belorussian Offensive (codenamed Operation Bagration), which began on 22 June 1944, was a massive Soviet attack, consisting of four Soviet army groups totaling over 120 divisions that smashed into a thinly held German line. They focused their massive attacks on Army Group Centre, not Army Group North Ukraine as the Germans had originally expected. More than 2.3 million Soviet troops went into action against the German Army Group Centre, which boasted a strength of fewer than 800,000 men. At the points of attack, the numerical and quality advantages of the Soviets were overwhelming: the Red Army achieved a ratio of ten to one in tanks and seven to one in aircraft over the enemy. The Germans crumbled. The capital of Belarus, Minsk, was taken on 3 July, trapping 50,000 Germans. Ten days later the Red Army reached the prewar Polish border. Bagration was by any measure one of the largest single operations of the war. By the end of August 1944, it had cost the Germans ~670,000 dead, missing, wounded and sick, from whom 160,000 were captured, as well as 2,000 tanks and 57,000 other vehicles. In the operation, the Red Army lost ~170,000 dead and missing (765,815 total casualties, including dead, missing, wounded, sick, among them 5,073 Poles),[43] as well as 2,957 tanks and assault guns. The offensive at Estonia claimed another 480,000 Soviet troopers, 100,000 of them as dead.


Also this:

The neighbouring Lvov-Sandomierz operation was launched on 17 July 1944, rapidly routing the German forces in Western Ukraine. The Soviet advance in the south continued into Romania and, following a coup against the Axis-allied government of Romania on 23 August, the Red Army occupied Bucharest on 31 August. In Moscow on 12 September, Romania and the Soviet Union signed an armistice on terms Moscow virtually dictated. The Romanian surrender tore a hole in the southern German Eastern Front causing the inevitable loss of the whole of the Balkans.


Basically, Communist Europe all the way to the Atlantic..
Last edited by New Manvir on Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
I am from Canada | I'm some kind of Socialist | And also Batman
"Never be deceived that the rich will permit you to vote away their wealth." - Lucy Parsons
Socialism is an economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy. "Social ownership" may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, state ownership, citizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these. There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them. They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets or planning, how management is to be organised within productive institutions, and the role of the state in constructing socialism.

User avatar
The Zombay
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 113
Founded: May 29, 2009
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Zombay » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:48 am

We would all be speaking German :(

User avatar
Illithar
Diplomat
 
Posts: 994
Founded: Mar 09, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Illithar » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:48 am

Even with a failed D-Day, the Nazis still probably wouldn't have won the war. The Soviet Union so vastly outnumbered the Germans that it would only have been a matter of time until Germany ran out of manpower while the Russians continue to drown Germany in a sea of blood.

Also, to whoever said that Hitler would have been assissinated, you do realize that:

A) Several of those plots were false

B) Himmler probably would have become Furher
Mentsch tracht, Gott lacht. "Man plans, God laughs"
Madness does not always howl. Sometimes it is the quiet voice at the end of the day saying "Hey, is there room in your head for one more?"
FactBook of Illithar

User avatar
New Manvir
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6821
Founded: Jan 06, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Manvir » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:49 am

Ermarian wrote:I know alternate history is, well, alternate, but it's still supposed to follow realism. I can't see anything Germany could have done to realistically withstand the Soviet army for more than another few years, regardless of Normandy. Even with nuclear weapons. If Germany could have beaten the odds and actually designed and tested one in spite of their research and resource shortage, they still wouldn't have been able to drop it in Russia.


This.
I am from Canada | I'm some kind of Socialist | And also Batman
"Never be deceived that the rich will permit you to vote away their wealth." - Lucy Parsons
Socialism is an economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy. "Social ownership" may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, state ownership, citizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these. There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them. They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets or planning, how management is to be organised within productive institutions, and the role of the state in constructing socialism.

User avatar
Illithar
Diplomat
 
Posts: 994
Founded: Mar 09, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Illithar » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:50 am

Ermarian wrote:I know alternate history is, well, alternate, but it's still supposed to follow realism. I can't see anything Germany could have done to realistically withstand the Soviet army for more than another few years, regardless of Normandy. Even with nuclear weapons. If Germany could have beaten the odds and actually designed and tested one in spite of their research and resource shortage, they still wouldn't have been able to drop it in Russia.


They would probably have to blow away a Russian army in Germany and even that wouldn't have stopped Stalin.
Mentsch tracht, Gott lacht. "Man plans, God laughs"
Madness does not always howl. Sometimes it is the quiet voice at the end of the day saying "Hey, is there room in your head for one more?"
FactBook of Illithar

User avatar
Carls-land
Minister
 
Posts: 2087
Founded: Apr 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Carls-land » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:50 am

Western cuba wrote:Well the Jews wouldn't be alive right now and the USA would not be a superpower so would the USSR. By the way in this movie did Fascist Italy survive or no?

just because nazi germany wins the war, does not mean they would have world domination. there would still be plenty of jews in the americas

User avatar
Northwest Slobovia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12531
Founded: Sep 16, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Northwest Slobovia » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:51 am

Carls-land wrote:
Rolamec wrote:
Carls-land wrote:hitler would be assasinated, and we would get a united european republic, or a non rascist military dictatorship.


