How does a kid willingly deciding to watch or not watch a show where people dress up in bright colors equal molesting? How does willingly giving teens medical treatment THEY asked for equal molesting?
Advertisement
by Bewaffnete Krafte » Tue Mar 14, 2023 11:54 am
Wächter|NEWS✉|Populist Right Wing Eine Deutschland Partei, 4th in Bundestag, makes official statement towards the acquirement of the Rhineland. Friday, November 19th, 2021 8:16 PM CET
by United States Reborn » Tue Mar 14, 2023 11:56 am
Ifreann wrote:Based on their lies about women ruining the lives of innocent men by pretending to have been raped, as I said. They've seen one or two powerful men actually going to jail for their sex crimes following a mass public movement of women coming forward about being victims and they're freaking out.
Aren't you just delightful.
by United Calanworie » Tue Mar 14, 2023 12:05 pm
United States Reborn wrote:Ifreann wrote:Based on their lies about women ruining the lives of innocent men by pretending to have been raped, as I said. They've seen one or two powerful men actually going to jail for their sex crimes following a mass public movement of women coming forward about being victims and they're freaking out.
There are cases it has happened. There was recently quite a high-profile case in the U.K. in which a girl did exactly what you've just described.
by Ifreann » Tue Mar 14, 2023 12:09 pm
United States Reborn wrote:Ifreann wrote:Based on their lies about women ruining the lives of innocent men by pretending to have been raped, as I said. They've seen one or two powerful men actually going to jail for their sex crimes following a mass public movement of women coming forward about being victims and they're freaking out.
There are cases it has happened. There was recently quite a high-profile case in the U.K. in which a girl did exactly what you've just described.
Aren't you just delightful.
Again, my point proven. You're completely outraged that I could possibly have an issue with that.
by Saiwana » Tue Mar 14, 2023 12:20 pm
Ifreann wrote:At the end of the day, the far right tell each other that there's a huge risk of women accusing men of a sex crime and ruining his life because the already very limited degree to which sex criminals face consequences for their actions is too much for them. The far right want more license to harass and molest and rape people and get away with it. They want even less credence given to victims. Sai has just fallen for these lies his people tell.
by United Calanworie » Tue Mar 14, 2023 12:23 pm
Saiwana wrote:Ifreann wrote:At the end of the day, the far right tell each other that there's a huge risk of women accusing men of a sex crime and ruining his life because the already very limited degree to which sex criminals face consequences for their actions is too much for them. The far right want more license to harass and molest and rape people and get away with it. They want even less credence given to victims. Sai has just fallen for these lies his people tell.
Even if that were the case, I still want some form of insurance against being cancelled or labeled as bad or suffering negative consequences in a career context for arbitrary or false reasons. I don't trust women enough overall (outside of perhaps my mother) to ever truly have my best interests at heart. The only reason I don't want to follow the Mike Pence rule 100% is because I don't want to violate title XII of Civil Rights Act of 1964 or some arcane aspects of labor law where I live.
But if I were to need to mentor or work with any woman in the workplace, I need witnesses or footage or something, that can vouch for my professional behavior if I've indeed done nothing wrong. I want to maintain a strict 100% "work mode" at work, where I won't mix anything private/non-work related when I'm on the clock, that includes any romance or feelings. This probably rules out me ever accepting any coworkers as friends or anything more if I have enough reasons to believe that there are no upsides to being too trusting.
Yes- while its unlikely, I still don't want there to even be the possibility that I reject the wrong woman's advances, and them then wanting to blackmail or frame me or get revenge somehow.
by Ifreann » Tue Mar 14, 2023 12:29 pm
Saiwana wrote:Ifreann wrote:At the end of the day, the far right tell each other that there's a huge risk of women accusing men of a sex crime and ruining his life because the already very limited degree to which sex criminals face consequences for their actions is too much for them. The far right want more license to harass and molest and rape people and get away with it. They want even less credence given to victims. Sai has just fallen for these lies his people tell.
Even if that were the case, I still want some form of insurance against being cancelled or labeled as bad or suffering negative consequences in a career context for arbitrary or false reasons. I don't trust women enough overall (outside of perhaps my mother) to ever truly have my best interests at heart. The only reason I don't want to follow the Mike Pence rule 100% is because I don't want to violate title XII of Civil Rights Act of 1964 or some arcane aspects of labor law where I live.
But if I were to need to mentor or work with any woman in the workplace, I need witnesses or footage or something, that can vouch for my professional behavior if I've indeed done nothing wrong. I want to maintain a strict 100% "work mode" at work, where I won't mix anything private/non-work related when I'm on the clock, that includes any romance or feelings. This probably rules out me ever accepting any coworkers as friends or anything more if I have enough reasons to believe that there are no upsides to being too trusting.
