Advertisement
by Pizza Friday Forever91 » Tue May 16, 2023 6:47 pm

by New haven america » Tue May 16, 2023 6:52 pm

by New haven america » Tue May 16, 2023 6:53 pm
Pizza Friday Forever91 wrote:https://twitter.com/spencersoicher/status/1658646487385899009 I think it's official now.
by Pizza Friday Forever91 » Tue May 16, 2023 6:57 pm
by Pizza Friday Forever91 » Tue May 16, 2023 6:59 pm

by Corrian » Tue May 16, 2023 7:03 pm
Pizza Friday Forever91 wrote:From what I can tell, Williams was a moderate-ish republican and Yemi Mobolade is an independent but is allied with the democrats.
by Pizza Friday Forever91 » Tue May 16, 2023 7:05 pm

by Urkennalaid » Tue May 16, 2023 7:09 pm
Khurkhogur wrote:Spirit of Hope wrote:The US has promised to pay a bunch of people money, but is running out of money to pay people. In order to pay people the money that is owed to them the Treasury wants to borrow money, but needs a new law to be passed to do this. Between the House, Senate, and President the law to allow borrowing hasn't been passed yet. Estimates are that some time in June the US runs out of money and some terrible things happen if it can't pay people the money that is owed.
People are negotiating, but haven't gotten anywhere yet.
All the more concerning because the nonaligned world is dumping the dollar. After Russia's invasion of Ukraine I thought everything they touched turned to shit, but BRICS actually got some middle powers together to do something for once. I remember discussing how a SWIFT ban was a bad idea because it contradicts the free global trade US primacy rests on, and now we're seeing the results of that. Turns out trade and finance are political after all.

by Corrian » Tue May 16, 2023 7:10 pm
by Pizza Friday Forever91 » Tue May 16, 2023 7:13 pm

by Tarsonis » Tue May 16, 2023 7:14 pm
Pizza Friday Forever91 wrote:Also just thought I should mention that Mobolade is from Nigeria.
by Pizza Friday Forever91 » Tue May 16, 2023 7:14 pm
by Pizza Friday Forever91 » Tue May 16, 2023 7:24 pm

by Khurkhogur » Tue May 16, 2023 7:27 pm
Ifreann wrote:Khurkhogur wrote:"People who criticized Sanders from the left didn't support Clinton" - but it's functionally the same thing. Unless you're ignorant of some basic political realities, the only purpose attacking Sanders would serve is to strengthen Clinton's campaign. That's it. Not even a republican would have any valid practical reason to publicly attack Sanders during the primary.
Americans sometimes seem to have a problem whereby they act like jaded players of a cynical political game, and expect others to do likewise. The problem being that you are not a player in this game. People talking politics online are just that, not political operatives campaigning and trying to use the best messaging to sway the public. People expressing their sincere political beliefs are not playing the game wrong to the detriment of "their candidate".
I remember seeing shit like that happen in 2016 on places like r/socialism. That happened. I don't know on what scale exactly, but the fact that Jeremy Corbyn was disowned by the Labour party around the same time tells me that it's a wider, serious trend.
Corbyn was the leader of the Labour party from 2015 to 2020, and he resigned that position after poor electoral results following sabotage from the right wing of the party and incessant attacks by Britain's right wing press. So I don't think that your experiences on Reddit are reflective of left wing politics in the Anglosphere generally.
No, that pretty much describes the bulk of BLM activists. Often based off of college campuses and generally holding those views. I don't really have a problem with generalizing them because I'd be right more often than not.
You continue to make people up and assume they exist rather than describe real people.
Yeahhh, the biggest show of support you could make is hijacking someone's speech and telling them to shut up and listen. They just really wanted him to endorse their movement, that's all. Not kick his campaign in the balls (which they successfully achieved mind you)
This would certainly be the first time that I've seen someone attribute Sanders' defeat in the 2016 primary to BLM disrupting one campaign speech of his. Generally people say he lost because he's too far left or because the DNC had it out for him.
I don't know if you're being disingenuous or wilfully ignorant or what? They're yelling and chanting defiant slogans at Sanders. They're pushing him out of his own speech. They're mobbing him. It's not a show of support, they're shitting on him. I don't recall the BLM movement ever showing up and hijacking a Clinton rally so they could "educate" her.
They stopped her from speaking for ten minutes at this rally. They crashed this private fundraiser. They went for Bill as well.

by San Lumen » Tue May 16, 2023 7:31 pm

by Khurkhogur » Tue May 16, 2023 7:31 pm
Pizza Friday Forever91 wrote:Pretty sure the I and C in BRICS hate each other.
Urkennalaid wrote:Khurkhogur wrote:All the more concerning because the nonaligned world is dumping the dollar. After Russia's invasion of Ukraine I thought everything they touched turned to shit, but BRICS actually got some middle powers together to do something for once. I remember discussing how a SWIFT ban was a bad idea because it contradicts the free global trade US primacy rests on, and now we're seeing the results of that. Turns out trade and finance are political after all.
BRICS isn't like an alliance, it's basically just an economical treaty really, and if anything, China is using Russia as far as they can throw them. But I mean, if countries wanna get off the US dollar, I don't care. The US has always economically ravaged countries that it doesn't like or that doesn't agree with Western hegemony. If these countries want to prosper, they should be able to without American interference. Also, international finance and trade has ALWAYS been political. Always.

