
by Intangelon » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:47 pm

by Vervaria » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:49 pm
Robustian wrote:If you disagree with me, you are wrong. Period.
Ashmoria wrote:it worries me more when people who hate the government and dont think it can do a good job at anything get into power and start running things.
Wanderjar wrote:hiding behind this "I WANT SOURCES" wall is very quaint
Self--Esteem wrote:No. I love smearing those people who evidently like their country blown by a nuke and who are too foolish to realise that middle-eastern terrorism is nothing to be fond of.
Novistranaya wrote:After the Civil War, the majority of Southerners were more than happy to accept defeat and acknowledge the fact that (though not immediately) blacks were going to have the same rights as them.

by Wilgrove » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:49 pm

by Intangelon » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:50 pm
Wilgrove wrote:Doesn't Bachmann say crazy stuff all the time though?

by Brogavia » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:51 pm

by Vervaria » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:51 pm
Brogavia wrote:As a conserative from Minnesota, I would like to say that she in no way, shape or form repersents most MN conseratives.
Robustian wrote:If you disagree with me, you are wrong. Period.
Ashmoria wrote:it worries me more when people who hate the government and dont think it can do a good job at anything get into power and start running things.
Wanderjar wrote:hiding behind this "I WANT SOURCES" wall is very quaint
Self--Esteem wrote:No. I love smearing those people who evidently like their country blown by a nuke and who are too foolish to realise that middle-eastern terrorism is nothing to be fond of.
Novistranaya wrote:After the Civil War, the majority of Southerners were more than happy to accept defeat and acknowledge the fact that (though not immediately) blacks were going to have the same rights as them.

by Intangelon » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:52 pm
Brogavia wrote:As a conserative from Minnesota, I would like to say that she in no way, shape or form repersents most MN conseratives.

by Lacadaemon » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:52 pm

by Wilgrove » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:52 pm
Intangelon wrote:Wilgrove wrote:Doesn't Bachmann say crazy stuff all the time though?
Yes, but this one would cost Bachmann her job. Ain't that great?

by Intangelon » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:53 pm
Vervaria wrote:Brogavia wrote:As a conserative from Minnesota, I would like to say that she in no way, shape or form repersents most MN conseratives.
That explains why they elected her.

by Vervaria » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:54 pm
Intangelon wrote:Vervaria wrote:Brogavia wrote:As a conserative from Minnesota, I would like to say that she in no way, shape or form repersents most MN conseratives.
That explains why they elected her.
Hey now, be nice.
Robustian wrote:If you disagree with me, you are wrong. Period.
Ashmoria wrote:it worries me more when people who hate the government and dont think it can do a good job at anything get into power and start running things.
Wanderjar wrote:hiding behind this "I WANT SOURCES" wall is very quaint
Self--Esteem wrote:No. I love smearing those people who evidently like their country blown by a nuke and who are too foolish to realise that middle-eastern terrorism is nothing to be fond of.
Novistranaya wrote:After the Civil War, the majority of Southerners were more than happy to accept defeat and acknowledge the fact that (though not immediately) blacks were going to have the same rights as them.

by Brogavia » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:55 pm
Vervaria wrote:Brogavia wrote:As a conserative from Minnesota, I would like to say that she in no way, shape or form repersents most MN conseratives.
That explains why they elected her.

by Brogavia » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:56 pm
Vervaria wrote:Well if she doesn't represent MN conservatives, and reasonably presuming that she doesn't represent MN liberals, who the hell voted for her?

by Vervaria » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:57 pm
Brogavia wrote:Vervaria wrote:Well if she doesn't represent MN conservatives, and reasonably presuming that she doesn't represent MN liberals, who the hell voted for her?
She comes from a fairly rural area, similar to mine. She's 6th, I'm 7th district. Areas like this tend to be pro life, and will not vote for anyone thats not, and only vote for the two parties.
Robustian wrote:If you disagree with me, you are wrong. Period.
Ashmoria wrote:it worries me more when people who hate the government and dont think it can do a good job at anything get into power and start running things.
Wanderjar wrote:hiding behind this "I WANT SOURCES" wall is very quaint
Self--Esteem wrote:No. I love smearing those people who evidently like their country blown by a nuke and who are too foolish to realise that middle-eastern terrorism is nothing to be fond of.
Novistranaya wrote:After the Civil War, the majority of Southerners were more than happy to accept defeat and acknowledge the fact that (though not immediately) blacks were going to have the same rights as them.

