Advertisement

by Shazbotdom » Tue May 11, 2010 5:14 pm
NCAAF Record Estimates
LSU Tigers: 9-3
Tulane Green Wave: 10-2
NHL Playoffs
East: FLA 4 - 0 CAR
West: DAL 1 - 3 VGK
Trump is Part of the Swamp...(VoteGold2024)
1 x NFL Picks League Champion (2021)
ShazWeb || IIWiki || Imperial Space Adminisration || Disc: ShazbertBot#0741

by Katganistan » Tue May 11, 2010 5:15 pm
Shazbotdom wrote:I say just build the damn thing, and if any of these "Patriotic Americans" who are claiming that it is incensitive have a problem with it, then they can move away.

by Gauthier » Tue May 11, 2010 5:38 pm

by Callisdrun » Tue May 11, 2010 6:04 pm
F1-Insanity wrote:Callisdrun wrote:Which isn't Christianity or Islam. Seriously, though, most Christians and Muslims I've met are ordinary people. I see fundamentalism in any ideology as a problem.
I think the problem is ideologies which allow for 'fundamentalist' views. Seems in some ideologies those doors are wide open.

by The Celestial Union » Tue May 11, 2010 8:02 pm
F1-Insanity wrote:Lord-General Drache wrote:I think it somewhat is prejudicial behavior It wasn't the mainstream religion that motivated them but a fringe section. Despite how I feel about all religions, I feel their objections to be completely void of merit.
Except that it was the mainstream 'religion'.
And I think that those folks wanting to build that thing, are doing it deliberately to plan it near the site of 9/11 just to provoke a reaction.

by Gauthier » Tue May 11, 2010 8:18 pm
The Celestial Union wrote:F1-Insanity wrote:Lord-General Drache wrote:I think it somewhat is prejudicial behavior It wasn't the mainstream religion that motivated them but a fringe section. Despite how I feel about all religions, I feel their objections to be completely void of merit.
Except that it was the mainstream 'religion'.
And I think that those folks wanting to build that thing, are doing it deliberately to plan it near the site of 9/11 just to provoke a reaction.
Then -how- did they know --before-- 2001 that this was going to happen. The plans were made, property bought. HOW? If you're seriously into Islam you can time travel ? The location of the mosque was chosen _before_ any one could have known it would be a provocation.
What law are these people breaking? None. OH having the mosque a few blocks from Ground Zero might be a provocation.
Since when does Al Qaeda 'provoke' through _non_ violent symbolic acts.??? Name one.
Just about every act Al Qaeda has committed was designed to cause as much damage as possible. Their goal is to intimidate through violence to force others to what they want.
Al Qaeda and it's ilk should be opposed. They have and do pose a clear and present danger. The difference here is that in order to stop a terrorist group. you have to analyze it carefully. Find out whatever you can. and target it's leadership.
Analyze ,not demonize. operating from the premise that all Muslims are in league with Al Qaeda you make the search for the threat -harder- Historically the best way to defeat a guerrilla ,insurgent ,or terrorist movement
is to alienate the population from the insurgents.
Imposing mass punishments on the civilian population will alienate them from =your= side. They will be more willing to aid the enemy if they feel they are assumed to be doing so and are treated unjustly. The enemy can move like a fish in the sea amongst innocents.
If you can drive a wedge between the bulk of Muslims and the extremists, it becomes much easier to deal with Al Qaeda. If Muslims,or any other group feel they are being treated fairly and are not being persecuted for religion etc. they have absolutely no reason to support the extremists.
Keep in mind that the mosque being established is not a Wahhabi or extreme version of Islam.
The principal goal of Al Qaeda and it's 'franchises' is to force the West out of the Middle east. Then to create an Islamic Caliphate.
Al Qaeda's leadership intends to run the caliphate or control who ever does.
I mentioned this in an earlier post Sources listed there. .Wahhabism is not a part of mainstream Islam. The Islamic group that intended to build the mosque are not Wahhabis. Islam doesn't have the hierarchy that Catholicism or other religions have. Which means that there are multiple denominations with differing branches or denominations. Sunni,Shia,Sufi and others I don't' know about![]()
Wahhabism is an offshoot from the Sunni branch.
Al Qaeda is a twig on an offshoot of Wahhabism
So far out that the weight of the nuts broke the twig off the tree.

