Just saying that to say "football is a wuss' game", would be to say that all codes of football are a wuss' game, and therefore, Rugby would be too by that logic.
Advertisement
by Blouman Empire » Sun Jun 06, 2010 11:01 pm
Maurepas wrote:
Just saying that to say "football is a wuss' game", would be to say that all codes of football are a wuss' game, and therefore, Rugby would be too by that logic.
by Maurepas » Sun Jun 06, 2010 11:05 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Maurepas wrote:
Just saying that to say "football is a wuss' game", would be to say that all codes of football are a wuss' game, and therefore, Rugby would be too by that logic.
Oh I didn't see that. The only version of football which is a wuss game is American Football, fancy using all that protection take your tackles and knocks like a real man.
by Blouman Empire » Sun Jun 06, 2010 11:09 pm
Maurepas wrote:Not when I play it, they just do that cause they sink shit-tonnes of money into those guys...Noone's done so to me and my friends, so we do them pretty hardcore, no pads,
by Maurepas » Sun Jun 06, 2010 11:12 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Maurepas wrote:Not when I play it, they just do that cause they sink shit-tonnes of money into those guys...Noone's done so to me and my friends, so we do them pretty hardcore, no pads,
So they never used to use padding and helmets till it turned professional and into big business?
by Blouman Empire » Sun Jun 06, 2010 11:15 pm
Maurepas wrote:Blouman Empire wrote:Maurepas wrote:Not when I play it, they just do that cause they sink shit-tonnes of money into those guys...Noone's done so to me and my friends, so we do them pretty hardcore, no pads,
So they never used to use padding and helmets till it turned professional and into big business?
Not really no, I think they wore a leather cap back in the day, but, IIRC, that was about it. Big business and a fear of injuries in schools are what prompted the pads I believe.
Hell, back then you couldn't pass, so, you didn't have a choice but to take the hit, >_>
by Maurepas » Sun Jun 06, 2010 11:16 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Maurepas wrote:Blouman Empire wrote:Maurepas wrote:Not when I play it, they just do that cause they sink shit-tonnes of money into those guys...Noone's done so to me and my friends, so we do them pretty hardcore, no pads,
So they never used to use padding and helmets till it turned professional and into big business?
Not really no, I think they wore a leather cap back in the day, but, IIRC, that was about it. Big business and a fear of injuries in schools are what prompted the pads I believe.
Hell, back then you couldn't pass, so, you didn't have a choice but to take the hit, >_>
Interesting.
by Blouman Empire » Sun Jun 06, 2010 11:33 pm
Maurepas wrote:Blouman Empire wrote:Maurepas wrote:Blouman Empire wrote:Maurepas wrote:Not when I play it, they just do that cause they sink shit-tonnes of money into those guys...Noone's done so to me and my friends, so we do them pretty hardcore, no pads,
So they never used to use padding and helmets till it turned professional and into big business?
Not really no, I think they wore a leather cap back in the day, but, IIRC, that was about it. Big business and a fear of injuries in schools are what prompted the pads I believe.
Hell, back then you couldn't pass, so, you didn't have a choice but to take the hit, >_>
Interesting.
The passing thing can thank California about, you still have people down here that bitch about that,
by Maurepas » Sun Jun 06, 2010 11:35 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Maurepas wrote:Blouman Empire wrote:Maurepas wrote:Blouman Empire wrote:Maurepas wrote:Not when I play it, they just do that cause they sink shit-tonnes of money into those guys...Noone's done so to me and my friends, so we do them pretty hardcore, no pads,
So they never used to use padding and helmets till it turned professional and into big business?
Not really no, I think they wore a leather cap back in the day, but, IIRC, that was about it. Big business and a fear of injuries in schools are what prompted the pads I believe.
Hell, back then you couldn't pass, so, you didn't have a choice but to take the hit, >_>
Interesting.
The passing thing can thank California about, you still have people down here that bitch about that,
Haha, doesn't it make it a one man against a team game without passing?
by Gordonopia » Sun Jun 06, 2010 11:41 pm
by Blouman Empire » Sun Jun 06, 2010 11:43 pm
Maurepas wrote:Not really, basically it entailed alot more running, and alot more laterals, did you ever see the "River City Relay" play? It's kinda like that.
Minus the pass at the beginning:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Od9C2dKiCI
That was an incredibly disappointing game though, >_>
by Maurepas » Sun Jun 06, 2010 11:44 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Maurepas wrote:Not really, basically it entailed alot more running, and alot more laterals, did you ever see the "River City Relay" play? It's kinda like that.
Minus the pass at the beginning:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Od9C2dKiCI
That was an incredibly disappointing game though, >_>
So like that put without all the passing?
Though that did look pretty intense and I forgot you had blockers.
by Blouman Empire » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:02 am
Maurepas wrote:I forgot, technical terminology I guess,
A lateral in American Football is different from a Pass, a lateral can be thrown to the side and behind you, a pass can be thrown forward.
Basically, back in the day, you couldn't throw in front of you. So, there was only one pass in that play, the first throw.
by Maurepas » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:04 am
Blouman Empire wrote:Maurepas wrote:I forgot, technical terminology I guess,
A lateral in American Football is different from a Pass, a lateral can be thrown to the side and behind you, a pass can be thrown forward.
