For once I wouldn't be opposed to it. Seems like a good man with a great record.
Sad he died at the age of 95.
Advertisement
by Southern Republic of Dixie » Wed Nov 30, 2022 8:31 pm
LGBTQ+ Rights Anti-Ethno Supremacy Anti-Slavery Anti-Fascist Anti-Communist Pro-IndependenceMy Nation Facts.
by American Legionaries » Wed Nov 30, 2022 8:32 pm
by Bombadil » Wed Nov 30, 2022 8:35 pm
Yerachmeal wrote:Bombadil wrote:
When Republicans failed to gain significant advantage in the House, the margin is so small that these people hold all the power.
No...They are not the most likely to flip thereby allowing Biden's bills that they oppose to come into action, it's the more moderate republicans who control the house.
by San Lumen » Wed Nov 30, 2022 8:36 pm
Bombadil wrote:Yerachmeal wrote:No...They are not the most likely to flip thereby allowing Biden's bills that they oppose to come into action, it's the more moderate republicans who control the house.
By becoming Democrats?
McCarthy has already had to promise ridiculous things and he still probably won't make 218, it's going to be a shambles.
by San Lumen » Wed Nov 30, 2022 8:43 pm
by Thermodolia » Wed Nov 30, 2022 9:03 pm
by New-Minneapolis » Wed Nov 30, 2022 9:04 pm
by New-Minneapolis » Wed Nov 30, 2022 9:04 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Nov 30, 2022 9:09 pm
New-Minneapolis wrote:What Native American tribes populated South Eastern Texas/North eastern Mexico?
by New-Minneapolis » Wed Nov 30, 2022 9:19 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:New-Minneapolis wrote:What Native American tribes populated South Eastern Texas/North eastern Mexico?
What do you think the chances someone will know that off the top of their head instead of just googling it...cause this really feels like something you should have asked google. I think the Pueblo people were around there but I haven't googled it. I'm gonna because you're in my head. But I'm not going to tell you.
by Thermodolia » Wed Nov 30, 2022 9:52 pm
by The Black Forrest » Wed Nov 30, 2022 10:13 pm
Thermodolia wrote:So I found something interesting out. The speaker is elected by the majority of the votes cast, not the majority of the representatives.
What this means is that the actual number for majority can be far lower. As of right now the majority number is 217. However if day for example the 31 republicans who all voted to nominate Biggs decided to just not vote or voted present then the majority needed would be 202. Which means the democrats would control the speakership.
Granted this is unlikely to happen but it would be funny to see. More likely is democrats working to support a centrist candidate on the second round like David Valadao or Jerrod Golden for speaker
by The Black Forrest » Wed Nov 30, 2022 10:15 pm
by Thermodolia » Wed Nov 30, 2022 10:48 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Thermodolia wrote:So I found something interesting out. The speaker is elected by the majority of the votes cast, not the majority of the representatives.
What this means is that the actual number for majority can be far lower. As of right now the majority number is 217. However if day for example the 31 republicans who all voted to nominate Biggs decided to just not vote or voted present then the majority needed would be 202. Which means the democrats would control the speakership.
Granted this is unlikely to happen but it would be funny to see. More likely is democrats working to support a centrist candidate on the second round like David Valadao or Jerrod Golden for speaker
Valadao? Looking at on the issues; he seems more like the typical rightish republican.
Golden? Might be more centrist; supports mainly liberal things and yet supports gun stuff.
by American Legionaries » Wed Nov 30, 2022 10:57 pm
Thermodolia wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
Valadao? Looking at on the issues; he seems more like the typical rightish republican.
Golden? Might be more centrist; supports mainly liberal things and yet supports gun stuff.
Valadao voted for Trumps impeachment and has supported climate change and gay rights legislation.
That’s about as centrist a republican you’re going to get
by New-Minneapolis » Wed Nov 30, 2022 11:07 pm
by Thermodolia » Wed Nov 30, 2022 11:08 pm
by Big Bad Blue » Wed Nov 30, 2022 11:32 pm
Free Algerstonia wrote:Big Bad Blue wrote:NYT: Right-wing armed protests growingIn June, armed demonstrations around the United States amounted to nearly one a day. A group led by a former Republican state legislator protested a gay pride event in a public park in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho. Men with guns interrupted a Juneteenth festival in Franklin, Tenn., handing out fliers claiming that white people were being replaced. Among the others were rallies in support of gun rights in Delaware and abortion rights in Georgia.
Whether at the local library, in a park or on Main Street, most of these incidents happen where Republicans have fought to expand the ability to bear arms in public, a movement bolstered by a recent Supreme Court ruling on the right to carry firearms outside the home. The loosening of limits has occurred as violent political rhetoric rises and the police in some places fear bloodshed among an armed populace on a hair trigger.
Bringing firearms to a protest is pretty much an admission that your argument is terminally weak. In a democracy the way to change policy is with ballots, not bullets. We will defeat the fascists with the weapons of democracy that we cherish and they despise.
armed protests are a fantastic idea and we need to do more armed protests to stop the neoliberal state from destroying all bastions of conservatism in this country... if the neoliberals win, there will be no more farms, there will be no more small businesses, there will be no more guns, everybody will be forced to cover their entire face up and be stabbed with a needle carrying dna-altering serums, there will be no more constitutional rights, the nation will be overran with furries, all christian values and the rule of law will be eliminated. every single patriot must stop becoming a slave and join the ranks of citizenship by buying a gun and storming the streets and beginning an uprising against the deep state
by Big Bad Blue » Wed Nov 30, 2022 11:41 pm
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:SCOTUS is like the Cash-for-a-HoL-Seat shit mixed in with turbo-polarisation and the previously supreme powers of the HoL all in one unholy mix... like... people should be aghast...
by American Legionaries » Wed Nov 30, 2022 11:48 pm
by Shrillland » Thu Dec 01, 2022 12:24 am
Thermodolia wrote:So I found something interesting out. The speaker is elected by the majority of the votes cast, not the majority of the representatives.
What this means is that the actual number for majority can be far lower. As of right now the majority number is 217. However if day for example the 31 republicans who all voted to nominate Biggs decided to just not vote or voted present then the majority needed would be 202. Which means the democrats would control the speakership.
Granted this is unlikely to happen but it would be funny to see. More likely is democrats working to support a centrist candidate on the second round like David Valadao or Jerrod Golden for speaker
by Shrillland » Thu Dec 01, 2022 12:28 am
New-Minneapolis wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:What do you think the chances someone will know that off the top of their head instead of just googling it...cause this really feels like something you should have asked google. I think the Pueblo people were around there but I haven't googled it. I'm gonna because you're in my head. But I'm not going to tell you.
According to ancestry, I am 40% Native American, specifically indigenous Mexico north east Mexico. This is the largest cut of my DNA profile. The next is Irish at 24%
by American Legionaries » Thu Dec 01, 2022 4:01 am
Shrillland wrote:Thermodolia wrote:So I found something interesting out. The speaker is elected by the majority of the votes cast, not the majority of the representatives.
What this means is that the actual number for majority can be far lower. As of right now the majority number is 217. However if day for example the 31 republicans who all voted to nominate Biggs decided to just not vote or voted present then the majority needed would be 202. Which means the democrats would control the speakership.
Granted this is unlikely to happen but it would be funny to see. More likely is democrats working to support a centrist candidate on the second round like David Valadao or Jerrod Golden for speaker
I think Valadao would be the better option, to name any Democrat would be exceedingly bad optics given that the Republicans did get an albeit slim majority of seats.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Emotional Support Crocodile, New Fortilla, Rary, Shearoa, Tungstan
Advertisement