Wow, where the hell did you get that from?

there were so many assasination atempts on hitler, it would only be some time before he got assasinated

If, as the OP says, the landings at Normandy failed, and the Red Army was at least held to a standstill, why would anybody try to whack Hitler again? The Nazis would be winning.

My answer to the OP is: what do you mean be "win"?

1) Survival of the Reich (with some conquered terrority?)

2) Festung Europa

3) Ve are alles speaken Cherman! (Conquest or destruction of the US)

Which you mean makes a big difference.

I think either of the first are possible if the landings at Normandy failed, but if the US developed the Bomb as historical and used it as intended (on Berlin, and then a few major industrial cities), #1 is most likely: we have the Bomb, they have jets, and the war is stalemated.
Gollum died for your sins.
Power is an equal-opportunity corrupter.

User avatar
Mighty Brittania
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 159
Founded: May 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mighty Brittania » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:51 am

Considering that Russia (for all intents and purposes) defeated Germany singlehandedly (It engaged 80% of the German forces for stalins sake!), no, history wouldn't be terribly different.

For all of you future Hitlers: Don't ever engage Russians, ever.

User avatar
Carls-land
Minister
 
Posts: 2087
Founded: Apr 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Carls-land » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:52 am

Illithar wrote:Even with a failed D-Day, the Nazis still probably wouldn't have won the war. The Soviet Union so vastly outnumbered the Germans that it would only have been a matter of time until Germany ran out of manpower while the Russians continue to drown Germany in a sea of blood.

Also, to whoever said that Hitler would have been assissinated, you do realize that:

A) Several of those plots were false

B) Himmler probably would have become Furher

A) no they were not

B) it was only really hitler who liked him. the rest of the high command hated him.

User avatar
Carls-land
Minister
 
Posts: 2087
Founded: Apr 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Carls-land » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:54 am

Northwest Slobovia wrote:
Carls-land wrote:
Rolamec wrote:
Carls-land wrote:hitler would be assasinated, and we would get a united european republic, or a non rascist military dictatorship.


Wow, where the hell did you get that from?

there were so many assasination atempts on hitler, it would only be some time before he got assasinated

If, as the OP says, the landings at Normandy failed, and the Red Army was at least held to a standstill, why would anybody try to whack Hitler again? The Nazis would be winning.

many germans hated him and his policies.

User avatar
Carls-land
Minister
 
Posts: 2087
Founded: Apr 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Carls-land » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:55 am

Mighty Brittania wrote:Considering that Russia (for all intents and purposes) defeated Germany singlehandedly (It engaged 80% of the German forces for stalins sake!), no, history wouldn't be terribly different.

For all of you future Hitlers: Don't ever engage Russians, ever.

exept that all of europe would be state capitalist.

User avatar
Mighty Brittania
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 159
Founded: May 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mighty Brittania » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:56 am

Carls-land wrote:exept that all of europe would be state capitalist.

I am in favour of the soviet union.

User avatar
Carls-land
Minister
 
Posts: 2087
Founded: Apr 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Carls-land » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:58 am

Mighty Brittania wrote:
Carls-land wrote:exept that all of europe would be state capitalist.

I am in favour of State Capitalism.

FIXED

why are you in favour of State Capitalism?

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55628
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:59 am

The USSR didn't defeat the Nazis by themselves.

The US didn't save Europe from the Nazis by themselves.


That is all I am going to say for this tired recycled topic of chest beating.
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
Murgoth
Diplomat
 
Posts: 843
Founded: Jan 12, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Murgoth » Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:00 pm

here are my thoughts:
if, by some miracle, hitler was able to repel the allies at normandy, that wouldn't stop the allies. america would possibly take troops from teh european theater and put them into the destructin of japan, but would still have troops in europe. assuming that germany did, god knows how, win the war, they would be completely unapposed. the japanese and american armies would both be depleted, russia would by that point almost collapsed from sheer mass of casualties, and any remaining allied armies would be depleted from trying to liberate europe. of course, the german military would be depleted as well, but if they won we can assume that all invasions of fortress europe failed. and so they would still have a semi-decent force. they would sweep through russia and force britain into submission. so we can say that if germany won the war, it would end at a similair time, with the entirety of the european continent under german control (they would probably betray italy, which would have weathered countless invasions).
the germans would retake nothern africa and the middle east. all the jews in europe would die.
so the world would end up in a stand off between america and nazi germany. unfortunately for america, the sheer amount of reasources and manpower germany would have would make germany more likely to win. america might well have a soviet union stye collapse from trying to fight off facist influence. by today, most of the world would probably be under german or facist rule. germany would slowly mellow out and become more liberal, but not horribly much.
comments?
Merteth Ech, Tikcs murgoth
"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most, our one fellow and brother who most needed a friend yet had not a single one, the one sinner among us all who had the highest and clearest right to every Christian's daily and nightly prayers, for the plain and unassailable reason that his was the first and greatest need, he being among sinners the supremest?"
Mark Twain

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Allemonde-Pala, Delitai, Dimetrodon Empire, Ethel mermania, Falafelandia, Forsher, Heavenly Assault, Hurtful Thoughts, New Temecula, Picairn, Port Caverton, Shrillland, Terminus Station, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Jamesian Republic, Torrocca, Uiiop, Umeria, Untecna, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads