Advertisement

by Shrillland » Tue May 16, 2023 4:01 pm

by Khurkhogur » Tue May 16, 2023 4:27 pm
Ifreann wrote:Khurkhogur wrote:I'm not conflating anyone. Sanders gets all kind of criticism and scrutiny from progressives that Clinton didn't get. It doesn't matter if these people settled for Clinton or ardently supported her. What matters is that they attacked him when he was weak and supported her when she was strong. That's all that matters to me.
None of that happened, though. People who criticised Sanders from the left didn't support Clinton. People who supported Clinton weren't attacking Sanders from the left.
But that is not the phenomenon you describe, of leftists stupidly attacking the further left candidate and supporting the further right candidate.
Why not? Your rejection of the evidence here is completely arbitrary. These are progressives.
Holding BLM signs does not put someone into the category of "[y]oung, committed to socialism (as they conceive of it - free college and UBI and a bunch of other dumb bullshit), publicly indulge in defying gender norms, adamantly in support of abortion, etc."
They oppose Sanders.
Do they? Seems to me they thought he was a candidate who they had some hope of bringing around to supporting their cause.
Maybe they don't hold influence in the democratic party (although the democratic party does fawn over the BLM movement, so make of that what you will), but they certainly hold some kind of influence. They stormed a stage, rallied a crowd, and made Sanders step aside while they gave their speech. At the very least they exist, which kind of invalidates the whole basis of your point.
The people at that rally are very clearly not the whole section of the progressive movement that you were talking about, who oppose Sanders because he's a man, despite agreeing with all his policies, and who want President Clinton to bomb Iran.
by Bombadil » Tue May 16, 2023 4:32 pm
Khurkhogur wrote:I remember seeing shit like that happen in 2016 on places like r/socialism. That happened. I don't know on what scale exactly, but the fact that Jeremy Corbyn was disowned by the Labour party around the same time tells me that it's a wider, serious trend.

by Khurkhogur » Tue May 16, 2023 4:32 pm
Pizza Friday Forever91 wrote:Don't you people get tired of debating Lumen?

by Khurkhogur » Tue May 16, 2023 4:40 pm
Bombadil wrote:Khurkhogur wrote:I remember seeing shit like that happen in 2016 on places like r/socialism. That happened. I don't know on what scale exactly, but the fact that Jeremy Corbyn was disowned by the Labour party around the same time tells me that it's a wider, serious trend.
It wasn't far left people who voted right, it was traditional unionists whose prospects were decimated by global outsourcing feeling their governments had done nothing to replace those prospects.
Factory workers in unions can still be quite nationalistic, take away the factories and the unions and you just have nationalism.

by Nazi Flower Power » Tue May 16, 2023 4:45 pm
Khurkhogur wrote:I don't know if you're being disingenuous or wilfully ignorant or what? They're yelling and chanting defiant slogans at Sanders. They're pushing him out of his own speech. They're mobbing him. It's not a show of support, they're shitting on him. I don't recall the BLM movement ever showing up and hijacking a Clinton rally so they could "educate" her.

by San Lumen » Tue May 16, 2023 4:50 pm
by Bombadil » Tue May 16, 2023 4:51 pm
Khurkhogur wrote:Bombadil wrote:It wasn't far left people who voted right, it was traditional unionists whose prospects were decimated by global outsourcing feeling their governments had done nothing to replace those prospects.
Factory workers in unions can still be quite nationalistic, take away the factories and the unions and you just have nationalism.
I don't see how that relates to animosity for Sanders from the left. Also, to that last point - the welfare state is fundamentally an outgrowth of nationalism. It makes perfect sense that the second refuge for the working classes is nationalism.

by Urkennalaid » Tue May 16, 2023 5:05 pm
Bombadil wrote:Khurkhogur wrote:I don't see how that relates to animosity for Sanders from the left. Also, to that last point - the welfare state is fundamentally an outgrowth of nationalism. It makes perfect sense that the second refuge for the working classes is nationalism.
A few people may have heckled Sanders from the far left, perhaps, but they're not the reason why Corbyn or Clinton lost.

by Shrillland » Tue May 16, 2023 5:08 pm
by Bombadil » Tue May 16, 2023 5:09 pm
Urkennalaid wrote:Bombadil wrote:
A few people may have heckled Sanders from the far left, perhaps, but they're not the reason why Corbyn or Clinton lost.
Remember when Corbyn was called anti-semetic by both the Right and liberals for criticizng Israel?
But yeah, surely liberals don't fuck over progressives and leftists as soon as they can. It's not like Biden and even FUCKING AOC voted against the recent rail strikes.
I don't know why libs can't admit it.

by Urkennalaid » Tue May 16, 2023 5:20 pm
Bombadil wrote:Urkennalaid wrote:
Remember when Corbyn was called anti-semetic by both the Right and liberals for criticizng Israel?
But yeah, surely liberals don't fuck over progressives and leftists as soon as they can. It's not like Biden and even FUCKING AOC voted against the recent rail strikes.
I don't know why libs can't admit it.
Oh oh oh, that's slightly different. Mainstream liberals certainly screw over progressives, I think someone was caught on tape just recently admitting to that strategy. And a few on the very far left will never be happy.
However this happens on the right as well, certainly a lot of right-leaning independents can't stand Trump, and some on the very far right felt betrayed by Trump.
My issue is that those on the far left who may or may not have heckled Sanders were not the reason the left lost in '16, that was due to a convergence of a completely different phenomenon.

by Umeria » Tue May 16, 2023 5:21 pm
Shrillland wrote:Polls are now closed in Pennsylvania. And another call to make:
GOP KY-Governor: Daniel Cameron
I thought Craft would fare better, but she's in third place at the moment.

by Austra-lia » Tue May 16, 2023 5:23 pm
by Bombadil » Tue May 16, 2023 5:25 pm
Austra-lia wrote:Can anyone explain on what's happening with the US debt ceiling and whether there is progress for that?

by Spirit of Hope » Tue May 16, 2023 5:35 pm
Austra-lia wrote:Can anyone explain on what's happening with the US debt ceiling and whether there is progress for that?
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Corrian » Tue May 16, 2023 5:45 pm
San Lumen wrote:https://www.firstcoastnews.com/amp/article/news/politics/elections/donna-deegan-will-be-the-next-mayor-of-jacksonville/77-867d6cd1-f9fb-456c-adcb-1ede027748e5
Donna Deegan will be the next mayor of Jacksonville
She will be the cities first woman mayor. This is a gain for Democrats.
by Pizza Friday Forever91 » Tue May 16, 2023 5:50 pm

by Khurkhogur » Tue May 16, 2023 6:11 pm
Nazi Flower Power wrote:Khurkhogur wrote:I don't know if you're being disingenuous or wilfully ignorant or what? They're yelling and chanting defiant slogans at Sanders. They're pushing him out of his own speech. They're mobbing him. It's not a show of support, they're shitting on him. I don't recall the BLM movement ever showing up and hijacking a Clinton rally so they could "educate" her.
At least some of the individuals who heckled Sanders were antisemites. Some of them later fell out of favor within BLM because they were harassing a Jewish shopkeeper and telling him to go back to Israel.
Urkennalaid wrote:Remember when Corbyn was called anti-semetic by both the Right and liberals for criticizng Israel?
But yeah, surely liberals don't fuck over progressives and leftists as soon as they can. It's not like Biden and even FUCKING AOC voted against the recent rail strikes.
I don't know why libs can't admit it.
by Pizza Friday Forever91 » Tue May 16, 2023 6:13 pm
Pizza Friday Forever91 wrote:imao, the gal who spent a bunch of money compared to her opponents got last place.
by Bombadil » Tue May 16, 2023 6:17 pm
Pizza Friday Forever91 wrote:Pizza Friday Forever91 wrote:imao, the gal who spent a bunch of money compared to her opponents got last place.
Lol, imao https://twitter.com/KellyCraftKY/status ... 2501348354

