American Politics 16: After The Ballooning

[The Jamesian Republic]

You never know.

Hopefully we'll find out. That's what investigations are for.

That's what GMS and everyone else clucking their tongues are missing for some reason.

We find out that Trump has boxes and boxes of papers he should have returned-holy shit, look into that. But Trump doesn't want that. Trump sycophants don't want that. So there's a debate, because you have Trump and Trump's surrogates saying that we shouldn't look into it, no big deal.

We find out that Biden had a dozen documents he should have returned but no one noticed until his lawyers found them, they were immediately reported to the archive and an investigation as to why there were there in the first place (as well as why no one noticed for six years) opens. Good, look into that. There is no 'other side' to this. Unless GMS is saying he doesn't want this investigated.

So what is he trying to argue here? What does he think we oppose? Is it just the relative benefit of the doubt Biden is getting? Because the behavior in the wake of it earns that since at the moment it doesn't appear like he's trying to hide anything or impede an investigation. When he does, we'll likely condemn that but we're not there yet.

So this is just sound and fury signalling nothing.

I agree with this.

[American Legionaries]

Hopefully we'll find out. That's what investigations are for.

That's what GMS and everyone else clucking their tongues are missing for some reason.

We find out that Trump has boxes and boxes of papers he should have returned-holy shit, look into that. But Trump doesn't want that. Trump sycophants don't want that. So there's a debate, because you have Trump and Trump's surrogates saying that we shouldn't look into it, no big deal.

We find out that Biden had a dozen documents he should have returned but no one noticed until his lawyers found them, they were immediately reported to the archive and an investigation as to why there were there in the first place (as well as why no one noticed for six years) opens. Good, look into that. There is no 'other side' to this. Unless GMS is saying he doesn't want this investigated.

So what is he trying to argue here? What does he think we oppose? Is it just the relative benefit of the doubt Biden is getting? Because the behavior in the wake of it earns that since at the moment it doesn't appear like he's trying to hide anything or impede an investigation. When he does, we'll likely condemn that but we're not there yet.

So this is just sound and fury signalling nothing.

It doesn't look like there was any crime here. If someone commits a crime unknowingly its very unlikely any charges would be filed.

The only time law enforcement works this way is when the person who committed the crime has the power to retaliate against any agency with jurisdiction.

[Cannot think of a name]

Hopefully we'll find out. That's what investigations are for.

That's what GMS and everyone else clucking their tongues are missing for some reason.

We find out that Trump has boxes and boxes of papers he should have returned-holy shit, look into that. But Trump doesn't want that. Trump sycophants don't want that. So there's a debate, because you have Trump and Trump's surrogates saying that we shouldn't look into it, no big deal.

We find out that Biden had a dozen documents he should have returned but no one noticed until his lawyers found them, they were immediately reported to the archive and an investigation as to why there were there in the first place (as well as why no one noticed for six years) opens. Good, look into that. There is no 'other side' to this. Unless GMS is saying he doesn't want this investigated.

So what is he trying to argue here? What does he think we oppose? Is it just the relative benefit of the doubt Biden is getting? Because the behavior in the wake of it earns that since at the moment it doesn't appear like he's trying to hide anything or impede an investigation. When he does, we'll likely condemn that but we're not there yet.

So this is just sound and fury signalling nothing.

It doesn't look like there was any crime here. If someone commits a crime unknowingly its very unlikely any charges would be filed.

And if that's the findings of the investigation, then game on. But it's still something to look into by the people given the authority to enforce those rules.

I'm not holding my breath that it will be some damning lynch pin that will destroy the Biden presidency. But, lets find out why they were there anyway because they should not have been.

[Kerwa]

I finally found a climate wacko. He is a water guy and has the background to explain the climate patterns.

He said we need to move the cities and homes out of the flood plains. Insurance should not be used to rebuild. It will be hard but worth it in the end.

What’s wacko about that? It’s pretty much basic civil engineering. Unfortunately it’s not always politically possible, but it’s just common sense. I wish the same thinking was applied to barrier islands and subsidizing flood insurance as well.

[San Lumen]

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watc ... e-devices/

NJ governor bans TikTok on state devices

[Daniel-Franklin]

So, meet the new boss, same as the old boss. With apologies to The Who.

[Greater Miami Shores 3]

Hopefully we'll find out. That's what investigations are for.

That's what GMS and everyone else clucking their tongues are missing for some reason.

We find out that Trump has boxes and boxes of papers he should have returned-holy shit, look into that. But Trump doesn't want that. Trump sycophants don't want that. So there's a debate, because you have Trump and Trump's surrogates saying that we shouldn't look into it, no big deal.

