Advertisement

by The Naacal » Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:58 pm

by Desperate Measures » Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:02 pm
The Naacal wrote:Ok, I get the point already.
Do any of you people believe that *any* report or scientific paper saying global warming is not a critical danger is not some sort of oil company influenced item?
I'm just curious about that.
And as far as Haliburton, we should have been given all the money given to them, and spent on Iraq for that matter, and built more nuclear plants. It both makes us more independent from foreign oil, creates jobs, and cuts down on the carbon dioxide emissions.
Yes there is nuclear waste, but reprocessing can reduce that.
At this point I almost wish they had conversion reactors, so they could throw Haliburton in them. As far as Iraq, quite frankly Saddam could have been more effectively dealt with by some wetworks types. They should have concentrated from the beginning on Afghanistan. That's where the terrorists were.
And are.

by Intangelon » Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:12 pm

by JarVik » Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:36 pm
The Naacal wrote:Ok, I get the point already.
Do any of you people believe that *any* report or scientific paper saying global warming is not a critical danger is not some sort of oil company influenced item?
I'm just curious about that.
And as far as Haliburton, we should have been given all the money given to them, and spent on Iraq for that matter, and built more nuclear plants. It both makes us more independent from foreign oil, creates jobs, and cuts down on the carbon dioxide emissions.
Yes there is nuclear waste, but reprocessing can reduce that.
At this point I almost wish they had conversion reactors, so they could throw Haliburton in them. As far as Iraq, quite frankly Saddam could have been more effectively dealt with by some wetworks types. They should have concentrated from the beginning on Afghanistan. That's where the terrorists were.
And are.

by Grays Harbor » Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:52 pm

by Muravyets » Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:08 pm
The Naacal wrote:
All I am saying is vulcanism can, has, and will have a far more drastic effect on the climate then industry has.
Yellowstone I was just mentioning as the single greatest volcanic event that could happen. It is "overdue" to erupt based on it's history, but that of course is in geological scale. It may not go off for a thousand years. Or it could erupt next month.

by Muravyets » Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:10 pm
The Naacal wrote:I do not believe there is enough evidence from non-politcally biased sources available to determine if climate change is being caused my man's actions.

by BunnySaurus Bugsii » Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:46 pm
Intangelon wrote:Note my location.

by Intangelon » Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:29 pm
BunnySaurus Bugsii wrote:Intangelon wrote:Note my location.
Um, how do I do that?

by Desperate Measures » Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:24 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Explain the Size of my Sheep
OK, depending on your locale, you measure from either the top of the head, or the back. Then follow it down to the point where it meets the ground. That should give you the size.I'm sorry. I couldn't resist. I am a bad bad person.

by Rhodmhire » Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:04 pm
Dolbri wrote:Are there still people who deny that the climate is changing? Aren't most of them arguing that it's not man-made?

by Pope Joan » Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:06 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Explain the Size of my Sheep
OK, depending on your locale, you measure from either the top of the head, or the back. Then follow it down to the point where it meets the ground. That should give you the size.I'm sorry. I couldn't resist. I am a bad bad person.

by Grays Harbor » Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:08 pm
Pope Joan wrote:Grays Harbor wrote:Explain the Size of my Sheep
OK, depending on your locale, you measure from either the top of the head, or the back. Then follow it down to the point where it meets the ground. That should give you the size.I'm sorry. I couldn't resist. I am a bad bad person.
Cue Steve Carell.

by Secruss » Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:15 pm

by The Naacal » Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:13 pm
Muravyets wrote:The Naacal wrote:I do not believe there is enough evidence from non-politcally biased sources available to determine if climate change is being caused my man's actions.
Do you believe there is enough evidence from non-politically biased sources available to determine that exposure to massive amounts of industrial and consumer pollution of air and water supplies is bad for human health?

