NATION

PASSWORD

The Problem with Andrew Tate (and Incel Radicalization)

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Alcala-Cordel
Senator
 
Posts: 4406
Founded: Dec 16, 2019
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Alcala-Cordel » Sat Oct 01, 2022 11:12 pm

GuessTheAltAccount wrote:
Fahran wrote:If you're a man, the social expectation a lot of men and women, since I'm not assuming your sexual orientation here, might have is that you'll make the first move in initiating a romantic relationship. Mind you, I understand and appreciate the arguments folks make about that being antiquated and unfair, but surveys routinely show that most women are unwilling to ask men out. I doubt there's anything particularly wrong with you. A lot of the incels who have gained notoriety have been average-looking or even slightly above average-looking. They just had a chip on their shoulders about not having had a relationship by twenty and serious issues with socialization and confidence. A LOT of men and WOMEN are in similar situations. And it's not a hopeless situation. Heck, one of my sister's former coworkers met her boyfriend when he was twenty six. Guy had never dated. They're married now.

So did he lie to her about his amount of sexual experience?

If so, how does she feel about a relationship built on a lie?

If not, how did he know she'd be willing to date him despite a lack of it, compared to all the other guys out there? For that matter, how does he know she loves him even now, given the commonality of the use of "virgin" as an insult?

Did you really make up a whole set of circumstances about people you know nothing about just to get angry over
Last edited by Alcala-Cordel on Sat Oct 01, 2022 11:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA

User avatar
Noob Topia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 17
Founded: Feb 08, 2021
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Noob Topia » Sun Oct 02, 2022 10:11 am

Alcala-Cordel wrote:
GuessTheAltAccount wrote:So did he lie to her about his amount of sexual experience?

If so, how does she feel about a relationship built on a lie?

If not, how did he know she'd be willing to date him despite a lack of it, compared to all the other guys out there? For that matter, how does he know she loves him even now, given the commonality of the use of "virgin" as an insult?

Did you really make up a whole set of circumstances about people you know nothing about just to get angry over

Yea gotta agree that person is a bit dumb but you know what I also think? That the people that are writing paragraphs on this needs to fucking go outside this is a game where you create and run a fake country
Last edited by Noob Topia on Sun Oct 02, 2022 10:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
GuessTheAltAccount
Minister
 
Posts: 2089
Founded: Apr 27, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby GuessTheAltAccount » Mon Oct 03, 2022 2:51 am

Alcala-Cordel wrote:
GuessTheAltAccount wrote:So did he lie to her about his amount of sexual experience?

If so, how does she feel about a relationship built on a lie?

If not, how did he know she'd be willing to date him despite a lack of it, compared to all the other guys out there? For that matter, how does he know she loves him even now, given the commonality of the use of "virgin" as an insult?

Did you really make up a whole set of circumstances about people you know nothing about just to get angry over

If you're going to respond at all, you might as well answer the questions.
Bombadil wrote:My girlfriend wanted me to treat her like a princess, so I arranged for her to be married to a stranger to strengthen our alliance with Poland.

User avatar
Haganham
Minister
 
Posts: 3064
Founded: Aug 17, 2021
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Haganham » Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:01 am

GuessTheAltAccount wrote:
Alcala-Cordel wrote:Did you really make up a whole set of circumstances about people you know nothing about just to get angry over

If you're going to respond at all, you might as well answer the questions.

The question about your made up scenario?
Imagine reading a signature, but over the course of it the quality seems to deteriorate and it gets wose an wose, where the swenetence stwucture and gwammer rewerts to a pwoint of uttew non swence, an u jus dont wanna wead it anymwore (o´ω`o) awd twa wol owdewl iws jus awfwul (´・ω・`);. bwt tw sinawtur iwswnwt obwer nyet, it gwos own an own an own an own. uwu wanyaa stwop weadwing bwut uwu cwant stop wewding, uwu stwartd thwis awnd ur gwoing two fwinibsh it nowo mwattew wat! uwu hab mwoxie kwiddowo, bwut uwu wibl gwib ub sowon. i cwan wite wike dis fwor owors, swo dwont cwalengbe mii..

… wbats dis??? uwu awe stwill weedinb mwie sinatwr?? uwu habe awot ob detewemwinyanyatiom!! 。◕‿◕。! u habve comopweedid tha signwtr, good job!