We find out that Biden had a dozen documents he should have returned but no one noticed until his lawyers found them, they were immediately reported to the archive and an investigation as to why there were there in the first place (as well as why no one noticed for six years) opens. Good, look into that. There is no 'other side' to this. Unless GMS is saying he doesn't want this investigated.

So what is he trying to argue here? What does he think we oppose? Is it just the relative benefit of the doubt Biden is getting? Because the behavior in the wake of it earns that since at the moment it doesn't appear like he's trying to hide anything or impede an investigation. When he does, we'll likely condemn that but we're not there yet.

So this is just sound and fury signalling nothing.

It doesn't look like there was any crime here. If someone commits a crime unknowingly its very unlikely any charges would be filed.

Not all, but many of you guys believe Biden, but not Trump, believe them both.

[The Jamesian Republic]

It doesn't look like there was any crime here. If someone commits a crime unknowingly its very unlikely any charges would be filed.

Not all, but many of you guys believe Biden, but not Trump, believe them both.

Or believe no one.

[Daniel-Franklin]

It doesn't look like there was any crime here. If someone commits a crime unknowingly its very unlikely any charges would be filed.

Not all, but many of you guys believe Biden, but not Trump, believe them both.

I believe that both of them are predators. And neither is fit for the Presidency for that reason and a slough of other ones.

[Yerachmeal]

So you guys believe Biden?

It’s not a question of belief. It’s what the investigation will show. Biden could be honest. Biden could by lying. Biden could have honestly not known especially with your lot’s declarations and jokes about his mental acuity.

We will probably not get an honest picture from the republicans who will be controlling this investigation. They; like you; will try to say both actions are the same.

2 things that I predict will be similar: 1. This will be investigated for over a year, and cause a big waste of time, just like last time. 2. It will be done very biased and unfairly just like last time.

[The Black Forrest]

I finally found a climate wacko. He is a water guy and has the background to explain the climate patterns.

He said we need to move the cities and homes out of the flood plains. Insurance should not be used to rebuild. It will be hard but worth it in the end.

What’s wacko about that? It’s pretty much basic civil engineering. Unfortunately it’s not always politically possible, but it’s just common sense. I wish the same thinking was applied to barrier islands and subsidizing flood insurance as well.

For one thing resources. Water, power and replacement housing.

Then you consider people will not be compensated for their property or at best the grossly devalued price.

It’s not worth really arguing as it won’t happen.

[Yerachmeal]

It doesn't look like there was any crime here. If someone commits a crime unknowingly its very unlikely any charges would be filed.

Not all, but many of you guys believe Biden, but not Trump, believe them both.

I agree with this. Neither of them did anything that qualifies as arrestible, and definitely not knowingly.

[Greater Miami Shores 3]

So you guys believe Biden?

It’s not a question of belief. It’s what the investigation will show. Biden could be honest. Biden could by lying. Biden could have honestly not known especially with your lot’s declarations and jokes about his mental acuity.

We will probably not get an honest picture from the republicans who will be controlling this investigation. They; like you; will try to say both actions are the same.

Just like Trump.

[Greater Miami Shores 3]

So you guys believe Biden?

It’s not a question of belief. It’s what the investigation will show. Biden could be honest. Biden could by lying. Biden could have honestly not known especially with your lot’s declarations and jokes about his mental acuity.

We will probably not get an honest picture from the republicans who will be controlling this investigation. They; like you; will try to say both actions are the same.

"We will probably not get an honest picture from the republicans who will be controlling this investigation." The same thing we Republicans say about the Democrats, what a coincidence. I works both way, not just one way, it works both ways. See I said it again, because it Fits again, it always Fits again.

[Southern Republic of Dixie]

It’s not a question of belief. It’s what the investigation will show. Biden could be honest. Biden could by lying. Biden could have honestly not known especially with your lot’s declarations and jokes about his mental acuity.

We will probably not get an honest picture from the republicans who will be controlling this investigation. They; like you; will try to say both actions are the same.

Just like Trump.

Hillary Clinton was given a Guilty, but wasn't found with intention when she deleted Emails.

I Doubt Trump and Biden would be Arrested for the same illegal ownership or Inappropriate keeping of government files.

So it's kinda just blank back and forth statement...
Still makes me worry how much our enemies know with the lack of Security in our officials. Loose papers and loose lips.

[The Black Forrest]

It’s not a question of belief. It’s what the investigation will show. Biden could be honest. Biden could by lying. Biden could have honestly not known especially with your lot’s declarations and jokes about his mental acuity.

We will probably not get an honest picture from the republicans who will be controlling this investigation. They; like you; will try to say both actions are the same.

2 things that I predict will be similar: 1. This will be investigated for over a year, and cause a big waste of time, just like last time. 2. It will be done very biased and unfairly just like last time.