by Big Jim P » Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:23 pm
Pope Joan wrote:Desperate Measures wrote:"In the past, only the big, healthy sheep and large lambs that had piled on weight in their first summer could survive the harsh winters on Hirta," said Professor Coulson.
Because of climate change, he explained, grass for food is now available for more months of the year on the island.
"Survival conditions are not so challenging - even the slower growing sheep have a chance of making it, and this means smaller individuals are becoming increasingly prevalent in the population," he said.
"Young mums" tend to give birth to smaller lambs
The team also found that younger sheep tended to give birth to smaller lambs - a phenomenon they termed "the young mum effect".
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8130907.stm
"That doesn't mean that animals will adapt and thrive in a warmer world. Far from it — by some estimates, rapid climate change could drive as many as one-third of the species on the planet out of existence by mid-century. Though warmer winters in blustery Scotland might sound nice — especially if you're a sheep on the small side — the changes due to global warming are likely to be far from positive in most parts of the world. Evolution will help species adapt, but there's a term for what happens when the pace of evolution can't match the pace of climate change: extinction. "http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1908411,00.html?iid=tsmodule
So? I'm waiting. I hold the deniers directly responsible for the size of my sheep.
Also, because this isn't hugely negative, do you think the deniers will use this as a "See? Climate Change isn't so bad."
Young mums?
This sounds like a teen pregnancy issue!
Teach them to abstain, "just say no"!
Sheer genius!

by The Naacal » Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:43 pm
Big Jim P wrote:Pope Joan wrote:Desperate Measures wrote:"In the past, only the big, healthy sheep and large lambs that had piled on weight in their first summer could survive the harsh winters on Hirta," said Professor Coulson.
Because of climate change, he explained, grass for food is now available for more months of the year on the island.
"Survival conditions are not so challenging - even the slower growing sheep have a chance of making it, and this means smaller individuals are becoming increasingly prevalent in the population," he said.
"Young mums" tend to give birth to smaller lambs
The team also found that younger sheep tended to give birth to smaller lambs - a phenomenon they termed "the young mum effect".
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8130907.stm
"That doesn't mean that animals will adapt and thrive in a warmer world. Far from it — by some estimates, rapid climate change could drive as many as one-third of the species on the planet out of existence by mid-century. Though warmer winters in blustery Scotland might sound nice — especially if you're a sheep on the small side — the changes due to global warming are likely to be far from positive in most parts of the world. Evolution will help species adapt, but there's a term for what happens when the pace of evolution can't match the pace of climate change: extinction. "http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1908411,00.html?iid=tsmodule
So? I'm waiting. I hold the deniers directly responsible for the size of my sheep.
Also, because this isn't hugely negative, do you think the deniers will use this as a "See? Climate Change isn't so bad."
Young mums?
This sounds like a teen pregnancy issue!
Teach them to abstain, "just say no"!
Sheer genius!
Personally I think its the addition of human DNA to the sheeps gene pool.


by Russia Untied » Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:10 am

by Desperate Measures » Sat Jul 04, 2009 10:50 am
Russia Untied wrote:Your right! Your sheep are prove Global warmming is happening! We should get rid of cars, stop drilling for oil, tear down all factories!
Wake up. This happens all the time. The earth is always changing. It warms up and cools down. The sun is more active right now and is also helping to raise tempetures. So what? Humans have gone through this before and survied and we will again.
Just because a few countires elect dumb leaders that hurt business with radical green laws doesnt mean the rest of the world is dumb enough to. We should be expending business not hurting them. In case you have notice there is a Gobal economic cirsis going on. Hurting busineses is the last thing we want to do. If you think making more regualtion on businesses are a good idea because you and a few others think you can stop climate change than you are out of touch of the real world. Nothing you do will change the fact the earth is going have it's climate change throughout it's life.
While these countries hurt their economies by trying to stop climate change the rest of us are going to build more factories, drill for more oil, build cars, and expand business. Have fun destorying your economies!

by Desperate Measures » Sat Jul 04, 2009 10:51 am
Rhodmhire wrote:Dolbri wrote:Are there still people who deny that the climate is changing? Aren't most of them arguing that it's not man-made?
Climate change is real, nobody denies that--it's the man-made apocalyptic fear-mongering false-media climate change that I don't buy.

by Dyakovo » Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:13 am
Rhodmhire wrote:Dolbri wrote:Are there still people who deny that the climate is changing? Aren't most of them arguing that it's not man-made?
Climate change is real, nobody denies that--it's the man-made apocalyptic fear-mongering false-media climate change that I don't buy.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Elejamie, Elwher, Ostroeuropa, Pizza Friday Forever91, Practice Nation State, Torisakia, Violetist Britannia
Advertisement