User avatar
Noob Topia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 17
Founded: Feb 08, 2021
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Noob Topia » Mon Oct 03, 2022 7:25 am

GuessTheAltAccount wrote:
Alcala-Cordel wrote:Did you really make up a whole set of circumstances about people you know nothing about just to get angry over

If you're going to respond at all, you might as well answer the questions.

Are you fucking mentally challenged?

User avatar
New Visayan Islands
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 9451
Founded: Jan 31, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby New Visayan Islands » Mon Oct 03, 2022 7:38 am

Noob Topia wrote:
GuessTheAltAccount wrote:If you're going to respond at all, you might as well answer the questions.

Are you fucking mentally challenged?

*** Warning issued for flamebait. ***
Let "¡Viva la Libertad!" be a cry of Eternal Defiance to the Jackboot.
My TGs are NOT for Mod Stuff.

For details on the man behind NVI, click here.

User avatar
Ors Might
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8497
Founded: Nov 01, 2016
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Ors Might » Mon Oct 03, 2022 11:49 am

GuessTheAltAccount wrote:
Fahran wrote:If you're a man, the social expectation a lot of men and women, since I'm not assuming your sexual orientation here, might have is that you'll make the first move in initiating a romantic relationship. Mind you, I understand and appreciate the arguments folks make about that being antiquated and unfair, but surveys routinely show that most women are unwilling to ask men out. I doubt there's anything particularly wrong with you. A lot of the incels who have gained notoriety have been average-looking or even slightly above average-looking. They just had a chip on their shoulders about not having had a relationship by twenty and serious issues with socialization and confidence. A LOT of men and WOMEN are in similar situations. And it's not a hopeless situation. Heck, one of my sister's former coworkers met her boyfriend when he was twenty six. Guy had never dated. They're married now.

So did he lie to her about his amount of sexual experience?

If so, how does she feel about a relationship built on a lie?

If not, how did he know she'd be willing to date him despite a lack of it, compared to all the other guys out there? For that matter, how does he know she loves him even now, given the commonality of the use of "virgin" as an insult?

My man, it ain't that deep. Sometimes people just click well together and have a relationship. People in healthy relationships aren't constantly focused on the sexual aspect of it.
https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU Best diss track of all time

User avatar
Joet
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Oct 03, 2022
Ex-Nation

Postby Joet » Mon Oct 03, 2022 11:52 am

yo mama :bow:

User avatar
Existential Cats
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 443
Founded: Oct 21, 2021
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Existential Cats » Mon Oct 03, 2022 12:04 pm

GuessTheAltAccount wrote:
Fahran wrote:If you're a man, the social expectation a lot of men and women, since I'm not assuming your sexual orientation here, might have is that you'll make the first move in initiating a romantic relationship. Mind you, I understand and appreciate the arguments folks make about that being antiquated and unfair, but surveys routinely show that most women are unwilling to ask men out. I doubt there's anything particularly wrong with you. A lot of the incels who have gained notoriety have been average-looking or even slightly above average-looking. They just had a chip on their shoulders about not having had a relationship by twenty and serious issues with socialization and confidence. A LOT of men and WOMEN are in similar situations. And it's not a hopeless situation. Heck, one of my sister's former coworkers met her boyfriend when he was twenty six. Guy had never dated. They're married now.

So did he lie to her about his amount of sexual experience?

If so, how does she feel about a relationship built on a lie?

If not, how did he know she'd be willing to date him despite a lack of it, compared to all the other guys out there? For that matter, how does he know she loves him even now, given the commonality of the use of "virgin" as an insult?

Surprisingly, most women will date a man without sexual experience.

It's guys who care about virginity more than girls--so many cultures prioritize the male marrying a "pure, untouched" female partner, and conversely, it's males who throw the "virgin" insult around to denigrate males they perceive as socially awkward or sexually unattractive.
(=^・ω・^=) Existential Cats /ᐠ‸⑅‸ ᐟ\ノ


The fish trap exists because of the fish. Once you've gotten the fish you can forget the trap. The rabbit snare exists because of the rabbit. Once you've gotten the rabbit, you can forget the snare. Words exist because of meaning. Once you've gotten the meaning, you can forget the words. Where can I find a man who has forgotten words so I can talk with him?

t. zhuangzi

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58535
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Oct 03, 2022 12:15 pm

Existential Cats wrote:
GuessTheAltAccount wrote:So did he lie to her about his amount of sexual experience?