Yes- while its unlikely, I still don't want there to even be the possibility that I reject the wrong woman's advances, and them then wanting to blackmail or frame me or get revenge somehow.
by Saiwana » Tue Mar 14, 2023 12:40 pm
Ifreann wrote:You're putting a lot of thought in how to deal with accusations of workplace misconduct for someone who doesn't have a job.
by Ifreann » Tue Mar 14, 2023 1:05 pm
Saiwana wrote:Ifreann wrote:You're putting a lot of thought in how to deal with accusations of workplace misconduct for someone who doesn't have a job.
I have a tech job starting soon for real, that is just for a limited time. Still a paid position however, that I'll be paying taxes on. Can't be a NEET forever?
by Saiwana » Tue Mar 14, 2023 2:05 pm
Ifreann wrote:Well you're not going to keep it if you go in wearing a camera.
by Thermodolia » Tue Mar 14, 2023 2:13 pm
Senkaku wrote:Ifreann wrote:Weird thing to say anonymously on the internet.El Lazaro wrote:Unless you have a strong reason to believe you’ll get into a legal dispute over a non-traffic related incident that you aren’t necessarily to blame for, it’s pretty weird, paranoid, and/or creepy.
Such nervous nellies— the surgery to get a dashcam permanently mounted on your forehead generally has very good outcomes, there’s only hemorrhaging in like five percent of cases
by Ifreann » Tue Mar 14, 2023 2:17 pm
Saiwana wrote:Ifreann wrote:Well you're not going to keep it if you go in wearing a camera.
That is what I consider to be a real problem. I'm searching for solutions, like ways to have the camera be concealed or to look like an ordinary button on my clothing. Even wearing a wire would be better than having no proof at all to back up my side of the story, if any disputes come up. I'm not going to be in a large environment full of other people as of yet. This is a small server room I'll be learning my craft from.
by Vonum » Tue Mar 14, 2023 2:24 pm
by Saiwana » Tue Mar 14, 2023 2:26 pm
Ifreann wrote:If any dispute arises and you reveal that you have been secretly recording everything that happens around you, your ass will get fired for that.
by Jabberwocky » Tue Mar 14, 2023 2:27 pm
by Thermodolia » Tue Mar 14, 2023 2:32 pm
Saiwana wrote:Ifreann wrote:If any dispute arises and you reveal that you have been secretly recording everything that happens around you, your ass will get fired for that.
I still don't like the implication that there is nothing I can do but take it, if Feminism tries to hurt me. Like I said, the Mike Pence rule insulates yourself from accusations but it also goes too far in that it can count as discrimination based on sex if a trend can be proven. My intentions are good if I'm trying to devise workarounds that will be of mutual benefit. It is perhaps just a matter of getting companies on board. I hope what I want becomes law or at least is an option in the future.
by Narland » Tue Mar 14, 2023 2:48 pm
by Ifreann » Tue Mar 14, 2023 4:06 pm
Saiwana wrote:Ifreann wrote:If any dispute arises and you reveal that you have been secretly recording everything that happens around you, your ass will get fired for that.
I still don't like the implication that there is nothing I can do but take it, if Feminism tries to hurt me. Like I said, the Mike Pence rule insulates yourself from accusations but it also goes too far in that it can count as discrimination based on sex if a trend can be proven. My intentions are good if I'm trying to devise workarounds that will be of mutual benefit. It is perhaps just a matter of getting companies on board. I hope what I want becomes law or at least is an option in the future.
by Neanderthaland » Tue Mar 14, 2023 5:37 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Saiwana wrote:
I still don't like the implication that there is nothing I can do but take it, if Feminism tries to hurt me. Like I said, the Mike Pence rule insulates yourself from accusations but it also goes too far in that it can count as discrimination based on sex if a trend can be proven. My intentions are good if I'm trying to devise workarounds that will be of mutual benefit. It is perhaps just a matter of getting companies on board. I hope what I want becomes law or at least is an option in the future.
Pretty sure feminism isn’t out to get you
by Saiwana » Tue Mar 14, 2023 6:05 pm
Ifreann wrote:Your intentions are obviously misogynist.
by Fractalnavel » Tue Mar 14, 2023 6:43 pm
by Floofybit » Tue Mar 14, 2023 6:51 pm
by Ifreann » Tue Mar 14, 2023 6:57 pm
Saiwana wrote:Ifreann wrote:Your intentions are obviously misogynist.
How are women meaningfully hurt by what I propose, if they're hurt more by if the "Mike Pence rule" is followed with no modifications to try to make it fairer towards women?
Me and other men only want sufficient enough evidence to exonerate us of any wrongdoing or rumors if nothing happened behind closed doors. The alternative is that more men intentionally do their utmost to try to exclude women if it isn't walking on eggshells around them. Is it not 100% equal if the women are allowed to have body cameras as well, to record any men either showing professional restraint or crossing over into being too forward in one on one business meetings or circumstances?
Whoever does wrong first, should be getting fired or disciplined depending on the company whims. If the footage can't be edited, it will undoubtedly be unbiased. But I deserve to be condemned by more than just words if someone else simply doesn't like me?
Floofybit wrote:Any way this could sufficienly work is an absolute must
by Neanderthaland » Tue Mar 14, 2023 7:09 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Republics of the Solar Union, The Lund
Advertisement