
by SoWiBi » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:04 am
| ..SoWiBi.. | ..Oeck.. | ..ElkElks.. | ..NietzscheHeretics.. | ..Isjan.. | ..I am a False Statement.. |

by Kostemetsia » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:08 am
Such info becomes creepy at the point where you bring it up in passing without previously mentioning that you gathered it, I think, as is what happened here.
by Starblaydia » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:11 am
SoWiBi wrote:If you listen to the old geezers, you'll hear that with the arrival of any new technology, the world is certain to end.
George Orwell wrote:"Every generation imagines itself to be more intelligent than the one that went before it, and wiser than the one that comes after it.
SoWiBi wrote:If you listen to me, you'll now be informed that I think that with the arrival of any new technology, a whole world of etiquette and norms is certain to end, and the search for a new such world begins.
<snip>
So, NSG, what sayeth you: Is googling another person (and browsing through the links that come up) fair game, or is it an unfair exploit of the new possibilities? When does such info-gathering become creepy?

by SoWiBi » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:14 am
Kostemetsia wrote:It's fair game, I think. If it's been published on the public internet, then that implies it's meant to be looked at by random people - although do you count as a random person? :P
Such info becomes creepy at the point where you bring it up in passing without previously mentioning that you gathered it, I think, as is what happened here.
| ..SoWiBi.. | ..Oeck.. | ..ElkElks.. | ..NietzscheHeretics.. | ..Isjan.. | ..I am a False Statement.. |

by Molested Sock » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:14 am

by SoWiBi » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:17 am
Starblaydia wrote:George Orwell wrote:"Every generation imagines itself to be more intelligent than the one that went before it, and wiser than the one that comes after it.
It's fair, if a little odd, but learn to keep such information to yourself!
| ..SoWiBi.. | ..Oeck.. | ..ElkElks.. | ..NietzscheHeretics.. | ..Isjan.. | ..I am a False Statement.. |

by SoWiBi » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:19 am
Molested Sock wrote:Knowing if someone plays volleyball is not creepy.
| ..SoWiBi.. | ..Oeck.. | ..ElkElks.. | ..NietzscheHeretics.. | ..Isjan.. | ..I am a False Statement.. |

by Aelosia » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:26 am

by Starblaydia » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:28 am
SoWiBi wrote:Starblaydia wrote:It's fair, if a little odd, but learn to keep such information to yourself!
You think? You see, if I thought it'd be of such a nature that I better keep it to myself, then that'd be what'd make it creepy for me.. I always figure that "If I feel confident telling the people involved that I did [thing X, like googling this], then it can't becreepy, right?", but if I feel I better hide it, then it's at leats questionable.


by SoWiBi » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:32 am
Aelosia wrote:1.- You need a new boyfriend/fuckbuddy.
2.- It's fair game, and it is not creepy because you are not really using said information to defame or harm. (Do you want to? I have some tips)
3.- If the information is public, it's ok. Not such a big deal.Creeping through non public information is a bit creepy, but fun nevertheless.
| ..SoWiBi.. | ..Oeck.. | ..ElkElks.. | ..NietzscheHeretics.. | ..Isjan.. | ..I am a False Statement.. |

by Molested Sock » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:35 am
SoWiBi wrote:Molested Sock wrote:Knowing if someone plays volleyball is not creepy.
I was less concerned about the things I ultimately got to know (though I do think it slightly weird to have read where exactly she works, and her phone number, and stuff), but about the process of searching for that kind of info in the first place (not knowing what would or would not come up).

by SoWiBi » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:39 am
Starblaydia wrote:"Oh, she's friends with one of my friends and I saw her on Facebook/Myspace," would be the acceptable version of events.
"I put on my sleuthing hat and deduced, investigated, used my contacts, googled and sifted through lots of personal information about the new version of me that you now have," is the creepy explanation.
And I agree with Aelosia, as you need to move on :blush:
| ..SoWiBi.. | ..Oeck.. | ..ElkElks.. | ..NietzscheHeretics.. | ..Isjan.. | ..I am a False Statement.. |

by SoWiBi » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:41 am
Molested Sock wrote:What's more there is a negative effect for some people in regard to the fact that employers search the web for their potential employees' past indescretions which may affect their ability to get a job they desire.
| ..SoWiBi.. | ..Oeck.. | ..ElkElks.. | ..NietzscheHeretics.. | ..Isjan.. | ..I am a False Statement.. |