If so, how does she feel about a relationship built on a lie?

If not, how did he know she'd be willing to date him despite a lack of it, compared to all the other guys out there? For that matter, how does he know she loves him even now, given the commonality of the use of "virgin" as an insult?

Surprisingly, most women will date a man without sexual experience.

It's guys who care about virginity more than girls--so many cultures prioritize the male marrying a "pure, untouched" female partner, and conversely, it's males who throw the "virgin" insult around to denigrate males they perceive as socially awkward or sexually unattractive.


What are your sources for this?
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Mon Oct 03, 2022 12:26 pm

Existential Cats wrote:Surprisingly, most women will date a man without sexual experience.

It's guys who care about virginity more than girls--so many cultures prioritize the male marrying a "pure, untouched" female partner, and conversely, it's males who throw the "virgin" insult around to denigrate males they perceive as socially awkward or sexually unattractive.


It's just the old sexist double standard still at work, which is for women to be expected to be virginal or pretend to, and for men to be expected to have lots of sexual experience and previous such conquests to boast of, when it is more likely for most people to either all have little to no sexual experience or for most people to be sexually active (depending on what stage of life they're at).

All else being equal, the older someone is; the more likely they'll have been with someone else before if its not you.

My recommendation: break any lust addictions if you have any, doing that on its own- can turn so many other things around. Like fixing your sleep schedule does. If you're always well rested, you can count on never being tired (until its late). You might think you're squeezing out more time to live in skipping sleep, but it doesn't help; like drinking coffee/caffeine doesn't either. The real solution: invest in getting good sleep, like you do in everything else you want to work towards or think is worthwhile.
Last edited by Saiwania on Mon Oct 03, 2022 12:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Existential Cats
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 443
Founded: Oct 21, 2021
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Existential Cats » Mon Oct 03, 2022 4:12 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Existential Cats wrote:Surprisingly, most women will date a man without sexual experience.

It's guys who care about virginity more than girls--so many cultures prioritize the male marrying a "pure, untouched" female partner, and conversely, it's males who throw the "virgin" insult around to denigrate males they perceive as socially awkward or sexually unattractive.


What are your sources for this?

Sources for what exactly?

It's pretty well established that many cultures esteem female virginity, particularly the Abrahamic religions. Like this cute little verse, explained with Lego figures. And sure, the Abrahamic religions would prefer that no one be promiscuous, though men aren't held to the standard of being stoned.

I also know this anecdotally from several of my Middle Eastern friends who tell me, yes, many men expect their wives to be pure virgins no matter how promiscuous they were in the past. Hell, Arab women literally pay money to have their "virginity restored."

Norms are changing of course, and in the West, it's typically only the conservatives who are concerned with girls being too promiscuous, but on the other hand, it's not like boys everywhere are becoming shamed for being virgins or not becoming sexually revolutionized or whatever, not to the degree women have historically faced.

As for virginity being a male insult, I haven't encountered any women throwing it around as an insult, though I'm sure some of them exist. Especially since that word exists as a pejorative in typically male majority spaces like video game chats. I'm thinking of when Elliot Rodger complained in his manifesto about how new users of World of Warcraft started using the term as an insult. Some guys just love being competitive, so they'll hyperbolize or downright lie about their sexual experience and conversely characterize their competitors as never having even seen a vulva or whatever. Comparatively fewer girls care: society's certainly never cared to the extent of stoning a husband for not being a virgin.
(=^・ω・^=) Existential Cats /ᐠ‸⑅‸ ᐟ\ノ


The fish trap exists because of the fish. Once you've gotten the fish you can forget the trap. The rabbit snare exists because of the rabbit. Once you've gotten the rabbit, you can forget the snare. Words exist because of meaning. Once you've gotten the meaning, you can forget the words. Where can I find a man who has forgotten words so I can talk with him?

t. zhuangzi

User avatar
Alcala-Cordel
Senator
 
Posts: 4406
Founded: Dec 16, 2019
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Alcala-Cordel » Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:41 pm

GuessTheAltAccount wrote:
Alcala-Cordel wrote:Did you really make up a whole set of circumstances about people you know nothing about just to get angry over

If you're going to respond at all, you might as well answer the questions.