by Intangelon » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:59 pm
Vervaria wrote:Well if she doesn't represent MN conservatives, and reasonably presuming that she doesn't represent MN liberals, who the hell voted for her?

by Brogavia » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:00 pm
Vervaria wrote:Brogavia wrote:Vervaria wrote:Well if she doesn't represent MN conservatives, and reasonably presuming that she doesn't represent MN liberals, who the hell voted for her?
She comes from a fairly rural area, similar to mine. She's 6th, I'm 7th district. Areas like this tend to be pro life, and will not vote for anyone thats not, and only vote for the two parties.
Fair enough.

by Vervaria » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:00 pm
Intangelon wrote:Vervaria wrote:Well if she doesn't represent MN conservatives, and reasonably presuming that she doesn't represent MN liberals, who the hell voted for her?
That's what I asked, only nicer.
Robustian wrote:If you disagree with me, you are wrong. Period.
Ashmoria wrote:it worries me more when people who hate the government and dont think it can do a good job at anything get into power and start running things.
Wanderjar wrote:hiding behind this "I WANT SOURCES" wall is very quaint
Self--Esteem wrote:No. I love smearing those people who evidently like their country blown by a nuke and who are too foolish to realise that middle-eastern terrorism is nothing to be fond of.
Novistranaya wrote:After the Civil War, the majority of Southerners were more than happy to accept defeat and acknowledge the fact that (though not immediately) blacks were going to have the same rights as them.

by Intangelon » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:01 pm
Vervaria wrote:*Shrugs* I'm blunt like that.

by The South Islands » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:06 pm

by Intangelon » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:10 pm
The South Islands wrote:Its interesting that so many "conservatives" are opposed to this Census, despite it being one of the few things the Constitution explicitly gives the Federal Government a duty to do.

by Farnhamia » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:13 pm
Lacadaemon wrote:There is such a thing as red list and blue lists. But I doubt they'll come off an ACORN provided census. If anything a lot of ACORN people are probably on the red list themselves.

by Lunatic Goofballs » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:19 pm


by Intangelon » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:21 pm
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:If she's a House rep, she's up for re-election in 2010. Might be a good time to nominate someone... sane. Or at least saner. Unless batshit insanity is grounds for removal from office.

by Lunatic Goofballs » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:22 pm
Intangelon wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:If she's a House rep, she's up for re-election in 2010. Might be a good time to nominate someone... sane. Or at least saner. Unless batshit insanity is grounds for removal from office.
Were that the case, we'd have a lot more vacancies on both sides of the aisle.

by JuNii » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:23 pm
Intangelon wrote:US Representative Michelle Bachmann (R-Minnesota 6th District) has warned her constituents not to answer the 2010 US Census. This according to Countdown -- and although Olberman is Limbaugh Left for the most part, this is interesting. Her reasoning? The government will use the information to set up potential "internment camps" and ACORN will get the information and do something nefarious with it. It does make me wonder if she'd be saying the same thing if a Republican were in office, but that's beside the point.
The point? If the Minnesota 6th District takes Rep. Bachmann's advice and the district's population is underreported, Minnesota could stand to lose one of its seats in Congress. The district that would be absorbed? THE MINNESOTA 6TH -- Bachmann's district.
Isn't the law of unintended consequences interesting?
View the bit here:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/ -- scroll down to the bottom of the left clip list for the relevant clip.
Bachmann is the #1 of the "World's Best Persons" in the clip. Enjoy and discuss.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Elejamie, Ostroeuropa, Pizza Friday Forever91, Practice Nation State, Urkennalaid, Violetist Britannia
Advertisement