by Ifreann » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:44 am

by SoWiBi » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:46 am
Ifreann wrote:It's a bit creepy, but no more than asking your friends about your ex-boy's new girl.
| ..SoWiBi.. | ..Oeck.. | ..ElkElks.. | ..NietzscheHeretics.. | ..Isjan.. | ..I am a False Statement.. |

by Ifreann » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:49 am
SoWiBi wrote:Ifreann wrote:It's a bit creepy, but no more than asking your friends about your ex-boy's new girl.
Thanks for the input. Now, umm.. happen to know anything about my ex-man's new woman? ;P

by SoWiBi » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:54 am
Ifreann wrote:I hear she has herpes and can't do that thing you can do. You know that thing.
| ..SoWiBi.. | ..Oeck.. | ..ElkElks.. | ..NietzscheHeretics.. | ..Isjan.. | ..I am a False Statement.. |

by Molested Sock » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:58 am
SoWiBi wrote:Molested Sock wrote:What's more there is a negative effect for some people in regard to the fact that employers search the web for their potential employees' past indescretions which may affect their ability to get a job they desire.
Absolutely. However, I'm one of those arrogant assholes who say that anyone who's stupid enough to publish such information in a way that makes it findable for potential future employers doesn't deserve any better.

by SoWiBi » Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:01 am
Molested Sock wrote:It's similar to sending 'questionable emails at work and/or by a work email address, it might reflect badly on the company if they got out.
| ..SoWiBi.. | ..Oeck.. | ..ElkElks.. | ..NietzscheHeretics.. | ..Isjan.. | ..I am a False Statement.. |

by Molested Sock » Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:12 am
SoWiBi wrote:Molested Sock wrote:It's similar to sending 'questionable emails at work and/or by a work email address, it might reflect badly on the company if they got out.
Yeah. I always wonder WTF that one person is thinking who's sending me chain mails from her work address all the time..
.. or, you know, those people who keep filling out these "Win $10,000 now!!!" thingamabobs and complain about all the junkmail being sent their way.

by BunnySaurus Bugsii » Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:58 am
SoWiBi wrote:If you listen to the old geezers, you'll hear that with the arrival of any new technology, the world is certain to end.
If you listen to me, you'll now be informed that I think that with the arrival of any new technology, a whole world of etiquette and norms is certain to end, and the search for a new such world begins.
For now, take the internet, and the vast array of information about people it provides. Where's the line between "fair game / normal curiosity", and where does "creepy stalker / violation of privacy" begin?
Here's the bloggy part: My best friend, ex-boyfriend, and ex-fuckbuddy has recently acquired a new woman, and has provided me with her first name and the fact that she sings in a choir with another person whose first name I know. Now I'm no stranger to the internet, and curious to boot, so that knowledge has easily combined to a smart search that quickly led me to her full name and age, and from then on of course it was just another click to see her current occupation/workplace, her myspace, lots of photos, her activities in various clubs.. Now I thought this was all normal curiosity about your best friend's new love, and so when I mentioned in passing to my friend some days later that I thought it was cool she played volleyball as well and we should organize a beach match soon, I never expected his rather shocked reaction ("How the fuck do you know she plays volleyball? ZOMG that's creepy!!"), and was in turn shocked that it was deemed very strange that I had done that.
So, NSG, what sayeth you: Is googling another person (and browsing through the links that come up) fair game, or is it an unfair exploit of the new possibilities? When does such info-gathering become creepy?

by SoWiBi » Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:08 am
BunnySaurus Bugsii wrote:"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." -- Clarke's Third Law, revised.
If they find it creepy, they're lamers.
| ..SoWiBi.. | ..Oeck.. | ..ElkElks.. | ..NietzscheHeretics.. | ..Isjan.. | ..I am a False Statement.. |

by Ashmoria » Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:53 am

by Parthenon » Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:13 am

by Ashmoria » Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:16 am
Parthenon wrote:If the ex wanted you to know information about the new girl he would have given it to you directly, going around his back to run a damn background check on her is both a breach of trust and sketch as hell.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Betoni, Bradfordville, Elejamie, Floofybit, Immoren, Kenowa, Narland, Port Caverton, Riviere Renard, Senkaku, The Rio Grande River Basin, Warvick
Advertisement