by Khurkhogur » Tue May 16, 2023 6:18 pm
Spirit of Hope wrote:Austra-lia wrote:Can anyone explain on what's happening with the US debt ceiling and whether there is progress for that?
The US has promised to pay a bunch of people money, but is running out of money to pay people. In order to pay people the money that is owed to them the Treasury wants to borrow money, but needs a new law to be passed to do this. Between the House, Senate, and President the law to allow borrowing hasn't been passed yet. Estimates are that some time in June the US runs out of money and some terrible things happen if it can't pay people the money that is owed.
People are negotiating, but haven't gotten anywhere yet.

by Ifreann » Tue May 16, 2023 6:34 pm
Khurkhogur wrote:Ifreann wrote:None of that happened, though. People who criticised Sanders from the left didn't support Clinton. People who supported Clinton weren't attacking Sanders from the left.
"People who criticized Sanders from the left didn't support Clinton" - but it's functionally the same thing. Unless you're ignorant of some basic political realities, the only purpose attacking Sanders would serve is to strengthen Clinton's campaign. That's it. Not even a republican would have any valid practical reason to publicly attack Sanders during the primary.
But that is not the phenomenon you describe, of leftists stupidly attacking the further left candidate and supporting the further right candidate.
I remember seeing shit like that happen in 2016 on places like r/socialism. That happened. I don't know on what scale exactly, but the fact that Jeremy Corbyn was disowned by the Labour party around the same time tells me that it's a wider, serious trend.
Holding BLM signs does not put someone into the category of "[y]oung, committed to socialism (as they conceive of it - free college and UBI and a bunch of other dumb bullshit), publicly indulge in defying gender norms, adamantly in support of abortion, etc."
No, that pretty much describes the bulk of BLM activists. Often based off of college campuses and generally holding those views. I don't really have a problem with generalizing them because I'd be right more often than not.
Do they? Seems to me they thought he was a candidate who they had some hope of bringing around to supporting their cause.
Yeahhh, the biggest show of support you could make is hijacking someone's speech and telling them to shut up and listen. They just really wanted him to endorse their movement, that's all. Not kick his campaign in the balls (which they successfully achieved mind you)
The people at that rally are very clearly not the whole section of the progressive movement that you were talking about, who oppose Sanders because he's a man, despite agreeing with all his policies, and who want President Clinton to bomb Iran.
I don't know if you're being disingenuous or wilfully ignorant or what? They're yelling and chanting defiant slogans at Sanders. They're pushing him out of his own speech. They're mobbing him. It's not a show of support, they're shitting on him. I don't recall the BLM movement ever showing up and hijacking a Clinton rally so they could "educate" her.
by Pizza Friday Forever91 » Tue May 16, 2023 6:39 pm

by Spirit of Hope » Tue May 16, 2023 6:44 pm
Khurkhogur wrote:Spirit of Hope wrote:The US has promised to pay a bunch of people money, but is running out of money to pay people. In order to pay people the money that is owed to them the Treasury wants to borrow money, but needs a new law to be passed to do this. Between the House, Senate, and President the law to allow borrowing hasn't been passed yet. Estimates are that some time in June the US runs out of money and some terrible things happen if it can't pay people the money that is owed.
People are negotiating, but haven't gotten anywhere yet.
All the more concerning because the nonaligned world is dumping the dollar. After Russia's invasion of Ukraine I thought everything they touched turned to shit, but BRICS actually got some middle powers together to do something for once. I remember discussing how a SWIFT ban was a bad idea because it contradicts the free global trade US primacy rests on, and now we're seeing the results of that. Turns out trade and finance are political after all.
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bombadil, El Lazaro, Honghai, In-dia, Juansonia, Likhinia, Necroghastia, Senkaku, Snowhead, The Two Jerseys, Tlaceceyaya, Xmara
Advertisement