Gun Control 2023 (V) - ATF Shenanigans, States Fight Back!

[Greater Cesnica]

Fudd

I...um... have no counter to this, other then I really don't want it to be true. :lol:

It's okay, you're OUR fudd.

Also I made the 1776th post in the thread :o

[Gun Manufacturers]

All law abiding reasons aside, I personally want another just to twist the AG's into a frenzy even further. Brings a tear to my eye.

Ah yes lets make the liberals cry. Your lot is despicable and I wish there was law your guns could be grabbed and smashed in front of you or gun shops could have all their merchandise broken.

Reaching for some stranger's firearm(s) is not an advisable course of action. It would most likely be considered a threat of lethal level, and the firearms owner would most likely act accordingly to stop the threat.

[Paddy O Fernature]

I...um... have no counter to this, other then I really don't want it to be true.

It's okay, you're OUR fudd.

Also I made the 1776th post in the thread

Well played.

[Gun Manufacturers]

Wasn't one of those "crimes" a self-defense shooting in the 80s? Or are these 3 different incidents?

I'll have to go back and check, but I believe they were three separate incidents resulting in a single death each.

One of them was perpetrated by an off duty Dayton, OH police officer with his legally owned Mac-11.

[Grinning Dragon]

@San- look, all you gotta do is find a historical analog from the time of the founding and at the time of the ratification of the 14th Amendment of a law that meet constitutional muster in regards to firearms under the 2nd Amendment, whether it was a regulation or ban. Analog sister laws are not the same as a historical analog. Ex. a ban on bobby traps with firearms or bans on dirks, daggers, bowie knives, etc. from being concealed.

[Eternal Algerstonia]

All law abiding reasons aside, I personally want another just to twist the AG's into a frenzy even further. Brings a tear to my eye.

Ah yes lets make the liberals cry. Your lot is despicable and I wish there was law your guns could be grabbed and smashed in front of you or gun shops could have all their merchandise broken.

sheesh bro you're wild

[Grinning Dragon]

NSSF has hooked up with the lawyers who successfully argued, Heller, MacDonald and Bruen and together have issued a amicus curiae in support of NAGR to ACB.
BRIEF FOR AMICUS CURIAE NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICANTS

[Paddy O Fernature]

NSSF has hooked up with the lawyers who successfully argued, Heller, MacDonald and Bruen and together have issued a amicus curiae in support of NAGR to ACB.
BRIEF FOR AMICUS CURIAE NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICANTS

Shit just got real.

[San Lumen]

NSSF has hooked up with the lawyers who successfully argued, Heller, MacDonald and Bruen and together have issued a amicus curiae in support of NAGR to ACB.
BRIEF FOR AMICUS CURIAE NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICANTS

And there will be more mass shootings and needless bloodshed and it will be the fault of people with attitudes like yours. I wouldn't be surprised if soon states and the people tell the courts to take a long walk off a plank when it comes to this issue in fact Im starting to think they should. If the court was ever to give your lot what they want of unlimited unrestricted guns no questions asked the Supreme Court should be told to pound sand.

[Ors Might]

NSSF has hooked up with the lawyers who successfully argued, Heller, MacDonald and Bruen and together have issued a amicus curiae in support of NAGR to ACB.
BRIEF FOR AMICUS CURIAE NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICANTS

And there will be more mass shootings and needless bloodshed and it will be the fault of people with attitudes like yours. I wouldn't be surprised if soon states and the people tell the courts to take a long walk off a plank when it comes to this issue in fact Im starting to think they should. If the court was ever to give your lot what they want of unlimited unrestrained guns no questions act the Supreme Court should be told to pound sand.

Have you considered the possibility that violence of all kinds aren't inherently caused by the tool used to commit the violence?

[Greater Cesnica]

NSSF has hooked up with the lawyers who successfully argued, Heller, MacDonald and Bruen and together have issued a amicus curiae in support of NAGR to ACB.
BRIEF FOR AMICUS CURIAE NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICANTS

And there will be more mass shootings and needless bloodshed and it will be the fault of people with attitudes like yours. I wouldn't be surprised if soon states and the people tell the courts to take a long walk off a plank when it comes to this issue in fact Im starting to think they should. If the court was ever to give your lot what they want of unlimited unrestricted guns no questions asked the Supreme Court should be told to pound sand.

Unlimited and unrestrained? Based.

[San Lumen]

And there will be more mass shootings and needless bloodshed and it will be the fault of people with attitudes like yours. I wouldn't be surprised if soon states and the people tell the courts to take a long walk off a plank when it comes to this issue in fact Im starting to think they should. If the court was ever to give your lot what they want of unlimited unrestricted guns no questions asked the Supreme Court should be told to pound sand.

Unlimited and unrestrained? Based.

Nothing based about it. That's what some here want and its honestly scary. Japan doesn't have a problem of mass shootings on regular basis and neither does the United Kingdom. The fact is mass shootings went up since the assault weapon ban expired but that's a fact you and others refuse to acknowledge.

[Juansonia]

NSSF has hooked up with the lawyers who successfully argued, Heller, MacDonald and Bruen and together have issued a amicus curiae in support of NAGR to ACB.
BRIEF FOR AMICUS CURIAE NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICANTS

And there will be more mass shootings and needless bloodshed and it will be the fault of people with attitudes like yours. I wouldn't be surprised if soon states and the people tell the courts to take a long walk off a plank when it comes to this issue in fact Im starting to think they should. If the court was ever to give your lot what they want of unlimited unrestricted guns no questions asked the Supreme Court should be told to pound sand.