Why should I? There's no substance to those questions.
FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA

User avatar
GuessTheAltAccount
Minister
 
Posts: 2089
Founded: Apr 27, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby GuessTheAltAccount » Tue Oct 04, 2022 12:37 pm

Existential Cats wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
What are your sources for this?

Sources for what exactly?

It's pretty well established that many cultures esteem female virginity, particularly the Abrahamic religions. Like this cute little verse, explained with Lego figures. And sure, the Abrahamic religions would prefer that no one be promiscuous, though men aren't held to the standard of being stoned.

I also know this anecdotally from several of my Middle Eastern friends who tell me, yes, many men expect their wives to be pure virgins no matter how promiscuous they were in the past. Hell, Arab women literally pay money to have their "virginity restored."

Norms are changing of course, and in the West, it's typically only the conservatives who are concerned with girls being too promiscuous, but on the other hand, it's not like boys everywhere are becoming shamed for being virgins or not becoming sexually revolutionized or whatever, not to the degree women have historically faced.

As for virginity being a male insult, I haven't encountered any women throwing it around as an insult, though I'm sure some of them exist. Especially since that word exists as a pejorative in typically male majority spaces like video game chats. I'm thinking of when Elliot Rodger complained in his manifesto about how new users of World of Warcraft started using the term as an insult. Some guys just love being competitive, so they'll hyperbolize or downright lie about their sexual experience and conversely characterize their competitors as never having even seen a vulva or whatever. Comparatively fewer girls care: society's certainly never cared to the extent of stoning a husband for not being a virgin.

Nah. They just keep with the virgin-bashing rhetoric until folks like Elliot Rodger feel unloved to the point where "if you do this, you'll get yourself killed" is less of a deterrent. Luckily for me, I didn't prioritize the approval of others over being right to the extent of getting anywhere close to that point. Just as I didn't prioritize the approval of others to the point of conforming to popular opinion here or elsewhere. But people will always vary amongst each other in how much they crave the approval of others, let alone the higher emotional stakes in the approval of the opposite sex.

Why is stating it directly the only thing that counts? What about how seldom refuted it is? We hear "you say nerdy like it's a bad thing" and "you say fat like it's a bad thing" all the time. (Unless the former's about Maddox or the latter's about Trump.) What does it suggest about virginity that "you say virgin like it's a bad thing" isn't as popular a response?
Bombadil wrote:My girlfriend wanted me to treat her like a princess, so I arranged for her to be married to a stranger to strengthen our alliance with Poland.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163844
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Tue Oct 04, 2022 12:42 pm

Wonder what's going on in the Tate thread.

"It's women's fault that Elliot Rodger killed people"

Mother of God
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Rusozak
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6971
Founded: Jun 14, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Rusozak » Tue Oct 04, 2022 1:10 pm

Ifreann wrote:Wonder what's going on in the Tate thread.

"It's women's fault that Elliot Rodger killed people"

Mother of God


The final evolution of "She was asking to be raped with what she was wearing."
NOTE: This nation's government style, policies, and opinions in roleplay or forum 7 does not represent my true beliefs. It is purely for the enjoyment of the game.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58535
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Tue Oct 04, 2022 2:59 pm

Ifreann wrote:Wonder what's going on in the Tate thread.

"It's women's fault that Elliot Rodger killed people"

Mother of God


Hey Ifreann, why do black people riot out of interest?

Existential Cats wrote:As for virginity being a male insult, I haven't encountered any women throwing it around as an insult, though I'm sure some of them exist. Especially since that word exists as a pejorative in typically male majority spaces like video game chats. I'm thinking of when Elliot Rodger complained in his manifesto about how new users of World of Warcraft started using the term as an insult. Some guys just love being competitive, so they'll hyperbolize or downright lie about their sexual experience and conversely characterize their competitors as never having even seen a vulva or whatever. Comparatively fewer girls care: society's certainly never cared to the extent of stoning a husband for not being a virgin.



