Advertisement

by Aursi » Fri Sep 09, 2022 1:22 am

by Perikuresu » Fri Sep 09, 2022 1:23 am
Laka Strolistandiler wrote:I find it rather wierd that Charles chose the title of Charles III, considering that Charles I and Charles II were both less than favorable royals. I suppose it’s up to him now to clear their names.

by Myrensis » Fri Sep 09, 2022 1:24 am
El Lazaro wrote:I think the public support could exist in Scotland for a majority in a referendum, but afaik they couldn’t secede without UK parliamentary approval. Seeing as the English parties oppose it, there’s not much of a chance.

by Laka Strolistandiler » Fri Sep 09, 2022 1:30 am
Perikuresu wrote:Laka Strolistandiler wrote:I find it rather wierd that Charles chose the title of Charles III, considering that Charles I and Charles II were both less than favorable royals. I suppose it’s up to him now to clear their names.
Tbh it's a little unfair to judge Charles over the names of 2 other monarchs dating from somewhere in the Stuart era and before, but then, the last bit is a little true, it is up to him to clear his name.
I think his reign will be marked by him trying to push environmentalism and leading the Commonwealth into a cleaner future, which probably would strike great favour with the younger generation.
I reserve the right to /stillme any one-liners if my post is at least two lines long

by The Alma Mater » Fri Sep 09, 2022 1:59 am
Laka Strolistandiler wrote:I find it rather wierd that Charles chose the title of Charles III, considering that Charles I and Charles II were both less than favorable royals. I suppose it’s up to him now to clear their names.

by The Blaatschapen » Fri Sep 09, 2022 2:12 am
The Alma Mater wrote:Laka Strolistandiler wrote:I find it rather wierd that Charles chose the title of Charles III, considering that Charles I and Charles II were both less than favorable royals. I suppose it’s up to him now to clear their names.
Well, the last George who had to wait for ages to get the throne was not a real success story either..
Arthur would have been awesome but I understand why he did not go for that.

by Hestarre » Fri Sep 09, 2022 2:14 am

by Australian rePublic » Fri Sep 09, 2022 2:56 am

by Azania- » Fri Sep 09, 2022 3:01 am
-------------------------
-------------------------
-------------------------
| Overview
| Government | Politics |
Military | Foreign Relations
15 November 2021
✉ News: "By failing to hold Moroka accountable, we were complicit in his crimes." - President Xitu as the 36th anniversary of Sebe Moroka's death reignites controversy surrounding the Silent War | REGIONAL NEWS | Alleged Moroccan terror attack in Western Sahara leaves 3 Algerians dead | African Parliament convenes in special session to discuss the burgeoning North African crisisWhen elephants fight, it's the grass that suffers.

by Australian rePublic » Fri Sep 09, 2022 3:03 am

by Old Tyrannia » Fri Sep 09, 2022 3:19 am

by The Alma Mater » Fri Sep 09, 2022 3:26 am
Ulajhan wrote:I have nothing really nice to say about the queen, but in hindsight nothing bad either, until recently diving into some really bad shit she was apart of. But for the sanctity of this thread I will leave it at didn't think she would actually die.


by Countesia » Fri Sep 09, 2022 3:31 am

by Australian rePublic » Fri Sep 09, 2022 3:46 am
Ulajhan wrote:I have nothing really nice to say about the queen, but in hindsight nothing bad either, until recently diving into some really bad shit she was apart of. But for the sanctity of this thread I will leave it at didn't think she would actually die.

by Australian rePublic » Fri Sep 09, 2022 3:48 am
The Alma Mater wrote:Ulajhan wrote:I have nothing really nice to say about the queen, but in hindsight nothing bad either, until recently diving into some really bad shit she was apart of. But for the sanctity of this thread I will leave it at didn't think she would actually die.
One can always focus on how she cut a cake with a sword, pulled a marmelade sandwich from her purse with Paddington or jumped from a helicopter with Bond
But I must say the way the Irish are celebrating her passing is... intruiging.

by The Blaatschapen » Fri Sep 09, 2022 3:50 am

by Australian rePublic » Fri Sep 09, 2022 3:52 am

by Michel Meilleur » Fri Sep 09, 2022 3:55 am
Aursi wrote:Some might think Charles should abdicate for his son William. But imo. Charles has been waiting for this for 73 years. He should enjoy it, even if for a small time.

by Australian rePublic » Fri Sep 09, 2022 3:57 am

by Australian rePublic » Fri Sep 09, 2022 3:59 am
Michel Meilleur wrote:Aursi wrote:Some might think Charles should abdicate for his son William. But imo. Charles has been waiting for this for 73 years. He should enjoy it, even if for a small time.
William isn't much better than his dad, tho. Honestly, with the current crop of royals, justifying the continued existence of the monarchy to the public is going to keep on getting harder and harder.

by Australian rePublic » Fri Sep 09, 2022 4:07 am

by The Blaatschapen » Fri Sep 09, 2022 4:09 am
Australian rePublic wrote:Many people are very anti-monarchy. Elizabeth herself was very popular, but Charlie not so much, especially thanks to Camilla. We all know how modern William and (pre-Meghan) Harry are, but Charlie is still a bit old fashioned, which isn't going to win over too many people, and I think he knows that. Charlie is also quite vocal about matters such as environmentalism and religious peace, whilst Elizabeth mostly kept her mouth shut about such matters. It'd be very interesting to see how Charlie will reign and possibly try to win over republicans

by Australian rePublic » Fri Sep 09, 2022 4:10 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:Australian rePublic wrote:Many people are very anti-monarchy. Elizabeth herself was very popular, but Charlie not so much, especially thanks to Camilla. We all know how modern William and (pre-Meghan) Harry are, but Charlie is still a bit old fashioned, which isn't going to win over too many people, and I think he knows that. Charlie is also quite vocal about matters such as environmentalism and religious peace, whilst Elizabeth mostly kept her mouth shut about such matters. It'd be very interesting to see how Charlie will reign and possibly try to win over republicans
When it comes to my environmental ideas, he's my lukewarm ally at best. When it comes to my democratic ideas, he's my adversary.

by The Blaatschapen » Fri Sep 09, 2022 4:17 am


by Risottia » Fri Sep 09, 2022 4:20 am
Perikuresu wrote:...
I think his reign will be marked by him trying to push environmentalism ...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Dakran, Dimetrodon Empire, DutchFormosa, Gun Manufacturers, Nilokeras, Terra dei Cittadini, The Black Forrest, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Huskar Social Union, The Jamesian Republic, Traditional-Values, Zurkerx
Advertisement