That would be an act of treason, which is punishable by death.

Of course, if you want the 2A's protections to not be in your way, you could try amending the Constitution. However, that would require 2/3 of Congress and 3/4 of the states. Until then, it will be you who should pound sand.

[The Two Jerseys]

NSSF has hooked up with the lawyers who successfully argued, Heller, MacDonald and Bruen and together have issued a amicus curiae in support of NAGR to ACB.
BRIEF FOR AMICUS CURIAE NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICANTS

And there will be more mass shootings and needless bloodshed and it will be the fault of people with attitudes like yours. I wouldn't be surprised if soon states and the people tell the courts to take a long walk off a plank when it comes to this issue in fact Im starting to think they should. If the court was ever to give your lot what they want of unlimited unrestricted guns no questions asked the Supreme Court should be told to pound sand.

I guess we can enact voter ID laws and have legislative districts with unequal populations then.

[American Legionaries]

NSSF has hooked up with the lawyers who successfully argued, Heller, MacDonald and Bruen and together have issued a amicus curiae in support of NAGR to ACB.
BRIEF FOR AMICUS CURIAE NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICANTS

And there will be more mass shootings and needless bloodshed and it will be the fault of people with attitudes like yours. I wouldn't be surprised if soon states and the people tell the courts to take a long walk off a plank when it comes to this issue in fact Im starting to think they should. If the court was ever to give your lot what they want of unlimited unrestricted guns no questions asked the Supreme Court should be told to pound sand.

You can tell them whatever colorful phrases you want to tell them, the law doesn't stop being the law.

[American Legionaries]

Unlimited and unrestrained? Based.

Nothing based about it.

Unrestricted access to guns is based, tho.

That's what some here want and its honestly scary.

It is, and I'm not scared at all.

Japan doesn't have a problem of mass shootings on regular basis and neither does the United Kingdom.

They're also horrible places to live.

The fact is mass shootings went up since the assault weapon ban expired but that's a fact you and others refuse to acknowledge.

Is it a fact? And if it is, it doesn't matter.

[San Lumen]

Nothing based about it.

Unrestricted access to guns is based, tho.

That's what some here want and its honestly scary.

It is, and I'm not scared at all.

Japan doesn't have a problem of mass shootings on regular basis and neither does the United Kingdom.

They're also horrible places to live.

The fact is mass shootings went up since the assault weapon ban expired but that's a fact you and others refuse to acknowledge.

Is it a fact? And if it is, it doesn't matter.

Why are they horrible places to live?

You’re therefore acknowledging you don’t care about the consequences you just want your stupid guns?

[Arval Va]

Unlimited and unrestrained? Based.

Nothing based about it. That's what some here want and its honestly scary. Japan doesn't have a problem of mass shootings on regular basis and neither does the United Kingdom. The fact is mass shootings went up since the assault weapon ban expired but that's a fact you and others refuse to acknowledge.

Japan actually has a history of biochemical and biohazard attacks, especially anthrax. Most of them were perpetrated by cults, though.

[American Legionaries]

Unrestricted access to guns is based, tho.



It is, and I'm not scared at all.



They're also horrible places to live.



Is it a fact? And if it is, it doesn't matter.

Why are they horrible places to live?

Because gun control.

You’re therefore acknowledging you don’t care about the consequences you just want your stupid guns?

No.

[Juansonia]

Unrestricted access to guns is based, tho.It is, and I'm not scared at all.They're also horrible places to live.Is it a fact? And if it is, it doesn't matter.

Why are they horrible places to live?

You’re therefore acknowledging you don’t care about the consequences you just want your stupid guns?

Japan has no problems, unless you value "the rights of the accused", "being tolerant of immigrants", "not getting groped on a train", and "not getting killed by a bioweapon less than a minute after you get groped on a train".

The UK has no problems, unless you value "the right to political protest", "not getting stabbed", "having healthcare for cheap without a decade-long waiting list", and "food that isn't bland".

[Grinning Dragon]

Unlimited and unrestrained? Based.

Nothing based about it. That's what some here want and its honestly scary. Japan doesn't have a problem of mass shootings on regular basis and neither does the United Kingdom. The fact is mass shootings went up since the assault weapon ban expired but that's a fact you and others refuse to acknowledge.

The unconstitutional 94 awb, had a negligible effect on crime, the other issue was and is still true today that handguns are still the most used firearm to carryout a mass shooting.

[San Lumen]

Why are they horrible places to live?

Because gun control.

You’re therefore acknowledging you don’t care about the consequences you just want your stupid guns?

No.

Guns are all you care about and it’s utterly and completely pathetic. A friend of mine was very nearly paralyzed from an assault weapon and at the Las Vegas shooting. It was only by the grace of someone upstairs that didn’t happen.

[Juansonia]

Because gun control.No.

Guns are all you care about and it’s utterly and completely pathetic.

If not for Broadway and 432 Park Avenue, I could say the same about you. Of course, the two of you are on opposite sides of the "I don't give a fuck either way" line.

[American Legionaries]

Because gun control.



No.

Guns are all you care about and it’s utterly and completely pathetic. A friend of mine was very nearly paralyzed from an assault weapon and at the Las Vegas shooting. It was only by the grace of someone upstairs that didn’t happen.

Amazing... Every word you just said was wrong.

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

Because gun control.



No.

Guns are all you care about and it’s utterly and completely pathetic. A friend of mine was very nearly paralyzed from an assault weapon and at the Las Vegas shooting. It was only by the grace of someone upstairs that didn’t happen.

What do you define an assault weapon as?