Stygon wrote:Also, if you think that life existed even just 1 million years ago, it couldn't of been on Earth. Why? Because the magnetic field shrinks about %50 every 100 years or so. So how could anything withstand a magnetic field large enough to reach the moon?
The Earth's Magnetic field isn't shrinking anywhere near that fast.
The Earth's magnetic field strength was measured by Carl Friedrich Gauss in 1835 and has been repeatedly measured since then, showing a relative decay of about 10% over the last 150 years
50% every 50 years works out to 1% a year, 10% over 150 years is 00.0666666667% a year. So 1 million years ago, the magnetic field was nowhere near as strong as you claim it was, assuming that the rate of decay is constant in percentage terms rather than absolute terms.
For that matter, insane magnetic field strengths don't seem to have that much affect either way on the health of organisms except those that are specifically attuned to them, such as for migration purposes. MRI technicians spend many hours a day bathed in intense magnetic fields, yet their average health is neither worse nor better than the rest of the population.
Balantania wrote:What made the 2 big stars that suposedly slammed into each otehr and made the big bang. Also if you think believing in religon is stupid how can you believe in evolution theory about a fish coming out of the water and growing legs and then turning into a lizard and then forming into an ape and then forming into a human. That sounds very stupid just like how you athiests think religion sounds.
The Big Bang wasn't caused by two big stars crashing together, the Universe was already there, but with substantially different laws of physics. Something caused a change and the universe began inflating like a balloon.
And evolution doesn't say a fish turned into a lizard then an ape then a man. It says a fish had fins that were a bit stiffer than its siblings, and had an advantage pushing off from the bottom after resting. It passed that on to its kids which did a bit better than their competitors, so they had more kids relative to the others. Eventually one of their descendants had even stiffer fins that allowed it to creep along the bottom when it wanted too, eventually one of it's descendants could process air just the slightest bit better than the others, eventually one of that ones descendants could stay out long enough to flop from one wet spot to the next a few feet away, eventually one of that one's descendants could hold it's breath long enough to hide on the shore for a few minutes, etc. No magical poofing from one form to the next like you seem to think it means, just very slow changes over time that give advantages to their inheritors. And not only atheists believe it, even the Vatican officially endorses this theory.