So no source then. Gotcha.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Tue Oct 04, 2022 3:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Juristonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6435
Founded: Oct 30, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Juristonia » Tue Oct 04, 2022 4:48 pm

Ifreann wrote:Wonder what's going on in the Tate thread.

"It's women's fault that Elliot Rodger killed people"

Mother of God

Yeah, I'd say the thread went off the rails a few pages ago, but this train was wobbly from the get go.
Which isn't surprising, considering the usual suspects in it.
Last edited by Juristonia on Tue Oct 04, 2022 4:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
From the river to the sea

Liriena wrote:Say what you will about fascists: they are remarkably consistent even after several decades of failing spectacularly elsewhere.

Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.

Cannot think of a name wrote:Anyway, I'm from gold country, we grow up knowing that when people jump up and down shouting "GOLD GOLD GOLD" the gold is gone and the only money to be made is in selling shovels.

And it seems to me that cryptocurrency and NFTs and such suddenly have a whooooole lot of shovel salespeople.

User avatar
GuessTheAltAccount
Minister
 
Posts: 2089
Founded: Apr 27, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby GuessTheAltAccount » Wed Oct 05, 2022 3:45 am

Ifreann wrote:Wonder what's going on in the Tate thread.

"It's women's fault that Elliot Rodger killed people"

Mother of God

Don't go twisting my words. Of course one shouldn't murder, if only because it's a heinous thing to do. But plenty of people otherwise lacking in a conscience can still be incentivized not to by extrinsic motives. That's part of the point of having laws. But laws are only one factor of many. Just as making clear someone has something to lose; and I don't even mean necessarily a sex life, just the dignity of not being talked to as if one were lesser just for being a virgin; and the role that plays in self-worth and the resulting self-preservation instinct (though granted the ideal option is to stop caring what others think) could also be one factor out of many.

When women and girls die of anorexia, males get blamed for failing to convince them they don't need to be thin to be considered attractive. If one sex's failure to convince the other of something is treated as fair game in one such context, why not another?
Bombadil wrote:My girlfriend wanted me to treat her like a princess, so I arranged for her to be married to a stranger to strengthen our alliance with Poland.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163844
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:31 am

GuessTheAltAccount wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Wonder what's going on in the Tate thread.

"It's women's fault that Elliot Rodger killed people"

Mother of God

Don't go twisting my words. Of course one shouldn't murder, if only because it's a heinous thing to do. But plenty of people otherwise lacking in a conscience can still be incentivized not to by extrinsic motives. That's part of the point of having laws. But laws are only one factor of many. Just as making clear someone has something to lose; and I don't even mean necessarily a sex life, just the dignity of not being talked to as if one were lesser just for being a virgin; and the role that plays in self-worth and the resulting self-preservation instinct (though granted the ideal option is to stop caring what others think) could also be one factor out of many.

When women and girls die of anorexia, males get blamed for failing to convince them they don't need to be thin to be considered attractive. If one sex's failure to convince the other of something is treated as fair game in one such context, why not another?

"Don't go twisting my words. All I'm saying is that it's women's fault that Elliot Rodger killed people because it was their responsibility to stop him from wanting to kill people."
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
GuessTheAltAccount
Minister
 
Posts: 2089
Founded: Apr 27, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby GuessTheAltAccount » Wed Oct 05, 2022 12:19 pm

Ifreann wrote:
GuessTheAltAccount wrote:Don't go twisting my words. Of course one shouldn't murder, if only because it's a heinous thing to do. But plenty of people otherwise lacking in a conscience can still be incentivized not to by extrinsic motives. That's part of the point of having laws. But laws are only one factor of many. Just as making clear someone has something to lose; and I don't even mean necessarily a sex life, just the dignity of not being talked to as if one were lesser just for being a virgin; and the role that plays in self-worth and the resulting self-preservation instinct (though granted the ideal option is to stop caring what others think) could also be one factor out of many.

When women and girls die of anorexia, males get blamed for failing to convince them they don't need to be thin to be considered attractive. If one sex's failure to convince the other of something is treated as fair game in one such context, why not another?

"Don't go twisting my words. All I'm saying is that it's women's fault that Elliot Rodger killed people because it was their responsibility to stop him from wanting to kill people."

It's everyone's responsibility. And some societies obviously do a better job of this sort of thing than others.