Basically, back in the day, you couldn't throw in front of you. So, there was only one pass in that play, the first throw.
Oh ok, that makes a bit more sense.
Rugby league still has that old rule passing the ball must be behind the play not forward.
by Blouman Empire » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:44 am
Maurepas wrote:Blouman Empire wrote:Maurepas wrote:I forgot, technical terminology I guess,
A lateral in American Football is different from a Pass, a lateral can be thrown to the side and behind you, a pass can be thrown forward.
Basically, back in the day, you couldn't throw in front of you. So, there was only one pass in that play, the first throw.
Oh ok, that makes a bit more sense.
Rugby league still has that old rule passing the ball must be behind the play not forward.
Definitely lends credence to the theory that American Football was based on Rugby.
by Errinundera » Mon Jun 07, 2010 1:05 am
by Starblaydia » Mon Jun 07, 2010 1:21 am
Maurepas wrote:Not really, basically it entailed alot more running, and alot more laterals, did you ever see the "River City Relay" play? It's kinda like that.
by Dyakovo » Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:14 am
Gordonopia wrote:American football wins every time. The players are bigger, faster and have more athletic prowess.
by The Zoogie People » Mon Jun 07, 2010 4:23 am
by Andrewboy » Mon Jun 07, 2010 4:30 am
by South Norwega » Mon Jun 07, 2010 4:37 am
Actually they probably can. But it's safer with the protection.
Hardly. They can throw forwards.its a copy of rugby
Oh noes. That is irrelevant.very few people outside North America care about it
ExaggerationThey break for comercials every 2 seconds
Arguable. Probably true, but still arguable.soccer:
more people like it, in fact its the most popluar sport in the world
Again arguable. Dodging 150 kilogram things running at you is fairly skilful.It takes more skill
And you're saying that American Football players can't do this?theres about the same amount of tactics, except soccer players have to have the mental ablitity to change those tactics depending on what oponents do.
Oh noes.Its tougher(soccer players only have shin pads, and trust me, they dont do much)
A couple larger, many of the top few are NFL sides.It has bigger franchises
That's because they don't have relegation. It's so you don't get dominated by 4 or 5 teams, unlike things like the Premier League, Serie A and the Spanish League whatever it's called.it dosent need a draft every year to keep people whos teams suck intrested.
by Dyakovo » Mon Jun 07, 2010 4:38 am
Andrewboy wrote:football:
they cant take a hit without 60 pounds of protection4
its a copy of rugby2
very few people outside North America care about it1
They break for comercials every 2 seconds3
soccer:
more people like it, in fact its the most popluar sport in the world1
It takes more skill5
theres about the same amount of tactics, except soccer players have to have the mental ablitity to change those tactics depending on what oponents do.6
Its tougher(soccer players only have shin pads, and trust me, they dont do much)4
It has bigger franchises1
it dosent need a draft every year to keep people whos teams suck intrested.
by Andrewboy » Mon Jun 07, 2010 4:40 am
Dyakovo wrote:Andrewboy wrote:football:
they cant take a hit without 60 pounds of protection4
its a copy of rugby2
very few people outside North America care about it1
They break for comercials every 2 seconds3
soccer:
more people like it, in fact its the most popluar sport in the world1
It takes more skill5
theres about the same amount of tactics, except soccer players have to have the mental ablitity to change those tactics depending on what oponents do.6
Its tougher(soccer players only have shin pads, and trust me, they dont do much)4
It has bigger franchises1
it dosent need a draft every year to keep people whos teams suck intrested.
1: More popular doesn't mean objectively better.
2: Derivative of, not copy of.
3: Exaggeration, to say the least and commercial breaks aren't a part of the game.
4: "Soccer" players (as would rugby players) would wear as much padding as American football players if they had to endure they same kind of hits...
5: Not more skill, simply a different skill set.
6: As do American football players...
by Dyakovo » Mon Jun 07, 2010 4:43 am
Andrewboy wrote:Dyakovo wrote:Andrewboy wrote:football:
they cant take a hit without 60 pounds of protection4
its a copy of rugby2
very few people outside North America care about it1
They break for comercials every 2 seconds3
soccer:
more people like it, in fact its the most popluar sport in the world1
It takes more skill5
theres about the same amount of tactics, except soccer players have to have the mental ablitity to change those tactics depending on what oponents do.6
Its tougher(soccer players only have shin pads, and trust me, they dont do much)4
It has bigger franchises1
it dosent need a draft every year to keep people whos teams suck intrested.
1: More popular doesn't mean objectively better.
2: Derivative of, not copy of.
3: Exaggeration, to say the least and commercial breaks aren't a part of the game.
4: "Soccer" players (as would rugby players) would wear as much padding as American football players if they had to endure they same kind of hits...
5: Not more skill, simply a different skill set.
6: As do American football players...
your points token, but on number 6 and 5, soccer players do it better
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Cerespasia, Cerula, El Lazaro, Plan Neonie, The Kharkivan Cossacks, Utquiagvik, Valyxias
Advertisement