1) The amount of documents involved and what led to it? Probably not.
2) Trumps investigation was biased and unfair. Explain.

[The Black Forrest]

It’s not a question of belief. It’s what the investigation will show. Biden could be honest. Biden could by lying. Biden could have honestly not known especially with your lot’s declarations and jokes about his mental acuity.

We will probably not get an honest picture from the republicans who will be controlling this investigation. They; like you; will try to say both actions are the same.

Just like Trump.

Actually no. I wont’ bother explaining as it’s irrelevant to you.

[The Black Forrest]

It’s not a question of belief. It’s what the investigation will show. Biden could be honest. Biden could by lying. Biden could have honestly not known especially with your lot’s declarations and jokes about his mental acuity.

We will probably not get an honest picture from the republicans who will be controlling this investigation. They; like you; will try to say both actions are the same.

"We will probably not get an honest picture from the republicans who will be controlling this investigation." The same thing we Republicans say about the Democrats, what a coincidence. I works both way, not just one way, it works both ways. See I said it again, because it Fits again, it always Fits again.

You are getting pretty good at spewing bullshit. I can see why the RNC would like you.

Sorry bud, Trump did bad things.

As mentioned many times. I can admit Trump is innocent if the details show it.

YOU……..can never admit he is guilty.

[The Black Forrest]

Just like Trump.

Hillary Clinton was given a Guilty, but wasn't found with intention when she deleted Emails.

I Doubt Trump and Biden would be Arrested for the same illegal ownership or Inappropriate keeping of government files.

So it's kinda just blank back and forth statement...
Still makes me worry how much our enemies know with the lack of Security in our officials. Loose papers and loose lips.

I will give her the benefit of cleaning up personal stuff. That is if she left things she didn’t have in place. It wasn’t the right move for her to have done that and yet you would have people making a great deal of noise over the personal emails.

Let’s not forget Trump asked the Russians to do a cyber-attack and declared there was server which still had them……fun times.

[Capisoc]

2 things that I predict will be similar: 1. This will be investigated for over a year, and cause a big waste of time, just like last time. 2. It will be done very biased and unfairly just like last time.

1) The amount of documents involved and what led to it? Probably not.
2) Trumps investigation was biased and unfair. Explain.

A committee to search the events are supposed to research both sides, as they are not supposed to be prosecutors. They were only looking for guilty stuff. And they were trying to bring public opinion in to bring peer pressure.

[Yerachmeal]

1) The amount of documents involved and what led to it? Probably not.
2) Trumps investigation was biased and unfair. Explain.

A committee to search the events are supposed to research both sides, as they are not supposed to be prosecutors. They were only looking for guilty stuff. And they were trying to bring public opinion in to bring peer pressure.

And by the way I am the same guy who uses Yerachmeal.

[Greater Miami Shores 3]

"We will probably not get an honest picture from the republicans who will be controlling this investigation." The same thing we Republicans say about the Democrats, what a coincidence. I works both way, not just one way, it works both ways. See I said it again, because it Fits again, it always Fits again.

You are getting pretty good at spewing bullshit. I can see why the RNC would like you.

Sorry bud, Trump did bad things.

As mentioned many times. I can admit Trump is innocent if the details show it.

YOU……..can never admit he is guilty.

How many times have you stated Trump is innocent of anything the Leftist Democrats have charged him with?

[The Black Forrest]

1) The amount of documents involved and what led to it? Probably not.
2) Trumps investigation was biased and unfair. Explain.

A committee to search the events are supposed to research both sides, as they are not supposed to be prosecutors. They were only looking for guilty stuff. And they were trying to bring public opinion in to bring peer pressure.

Do you have any proof of this? Evidence of things which would exonerate Trump from the claims?

Even then the committee doesn’t prosecute for legal violations. Now court of politics…sure. It’s why you have Trump and his asskissers saying one thing to the public and something different in the courts.

[Cannot think of a name]

Just like Trump.

Hillary Clinton was given a Guilty, but wasn't found with intention when she deleted Emails.

I Doubt Trump and Biden would be Arrested for the same illegal ownership or Inappropriate keeping of government files.

So it's kinda just blank back and forth statement...
Still makes me worry how much our enemies know with the lack of Security in our officials. Loose papers and loose lips.

Movie spies are working too hard

[The Black Forrest]

You are getting pretty good at spewing bullshit. I can see why the RNC would like you.

Sorry bud, Trump did bad things.

As mentioned many times. I can admit Trump is innocent if the details show it.

YOU……..can never admit he is guilty.

How many times have you stated Trump is innocent of anything the Leftist Democrats have charged him with?

Ok. What has trump been charged with? Make 2 lists. One for the political charges and one for the legal violations.