NationStates

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:13 pm**

To protect your first amendmant rights? Would you kill to keep them intact? Or at the slightest hint of debate would you give them up?

DISCUSS! :lol:

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:14 pm**

There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:15 pm**

Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

Win.

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:15 pm**

Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

Then would you kill to regain those rights? How important are they to you?

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:17 pm**

WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

Then would you kill to regain those rights? How important are they to you?

They are unobtainable.

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:17 pm**

Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

By that big scary world government? :rofl:

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:17 pm**

Tom Bishop wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

Then would you kill to regain those rights? How important are they to you?

They are unobtainable.

Okay, but say they were.

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:18 pm**

WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

Then would you kill to regain those rights? How important are they to you?

I would pick up a rifle to protect the 1st ammendment.

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:19 pm**

WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

Then would you kill to regain those rights? How important are they to you?

They are unobtainable.

Okay, but say they were.

In this point in time it would be hard to topple a government of Western Europe or North America which takes your rights. Especially if they're united under one regime.

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:21 pm**

Tom Bishop wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

Then would you kill to regain those rights? How important are they to you?

They are unobtainable.

Okay, but say they were.

In this point in time it would be hard to topple a government of Western Europe or North America which takes your rights. Especially if they're united under one regime.

Not really, you just need to use a different method.

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:23 pm**

North Amerikan States wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

Then would you kill to regain those rights? How important are they to you?

They are unobtainable.

Okay, but say they were.

In this point in time it would be hard to topple a government of Western Europe or North America which takes your rights. Especially if they're united under one regime.

Not really, you just need to use a different method.

The only important right is the right to think. Not out loud. Just think. All the other rights are pointless.

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:23 pm**

As far as is necessary.

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:26 pm**

i would do everything to stop those who seek to have these ''right's''

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:29 pm**

All of you would kill just to be able to say what you want to?

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:32 pm**

WWII History Geeks wrote:All of you would kill just to be able to say what you want to?

no i was just trying to get a point Through

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:33 pm**

WWII History Geeks wrote:All of you would kill just to be able to say what you want to?

Hmm, good question. Don't think I could kill someone over it, if I'm honest.
I do enjoy having an opinion however, as well as the right to express that opinion.
I guess I'd protest.

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:37 pm**

Carls-land wrote:i would do everything to stop those who seek to have these ''right's''

What?

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:37 pm**

WWII History Geeks wrote:All of you would kill just to be able to say what you want to?

Once freedom of speech is gone, the powers that be can tell you what to think without a counter arguement.

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:37 pm**

Straughn wrote:
Carls-land wrote:i would do everything to stop those who seek to have these ''right's''
What?

only the police and military should have guns

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:38 pm**

WWII History Geeks wrote:All of you would kill just to be able to say what you want to?

Yes, because this right is an integral component of liberty.

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:39 pm**

Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:All of you would kill just to be able to say what you want to?

Once freedom of speech is gone, the powers that be can tell you what to think without a counter arguement.

I think I would...but only in a revolution-like situation.

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:39 pm**

Carls-land wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Carls-land wrote:i would do everything to stop those who seek to have these ''right's''
What?

only the police and military should have guns

Who's police & military?

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:41 pm**

Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:
Carls-land wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Carls-land wrote:i would do everything to stop those who seek to have these ''right's''
What?

only the police and military should have guns

Who's police & military?

any nation that is democratic

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:41 pm**

WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:All of you would kill just to be able to say what you want to?

Once freedom of speech is gone, the powers that be can tell you what to think without a counter arguement.

I think I would...but only in a revolution-like situation.

I agree. the right situation has to come up. If I would have live in the time of Eugene Debs, I would have rioted for his freedom.

Posted: **Fri May 28, 2010 2:41 pm**

Carls-land wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Carls-land wrote:i would do everything to stop those who seek to have these ''right's''
What?

only the police and military should have guns

The First Amendment does not address firearms, firearms are addressed by the Second Amendment. Please stick to discussion on the First Amendment.

NationStates

How far would you go...

How far would you go...