by The Celestial Union » Tue May 11, 2010 8:26 pm
Gauthier wrote:The Celestial Union wrote:F1-Insanity wrote:Lord-General Drache wrote:I think it somewhat is prejudicial behavior It wasn't the mainstream religion that motivated them but a fringe section. Despite how I feel about all religions, I feel their objections to be completely void of merit.
Except that it was the mainstream 'religion'.
And I think that those folks wanting to build that thing, are doing it deliberately to plan it near the site of 9/11 just to provoke a reaction.
Then -how- did they know --before-- 2001 that this was going to happen. The plans were made, property bought. HOW? If you're seriously into Islam you can time travel ? The location of the mosque was chosen _before_ any one could have known it would be a provocation.
What law are these people breaking? None. OH having the mosque a few blocks from Ground Zero might be a provocation.
Since when does Al Qaeda 'provoke' through _non_ violent symbolic acts.??? Name one.
Just about every act Al Qaeda has committed was designed to cause as much damage as possible. Their goal is to intimidate through violence to force others to what they want.
Al Qaeda and it's ilk should be opposed. They have and do pose a clear and present danger. The difference here is that in order to stop a terrorist group. you have to analyze it carefully. Find out whatever you can. and target it's leadership.
Analyze ,not demonize. operating from the premise that all Muslims are in league with Al Qaeda you make the search for the threat -harder- Historically the best way to defeat a guerrilla ,insurgent ,or terrorist movement
is to alienate the population from the insurgents.
Imposing mass punishments on the civilian population will alienate them from =your= side. They will be more willing to aid the enemy if they feel they are assumed to be doing so and are treated unjustly. The enemy can move like a fish in the sea amongst innocents.
If you can drive a wedge between the bulk of Muslims and the extremists, it becomes much easier to deal with Al Qaeda. If Muslims,or any other group feel they are being treated fairly and are not being persecuted for religion etc. they have absolutely no reason to support the extremists.
Keep in mind that the mosque being established is not a Wahhabi or extreme version of Islam.
The principal goal of Al Qaeda and it's 'franchises' is to force the West out of the Middle east. Then to create an Islamic Caliphate.
Al Qaeda's leadership intends to run the caliphate or control who ever does.
I mentioned this in an earlier post Sources listed there. .Wahhabism is not a part of mainstream Islam. The Islamic group that intended to build the mosque are not Wahhabis. Islam doesn't have the hierarchy that Catholicism or other religions have. Which means that there are multiple denominations with differing branches or denominations. Sunni,Shia,Sufi and others I don't' know about![]()
Wahhabism is an offshoot from the Sunni branch.
Al Qaeda is a twig on an offshoot of Wahhabism
So far out that the weight of the nuts broke the twig off the tree.
A very detailed explanation. Too bad he's still in love with the "All Muslims Are Evil and Violent and this was according to their religious decree" hype.

by The Black Forrest » Tue May 11, 2010 8:48 pm

by The Alma Mater » Tue May 11, 2010 11:31 pm
The Celestial Union wrote:F1-Insanity wrote:Lord-General Drache wrote:I think it somewhat is prejudicial behavior It wasn't the mainstream religion that motivated them but a fringe section. Despite how I feel about all religions, I feel their objections to be completely void of merit.
Except that it was the mainstream 'religion'.
And I think that those folks wanting to build that thing, are doing it deliberately to plan it near the site of 9/11 just to provoke a reaction.
Then -how- did they know --before-- 2001 that this was going to happen. The plans were made, property bought. HOW? If you're seriously into Islam you can time travel ? The location of the mosque was chosen _before_ any one could have known it would be a provocation.

by North Calaveras » Tue May 11, 2010 11:32 pm
The Alma Mater wrote:The Celestial Union wrote:F1-Insanity wrote:Lord-General Drache wrote:I think it somewhat is prejudicial behavior It wasn't the mainstream religion that motivated them but a fringe section. Despite how I feel about all religions, I feel their objections to be completely void of merit.
Except that it was the mainstream 'religion'.
And I think that those folks wanting to build that thing, are doing it deliberately to plan it near the site of 9/11 just to provoke a reaction.
Then -how- did they know --before-- 2001 that this was going to happen. The plans were made, property bought. HOW? If you're seriously into Islam you can time travel ? The location of the mosque was chosen _before_ any one could have known it would be a provocation.
They planned the attack silly. Remember: ALL muslims are terrorists and they ALL participated in 9/11. So say fans of the "war on terror", so it must be true.

by Islamic Hazarastan » Tue May 11, 2010 11:34 pm
The Alma Mater wrote:The Celestial Union wrote:F1-Insanity wrote:Lord-General Drache wrote:I think it somewhat is prejudicial behavior It wasn't the mainstream religion that motivated them but a fringe section. Despite how I feel about all religions, I feel their objections to be completely void of merit.
Except that it was the mainstream 'religion'.
And I think that those folks wanting to build that thing, are doing it deliberately to plan it near the site of 9/11 just to provoke a reaction.
Then -how- did they know --before-- 2001 that this was going to happen. The plans were made, property bought. HOW? If you're seriously into Islam you can time travel ? The location of the mosque was chosen _before_ any one could have known it would be a provocation.
They planned the attack silly. Remember: ALL muslims are terrorists and they ALL participated in 9/11. So say fans of the "war on terror", so it must be true.