The first person of us 3 to single out one sex for their role in this was Existential Cats, who claimed it was mostly just men using it as an insult (how would you even prove that?) as if the fact that they don't say "you say it like it's a bad thing" like they do for certain other insults meant nothing. So when, in response, I emphasize women have a share of the blame for creating the impression that they don't respect virgin males any more than they love them, you act like I did it out of nowhere.

So yeah, you are twisting my words no matter how much you deny it.

You also conveniently ignored my anorexia analogy.
Bombadil wrote:My girlfriend wanted me to treat her like a princess, so I arranged for her to be married to a stranger to strengthen our alliance with Poland.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163844
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Wed Oct 05, 2022 12:22 pm

GuessTheAltAccount wrote:
Ifreann wrote:"Don't go twisting my words. All I'm saying is that it's women's fault that Elliot Rodger killed people because it was their responsibility to stop him from wanting to kill people."

It's everyone's responsibility. And some societies obviously do a better job of this sort of thing than others.

The first person of us 3 to single out one sex for their role in this was Existential Cats, who claimed it was mostly just men using it as an insult (how would you even prove that?) as if the fact that they don't say "you say it like it's a bad thing" like they do for certain other insults meant nothing. So when, in response, I emphasize women have a share of the blame for creating the impression that they don't respect virgin males any more than they love them, you act like I did it out of nowhere.

So yeah, you are twisting my words no matter how much you deny it.

I'm just repeating what you're saying in a way that highlights how you think women are to blame for being targeted by a misogynist murderer.

You also conveniently ignored my anorexia analogy.

Yes, it's very convenient for you that I'm not digging into that insane belief you hold in favour of focusing on the other insane belief.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
GuessTheAltAccount
Minister
 
Posts: 2089
Founded: Apr 27, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby GuessTheAltAccount » Wed Oct 05, 2022 12:59 pm

And yet, some societies have more murderers than others. Obviously the murderer deserving the lion's share of the blame doesn't mean society as a whole doesn't deserve a slice of it. The only question is on the specifics.

Existential Cats singled out men in particular for the very thing pointed out. I made the case for why they aren't the only ones involved, and how people only tangentially related to a particular set of deaths get similarly assigned a slice of the blame. If you want to twist my words that's your business, not mine.
Last edited by GuessTheAltAccount on Wed Oct 05, 2022 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Bombadil wrote:My girlfriend wanted me to treat her like a princess, so I arranged for her to be married to a stranger to strengthen our alliance with Poland.

User avatar
Ayytaly
Minister
 
Posts: 2453
Founded: Feb 08, 2019
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ayytaly » Thu Oct 13, 2022 5:02 pm

Sexual frustration leads to terrorism. Shaming people for their lack of "experience" is sure as hell a trigger for that. The status quo creates its own enemy and yet it cynically blames those who don't partake in it.
Signatures are the obnoxious car bumper stickers of the internet. Also, Rojava did nothing right.

User avatar
Chan Island
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6824
Founded: Nov 26, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Chan Island » Thu Oct 13, 2022 10:28 pm

Ayytaly wrote:Sexual frustration leads to terrorism. Shaming people for their lack of "experience" is sure as hell a trigger for that. The status quo creates its own enemy and yet it cynically blames those who don't partake in it.


Majorities of people in the developed world report being lonely on a regular basis nowadays. Loneliness has a comparable effect on life expectancy to cigarettes.

As I've said previously on this thread, I don't know what the actual solution is, but it's clear that the pendulum has swung way, way too far towards isolation. We need some kind of society wide socialisation or this shit's going to get worse.
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=513597&p=39401766#p39401766
Conserative Morality wrote:"It's not time yet" is a tactic used by reactionaries in every era. "It's not time for democracy, it's not time for capitalism, it's not time for emancipation." Of course it's not time. It's never time, not on its own. You make it time. If you're under fire in the no-man's land of WW1, you start digging a foxhole even if the ideal time would be when you *aren't* being bombarded, because once you wait for it to be 'time', other situations will need your attention, assuming you survive that long. If the fields aren't furrowed, plow them. If the iron is not hot, make it so. If society is not ready, change it.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Estado Novo Portugues, New haven america, Pasong Tirad, Perikuresu, Tillania, Utrachiasa

Advertisement

Remove ads