Ifreann wrote:True art is inflammatory.
True art is flammable.
I mean, have you ever tried applying a match to an oil painting? Try it with a Rembrandt. It's fun!
Advertisement

by Chorridonia » Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:35 pm
Ifreann wrote:True art is inflammatory.

by North Wiedna » Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:37 pm

by Saurisia » Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:38 pm
Israslovakahzerbajan wrote:Stealing a copy of The Land Before Time.
Coccygia wrote:The only good mammal is a dead mammal.
Pythria wrote:Fascist dictatorship run by dinosaurs. I like it
Tartonica wrote:2/10 because dinosaurs do NOT rule nations (Except for Saurisia)
The Tavan Race wrote:Yeah, your nation scares me
Wolohanistan wrote:Saurisia - Dinosaur Dictatorship is the best dictatorship, not that we support that sort of thing.
Conoga wrote:Dinosaurs-in-Bikinis-Boy
Lancov wrote:Condemn, because we now have to go soak our brains in bleach.
The Floor Kippers wrote:We Have Dinosaurs.....Argument Rendered Invalid
Grossrheinland Reich wrote:DINOSAUR FETISHIST
Tetraca wrote:Also: yay, Saurisia's here! This thread just became more awesome :D

by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:40 pm
North Wiedna wrote:
If I piss in a cup and put a lid on it, that is not art, taking something in the public domain made by someone else and burning the edges of it is not art. If she had actually sewn together a flag and did such, sure, art. But since she could have gotten the same effect by pissing on the thing, no, I say not art.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:40 pm
Saurisia wrote:Yes, it is an affront to veterans, it is not art it's Assholery! No national flag should EVER be mistreated like this, this is a disrespect of Memorial Day, which ended yesterday! I'm offended by this travesty which some dumbasses call "Art". If this is Art, then I guess the Muslim rallies where they burn the Israeli and American flags could be called "Art Fairs".
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:41 pm
North Wiedna wrote:
If I piss in a cup and put a lid on it, that is not art, taking something in the public domain made by someone else and burning the edges of it is not art. If she had actually sewn together a flag and did such, sure, art. But since she could have gotten the same effect by pissing on the thing, no, I say not art.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by Chorridonia » Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:46 pm
North Wiedna wrote:
If I piss in a cup and put a lid on it, that is not art, taking something in the public domain made by someone else and burning the edges of it is not art. If she had actually sewn together a flag and did such, sure, art. But since she could have gotten the same effect by pissing on the thing, no, I say not art.

by Barringtonia » Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:49 pm

by North Wiedna » Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:51 pm
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:North Wiedna wrote:
If I piss in a cup and put a lid on it, that is not art, taking something in the public domain made by someone else and burning the edges of it is not art. If she had actually sewn together a flag and did such, sure, art. But since she could have gotten the same effect by pissing on the thing, no, I say not art.
First off, what art is is very subjective. There is no established definition. To me, yes, I wouldn't label that flag as art, but it is. In a mediocre shitty way, it is. The student was expressing something. Now, how do you know she didn't sew the flag herself and then burned the edges? Hm?

by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:52 pm
North Wiedna wrote:Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:North Wiedna wrote:
If I piss in a cup and put a lid on it, that is not art, taking something in the public domain made by someone else and burning the edges of it is not art. If she had actually sewn together a flag and did such, sure, art. But since she could have gotten the same effect by pissing on the thing, no, I say not art.
First off, what art is is very subjective. There is no established definition. To me, yes, I wouldn't label that flag as art, but it is. In a mediocre shitty way, it is. The student was expressing something. Now, how do you know she didn't sew the flag herself and then burned the edges? Hm?
It looks too perfect in the picture.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Blouman Empire » Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:52 pm
Hydesland wrote:If the person creating it says it's art, it's art. It may be boring, meaningless, unoriginal and pretentious, but that doesn't stop it from being art.

by Blouman Empire » Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:53 pm
North Wiedna wrote:
If I piss in a cup and put a lid on it, that is not art, taking something in the public domain made by someone else and burning the edges of it is not art. If she had actually sewn together a flag and did such, sure, art. But since she could have gotten the same effect by pissing on the thing, no, I say not art.

by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:54 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:56 pm
North Wiedna wrote:Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:North Wiedna wrote:
If I piss in a cup and put a lid on it, that is not art, taking something in the public domain made by someone else and burning the edges of it is not art. If she had actually sewn together a flag and did such, sure, art. But since she could have gotten the same effect by pissing on the thing, no, I say not art.
First off, what art is is very subjective. There is no established definition. To me, yes, I wouldn't label that flag as art, but it is. In a mediocre shitty way, it is. The student was expressing something. Now, how do you know she didn't sew the flag herself and then burned the edges? Hm?
It looks too perfect in the picture.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by Conservative Alliances » Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:59 pm
Rhodmhire wrote:I love you.
Liuzzo wrote:Conversely Conservative Alliances, Vetalia, and others make terrific arguments that people may not agree with but you can discuss.
Glorious Homeland wrote:Although some individuals provided counter-points which tended to put to bed a few of my previous statements (conservative alliances, zoingo)

by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:00 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Blouman Empire » Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:01 pm

by The Bleeding Roses » Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:02 pm

by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:02 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by JarVik » Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:03 pm

by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:03 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Barringtonia » Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:03 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Based Illinois, Loeje, Necroghastia, New haven america, The Holy Therns, Vassenor
Advertisement