by The Alma Mater » Tue May 11, 2010 11:34 pm
North Calaveras wrote:The Alma Mater wrote:The Celestial Union wrote:F1-Insanity wrote:Lord-General Drache wrote:I think it somewhat is prejudicial behavior It wasn't the mainstream religion that motivated them but a fringe section. Despite how I feel about all religions, I feel their objections to be completely void of merit.
Except that it was the mainstream 'religion'.
And I think that those folks wanting to build that thing, are doing it deliberately to plan it near the site of 9/11 just to provoke a reaction.
Then -how- did they know --before-- 2001 that this was going to happen. The plans were made, property bought. HOW? If you're seriously into Islam you can time travel ? The location of the mosque was chosen _before_ any one could have known it would be a provocation.
They planned the attack silly. Remember: ALL muslims are terrorists and they ALL participated in 9/11. So say fans of the "war on terror", so it must be true.
If I was muslim and I murdered your family in the name of my god would you not feel a little weird around muslims?

by Callisdrun » Tue May 11, 2010 11:35 pm

by North Calaveras » Tue May 11, 2010 11:36 pm
The Alma Mater wrote:North Calaveras wrote:The Alma Mater wrote:The Celestial Union wrote:F1-Insanity wrote:Lord-General Drache wrote:I think it somewhat is prejudicial behavior It wasn't the mainstream religion that motivated them but a fringe section. Despite how I feel about all religions, I feel their objections to be completely void of merit.
Except that it was the mainstream 'religion'.
And I think that those folks wanting to build that thing, are doing it deliberately to plan it near the site of 9/11 just to provoke a reaction.
Then -how- did they know --before-- 2001 that this was going to happen. The plans were made, property bought. HOW? If you're seriously into Islam you can time travel ? The location of the mosque was chosen _before_ any one could have known it would be a provocation.
They planned the attack silly. Remember: ALL muslims are terrorists and they ALL participated in 9/11. So say fans of the "war on terror", so it must be true.
If I was muslim and I murdered your family in the name of my god would you not feel a little weird around muslims?
You are also male, right ? Should I feel a little weird around males as well ?

by The Alma Mater » Tue May 11, 2010 11:37 pm
North Calaveras wrote:I dont think radical muslims kill people in the name of there penis..........................

by Islamic Hazarastan » Tue May 11, 2010 11:38 pm

by North Calaveras » Tue May 11, 2010 11:39 pm

by Islamic Hazarastan » Tue May 11, 2010 11:40 pm
North Calaveras wrote:
But seriously, you realize that if a religous person killed your family or people you knew in the name of there god you would be like " Oh, those people hurt me before I don't know if I should trust them" right?

by The Alma Mater » Tue May 11, 2010 11:40 pm
North Calaveras wrote:
But seriously, you realize that if a religous person killed your family or people you knew in the name of there god you would be like " Oh, those people hurt me before I don't know if I should trust them" right?


by North Calaveras » Tue May 11, 2010 11:44 pm
The Alma Mater wrote:North Calaveras wrote:
But seriously, you realize that if a religous person killed your family or people you knew in the name of there god you would be like " Oh, those people hurt me before I don't know if I should trust them" right?
Of course I would not trust the people who killed. Doesn't mean I should distrust the 1,5 billion people or so who disagree with those inviduals interpretation of their faith.
I dislike Islam for other reasons

by Callisdrun » Tue May 11, 2010 11:46 pm
North Calaveras wrote:
But seriously, you realize that if a religous person killed your family or people you knew in the name of there god you would be like " Oh, those people hurt me before I don't know if I should trust them" right?

by North Calaveras » Tue May 11, 2010 11:47 pm
Callisdrun wrote:North Calaveras wrote:
But seriously, you realize that if a religous person killed your family or people you knew in the name of there god you would be like " Oh, those people hurt me before I don't know if I should trust them" right?
The muslims, jews and christians all worship the same god.

by Islamic Hazarastan » Tue May 11, 2010 11:48 pm
North Calaveras wrote:Callisdrun wrote:North Calaveras wrote:
But seriously, you realize that if a religous person killed your family or people you knew in the name of there god you would be like " Oh, those people hurt me before I don't know if I should trust them" right?
The muslims, jews and christians all worship the same god.
True, but there doing it specifically in the name of Islam.

by Callisdrun » Tue May 11, 2010 11:48 pm

by The Alma Mater » Tue May 11, 2010 11:48 pm
North Calaveras wrote:Look, build the mosque if its legal, but don't look stupid when people think its kind of wrong for you to do so.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Armeattla, Bradfordville, Cannot think of a name, Elejamie, Eternal Algerstonia, Imperiul romanum, Incelastan, Laurel, Necroghastia, New Fernia, Nouveau Strasbourg, Stellar Colonies, The Astral Mandate, The Corpus Christi, The Sherpa Empire, Tyrantio Land, Warvick
Advertisement