by San Lumen » Tue May 16, 2023 8:09 pm

by San Lumen » Tue May 16, 2023 8:24 pm

by Elwher » Tue May 16, 2023 8:36 pm
Spirit of Hope wrote:Austra-lia wrote:Can anyone explain on what's happening with the US debt ceiling and whether there is progress for that?
The US has promised to pay a bunch of people money, but is running out of money to pay people. In order to pay people the money that is owed to them the Treasury wants to borrow money, but needs a new law to be passed to do this. Between the House, Senate, and President the law to allow borrowing hasn't been passed yet. Estimates are that some time in June the US runs out of money and some terrible things happen if it can't pay people the money that is owed.
People are negotiating, but haven't gotten anywhere yet.

by San Lumen » Tue May 16, 2023 8:48 pm

by San Lumen » Tue May 16, 2023 9:11 pm
Elwher wrote:Spirit of Hope wrote:
The US has promised to pay a bunch of people money, but is running out of money to pay people. In order to pay people the money that is owed to them the Treasury wants to borrow money, but needs a new law to be passed to do this. Between the House, Senate, and President the law to allow borrowing hasn't been passed yet. Estimates are that some time in June the US runs out of money and some terrible things happen if it can't pay people the money that is owed.
People are negotiating, but haven't gotten anywhere yet.
In order to pay the people we borrowed money from, we generally borrow more money. It's sort of like taking a cash advance on your credit card to pay this month's credit card bill.

by Spirit of Hope » Tue May 16, 2023 9:14 pm
Elwher wrote:Spirit of Hope wrote:
The US has promised to pay a bunch of people money, but is running out of money to pay people. In order to pay people the money that is owed to them the Treasury wants to borrow money, but needs a new law to be passed to do this. Between the House, Senate, and President the law to allow borrowing hasn't been passed yet. Estimates are that some time in June the US runs out of money and some terrible things happen if it can't pay people the money that is owed.
People are negotiating, but haven't gotten anywhere yet.
In order to pay the people we borrowed money from, we generally borrow more money. It's sort of like taking a cash advance on your credit card to pay this month's credit card bill.
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Spirit of Hope » Tue May 16, 2023 9:16 pm
San Lumen wrote:Elwher wrote:
In order to pay the people we borrowed money from, we generally borrow more money. It's sort of like taking a cash advance on your credit card to pay this month's credit card bill.
So stop borrowing money and adding to the debt. Take the credit card away and say you can't borrow anymore. Spend within your means. Pay bills as we have the money and if that means interest payments and other bills are missed and treasury bonds are no longer risk free i don't care. Crack the very foundation of the financial system and wallop markets worldwide and maybe we will make a better system that isn't based around one countries debt.
Spirit of Hope wrote:
THATS NOT HOW THIS WORKS!
Defaulting on the debt isn't taking the credit card away, it's failing to pay the credit card. It is not paying people, mostly Americans, money that is owed to them. Why do you like the idea of the government not paying money it owes to people?
Not like people can take government to the debt collector, government has the army and police. You're basically saying the government should take money, promise to pay it back, and then stick a gun in people's face and say "nope, you aren't getting shit." In what world is that ok with you?
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by San Lumen » Tue May 16, 2023 9:19 pm
Spirit of Hope wrote:San Lumen wrote:
So stop borrowing money and adding to the debt. Take the credit card away and say you can't borrow anymore. Spend within your means. Pay bills as we have the money and if that means interest payments and other bills are missed and treasury bonds are no longer risk free i don't care. Crack the very foundation of the financial system and wallop markets worldwide and maybe we will make a better system that isn't based around one countries debt.Spirit of Hope wrote:
THATS NOT HOW THIS WORKS!
Defaulting on the debt isn't taking the credit card away, it's failing to pay the credit card. It is not paying people, mostly Americans, money that is owed to them. Why do you like the idea of the government not paying money it owes to people?
Not like people can take government to the debt collector, government has the army and police. You're basically saying the government should take money, promise to pay it back, and then stick a gun in people's face and say "nope, you aren't getting shit." In what world is that ok with you?

by Deblar » Tue May 16, 2023 9:23 pm
San Lumen wrote:Elwher wrote:
In order to pay the people we borrowed money from, we generally borrow more money. It's sort of like taking a cash advance on your credit card to pay this month's credit card bill.
So stop borrowing money and adding to the debt. Take the credit card away and say you can't borrow anymore. Spend within your means. Pay bills as we have the money and if that means interest payments and other bills are missed and treasury bonds are no longer risk free i don't care. Crack the very foundation of the financial system and wallop markets worldwide and maybe we will make a better system that isn't based around one countries debt.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bombadil, El Lazaro, Honghai, In-dia, Juansonia, Likhinia, Necroghastia, Senkaku, Snowhead, The Two Jerseys, Tlaceceyaya, Xmara
Advertisement